dslreports logo
Comcast Nominated for Having Worst ToS
People use the service but don't like the terms
A blog over at InfoWorld recently ran a challenge asking readers to find a company with a ToS agreement worse than the Dilbert.com Terms of Use reported on by the blog. The first nominee by the readers is Comcast. Although Comcast recently changed their ToS to make their traffic-shaping practices look more legit, they still have a number of provisions that concern their customers. It’s primarily the lack of privacy that one has when using their service that seems to have gotten the company nominated for the dubious honor of Worst ToS. The challenge is still going on so people who believe that Comcast’s ToS isn’t the worst one out there may come back with a response.

Most recommended from 108 comments



dadkins
Can you do Blu?
MVM
join:2003-09-26
Hercules, CA

1 edit

dadkins

MVM

No Likey?

If the TOS is not to your liking, don't get the service!

Don't give me this "Only Provider" BS.
Either you accept it or not - don't get it then bitch!

I agreed and got the service!

While I may not approve of the whole Sandvine horseshit,
if it was such a POS I would cancel.

Sandvine on BT vs 16mbps... Hmmm.
I'm still here, aint I?

*SO FAR*, my service has been great!
That's 4 years and counting... started at 1500kbps x 256kbps and now at 16000kbps x 2000kbps.

Sure beats the hell out of what AT&T(SBC) has ever tried to offer me!

YMMV