Search:  

 
 
   News
newer
story category Comcast Launches New DNS Health Portal
ISPs starting to fight back against OpenDNS?
02:31PM Wednesday Sep 23 2009 by Karl Bode
tags: business · alternatives · networking · Comcast
In an apparent bid to lure back those customers who've made the switch to OpenDNS (along with those users' DNS redirection ad dollars), Comcast this month announced in our forums that they've launched a new portal for tracking DNS server uptime. "The new DNS cache query tool will allow customers to run queries against not only our National Domain Helper cache servers but also the No Redirect caching servers as well," says a Comcast employee. "You can also run a custom query against other third party DNS servers," they note.

Click for full size
It's a welcome change, given both the DNS and network status pages for most major ISPs are either non-existent or leave plenty to be desired. According to the company, improved functionality will be added to the website in the coming months.

In July Comcast became the latest ISP to employ DNS Redirection advertising, which replaces the traditional 404 page with an ad-laden search portal that pops up when a user mistypes a URL. The practice essentially creates an entirely new revenue stream out of clumsy typists.

While such services aren't popular among 'Net purists and are over hyped by carriers as being more helpful than they really are, Comcast at least went about deploying it the right way by making it easy to opt-out of, engaging in clear dialog with our users, and standardizing the practice transparently with the IETF. Many ISPs have lunged dumbly for the advertising cash without ensuring their opt-out mechanisms even work.

Given the popularlity of alternative DNS services like OpenDNS, it's not too surprising to see ISPs start giving DNS functionality a little more attention. Flaky DNS servers for the major ISPs consistently act to give OpenDNS free advertising, and the company cashes in: in 2008 it was estimated that OpenDNS generates a whopping $20,000 per day off of their DNS redirection relationship with Yahoo. ISPs obviously want to keep that money in house.

Related:
  1. Comcast To Deploy Femtocells
  2. Comcast Finally Launches DNS Redirection
  3. Nobody's Complaining About Comcast's New Throttling
  4. Comcast Deploys Root Server On Comcast Network
  5. Metrocast Offers Fiber To The Home
  6. Comcast Still Fighting FCC Throttling Sanction
  7. Comcast TV Everywhere WILL Work Outside The Home
  8. ICANN Slams DNS Redirection
Forums » Comcast Launches New DNS Health Portal
view: topics flat text 
Post a:

Rob
In Deo speramus, God Bless the USA
Premium
join:2001-08-25
Kendall, FL
·Comcast

Bandwidth Meter

And yet the bandwidth meter that was promised so many months ago is no where to be seen. At the same time, customers are still receiving phone calls that they are going over their 250GB cap: »Got the call, 850G this month

Sorry, but if you're going to expect customers to adhere to the terms of service, then you must provide a way for them to do so. Telling them to download or purchase bandwidth monitoring tools is not sufficient. Customers need one that is directly connected to Comcast, so everyone is on the same page.
--
CheckSite.us | YourIP.us | Reverseip.us
iansltx

join:2007-02-19
Golden, CO

Re: Bandwidth Meter

Apparently a DNS health meter plus a static list of server IPs plus a prettified version of NSLookup is easier to create than an accurate bandwidth meter...

Woody79_00

join:2004-07-08
united state

I quit using Comcast DNS Servers when they started the Advertisement Re directions...its worse than Closed DNS(OpenDNS)

I now use the National DNS Servers provided my Level 3 Networks

4.2.2.1
4.2.2.2

they are speedy, and no added junk..I likes
--
My Blog

ctg1701a

join:2008-08-07
Philadelphia, PA

Re: Bandwidth Meter

said by Woody79_00 See Profile :

I quit using Comcast DNS Servers when they started the Advertisement Re directions...its worse than Closed DNS(OpenDNS)

I now use the National DNS Servers provided my Level 3 Networks

4.2.2.1
4.2.2.2

they are speedy, and no added junk..I likes
You could just as easily use the DNS servers here with no redirection:

»dns.comcast.net/dns-ip-addresses2.php

And get faster responses from a closer DNS server to you on the Comcast network.

cdru
Go Colts
Premium,MVM
join:2003-05-14
Fort Wayne, IN

Re: Bandwidth Meter

said by ctg1701a See Profile :

You could just as easily use the DNS servers here with no redirection:

»dns.comcast.net/dns-ip-addresses2.php

And get faster responses from a closer DNS server to you on the Comcast network.
Define "faster" please.

ping 4.2.2.1 -n 10

Ping statistics for 4.2.2.1:
Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 17ms, Maximum = 23ms, Average = 18ms

ping 4.2.2.2 -n 10

Ping statistics for 4.2.2.2:
Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 19ms, Maximum = 21ms, Average = 19ms

ping 68.87.72.130 -n 10

Ping statistics for 68.87.72.130:
Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 27ms, Maximum = 30ms, Average = 27ms

ping 68.87.77.130 -n 10

Ping statistics for 68.87.77.130:
Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 61ms, Maximum = 67ms, Average = 62ms

The below queries were ran once to "cache" the lookup on the DNS server, then repeated 10x in succession to compute the average query response time:
dig www.dslreports.com. @4.2.2.1 = 29 ms
dig www.dslreports.com. @4.2.2.2 = 30 ms
dig www.dslreports.com. @68.87.72.130 = 39 ms
dig www.dslreports.com. @68.87.77.130 = 70 ms

From any definition of "faster" that I can think of relating to DNS, 4.2.2.1 and 4.2.2.2 were marginally to twice as fast as the "closer" Comcast provided server.
JnKC

join:2008-06-17
Independence, MO
·Comcast Digital Vo..

I don't get it! If we are talking about milliseconds, there aren't many differences. If we are talking about the presence of advertisements when u foul up a URL; who cares. I simply click the link to what I meant. If that is giving comcast more money, then I would like to see a discount for using the dns helpers. If not; who cares? I guess a blank page is better than saying you fouled up the URL dummy! Oh yeah; bandwidth meter would be fine if I could track u/d with router; otherwise it is a moot point.

Nerdtalker
Working Hard, Or Hardly Working?
Premium,MVM
join:2003-02-18
Tucson, AZ
clubs:


1 edit
Click for full size
WTH happened?
From the tracking I've been doing Level 3's DNS servers have actually been acting rather wonky and slow lately. Much slower than OpenDNS has been. It seems that they're starting to become victims of their own stability and speed.

yolarry

join:2007-12-29
Creston, WV
Same with Hughesnet. they cap you but they do not give you official meter expect 1 hour delay usage page.

Space

@comcast.net

Many bandwidth hogs according to comcast use more than about 488GB a month. They are about 1% of the users and possibly less. The bandwidth monitor on mcafee might not even show a large portion of your use. You can download 1GB and it might show 400 or 700MB etc. Some articles shows that ISP don't have accurate measuring tools either. I don't know if there is even something that can accurately measure bandwidth.

rawwhide
Zer0
Premium
join:2000-09-03
Zero
clubs:
·AT&T DSL Service

Re: Bandwidth Meter

said by Space :

Many bandwidth hogs according to comcast use more than about 488GB a month. They are about 1% of the users and possibly less.
The amount and one percent is slowly shrinking. I wonder how many one percenters Comcast has ditched? Eventually even the people just surfing social sites and video sites the web offers will be one percenters. You just wait.
--
To talk much and arrive nowhere is the same as climbing a tree to catch a fish.

spamd
Premium
join:2001-04-22
Rockford, IL
·Insight Communicat..


dd wrt traffic meter
Well for those that have the hardware and have the technical know how can use this for now until Comcast makes their own D/U meter.
»www.dd-wrt.com/dd-wrtv3/dd-wrt/about.html

--
--
When everything is coming your way, you are in the wrong lane.
ISurfTooMuch

join:2007-04-23
Tuscaloosa, AL

Big problem

But there's a big problem with a site like this, just like other ISP outage sites. If DNS is out, how do you reach the site to check its status?

I'm not joking. There's nothing wrong with a tool to find out about ISP outages, but, for Web-based sites, if the ISP is down, you aren't going to be able to visit the site to see if there's a problem with the ISP or if it's something on your end, such as a modem that's died or that's had its MAC mysteriously fall off your account. A phone-based tool is better, except the damn thing has to be kept up to date, and it should be easy to reach. You certainly shouldn't have to get a CS rep to ask them if there's an outage in your area.

backfeed
is giving feedback

join:2002-12-16
Peru, IN
·Comcast Digital Vo..
·Comcast Formerly ..

Re: Big problem

said by ISurfTooMuch See Profile :

But there's a big problem with a site like this, just like other ISP outage sites. If DNS is out, how do you reach the site to check its status?

If just the DNS is out you can still get there if you know the address. Most routers are set up to allow for 2 or 3 DNS servers.
I use Open DNS then the closest Comcast DNS and if all else fails I can use a Level 3 server. I a floating the idea of putting one local on my network to speed things up even more.
--
There are 10 types of people. Those who can read Binary and those who cannot.

baineschile
2600
Premium
join:2008-05-10
Sterling Heights, MI

Why

Why do ISPs care what DNS their clients use? Aside from the recent idea to turn redirection to ad dollars, is there another advantage?
iansltx

join:2007-02-19
Golden, CO
·Comcast
·Qwest.net
·magicjack.com
·BeeCreek Communica..
·Sprint Mobile Broa..

Re: Why

Some CDN-based services work better when you have local DNS. For example Akamai has a cache here in Denver. Comcast DNS points to this cache, which serves up content while directly connected to Comcast's network, thus saving Comcast money. If you use other DNS services, you'll get a different Akamai endpoint and lower performance.

jlivingood
Premium,VIP
join:2007-10-28
Philadelphia, PA

Re: Why

said by iansltx See Profile :

Some CDN-based services work better when you have local DNS. For example Akamai has a cache here in Denver. Comcast DNS points to this cache, which serves up content while directly connected to Comcast's network, thus saving Comcast money. If you use other DNS services, you'll get a different Akamai endpoint and lower performance.
You are spot on regarding performance.

Many websites use Content Delivery Networks to distribute their content more efficiently across Internet Service Providers by pushing the content closer to the end user. Comcast's DNS should send users to the closest content servers to the customer, resulting an a speedier experience. Give it a try yourself with CDN-based content --> try with names like cdn.netflix.com or www.comcast.net for example (compare results from our cache vs. some other server).
--
JL
Comcast

jlivingood
Premium,VIP
join:2007-10-28
Philadelphia, PA

Re: Why

I am in Philly... So for example I might ask how is performance to cdn.netflix.com?

Comcast DNS in Philadelphia, PA (68.87.64.150)
netflix.vo.llnwd.net.
208.111.160.6
208.111.161.254

PING 208.111.160.6
64 bytes from 208.111.160.6: icmp_seq=0 ttl=50 time=11.169 ms
64 bytes from 208.111.160.6: icmp_seq=1 ttl=50 time=8.923 ms
64 bytes from 208.111.160.6: icmp_seq=2 ttl=50 time=8.738 ms
64 bytes from 208.111.160.6: icmp_seq=3 ttl=50 time=11.508 ms
64 bytes from 208.111.160.6: icmp_seq=4 ttl=50 time=8.057 ms

--- 208.111.160.6 ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 8.057/9.679/11.508/1.389 ms

Then, let's check against DNS @ 4.2.2.1
QUESTION SECTION:
cdn.netflix.com. IN A
ANSWER SECTION:
cdn.netflix.com. 1671 IN CNAME netflix.vo.llnwd.net.
netflix.vo.llnwd.net. 31 IN A 208.111.148.7
netflix.vo.llnwd.net. 31 IN A 208.111.148.6

PING 208.111.148.7
64 bytes from 208.111.148.7: icmp_seq=0 ttl=44 time=86.473 ms
64 bytes from 208.111.148.7: icmp_seq=1 ttl=44 time=85.991 ms
64 bytes from 208.111.148.7: icmp_seq=2 ttl=44 time=86.000 ms
64 bytes from 208.111.148.7: icmp_seq=3 ttl=44 time=86.002 ms
64 bytes from 208.111.148.7: icmp_seq=4 ttl=44 time=85.668 ms

--- 208.111.148.7 ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 85.668/86.027/86.473/0.257 ms

YMMV but you get the idea.
--
JL
Comcast

cypherstream
Looking forward to the future of things.
Premium,MVM
join:2004-12-02
Reading, PA
clubs:

Re: Why

As a sysadmin myself your dead on. Despite what people say, I stick with the ISP's DNS. I do use OpenDNS at work, but that's a commercial bonded multi-T1 connection.

beerbum
Premium
join:2000-05-06
Reading, PA
clubs:

I run my own DNS server, and it just so happens I get the same IP's (for netflix at least) as the Comcast servers - that is when the servers actually work..

C:\>nslookup

Default Server: UnKnown
Address: 192.168.1.5

> cdn.netflix.com
Server: UnKnown
Address: 192.168.1.5

Non-authoritative answer:
Name: netflix.vo.llnwd.net
Addresses: 208.111.160.6
208.111.161.254
Aliases: cdn.netflix.com

> server 68.87.64.146

Default Server: [68.87.64.146]
Address: 68.87.64.146

> cdn.netflix.com
Server: [68.87.64.146]
Address: 68.87.64.146

Non-authoritative answer:
Name: netflix.vo.llnwd.net
Addresses: 208.111.160.6
208.111.161.254
Aliases: cdn.netflix.com

> server 68.87.96.4
Default Server: phildns2.inflow.pa.bo.comcast.net
Address: 68.87.96.4

> cdn.netflix.com
Server: phildns2.inflow.pa.bo.comcast.net
Address: 68.87.96.4

DNS request timed out.
timeout was 2 seconds.
DNS request timed out.
timeout was 2 seconds.
DNS request timed out.
timeout was 2 seconds.
DNS request timed out.
timeout was 2 seconds.
*** Request to phildns2.inflow.pa.bo.comcast.net timed-out
--

The good may die young, pricks live forever...

ctg1701a

join:2008-08-07
Philadelphia, PA

1 edit

Re: Why

68.87.96.3 and 68.87.96.4 were decomissioned over a year ago. Please look at »dns.comcast.net for the most valid list of DNS for Comcast.

Thanks

beerbum
Premium
join:2000-05-06
Reading, PA
clubs:

Re: Why

said by ctg1701a See Profile :

68.87.96.3 and 68.87.96.4 were decomissioned over a year ago. Please look at »dns.comcast.net for the most valid list of DNS for Comcast.

Thanks
then why are they still showing up when using dhcp? this is why I started running my own DNS, the servers issued by dhcp did not work.
--

The good may die young, pricks live forever...

ctg1701a

join:2008-08-07
Philadelphia, PA

Re: Why

said by beerbum See Profile :

said by ctg1701a See Profile :

68.87.96.3 and 68.87.96.4 were decomissioned over a year ago. Please look at »dns.comcast.net for the most valid list of DNS for Comcast.

Thanks
then why are they still showing up when using dhcp? this is why I started running my own DNS, the servers issued by dhcp did not work.
No DHCP server should be handing those addresses out. Can you PM me with the DHCP server you are getting these from and what IP space you are getting so I can look at the subnet settings?

Thanks

Thanks
BosstonesOwn

join:2002-12-15
Everett, MA
clubs:
·Comcast

That is interesting.

According to what I know about akamai their mapping software makes up for this. They do test dns servers when mapping.

The fastest replies get the route. If it's costing comcast money , then may I suggest you get a better route ?
--
"It's always funny until someone gets hurt......and then it's absolutely friggin' hysterical!"

jlivingood
Premium,VIP
join:2007-10-28
Philadelphia, PA

Re: Why

said by BosstonesOwn See Profile :

That is interesting.

According to what I know about akamai their mapping software makes up for this. They do test dns servers when mapping.

The fastest replies get the route. If it's costing comcast money , then may I suggest you get a better route ?
If you look at the data I posted, our DNS provides a superior answer. (So not sure what you mean about getting a better route.)
--
JL
Comcast
BosstonesOwn

join:2002-12-15
Everett, MA
clubs:
·Comcast

Re: Why

I was answering in regards to the akamai software.

Mapper runs according to pings and other functions.

If your dns server answers slower then another then the route gets shifted to let the user get the content faster.

The same with servers. If the content is in Chicago and mapper detects the user is in Chicago but the route is congested mapper will let the user get pushed to say New York , to get the download and content quicker. Which is why Akamai moving gear into every pop they can get space in is a major win for the providers , but the content can still sometimes be gotten from a faster route even if it's half way across the country.

So again , if the links are congested maybe you need a better route
--
"It's always funny until someone gets hurt......and then it's absolutely friggin' hysterical!"

TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast

said by baineschile See Profile :

Why do ISPs care what DNS their clients use? Aside from the recent idea to turn redirection to ad dollars, is there another advantage?
Karl explained it well:
OpenDNS generates a whopping $20,000 per day off of their DNS redirection relationship with Yahoo. ISPs obviously want to keep that money in house.

--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page


dvd536
as Mr. Pink as they come
Premium
join:2001-04-27
Phoenix, AZ

said by baineschile See Profile :

Why do ISPs care what DNS their clients use? Aside from the recent idea to turn redirection to ad dollars, is there another advantage?
NOPE! its all about the benjamins!
purest form of corporate greed in which NONE of the revenue generated off your back is kicked back to you!
--
When I gez aju zavateh na nalechoo more new yonooz tonigh molinigh - Ken Lee

TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast


3 edits

Tool can tell you what DNS servers Comcast has & where

»dns.comcast.net/dig-tool.php



The domain helper dns addresses:
»dns.comcast.net/dns-ip-addresses.php

The opt-out dns addresses:
»dns.comcast.net/dns-ip-addresses2.php

P.S.>> the 2 links above also give a nice look at where Comcast has their major concentrations of users.

birdfeedr
Premium,MVM
join:2001-08-11
Warwick, RI
·Verizon FIOS

Re: Tool can tell you what DNS servers Comcast has & where

said by TKJunkMail See Profile :

»dns.comcast.net/dig-tool.php
Half of the CAPTCHAs at that site are so poorly legible, it will result in most people saying "useless tool". CC gets to crow about how helpful they're being, and their subscribers go back to "yeah, whatever".

cdru
Go Colts
Premium,MVM
join:2003-05-14
Fort Wayne, IN

Re: Tool can tell you what DNS servers Comcast has & where

said by birdfeedr See Profile :

said by TKJunkMail See Profile :

»dns.comcast.net/dig-tool.php
Half of the CAPTCHAs at that site are so poorly legible, it will result in most people saying "useless tool". CC gets to crow about how helpful they're being, and their subscribers go back to "yeah, whatever".
Those captchas are from Recaptcha. It's a project that's aimed to OCR old documents, newspapers, and books whose text is poor enough quality that they can't easily be machine processed (which makes them good against automated attempts at solving them) but hopefully can be human readable (which makes them better suited then some distortion techniques that REALLY mangle the letters/words.

jlivingood
Premium,VIP
join:2007-10-28
Philadelphia, PA

Re: Tool can tell you what DNS servers Comcast has & where

And FWIW, Recaptcha has been acquired by Google.

»www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/a···rts.html
--
JL
Comcast

LeftOfSanity

join:2005-11-06
Felton, DE

said by birdfeedr See Profile :

said by TKJunkMail See Profile :

»dns.comcast.net/dig-tool.php
Half of the CAPTCHAs at that site are so poorly legible, it will result in most people saying "useless tool". CC gets to crow about how helpful they're being, and their subscribers go back to "yeah, whatever".
Good God man, really?

I see your future... "hey you kids!!!! get away from my lawn!!!" ::Shaking walker::

ctg1701a

join:2008-08-07
Philadelphia, PA

This is a valid point . This empowers users to look at where DNS is relative to them on the network and find out which ones are closest to you. As a power user you can decide to use the DHCP assigned ones or maybe ones that are a little closer on the network if that is the case.

Hopefully this gives users a better idea where the DNS is and how better to use it.

Thanks

Chris
JnKC

join:2008-06-17
Independence, MO
·Comcast Digital Vo..

Re: Tool can tell you what DNS servers Comcast has & where

I can't complain here is what I get for ad redirect:

Pinging 68.87.72.134 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 68.87.72.134: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=56
Reply from 68.87.72.134: bytes=32 time=37ms TTL=56
Reply from 68.87.72.134: bytes=32 time=38ms TTL=56
Reply from 68.87.72.134: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=56

Ping statistics for 68.87.72.134:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 37ms, Maximum = 60ms, Average = 44ms

Non ad redirect:

Pinging 68.87.72.130 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 68.87.72.130: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=56
Reply from 68.87.72.130: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=56
Reply from 68.87.72.130: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=56
Reply from 68.87.72.130: bytes=32 time=52ms TTL=56

Ping statistics for 68.87.72.130:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 41ms, Maximum = 52ms, Average = 45ms

The above is my DNS so there isn't much difference from machine to DNS. I don't think clicking on the Did you mean URL makes much difference unless Comcast is rewarded for my typo.

skuv

@rr.com

NO

It does NOT replace the traditional 404 page.

Why do you continue to say this EVERY time DNS redirection is reported on here?

A 404 is an error page returned by a web server. That means DNS actually worked, and you got to a non-working link.

DNS redirection looks at DNS queries, not at port 80/443 connections to web servers.

No one's 404 pages are being replaced by Comcast's or anyone's DNS redirection.

Fluker

join:2005-04-07
West Lafayette, IN

Re: NO

I'm pretty sure the topic was 'server not found' but 404 slipped through.

I never claim to be competent before half a pot of coffee..

But yeah the idea is that if you type google.om or something similar you know what I just gave up explaining halfway through the sentence you know what I'm talking about anyhow.

Skwhirl

join:2009-08-13
Knoxville, TN
·Comcast
·AT&T DSL Service


1 edit

'Domain helpers' are a pain

I have relied on DNS protocol feedback like NXDomain for years with several different apps.

It's not a matter of being a 'net purist' but the fact that their 'enhancement' really breaks the DNS protocol. It's annoying!

OpenDNS is corrupted with 'helper' junk as well, and unlike Comcast, you CANNOT opt out. At least Comcast gives you a choice.
vp71inet

join:2005-05-12
Englishtown, NJ

Re: 'Domain helpers' are a pain

said by Skwhirl See Profile :

OpenDNS is corrupted with 'helper' junk as well, and unlike Comcast, you CANNOT opt out. At least Comcast gives you a choice.
I thought you could just point your router, PC or whatever to new DNS servers of your choice. That would be your opt-out.

Skwhirl

join:2009-08-13
Knoxville, TN
·Comcast
·AT&T DSL Service


2 edits

Re: 'Domain helpers' are a pain

said by vp71inet See Profile :

I thought you could just point your router, PC or whatever to new DNS servers of your choice. That would be your opt-out.
Good point. You can opt out of it by choosing to not use the internet

I was referring to all the hype about OpenDNS being something that it isn't. You cannot use their servers and opt out of their 'helper' enhancement. Also, my experience has proven OpenDNS slower than the standard issue ISP DNS servers.

Even if they all went to that, you can host your own DNS server and make repairs best you can. It's just a needless pain for a few extra advertising bucks. I applaud Comcast for not overlooking us who rely on 'clean' DNS replies

sivran
Long Live The Suite
Premium
join:2003-09-15
Arlington, TX
clubs:
·RoadRunner Cable

Re: 'Domain helpers' are a pain

You can't?

quote:
$ nslookup this-is-a-bogus-domain-okzx1234.com 208.67.220.220
Server: 208.67.220.220
Address: 208.67.220.220#53

** server can't find this-is-a-bogus-domain-okzx1234.com: NXDOMAIN

Only if you don't sign up for an account, which is free. The opt-out is also not cookie-based. The output above came from my linux box, which has never been to opendns.com.
--
In dadkins' memory, Think outside the Fox...

Goober
Premium
join:2000-12-17
Naperville, IL
Even then it's worth it for me with kids at home and being able to do a lot of filtering at the DNS level.

Scree
In the pipe 5 by 5

join:2001-04-24
Mount Laurel, NJ

ha

Comcast is so cute sometimes. lol At least OpenDNS will update will similar or cooler features now.

meskinct
Mad Scientist at Work
Premium
join:2002-01-07
Danbury, CT
clubs:
·Comcast
·magicjack.com

Thank You!

Comcast guys-

Thank you for at least doing something. Everyone is quick to point out faults. I just appreciate the fact that SOMETHING is being done. It's a step in the right direction. Improving network status pages, making DNS opt-out relatively simple and posting here on BBR has gone a long way to improve my opinion of CHSI. There's more to be done, but is great stuff. Thanks!

When you guys are done with that do you want to go over to the video side and help them out? We gotta talk.
--
Rich. My Website

Fluker

join:2005-04-07
West Lafayette, IN

Off topic.

Hey piratebay's trackers never came back online for me after they switched ISP's. Is that just me having slow dns or is it fudged for everybody else?
BosstonesOwn

join:2002-12-15
Everett, MA
clubs:

Re: Off topic.

works using opendns

might need to flush your dns cache.
Forums » Comcast Launches New DNS Health Portal


Friday, 27-Nov 09:00:51 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.