Comcast Sued For Traffic Shaping (Again)Class action lawsuit springs up in DC
(
old news - 09:47AM Thursday Feb 21 2008)
tags: legal · hardware · bandwidth · cable · networkingTipped by funchords 
Last November a California man
filed suit against Comcast for the company's traffic shaping practices, which involve forging TCP packets in order to throttle upstream p2p traffic. While Comcast insisting their brand of network management is
"reasonable" might thwart the FCC's investigation into the practice, the courts may see things differently. A second, class-action lawsuit
has sprung up in Washington DC.
According to a
statement from the law firm involved, Comcast is misleading customers by saying they offer the "fastest Internet connection," because the ISP "intentionally blocks or impedes its customer's access to peer-to-peer file sharing." We're actually (almost) starting to feel bad for Comcast spokesman Charlie Douglas, who has been forced to repeat the same stock quote to hundreds of news outlets by now (including us):
"To be clear, Comcast does not, has not, and will not block any Web sites or online applications, including peer-to-peer services, and no one has demonstrated otherwise," said Comcast spokesman Charlie Douglas. Douglas said that a minority of their customers use peer-to-peer. "Sometimes we have to delay [the sharing] because of the volume of it," Douglas said, so that the rest of the company's customers aren't affected by the network being bogged down by peer-to-peer.
Comcast isn't commenting publicly on any lawsuits they're facing.