Comcast Targets Frontier/Verizon Customers DOCSIS 3.0 upgrades versus last-gen DSL? If it's anything like their rocky deal with Fairpoint, Verizon's recent decision to sell a massive chunk of their less profitable DSL and landline networks to Frontier Communications is going to be very good for Verizon. The deals allow Verizon to ignore areas they don't want to upgrade, offload a huge chunk of debt, while providing significant tax breaks. But the deals may also be good for cable companies, since the smaller carriers gobbling up these networks are usually in no position to seriously invest in next-generation upgrades. With the deal 8-12 months away, Comcast is already courting impacted customers in Verizon territory, according to Telecompetitor. A letter being sent to customers in sale markets infers it's a good time to switch, and Comcast may not be wrong. Comcast has promised DOCSIS 3.0 upgrades across their entire footprint by the end of 2010 -- while Frontier has no immediate plans for next-gen upgrades -- and in some markets has struggled to provide even 6Mbps DSL service. Given the problems Fairpoint is having integrating Verizon networks in Maine, New Hampshire and Vermont, the Frontier customers impacted in this latest deal are probably already very nervous. The deal immediately infuses Frontier, which has 2.3 million customers, with 4.8 million new residential and small-business phone lines and 1 million broadband connections. That kind of sudden growth means support issues, something that in the case of Fairpoint, Time Warner Cable took easy advantage of with ads highlighting Fairpoint's dysfunction.
|
 baineschile2600 ways to livePremium join:2008-05-10 Sterling Heights, MI | Isnt it? This is the industry standard.... to create negative perception of competition | |
|  |  MikePremium,Mod join:2000-09-17 Pittsburgh, PA | Re: Isnt it? It's like that everywhere...
People would rather say that guy sucks than I'm good | |
|  |  |  | | Re: Isnt it? well this also should enlighten some of the potential legislatures and pucs that will approve or deny the deal with frontier. Comcast is just informing the uninformed.....the folks here at BBR already knew this. -- BF69~~~Please stop suffocating gerbils! | |
|
 MannusPremium join:2005-10-25 Fort Wayne, IN | Good luck w/ that. Until Comcast removes their 250Gb cap, it is a non-issue at least for me. | |
|  |  djdanskaRudie32Premium,MVM join:2001-04-21 kudos:4 Reviews:
·Clear Wireless
·Time Warner Cable
·T-Mobile US
| Re: Good luck w/ that. said by Mannus:Until Comcast removes their 250Gb cap, it is a non-issue at least for me. Comcast's 250 gig vs. frontiers 5gb. (at least in Illinois). Comcast wins!
»www.frontier.com/5GB/ -- The day the child realizes that all adults are imperfect, he becomes an adolescent; the day he forgives them, he becomes an adult. The day he forgives himself, he becomes wise. Alden Nowlan | |
|  |  | | Well if Frontier is anything like Embarq, I'll take 30M/2M with a 100GB cap over 5M/less than 1M with no caps any day.
Not saying that I like the 100GB cap but I can live with it. | |
|  |  Reviews:
·Frontier Communi..
| If I were a Verizon FiOS customer in Oregon, Washington, or Ft. Wayne, IN. (all areas going from Verizon to Frontier within 1 year) , I would stay with FiOS. Would be a major step down, to go Comcast.
You to-be-abandoned-next year Verizon FiOS people will be in the media/PR spotlight during this Verizon-Frontier transition. Especially, the Washington State FiOS customers. (In Microsoft's backyard, right?) So, please be squeaky wheels during this! | |
|  |  |  djdanskaRudie32Premium,MVM join:2001-04-21 kudos:4 Reviews:
·Clear Wireless
·Time Warner Cable
·T-Mobile US
| Re: Good luck w/ that. said by Bob61571:If I were a Verizon FiOS customer in Oregon, Washington, or Ft. Wayne, IN. (all areas going from Verizon to Frontier within 1 year) , I would stay with FiOS. Would be a major step down, to go Comcast. You to-be-abandoned-next year Verizon FiOS people will be in the media/PR spotlight during this Verizon-Frontier transition. Especially, the Washington State FiOS customers. (In Microsoft's backyard, right?) So, please be squeaky wheels during this! Then i hope frontier gets rid of their 5gb cap they currently have on their hsi product! 5gb with fios is horrible! -- The day the child realizes that all adults are imperfect, he becomes an adolescent; the day he forgives them, he becomes an adult. The day he forgives himself, he becomes wise. Alden Nowlan | |
|  |  |  |  | | Re: Good luck w/ that. agreed, I predict that Frontier will modify that cap upward, especially for these FiOS customers. | |
|  |  |  |  |  darciliciousCyber LibrarianPremium join:2001-01-02 Forest Grove, OR kudos:1 Reviews:
·Frontier FiOS
| Re: Good luck w/ that. said by Bob61571:agreed, I predict that Frontier will modify that cap upward, especially for these FiOS customers. Good lord, I can do 5GB in a day without trying -- and I have no IDEA what my husband is up to on his computer!  | |
|
 funchordsHelloPremium,MVM join:2001-03-11 Yarmouth Port, MA kudos:5 | But VZ also sold areas they upgraded to FIOS... ... like Washington and Oregon. I don't understand why.
BTW, my friends back in Oregon did get that letter from Comcast reminding them that Comcast stands ready to be their telecom provider. Given that Fairpoint was becoming the alternative, I really couldn't fault Comcast for pointing themselves out. -- Robb Topolski -= funchords.com =- District of Columbia -- KJ7RL | |
|  |  jmn1207Premium join:2000-07-19 Ashburn, VA 1 edit | Re: But VZ also sold areas they upgraded to FIOS... Perhaps these areas that had FiOS were not completely upgraded? If resources were necessary to support two plants, and the cost to fully upgrade was too high when compared to the expected returns, I can see why Verizon "flipped" and sold these regions. | |
|  |  |  | | Re: But VZ also sold areas they upgraded to FIOS... Just like Comcast, they are a bunch of scavengers picking on the bones of a carcass, in this case the area Verizon so. | |
|
 |  | | said by funchords:... like Washington and Oregon. I don't understand why. BTW, my friends back in Oregon did get that letter from Comcast reminding them that Comcast stands ready to be their telecom provider. Given that Fairpoint was becoming the alternative, I really couldn't fault Comcast for pointing themselves out. Not Fairpoint, Frontier...two completely separate companies. | |
|  |  |  funchordsHelloPremium,MVM join:2001-03-11 Yarmouth Port, MA kudos:5 | Re: But VZ also sold areas they upgraded to FIOS... said by rifleman69:Not Fairpoint, Frontier...two completely separate companies. Thanks, I keep doing that! -- Robb Topolski -= funchords.com =- District of Columbia -- KJ7RL | |
|
 |  patcat88 join:2002-04-05 Jamaica, NY kudos:1 | said by funchords:... like Washington and Oregon. I don't understand why. BTW, my friends back in Oregon did get that letter from Comcast reminding them that Comcast stands ready to be their telecom provider. Given that Fairpoint was becoming the alternative, I really couldn't fault Comcast for pointing themselves out. The areas themselves were profitable, except Verizon can only spin off states, not parts of a state. Verizon wasn't initially planning to spin those states off, it just thought of making a very bad profit state into a bad profit state, there was no way it would become a good profit state, so it had to go. | |
|  |  JPLPremium join:2007-04-04 Downingtown, PA kudos:1 | said by funchords:... like Washington and Oregon. I don't understand why. Because the return on investment didn't live up to expectations in those areas. For example, in the combined footprint of WA, OR, and IN, Verizon has a grand total of just 69,000 TV customers. That's a tiny number for such a large area. | |
|
 glinc join:2009-04-07 New York, NY | Verizon! that's why verizon should only invest in 1Gbps symmetrical connection in NYC!!!! this is where the money is Big Red!!!! | |
|  |  | | Re: Verizon! said by glinc:that's why verizon should only invest in 1Gbps symmetrical connection in NYC!!!! this is where the money is Big Red!!!! You can get 1Gbps symmetrical in NYC if you are willing to pay for it.
Why don't you not be greedy and let the rest of the country get something for a change. | |
|
 Reviews:
·Frontier Communi..
| In Comcast and Verizon territory I am in Comcast and Verizon hardwire phone/DSL territory. I have NOT received such a letter from Comcast, but will watch for it and report back. Comcast not good here with marketing or PR, so I don't expect the letter til Xmas.
Comcast took over Central/Northern Illinois and Central/Northern Indiana from Insight back in January 2008. This was the former 50/50 Comcast/Insight partnership. Typical comment from many consumers is that they wish Insight was still here.
Comcast still struggling here with their service issues, billing issues, dumping of analog channels(without the DTAs other parts of US have transitioned to), low # of HD offerings, old DVRs, and compression issues. Not to mention the bad PR they have received from Rockford to Peoria to Bloomington-Normal to Springfield to Champaign-Urbana. Oh yes, AT&T U-Verse starting to rollout in the Springfield-Decatur-CU-Danville areas this summer. Comcast has their hands full here. | |
|  |  | | Re: In Comcast and Verizon territory said by Bob61571:I am in Comcast and Verizon hardwire phone/DSL territory. I have NOT received such a letter from Comcast, but will watch for it and report back. Comcast not good here with marketing or PR, so I don't expect the letter til Xmas. I am in FIOS/Comcast territory. I receive a post card or letter from Comcast almost daily, sometimes 2 in one day. I am not kidding! Consider yourself lucky. | |
|
 Reviews:
·Verizon Online DSL
| No FIOS, darnit. Well, there goes my area's chance of getting upgraded to FIOS anytime soon. Verizon actually sold off what they consider a "rural" area in southeastern WA, which could be considered a small metro area with over 150,000 people! I guess they had too much competition with Charter (hey, they are bankrupt, but at least they have decent service here!) | |
|  xdeadhead220, 221, Whatever It Takes.Premium join:2000-11-08 Mechanicsburg, PA Reviews:
·Verizon FiOS
·Comcast
| wat? you do understand that vz doesnt give a tinkers damn about those customers? quite obviously if they did, they would still be trying to serve them. inefficiently, but still at least trying. why they wouldnt just sell the whole damn thing to comcast is anyones guess. they basically did that any ways. the end result is a shit ton of new customers for comcast. makes perfect sense to go after them. i would. | |
|  |  | | Re: wat? Yeah but then Comcast would have to invest the money into maintaining and upgrading the rural phone lines, which is why Verizon offloaded it in the first place. Comcast doesn't want to get stuck with that sort of "slow growth" either. They want the big bucks you can get from fiber. The only companies that will touch the rural areas are usually rural DSL companies like Fairpoint and Frontier and Centurytel, because they are already invested in the slow growth market and don't have any stake in cable or fiber (though they do have some FTTP).
That's just my take on it, anyway. | |
|
 |  | | stop talking and Lets get the race started Whoever rolls out first in my area and provide me something better then hughesnet. Sign me up!
I rather have the 250GB then 2GB a night, 375MB during the day. | |
|  bicker join:2007-05-10 Burlington, MA 2 edits | The importance of being a valuable customer The deals allow Verizon to ignore areas they don't want to upgrade, offload a huge chunk of debt, while providing significant tax breaks. In this environment, consumers are well-advised to keep in mind what it takes to run a successful business, and sometimes situations like this really help clear away the cobwebs spun by misconceptions of entitlement. Here we see the successful business (Verizon) in action, identifying a market where the best they could hope for is marginal profit above cost -- where provision of service is either too costly or consumers to miserly to foster the kind of returns that investors expect. The strategic decision? Stop operating in the states where the marginal markets are.
It is very unfortunate for the consumers who are consequently left with fewer and lesser options. However, this is one of the choices people are implicitly making when the choose to situate themselves in a specific location, stay there, and/or ascribe themselves into a specific market segment.
This is not something that consumers do consciously, of course, but it is critical for consumers to realize that product and service providers are not responsible for the fact that any specific consumers have placed or left themselves in a situation where they are not especially profitable to market to. The consumers are responsible for the ramifications of their own decisions, even implicit ones.
What can consumers do (short of moving)? There are only two choices: More socialism (either in terms of actual political changes, or higher taxes, with the additional tax revenues used to provide specific and recurrent incentives to suppliers to overlook the marginal aspect of the market segment), or increasing the value to suppliers from supplying that area or market segment (i.e., driving those who live in the communities they live in to a general willingness to pay substantially higher premiums for products and services). Many consumers will bristle at the idea that they need to make themselves more valuable to product and service providers, but those who deny or ignore the realities of the marketplace are condemning themselves to continual bitterness and disappointment. | |
|
 | |
|
|