 1 edit | omg Watch out Karl some might say you have gone soft on Comcast... Next thing we will know is your in a pub drinking with Roadrunner Rick | |
|
 |  Smith6612Premium,MVM join:2008-02-01 North Tonawanda, NY kudos:21 | Re: omg He's Comcast Rick I believe. If you look at his avatar, an anvil is smashing the RR and Comcast is coming in. | |
|
 1 edit | What?
Why are you always trashing Comcast every chance you get? You never publish anything positive about Comcast, it's so UNFAIR! -- OASAASLLS | |
|
 |  Smith6612Premium,MVM join:2008-02-01 North Tonawanda, NY kudos:21 | Re: What? This is positive news towards Comcast. Karl did not trash Comcast on this one. | |
|
 |  |  | | Re: What? said by Smith6612:This is positive news towards Comcast. Karl did not trash Comcast on this one. Sorry for my poor use of sarcasm. | |
|
 |  |  |  | | Re: What? said by canesfan2001:said by Smith6612:This is positive news towards Comcast. Karl did not trash Comcast on this one. Sorry for my poor use of sarcasm. I was with you %100 It worked | |
|
 |  |  |  Smith6612Premium,MVM join:2008-02-01 North Tonawanda, NY kudos:21 | I have a hard time of recognising sarcasm online >.>  | |
|
 |  | | There are often positive editorials about Comcast on the front page. The sad thing is that the front page editorials usually include some sort of bash that is totally unrelated to the positive editorial. | |
|
 | | hah Comcast would loose cash on redirection that is why they patched this DNS issue so quickly | |
|
 |  Romney2012Defeat Obama 2012-Chg we can believe inPremium join:2002-03-03 USA kudos:4 | Re: hah said by brianiscool:Comcast would loose cash on redirection that is why they patched this DNS issue so quickly And how would they lose cash?
1 - If their DNS servers were cache poisoned by this exploit it could cost their users some money if their identities were stolen when going to their online banking accounts and were misdirected to a phishing page. It wouldn't cost Comcast anything.
2 - Comcast doesn't run a redirection service to their own search page with ads when a user mistypes a domain name. So no money lost there.
So maybe you could enlighten us on how they would have lost money by not patching this flaw. -- My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page Ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk? | |
|
 |  |  | | Re: hah stop poisoning our minds | |
|
 |  |  |  ptrowskiGot Helix?Premium join:2005-03-14 Putnam, CT kudos:4 Reviews:
·VOIPo
| Re: hah Care to respond to TK Junk Mail? I would like to know how they are "losing cash" as you put it. -- "A religious war is like children fighting over who has the strongest imaginary friend."
Have you been touched by his noodly appendage? »www.venganza.org | |
|
 |  |  Anonymous_AnonymousPremium join:2004-06-21 127.0.0.1 kudos:2 Reviews:
·RoadRunner Cable
·Comcast
·Time Warner VOIP
| said by Romney2012:said by brianiscool:Comcast would loose cash on redirection that is why they patched this DNS issue so quickly And how would they lose cash? 1 - If their DNS servers were cache poisoned by this exploit it could cost their users some money if their identities were stolen when going to their online banking accounts and were misdirected to a phishing page. It wouldn't cost Comcast anything. 2 - Comcast doesn't run a redirection service to their own search page with ads when a user mistypes a domain name. So no money lost there. So maybe you could enlighten us on how they would have lost money by not patching this flaw. they will get sued | |
|
 jester121Premium join:2003-08-09 Lake Zurich, IL Reviews:
·voip.ms
| I do not wish to enter a subject The most interesting news out of this entire series of events was that Level 3 indicated they are going to restrict access to their 4.2.2.x DNS servers at some point in the future.
That's going to be an interesting day for sure -- those addresses have been a crutch for lazy admins for years and I bet they're buried in millions of configs that have no business using them. | |
|
 |  NormanSPremium,MVM join:2001-02-14 San Jose, CA kudos:4 Reviews:
·SONIC.NET
·Pacific Bell - SBC
| Re: I do not wish to enter a subject That may have already begun. Level 3 uses "Anycast" on their DNS servers, and I noticed a hard failure on 4.2.2.1 once. Anycast means that you don't always reach the same server, so your results can be variable. This is obvious with the ATTIS DNS servers, which also use Anycast, and sometimes fail the DNS vulnerability test, but other times pass. -- Norman ~Oh Lord, why have you come ~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum | |
|
 |
 ztmikeMark for moderationPremium join:2001-08-02 Michigan City, IN | OpenDNS ? Has OpenDNS been patched? I stay FAR away from Comcast's DNS servers. -- WhY sO SeRiOUs!? | |
|
 |  iansltx join:2007-02-19 Golden, CO kudos:2 | Re: OpenDNS ? Yes, they were patched from the start actually. | |
|
 |  |  jgkoltPremium join:2004-02-21 Lakewood, OH | Re: OpenDNS ? how can you check to see if your dns was patched. DO you have a link? | |
|
 |  |  |  iansltx join:2007-02-19 Golden, CO kudos:2 | Re: OpenDNS ? It's in the main body of the article, DoxPara.net off the top of my head. | |
|
 |  |  jubangyPremium join:2005-03-26 Erie, PA | Actually their comment was that they were never vulnerable to this problem and did not need patched. | |
|
 Anonymous_AnonymousPremium join:2004-06-21 127.0.0.1 kudos:2 2 edits | TWC patch has Failed last time twc try to patch there DNS servers stop working
and it does have the vulnerability
Your name server, at 66.75.164.90, appears vulnerable to DNS Cache Poisoning. All requests came from the following source port: 38581 | |
|
 |
|