  powerspec88 Premium join:2007-03-11 Harrisonville, MO
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·AT&T Yahoo
| thank god Those few days when they de-peered sucked. I would say at lease 10% of my daily sites stopped working and i was unable to access work as we use cogent as one of our isp's and i was not rerouted to our at&t link. -- »twitter.com/powerspec | www.netisinc.com | |
|  |  |  k1ll3rdr4g0n
join:2005-03-19 Homer Glen, IL
| Confidential agreement? Confidential agreement? Ummm...anyone else smell sexual activities? The only reason why it would be "confidential" is because they are hiding something.
Sorry, the sexual refrence is from the title "Cogent, Sprint Kiss, Make Up" and in the article "...how simple carrier lovers' quarrels...".
 | |
|  |  jmr50
join:2000-05-14 Chantilly, VA
| Re: Confidential agreement? Confidential because Cogent wanted settlement-free but didn't get it. Sprint, for its part, likely agreed to accept some subset of what it would charge for transit to do a paid peering arrangement. Cogent saves face, Sprint gets paid. Everyone's happy. | |
|  |  |  tkdslr
join:2004-04-24 Pompano Beach, FL
·Speakeasy
| Re: Confidential agreement? said by jmr50 :Confidential because Cogent wanted settlement-free but didn't get it. Sprint, for its part, likely agreed to accept some subset of what it would charge for transit to do a paid peering arrangement. Cogent saves face, Sprint gets paid. Everyone's happy. A more likely outcome.. Sprint got zilch and doesn't want to advertise it.. It was Sprint customers who requested Content from servers hosted on Cogent connectivity.. | |
|  | |  |
|
|