 | | Liar "Second, the recent FCC Court decision determined that Comcast did not violate any FCC rules or law," he says."
Wrong. The DC circuit ruled that the FCC's legal theory to enforce its Broadband Policy Statement was bunk. The court did not in anyway address the merit of the case. | |
|
 | | a nifty way... to get names of the p2p folks and cut off their internet...
pay out $16.... save $100 by saving the bandwidth! | |
|
 | | wonder if the list of claimants gets shared with RIAA THAT would be interesting! | |
|
 pnh102Reptiles Are Cuddly And PrettyPremium join:2002-05-02 Mount Airy, MD | Nice Joke
Make the people who sign up for this settlement take a fat rate hike to pay the costs of the settlement. -- "Net Neutrality" zealots - the people you can thank for your capped Internet service. | |
|
 |  | | Re: Nice Joke Hmm...
Gotta figure out how to add you to my ignore filter. | |
|
 |  |  pnh102Reptiles Are Cuddly And PrettyPremium join:2002-05-02 Mount Airy, MD | Re: Nice Joke said by digitalfreak:Hmm... Gotta figure out how to add you to my ignore filter. Click on "Members" on the side bar, choose "Account," the use the "Remove Me" option. -- "Net Neutrality" zealots - the people you can thank for your capped Internet service. | |
|
 |  |  |  | | Re: Nice Joke OMG, ROFLMAO!
/sarcasm | |
|
 |  |  | | I did that over a year ago. | |
|
 |  |  quatrixPremium join:2005-02-11 Davie, FL kudos:2 | I love it when people say "you're on ignore" so they feel like they got the last word, then don't actually put the person on ignore.
P.S. Are people really complaining that they're getting PAID $16 for stealing? | |
|
 |  |  |  james join:2001-02-26 CWCville USA | Re: Nice Joke Copyright infringement isn't stealing.
You're on ignore | |
|
 |  dvd536as Mr. Pink as they comePremium join:2001-04-27 Phoenix, AZ kudos:4 | said by pnh102:Make the people who sign up for this settlement take a fat rate hike to pay the costs of the settlement. lol. you think comcast has a magic money tree somewhere? this will end up filtering back onto the subs bill as a new unfee or they'll hike an existing unfee a few pennies. -- The shortest distance between 2 points adds 1.5 stars to T. want $50? solve »coord.info/GC20A37 for me | |
|
 |  |  pnh102Reptiles Are Cuddly And PrettyPremium join:2002-05-02 Mount Airy, MD | Re: Nice Joke said by dvd536:lol. you think comcast has a magic money tree somewhere? this will end up filtering back onto the subs bill as a new unfee or they'll hike an existing unfee a few pennies. You know full well that evil corporations like Comcast can just PRINT money!  -- "Net Neutrality" zealots - the people you can thank for your capped Internet service. | |
|
 Z80APremium join:2009-11-23 | Follow the money Robb doesn't stand to make money either way.
The bloodsucking lawyer does.
I'd side with Robb. | |
|
 |  |
 |  |  Z80APremium join:2009-11-23 Reviews:
·Cox HSI
4 edits | Re: Follow the money Uh, according to the settlement documents, Jon Hart is lead plaintiff. So after posting some links Robb still doesn't stand to make money either way.
Robb > bloodsucking lawyers just looking for their cut of $16M
»funchords.livejournal.com/432415.html
It is funny that you can easily file a claim online, but you can't opt out online. You must write a letter. How convenient for the bloodsuckers.
said by »p2pcongestionsettlement.com/Faqs.htm#5 : Who is paying the costs associated with the Settlement? Costs associated with the Notice and administration of this Settlement will be paid from the Settlement fund to be established by Comcast.
That is mighty nice of them. The subscribers who were supposedly wronged foot the bill.
said by What the bloodsuckers get : What is the attorneys fee award to Class Counsel? Class Counsel will request an award of attorneys fees and expenses from the Court up to $3,000,000. Comcast will pay all attorneys fees and expenses. This will not reduce the benefit available to Settlement Class Members.
So let's look at the score shall we?
Robb = $0
Bloodsucking lawyers = up to $3,000,000.00
Always follow the money. | |
|
 |  |  |  ThrowDemsOutIf you can't convince 'em, confuse 'emPremium join:2002-03-03 Mullica Hill, NJ kudos:4 2 edits | Re: Follow the money said by Z80A:So let's look at the score shall we? Robb = $0 Bloodsucking lawyers = up to $3,000,000.00 Always follow the money. Don't forget, Robb got a nice Wash, DC job out of this whole Comcast throttling issue. »newamerica.net/user/233 | |
|
 |  |  |  |  TailsPremium join:2007-09-25 Sanford, NC kudos:2 | Re: Follow the money And that means...? | |
|
 |  |  |  |  Z80APremium join:2009-11-23 | Yeah, because exposing Comcast as the liars they are was the only thing on his resume. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  newviewEx .. Ex .. ExactlyPremium join:2001-10-01 Parsonsburg, MD kudos:1 Reviews:
·Vonage
·DIRECTV
| Re: Follow the money said by Z80A:Yeah, because exposing Comcast as the liars they are was the only thing on his resume. . . . and we've been saying that about Comcast on these Forums for years. -- Ö¿Ö The Rules of Spam | Maryland's Newest Anti-Spam Law Where are we going? And what's with the hand basket? | |
|
 |  |  |  |  jus10 join:2009-08-04 Sterling, VA Reviews:
·Comcast
| You've clearly never lived in DC.
I sided with Robb. Yes, I know the chances of some windfall future settlement is unlikely but my principles are worth more than $16. | |
|
 |  |  |  | | so if you are in court one day will you represent yourself or will you use one of them bloodsucking lawyers? | |
|
 |  |  |  |  Z80APremium join:2009-11-23 Reviews:
·Cox HSI
| Re: Follow the money I don't abuse the court process. I don't extort subscriber money from providers. So no, I would not get a bloodsucking lawyer to extort $0.50 for subscribers and $3,000,000.00 for the bottom feeding waste of skin ambulance chasing lawyer.
All class actions should be opt in instead of opt out and bloodsucker fees should reflect the amount of WORK they actually did.
Unlike you, I think people should EARN what they make. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  | | Re: Follow the money said by Z80A:I don't abuse the court process. I don't extort subscriber money from providers. So no, I would not get a bloodsucking lawyer to extort $0.50 for subscribers and $3,000,000.00 for the bottom feeding waste of skin ambulance chasing lawyer. All class actions should be opt in instead of opt out and bloodsucker fees should reflect the amount of WORK they actually did. Unlike you, I think people should EARN what they make. what?!
this is simply ludicrous, congratulations. and you still did not answer my question. were you to be in court (whatever the reason, criminal or civil, should be obvious I didn't mean class action specifically) would you or would you not represent yourself? certainly you would represent yourself instead of using a blood sucking lawyer right?
"and bloodsucker fees should reflect the amount of WORK they actually did."
so what fees (a number please) would you have them be paid? why should they not get paid what they are able to produce, like everybody else?? this almost sounds like a socialist argument you are making, "they make too much they should make less money, because damn it they're not really earning it!"
"Unlike you, I think people should EARN what they make."
so they didn't earn the money they just went in there and grabbed it out of the air or something?
you are making ludicrous and vaguely socialist sounding arguments.
this is capitalism here, and there are no exceptions. sorry that sometimes your blessed big biz takes some losses, but that's just tough!! | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  Z80APremium join:2009-11-23 Reviews:
·Cox HSI
3 edits | Re: Follow the money I've already explained it to you multiple times. Get hooked on phonics if you still can't follow the simple concept that THESE bloodsuckers didn't earn that money nor were they hired by everyone supposedly damaged.
That $3,000,000.00 comes from the subscribers genius. Surely someone so interested in capitalism realizes that Comcast doesn't print their own money. These are subscribers who weren't given a choice as to how much they wanted to pay for counsel. $3,000,000.00 is obscene by any measure and the result of a corrupt system; laws, written by lawyers, passed by lawyers, for lawyers.
But it doesn't matter how many times I will explain it. You will continue defending this corrupt system where supposed victims are victimized again for the benefit of a bunch of scum-sucking waste of skin ambulance chasers.
Congrats for choosing bloodsuckers over the subscribers. Enjoy your price increases. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | | Re: Follow the money you haven't explained anything. bloodsucker this and bloodsucker that and calling the system corrupt is no argument at all for why they didn't earn that money. it's just sour grapes is what it is!! and 3 million is not near obscene.
i could call a lot of things corrupt and say such and such didn't really earn their money but that doesn't make it so. | |
|
 PhoenixDown-- Wants FIOSPremium join:2003-06-08 Fresh Meadows, NY kudos:1 | Punishment... If Comcast's lawyer is advising that customers take up the settlement offer to "punish" Comcast -- then perhaps Comcast should punish itself by donating 150 million extra to organizations like the EFF that are protecting fair rights. -- ~ Insert a Funny Sig Here ~ | |
|
 |  SLDPremium join:2002-04-17 San Francisco, CA | Re: Punishment... The article doesn't imply *whose* lawyer he is. | |
|
 |  RARPSL join:1999-12-08 Suffern, NY | said by PhoenixDown:If Comcast's lawyer is advising that customers take up the settlement offer to "punish" Comcast He is not Comcast's lawyer - He is the Lawyer who brought the case and will be paid for his efforts. Thus by saying agree to the settlement, he is protecting the money he will reap once the settlement is approved. Thus although he is not Comcast's Lawyer he still has the same interest in getting the settlement approved as if he were. | |
|
 |  |
 JJVPremium join:2001-04-25 Seattle, WA | In for 16Hey 16 bucks gets me a 18 pack  | |
|
 |  Z80APremium join:2009-11-23 | Re: In for 16 And $3,000,000.00 will get the lawyers a really nice yacht. | |
|
 |  | 
approval from: canesfan2001 
| Re: In for 16 said by Z80A:And $3,000,000.00 will get the lawyers a really nice yacht. it kills me how conservatives are all about being successful and making big money UNLESS it's lawyers that have the audacity to meddle in the affairs of big biz...
(any other profession this same kind of argument would be quickly labeled as class envy / socialism by those same very conservatives)
shouldn't you be celebrating this skill and ability ("rugged individualism!") to earn 3 million and get a really nice yacht?? | |
|
 |  |  |  Z80APremium join:2009-11-23 | Re: In for 16 Nope. Being a waste of skin bloodsucking leech is nothing to be admired just like a tick is not to be admired.
These bloodsuckers didn't "earn" anything. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  2 edits | Re: In for 16 said by Z80A  Nope. Being a waste of skin bloodsucking leech is nothing to be admired just like a tick is not to be admired. These bloodsuckers didn't "earn" anything. they didn't earn it? go tell the court system and the judges how they didn't actually earn that money and that CC should have those millions back. you go tell them exactly how that money was not earned and why it should be returned!
i know conservatives get a hard on for tort reform, but their arguments are totally asinine. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  Z80APremium join:2009-11-23 Reviews:
·Cox HSI
2 edits | Re: In for 16 They didn't earn anything. They game a corrupt system of laws, written by lawyers for lawyers. If I roll into Congress or a state legislature with a prewritten law and a bag of money, I go to prison (lawyer or not) for bribery. The trial lawyer union does it and it's a contribution. You are the reason Justin made the ignore button.
Enjoy your price increases genius. You've earned them. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | | Re: In for 16 said by Z80A:They didn't earn anything. They game a corrupt system of laws, written by lawyers for lawyers. If I roll into Congress or a state legislature with a prewritten law and a bag of money, I go to prison (lawyer or not) for bribery. The trial lawyer union does it and it's a contribution. You are the reason Justin made the ignore button. Enjoy your price increases genius. You've earned them. "roll into Congress or a state legislature with a prewritten law and a bag of money"
sounds like you're talking about lobbying here, which is something your big biz buddies are at the forefront of. talk about gaming the system (can't believe you have the audacity to use this argument, "gaming the system"). trial lawyers don't have much when compared to the other side's favorable amounts of legislation. don't know how you can point the finger at trial lawyers in this instance.
or you going to tell me now how big biz doesn't lobby or that it's only a very minimal amount or that it's somehow different? | |
|
 thor793 join:2005-09-10 Schaumburg, IL | ha A Class Action lawyer wants a bunch of people to sign onto a settlement? You don't say. It's a completely self-serving statement. | |
|
 camaro92Question everythingPremium join:2008-04-05 Westfield, MA | I say Keep your dollar,instead please reinvest in your network maybe a few new patch cords in the headend in my area. | |
|
 |  dvd536as Mr. Pink as they comePremium join:2001-04-27 Phoenix, AZ kudos:4 | Re: I say said by camaro92:Keep your dollar,instead please reinvest in your network maybe a few new patch cords in the headend in my area. how about a larger yacht for the ceo instead? -- The shortest distance between 2 points adds 1.5 stars to T. want $50? solve »coord.info/GC20A37 for me | |
|
 TamaraBQuestion The Current ParadigmPremium join:2000-11-08 Brooklyn NYC Reviews:
·Clearwire Wireless
| All their money back! These people who were throttled, should get ALL the money back which they paid during the throttled period simply based on fraud and false advertising. In addition, they all should be allowed to terminate their contracts without paying any ETF.
The penalty should be severe enough to dissuade Comcast and any other any other ISP from lying about fraudulent bandwidth and services, not a weak slap on the wrist. Fraud needs to be punished severely, with real economic consequences to the thief.
Bob -- Would you ever go over to Czechoslovakia, and marry me daughter for me?" | |
|
 Reviews:
·Verizon FiOS
| does nothing going forward This does nothing for the consumer going forward. Nothing for competition, nothing for consumer (internet subscriber) privacy, nothing. Grab the $16 if you want, but in the end I see this costing you more in the long run. Large companies have a way of making RATE PAYERS absorb any additional costs to the company's bottom line. There are plenty of regulatory ways to MAKE comcast do the right things going foward by but this isn't one of 'em. | |
|
 JonPremium join:2001-01-20 Lisle, IL 1 edit | LOL! up to!! I love the "up to" $16. Just like a BB company to always be sure to add the "up to" in there.
They're probably throttle that back to $6 or $7 though. | |
|
 |  Z80APremium join:2009-11-23 | Re: LOL! up to!! Class Action Settlement Recovery Fee | |
|
 |  |
 | | laywer fees How much does the worthless lawyer get? Consumers get very little to the new house and new Porsche the lawyer gets.
Class actions are all about lawyers getting rich. | |
|
 |
 |  | | Re: $16.00 to sign your rights away "I have read some of the finer details and if you accept the $16.00, you agree to wave your rights on any future lawsuit or the right to disagree to any future terms changes, policy changes, and the most eye popper was the right to dispute any future disagreement in which you or Comcast could ever have (in the future)."
This is pretty standard in any settlement suit. Which is also why you shouldn't settle for something as insanely low as a handful of bills. | |
|
 | | answer dump them case closed | |
|
 |
|