 questionable
join:2005-10-18 Phoenix, AZ edit: July 25th, @09:57AM
| omg Watch out Karl some might say you have gone soft on Comcast... Next thing we will know is your in a pub drinking with Roadrunner Rick | |
|
 |  Smith6612 Premium join:2008-02-01 united state | Re: omg He's Comcast Rick I believe. If you look at his avatar, an anvil is smashing the RR and Comcast is coming in. | |
|
  sousademiami
join:2003-02-04 Miami, FL edit: July 25th, @10:06AM
| What?
Why are you always trashing Comcast every chance you get? You never publish anything positive about Comcast, it's so UNFAIR! -- OASAASLLS | |
|
 |  Smith6612 Premium join:2008-02-01 united state | Re: What? This is positive news towards Comcast. Karl did not trash Comcast on this one. | |
|
 |  |   sousademiami
join:2003-02-04 Miami, FL
·Comcast
·AT&T Southeast
| Re: What? said by Smith6612 :This is positive news towards Comcast. Karl did not trash Comcast on this one. Sorry for my poor use of sarcasm. | |
|
 |  |  |   Pingmeister
| Re: What? said by sousademiami :said by Smith6612 :This is positive news towards Comcast. Karl did not trash Comcast on this one. Sorry for my poor use of sarcasm. I was with you %100 It worked | |
|
 |  |  |  Smith6612 Premium join:2008-02-01 united state | I have a hard time of recognising sarcasm online >.>  | |
|
 |  battleop
join:2005-09-28 00000 | There are often positive editorials about Comcast on the front page. The sad thing is that the front page editorials usually include some sort of bash that is totally unrelated to the positive editorial. | |
|
 brianiscool
join:2000-08-16 Miami, FL | hah Comcast would loose cash on redirection that is why they patched this DNS issue so quickly | |
|
 |   TK Junk Mail Go ahead, make my day Premium join:2002-03-03 Margate City, NJ clubs:
·Comcast
| Re: hah said by brianiscool :Comcast would loose cash on redirection that is why they patched this DNS issue so quickly And how would they lose cash?
1 - If their DNS servers were cache poisoned by this exploit it could cost their users some money if their identities were stolen when going to their online banking accounts and were misdirected to a phishing page. It wouldn't cost Comcast anything.
2 - Comcast doesn't run a redirection service to their own search page with ads when a user mistypes a domain name. So no money lost there.
So maybe you could enlighten us on how they would have lost money by not patching this flaw. -- My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page Ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk? | |
|
 |  |  brianiscool
join:2000-08-16 Miami, FL | Re: hah stop poisoning our minds | |
|
 |  |  |  |
 |  |   punker deleted by moderator Premium join:2004-06-21 Palmdale, CA clubs:
·Time Warner VOIP
·RoadRunner Cable
| said by TK Junk Mail :said by brianiscool :Comcast would loose cash on redirection that is why they patched this DNS issue so quickly And how would they lose cash? 1 - If their DNS servers were cache poisoned by this exploit it could cost their users some money if their identities were stolen when going to their online banking accounts and were misdirected to a phishing page. It wouldn't cost Comcast anything. 2 - Comcast doesn't run a redirection service to their own search page with ads when a user mistypes a domain name. So no money lost there. So maybe you could enlighten us on how they would have lost money by not patching this flaw. they will get sued | |
|
 jester121
join:2003-08-09 Lake Zurich, IL
·ViaTalk
| I do not wish to enter a subject The most interesting news out of this entire series of events was that Level 3 indicated they are going to restrict access to their 4.2.2.x DNS servers at some point in the future.
That's going to be an interesting day for sure -- those addresses have been a crutch for lazy admins for years and I bet they're buried in millions of configs that have no business using them. | |
|
 |  NormanS Premium,MVM join:2001-02-14 San Jose, CA
·Pacific Bell - SBC
| Re: I do not wish to enter a subject That may have already begun. Level 3 uses "Anycast" on their DNS servers, and I noticed a hard failure on 4.2.2.1 once. Anycast means that you don't always reach the same server, so your results can be variable. This is obvious with the ATTIS DNS servers, which also use Anycast, and sometimes fail the DNS vulnerability test, but other times pass. -- Norman ~Oh Lord, why have you come ~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum | |
|
 |
  ztmike 1kwikgt Premium join:2001-08-02 | OpenDNS ? Has OpenDNS been patched? I stay FAR away from Comcast's DNS servers. -- WhY sO SeRiOUs!? | |
|
 |  iansltx
join:2007-02-19 Fredericksburg, TX | Re: OpenDNS ? Yes, they were patched from the start actually. | |
|
 |  |   jgkolt Premium join:2004-02-21 Lakewood, OH clubs: | Re: OpenDNS ? how can you check to see if your dns was patched. DO you have a link? | |
|
 |  |  |  iansltx
join:2007-02-19 Fredericksburg, TX | Re: OpenDNS ? It's in the main body of the article, DoxPara.net off the top of my head. | |
|
 |  |  jubangy Premium join:2005-03-26 Erie, PA | Actually their comment was that they were never vulnerable to this problem and did not need patched. | |
|
  punker deleted by moderator Premium join:2004-06-21 Palmdale, CA clubs: edit: July 25th, @03:35PM
| TWC patch has Failed last time twc try to patch there DNS servers stop working
and it does have the vulnerability
Your name server, at 66.75.164.90, appears vulnerable to DNS Cache Poisoning. All requests came from the following source port: 38581 | |
|
 |
|
 |