 eric87m
join:2003-12-07
Princeton, NJ | H.264 new video compression scheme = MPEG4? | |
|
 |  en102Canadian, eh?
join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA | Re: H.264 Hmm.. I wonder if the picture will start looking more like DirecTv's
--
Canada = Hollywood North | |
|
| Emiya
join:2006-03-30
Southington, OH | Even mpeg-4 asp (ie. XviD & DivX) would be able to reduce the bitrate significantly over mpeg-2 without losing quality. It would probably be easier and cheaper to implement over AVC (h.264). | |
|
|  mix
join:2002-03-19
Utica, MI | From the article, the new compression scheme "will work with the MSO's massive base of MPEG-2 set-tops". So can it be MPEG4? Or is it variable bit rate encoding or something? | |
|
| | Reviews:
 ·ProLog
 ·DIRECTV
| Re: H.264 I can only imagine it would be really creative variable bit rate statistical multiplexing.
They can put the real expensive high end loop encoder systems in the headend that do all the heavy lifting, while the stb's out in the field act as the dumb client.
It can't be too complicated to decode because the horsepower in the Motorola STB's are practically zilch. Have you ever used one of those DVR's? Try scrolling or changing channels too fast, the dang thing freezes up for 20 seconds and then it plays catch up with itself. | |
|
| | | mix
join:2002-03-19
Utica, MI | Re: H.264 Yes, I have a DVR, and it freezes all the time... I don't know if its terrible programming or like you say a very limited hardware set. | |
|
 tiger72SexaT duorPPremium
join:2001-03-28
Saint Louis, MO
kudos:1
 ·T-Mobile US
1 edit | Speed + Caps I guarantee that even after Docsis 3 is rolled out, they'll merely offer up to 25mbps speeds at a fraction of the cost of the current 6mbps speeds, unless in FIOS competitive areas. Why? Significantly more profit. Comcast *never* does anything without thinking profit 1st, marketing 2nd, and somewhere towards the bottom is customer satisfaction.
Let's not forget that higher speeds mean customers hit those hidden caps quicker!
--
|- The LP »www.lp.org/issues/issues.shtml -|
|- Cato @ Liberty »www.cato-at-liberty.org -| | |
|
| en102Canadian, eh?
join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA
1 edit | Re: Speed + Caps Just because it saves them money, it doesn't mean it will save you money. I agree that this will be primarily targeted at FiOS areas. The cost savings is in bandwidth... that doesn't mean that Cablelabs will give away Docsis3.0 for free, and that implementing SDV doesn't cost anything to deploy either.
--
Canada = Hollywood North | |
|
|  Romney2012Defeat Obama 2012-Chg we can believe inPremium
join:2002-03-03
USA
kudos:4 | said by tiger72: Comcast *never* does anything without thinking profit 1st A business that doesn't think about profit doesn't stay in business.
--
--
Internet News
My BLOG
My Web Page | |
|
| | | | Re: Speed + Caps said by Romney2012:said by tiger72: Comcast *never* does anything without thinking profit 1st A business that doesn't think about profit doesn't stay in business. Agreed. Let's be honest, as a consumer yea I want everything cheaper. Gas, my electric company just raised their rates 59% after a six year rate freeze. Id like my car insurance to drop, my media bills to drop. Of course, who wouldn't.
But they are a business. If you were CEO what would you do? | |
|
| | | Reviews:
·Comcast
| Re: Speed + Caps Put customer satisfaction first then profits second.
It made home depot and others huge profits before they went all stock holder.
--
"It's always funny until someone gets hurt......and then it's absolutely friggin' hysterical!" | |
|
| | | | en102Canadian, eh?
join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA | Re: Speed + Caps Not if you're the only business in town...
Basically, businesses will charge as much as they can to make maximum profit (short term, long term, etc).
There's product sales people to 'push' the product (sure its nice if customers 'want it', but when there's few choices, people will accept whats there, and TV has almost become a utility).
Satisfaction ratings typically come into play when its something like a CO-OP, or there's competition (DirecTv has high satisfaction ratings, as all it does is TV, and has to do a GOOD job of it).
--
Canada = Hollywood North | |
|
| | | | | said by LeftOfSanity:said by Romney2012:said by tiger72: Comcast *never* does anything without thinking profit 1st A business that doesn't think about profit doesn't stay in business. Agreed. Let's be honest, as a consumer yea I want everything cheaper. Gas, my electric company just raised their rates 59% after a six year rate freeze. Id like my car insurance to drop, my media bills to drop. Of course, who wouldn't. But they are a business. If you were CEO what would you do? If I was CEO I would continue to rape each and every one of you consumer whores until ye bungholes turned to dust! Then I would take my money and laugh as I invest it in a strategy to target your children, and your children's children for more of the same. If you didn't like it I would take my money to congress and pass bipartisan laws which will force you to submit. You and all generations after you would be enslaved to a bondage of my choosing. You are born unto this world for one reason only. Rebels and law breakers will be dealt with swiftly via black boots and the barrel of a gun.
Your life truly is worth nothing compared to the all mighty dollar! Now get back to work...I think you have some bills to pay and a debt you will never satisfy. | |
|
| | tiger72SexaT duorPPremium
join:2001-03-28
Saint Louis, MO
kudos:1 | I'm not naive. However, a business can prioritize serving the customer well while making a profit all at once. Verizon's FIOS comes to mind... | |
|
priller
join:2000-10-20
Gainesville, VA | Deployable Where Needed
"Deployable Where Needed" is a key point of the slide.
In other words where there is FiOS competition???? | |
|
| | | Re: Deployable Where Needed said by priller:"Deployable Where Needed" is a key point of the slide. In other words where there is FiOS competition???? Or maybe in areas where congestion is high, so they could send out less of "the letter".
Nahh.. that would make to much sense.  | |
|
|  dvd536as Mr. Pink as they comePremium
join:2001-04-27
Phoenix, AZ
kudos:4 | said by priller:"Deployable Where Needed" is a key point of the slide. In other words where there is FiOS competition???? BINGO!
--
You can never be too rich, too thin or have too much Bandwidth | |
|
| | Here's an Idea Comcast should give all their customers 100mbit and disconnect them the minute they reach their imaginary cap.... Or, they could cut the ridiculous crap. Why the heck does anyone want faster speeds, when they are restricted with its usage. That's like offering a kid a candy bar, then making him or her run ten miles afterwards. | |
|
| Ahrenl
join:2004-10-26
North Andover, MA | Re: Here's an Idea The cap is there to reduce congestion, in overly congested nodes. If there is more bandwidth, there is less congestion, thus less need for the cap; which is dynamic.
But please... bitch away... | |
|
| | | | Re: Here's an Idea Ahr,
LOL so you'd think. The sad truth is that more bandwidth means more customers to add. IE, back to overselling the lines and capping people in no time. DO you ACTUALLY expect these upgrades to simply go to existing customers and no one else. HAH. | |
|
| | | Ahrenl
join:2004-10-26
North Andover, MA | Re: Here's an Idea I guess they could remove and combine nodes to accomplish this.. seems like a pretty dumb thing to do though. Adding user in a different geographic area shouldn't effect your node. | |
|
Reviews:
·Comcast
| New revenue source... By only sending the channels that are needed, Comcast could potentially wipe out the Neilson ratings system. Hello Mr. TV Network, would you like to know exactly how many people are watching your channels and for how long?
I can't wait to see how bad the numbers are on the dozens of useless cable channels, like the soaps channel or oxygen.
- Sherman | |
|
| |
| | | | Re: New revenue source... I don't know one way or the other. To me, the new technology implies that this would be easier to track.
- Sherman | |
|
| DMS1
join:2005-04-06
Carrollton, TX | said by sherman06810:By only sending the channels that are needed, Comcast could potentially wipe out the Neilson ratings system. How? If an STB is tuned to a channel then that channel will be sent out. If no STBs on a node are, then it won't, but no one will know because by definition no one is trying to watch it. I don't see how this differs from now. | |
|
| | Reviews:
·Comcast
| Re: New revenue source... From what I understand about current digital cable deployments, all channels are sent to every STB (whether they are watched or not).
SDV only sends the channels that are needed at any given time. I'm assuming the data mining potential on this type of setup would be easier to implement.
- Sherman | |
|
 MattAll noise, no signal.Premium
join:2003-07-20
Jamestown, NC
kudos:12 | Difference in cost? Does anyone notice they are stating it's roughly twice as much per subscriber to offer 16 times the bandwidth?
If it's really only twice as much to offer 100Mbps vs 6Mbps then the MSOs are greedier than I thought.
Anyone know if that number includes transit costs and such?
--
Pretty Fly for a White Guy™ | |
|
| | | Re: Difference in cost? I wouldn't underestimate the greediness of the MSOs.  | |
|
| | Romney2012Defeat Obama 2012-Chg we can believe inPremium
join:2002-03-03
USA
kudos:4 | Re: Difference in cost? said by nweibley:I wouldn't underestimate the greediness of the MSOs. Comcast profit margins are less than businesses in many other industries. In fact, they are barely high enough to get people to invest in their stock. People who constantly whine about greed haven't the faintest notion about how business works or a capitalist economy works. They mostly dream of some socialist utopia promised by Karl Marx in his published works. And we all saw how that utopia worked in practice - see Russia, North Korea, Cuba, etc.
--
--
Internet News
My BLOG
My Web Page | |
|
| | | | | Re: Difference in cost? They never fully applied Marx's principles. There has never been a true, 100% Communist country. And there are also countless countries that have tried capitalism and failed miserably. Capitalism can also be blamed for the current healthcare crisis facing this country -- what did we expect would happen when profit is placed ahead of a person's health? | |
|
| | | |  chanurPremium
join:2001-02-26
Colorado Springs, CO | Re: Difference in cost? said by matrix3D:They never fully applied Marx's principles. There has never been a true, 100% Communist country. And there are also countless countries that have tried capitalism and failed miserably. Capitalism can also be blamed for the current healthcare crisis facing this country -- what did we expect would happen when profit is placed ahead of a person's health? There has never been a true, 100% Communist country. ...and there never will be. Human nature will never allow for it. For all it's faults, capitalism fits humans natural competitiveness far better, and even if you suck at that game the living quality of those who don't do well still ride the coattails of the overall success. | |
|
| | | | |  aaronwtPremium
join:2004-11-07
Woodbridge, VA
 ·Verizon FiOS
| Re: Difference in cost? Has there ever been a 100% pure capitalist society? Ours certainly isn't.
said by chanur:said by matrix3D:They never fully applied Marx's principles. There has never been a true, 100% Communist country. And there are also countless countries that have tried capitalism and failed miserably. Capitalism can also be blamed for the current healthcare crisis facing this country -- what did we expect would happen when profit is placed ahead of a person's health? There has never been a true, 100% Communist country. ...and there never will be. Human nature will never allow for it. For all it's faults, capitalism fits humans natural competitiveness far better, and even if you suck at that game the living quality of those who don't do well still ride the coattails of the overall success. | |
|
| | | Ahrenl
join:2004-10-26
North Andover, MA | Laugh.. their profit margin is as much smoke and mirrors and as Exxon's. It's closer to 40-60%, though we'll never really know for sure. | |
|
| | |
1 edit | said by Romney2012:said by nweibley:I wouldn't underestimate the greediness of the MSOs. Comcast profit margins are less than businesses in many other industries. In fact, they are barely high enough to get people to invest in their stock. People who constantly whine about greed haven't the faintest notion about how business works or a capitalist economy works. They mostly dream of some socialist utopia promised by Karl Marx in his published works. And we all saw how that utopia worked in practice - see Russia, North Korea, Cuba, etc. Just don't forget...As the Golden Age of renewed capitalism in the USA fades, we the people will continue to get the shorter end of the stick...and the stick will get shorter and shorter as the age continues it's cycle to the next. There is nothing you can do about it (marx bs etc...).
You need to study the cycles of civilization and the accompanying signs of change to understand much more. Capitalism has been around since the beginning of consciousness; we did not invent it here in the USA.  | |
|
| | |  SandSharkLong may you runPremium,MVM
join:2000-05-23
Santa Fe, TX
kudos:3 | All I can say is I'm glad to see my monthly $50 $60 $70 $80 $90 $100 going to something worthwhile. 
--
• • • - - - • • • | |
|
| | | kaila
join:2000-10-11
Lincolnshire, IL | Not true. »finance.aol.com/quotes/comcast-c···amentals
Gross margins are well over 40%. Not too shabby. It's the salaries and overhead that bring the net down to 10%, which still isn't bad- it's not like they have to penny-pinch. | |
|
| | | | Romney2012Defeat Obama 2012-Chg we can believe inPremium
join:2002-03-03
USA
kudos:4 | Re: Difference in cost? said by kaila:Not true. » finance.aol.com/quotes/comcast-c···amentalsGross margins are well over 40%. Not too shabby. It's the salaries and overhead that bring the net down to 10%, which still isn't bad- it's not like they have to penny-pinch. Salaries and overhead are still costs. A return of 10% is barely enough to meet the cost of capital. »en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cost_of_capital
Back before I retired, the railroad I worked for had a cost of capital around 10.5 to 11% and the battle every year was to make a return on capital greater than that. It wasn't easy and it never is for companies with huge underlying infrastructure like railroads, electric companies, telco, cable companies, etc. If Comcast is only making 10% profit margin, then they are barely earning enough to satisfy their debt holders and stockholders.
--
--
Internet News
My BLOG
My Web Page | |
|
| | | | | Ahrenl
join:2004-10-26
North Andover, MA | Re: Difference in cost? Actually it's the mythical SG&A (of which salaries are part) which is way over-inflated. Along with the hyper inflation of the COGS, that give their net margin no meaning.
Comcast moves electronic bits from a content provider to the customer. Their cost of capital is much, much, much less than a railroad. Not to mention they've depreciated everything in sight to keep their net down. | |
|
| | | | | | | said by Romney2012:said by kaila:Not true. » finance.aol.com/quotes/comcast-c···amentalsGross margins are well over 40%. Not too shabby. It's the salaries and overhead that bring the net down to 10%, which still isn't bad- it's not like they have to penny-pinch. Salaries and overhead are still costs. A return of 10% is barely enough to meet the cost of capital. » en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cost_of_capitalBack before I retired, the railroad I worked for had a cost of capital around 10.5 to 11% and the battle every year was to make a return on capital greater than that. It wasn't easy and it never is for companies with huge underlying infrastructure like railroads, electric companies, telco, cable companies, etc. If Comcast is only making 10% profit margin, then they are barely earning enough to satisfy their debt holders and stockholders. COST OF CAPITAL? DUDE! I am a Financial Analyst. LISTEN UP> You fail to understand the entire Income Statement.
After Net Sales you have Cost of Goods Sold, Selling General & Administrative , Depreciation Depletion and Amortization, Non Operating Exps and INTEREST EXPENSE -(Cost of capital is accounted for RIGHT HERE in IE!) After that you have a bunch of bull shit (Serious Bullshit I can't emphasize enough) "Special Items" (Non-recurring, write-downs, impairments, extinguishments of debt, accounting changes, restructuring charges, hurricane Katrina costs, etc...) After all that crap you have TAXES.... then you finally get NET INCOME.
And FYI: ALL of the above are reported in BS snow job terms. It has nothing to do with what is actually going on, just hustle yourself up and actual tax return and compare to the BS that they report..
NOW AFTER ALL THAT CRAP THEY CLAIM A....NET PROFIT MARGIN of 10.15% in the prior qtr.
My professional job it to take out all the BS included in every line item and calculate an actual core earning from operations. I am telling you all. It is all a bunch BS when taken at face value for every industrial and utility company I have ever broken down including Rail Roads.
I saw the light and lost my faith. | |
|
| | 20 meg tier???? maybe they will truthfully offer a 20 meg tier.
I'm refering to the imaginary 20 meg tier that "comacast Rick" boasts about here. If he only knew that it's a temporary boost. Oh well. Ce la vi'. | |
|
|  CheesePremium
join:2003-10-26
Naples, FL
kudos:1 | Re: 20 meg tier???? said by angel6 :
maybe they will truthfully offer a 20 meg tier.
I'm refering to the imaginary 20 meg tier that "comacast Rick" boasts about here. If he only knew that it's a temporary boost. Oh well. Ce la vi'.
You think he doesn't? I am pretty sure he does | |
|
| fiberguyMy views are my own.Premium
join:2005-05-20
kudos:3 | Don't you just love how when someone is actually happy with their service, have nothing to complain about.. that they become a shill, paid mouth piece, or a target for those that are disgruntled or have nothing better to do in their life but be miserable?
Some people have the "perma-boost"... I do..
--
"Complaining is the least path of resistance for the self-serving, the lazy, and I’m told it’s a woman’s prerogative..." | |
|
 MemphisPCGuySenior Systems EngineerPremium
join:2004-05-09
Memphis, TN
·Comcast
| All I know is the 12 Hour HD infomercials are finally here As of the 1st - Comcast Added 3 new HD Channels - TBS, FOOD HD and Home & Garden HD with USA HD coming on the 1st of November.
Now flipping through the 800 channels afterhours is not unlike the seedy side of hell on the SD side  Only prettier 16:9. Damnation to bobwhites! Insomniax take me away!
--
»www.memphispcguy.com | |
|
| | a real 20 meg tier Maybe they will some day offer a 20 meg tier like the one comcast "Rick" thinks he has......... | |
|
| | comcast its crapcastic!!!!! | |
|
| fiberguyMy views are my own.Premium
join:2005-05-20
kudos:3 | Re: comcast Wow! Original! Did you come up with that all by your little self?? Take all day to form that thought?? or what?
--
"Complaining is the least path of resistance for the self-serving, the lazy, and I’m told it’s a woman’s prerogative..." | |
|
| |
| | Does it blend? Will someone FINALLY shove their comcast cablemodem into the
next version of DOES IT BLEND?
Would like to see that sucker go for a whirl..
Same goes for the new motorola AT&T dsl modems!
And the new IPODS, ZUNES, etc, etc. | |
|
| | next gen No modems will be changed. DOCSIS3 will work on existing structure and use the same modem, believe it or not. It will be presented in Jan-Feb. 08, and be commercially available in May 08. | |
|
|
|
·
·
