Search:  

 
 
   News
newer
story category Comcast Unfazed By Traffic Shaping Media Heat
Continues forged packet practice, BitTorrent creator impressed...
(old news - 12:30PM Friday Jan 25 2008)
tags: Fileswapping · business · bandwidth · cable · networking · net-neutrality · Comcast
San Francisco Weekly finds that Comcast continues to throttle upstream p2p traffic using forged TCP packets. Of course that shouldn't be too surprising, given that Comcast's practices probably don't infringe upon the FCC's intentionally wimpy guidelines covering network neutrality versus "reasonable" network management. Most probably, the only thing Comcast can get in trouble for is for not being honest about the practice with consumers. At most, that means an easily-swallowed fine and some additional fine print in your contract.

Click for full size
Like the AP and our users before them, SFWeekly uses Wireshark to sample the traffic as it makes its way across the Comcast network from San Fran to Melbourne. They also talk briefly with BitTorrent creator (and Comcast customer) Bram Cohen. Cohen says he's creating a "more bandwidth-conscious" version of the now closed-source BitTorrent client this year, and shares his thoughts on the practice:
"My whole idea was, 'Let's use up a lot of bandwidth,'" he laughs. "I had a friend who said, 'Well, ISPs won't like that.' And I said, 'Why should I care?'". . . "Whoever came up with [forging RST TCP packets], I have to hand it to him," Cohen says. "It's well thought out."
The process used to test for packet forgery, for those interested in testing it with your own ISP, was outlined recently in a tutorial (you'll want a modicum of networking knowledge) created by the EFF. Using it, we discovered that Cox was using a similar technique to thwart eDonkey transfers. The major difference between Cox (now a private company) and Comcast is that Cox is being forthcoming about the practice.

Related:
  1. Comcast Gets Investigated While Cox Gets Free Pass
  2. Comcast Begins Testing 'Protocol Agnostic' Network Management
  3. Comcast, Cox, Trot Out Their Worst 'Bandwidth Hogs'
  4. Beating Comcast's Sandvine On Linux With Iptables
  5. Virgin Takes Aim At BitTorrent
  6. Verizon Laughs Off DOCSIS 3.0
  7. Cable Cooking Up New Network Management System
  8. Comcast Still Fighting FCC Throttling Sanction
Forums » Comcast Unfazed By Traffic Shaping Media Heat
view: topics flat text 
Post a:
patcat88

join:2002-04-05
Jamaica, NY

nothing will change

They aren't stupid to suddenly get rid of it, and have all their users calling in that they are getting dialup speeds. Nothing will change until ATT/Verizon do a smear campaign about it. Internet is unregulated, so is Comcast. If you want a real internet connection, rent a lamba/fiber to Equinix.

yepyep more

@charter.com

Re: nothing will change

you can add cincinatti's Fuse.net to the list of DSL ISP's that use forged packets.

dr3yec

join:2002-12-19
00000
·CableOne

Just stupid!

Well they can look foward to losing customers. I dont even use p2p much anymore. But any company blocking any traffic, doesnt deserve my business. I am gone from comcast in 28 days. For this reason and there price hikes. To me the 2 great evils in this country are Comcrap and At&t. Just cant see myself giving any of my hard earned money to these companies anymore.

ninjatutle
Premium

join:2006-01-02
San Ramon, CA

Don't see a problem here.....

less speed slowdowns due to the pirate crowd.

Camelot One
Premium,MVM
join:2001-11-21
Sarasota, FL
clubs:

Re: Don't see a problem here.....

said by ninjatutle See Profile :

less speed slowdowns due to the pirate crowd.
If they didn't constantly oversell their available bandwidth, there wouldn't be an issue to begin with.
--
Intel Quad Core QX6700 @3500Mhz/Asus P5N32-E SLI/4x 1024Mb Corsair/Seagate 750.10/PNY 7800GTs SLI/Silverstone 850W/Custom water cooler
openbox9

join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA
·AT&T Southeast

Re: Don't see a problem here.....

And if they didn't constantly oversell their available bandwidth, customers wouldn't be seeing 10 Mbps connection for $49/mth. The problem is, the old model of scaling and planning for network usage doesn't play well with a few abusers and some of the new applications/protocols being used. Additionally, it's not necessarily about bandwidth usage, it's also about the number of connections that BT brings to the network. It truly is a hog of a protocol in every respect. Cohen even cockily admits that he designed it to be so. It's a broken design that's become too popular to passively ignore any longer.

digitalfreak

join:2005-12-09
49533

Re: Don't see a problem here.....

You again?
openbox9

join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA

Re: Don't see a problem here.....

Right back at ya...

james

join:2001-02-26
antarctica
I don't agree with openbox9's opinion but what exactly is the point of your post? Oh no! He's giving his opinion! How dare he? Amirite? I mean, he's only been a member of this site for two years more than you.

TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast

said by openbox9 See Profile :

And if they didn't constantly oversell their available bandwidth, customers wouldn't be seeing 10 Mbps connection for $49/mth. The problem is, the old model of scaling and planning for network usage doesn't play well with a few abusers and some of the new applications/protocols being used. Additionally, it's not necessarily about bandwidth usage, it's also about the number of connections that BT brings to the network. It truly is a hog of a protocol in every respect. Cohen even cockily admits that he designed it to be so. It's a broken design that's become too popular to passively ignore any longer.
Right on every count. Bittorrent is cost shifting and nothing more.
--
Internet News
My BLOG
My Web Page
patcat88

join:2002-04-05
Jamaica, NY

Re: Don't see a problem here.....

Yep, you pay with your bandwidth, guess why companies love to distribute things through it.

Karl Bode
News Guy
join:2000-03-02

Re: Don't see a problem here.....

Weird huh? Companies who provide bandwidth finding out that people will fill that bandwidth? Outrageous.

KrK
Heavy Artillery For The Little Guy
Premium
join:2000-01-17
Tulsa, OK

Re: Don't see a problem here.....

Isn't it amazing how they promise you everything but then get pissed if you actually try to take them up on it.

So, they sell you on a fast connection. Then cap you/block you/reset you/filter you if you actually want to use it.

phattieg

join:2001-04-29
Winter Park, FL
·Verizon Wireless B..
·Sprint Mobile Broa..

said by Karl Bode See Profile :

Weird huh? Companies who provide bandwidth finding out that people will fill that bandwidth? Outrageous.
Whats outrageous is the fact that said company is only protecting the network from VERY FEW people who are using the protocol enough to cause the problem in the first place. I can tell you I don't have problems with BitTorrent, but I'm using Azereus (misspelled)... I download lots of stuff, and I don't have any issues with completing the download... I think the issue is coming from the folks who host the file, and have 150 people hit them at the same time for the file, then the UBR rejects it by sending an RST packet. That makes sense, because BitTorrent is not bandwidth friendly, so on a 384k upstream, that would suck the life out of your connection.
--
SIPPhone/Gizmo # 17476200648 / PIMPNET Chatline / Ran by Asterisk & Slackware 10.1.

Camelot One
Premium,MVM
join:2001-11-21
Sarasota, FL
clubs:

Re: Don't see a problem here.....

No one has issues with downloading. Its the upload they are blocking. And while people like yourself think that is fine, since you can still download, I'll remind you that without people uploading, no one can download.
--
Intel Quad Core QX6700 @3500Mhz/Asus P5N32-E SLI/4x 1024Mb Corsair/Seagate 750.10/PNY 7800GTs SLI/Silverstone 850W/Custom water cooler
lordofwhee

join:2007-10-21
Everett, WA

Simple solution: spend the bloody money to upgrade crappy gear. I'd be willing to bet people would be willing to pay more for faster speeds (gasp!), especially if that service didn't drop out every month or so for three days.

Oh, and it's $55 here.
openbox9

join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA
·AT&T Southeast

Re: Don't see a problem here.....

said by lordofwhee See Profile :

Simple solution: spend the bloody money to upgrade crappy gear.
ISPs are spending money to upgrade the infrastructure. Listen to conference calls and look at the balance sheets for the public companies.
said by lordofwhee See Profile :

I'd be willing to bet people would be willing to pay more for faster speeds (gasp!)
Relatively few people are willing to pay more for additional bandwidth, evidenced by the popularity of telecoms' low cost offerings of 768 kbps tiers and cablecos "retention" priced tiers.

Matt
Take me down to the paradise city
Premium
join:2003-07-20
Jamestown, NC
·North State Commun..

Re: Don't see a problem here.....

said by openbox9 See Profile :

said by lordofwhee See Profile :

Simple solution: spend the bloody money to upgrade crappy gear.
ISPs are spending money to upgrade the infrastructure. Listen to conference calls and look at the balance sheets for the public companies.
said by lordofwhee See Profile :

I'd be willing to bet people would be willing to pay more for faster speeds (gasp!)
Relatively few people are willing to pay more for additional bandwidth, evidenced by the popularity of telecoms' low cost offerings of 768 kbps tiers and cablecos "retention" priced tiers.
The popularity of those tiers are for the remaining people on dial-up. They are there to get people to upgrade to broadband and nothing more.
openbox9

join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA

Re: Don't see a problem here.....

The retention offers are to obtain new customers? More like to retain customers tired of paying high fees.

Matt
Take me down to the paradise city
Premium
join:2003-07-20
Jamestown, NC
·North State Commun..

Re: Don't see a problem here.....

said by openbox9 See Profile :

The retention offers are to obtain new customers? More like to retain customers tired of paying high fees.
The lower speed tiers.
openbox9

join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA
·AT&T Southeast

Re: Don't see a problem here.....

I agree that those tiers are popular in some part for those still utilizing dial-up. However, it only furthers my point that cost does matter and a large number of people are not willing to pay more for service simply for the luxury of having more bandwidth as lordofwhee stated.

swhx7
Premium
join:2006-07-23
Elbonia
·RoadRunner Cable

Please get your facts straight before you rely on a cliche to make excuses for an abusive practice.

1. File sharing is not only "pirates", it also comprises lots of legal users.

2. Comcast is blocking certain types of transfers regardless of the traffic amount. Customers are prevented from seeding torrents to non-Comcast addresses even if they're using only a little bandwidth.

If it were only a restraint of large bandwidth use, it would be less objectionable. The problem is that it's selective blocking of connections which only approximately correlates with any interests of other users.

Matt
Take me down to the paradise city
Premium
join:2003-07-20
Jamestown, NC
·North State Commun..

said by ninjatutle See Profile :

less speed slowdowns due to the pirate crowd.
I know it seems laughable and a cop-out, but my CentOS 5 DVD went bad, so I have the CentOS 5 DVD and CentOS 5 7 CD set coming down via BT right now. There's 10GB or so in one day via BT.

I try to respect the network though and I limit my torrent client to 100 GLOBAL maximum connections. I throttle it to only about 1/8th of my upload and download during peak hours as well.

It's the script kiddies who leave uTorrent at 400 connections, or worse, 800+ and leave the upload and download to unlimited that cause the issue.

I don't think BT would be such a concern if people were a little more respectful of the network they connect to.
openbox9

join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA
·AT&T Southeast

Re: Don't see a problem here.....

said by Matt See Profile :

I don't think BT would be such a concern if people were a little more respectful of the network they connect to.
What? Obviously this is your first visit to BBR Your statement is in contradiction to what many believe in this forum. Yes, if we did a better job policing ourselves, we wouldn't have to worry as much about somebody else doing it...like almost everything else in life.

knightmb
Everybody Lies

join:2003-12-01
Franklin, TN
·AT&T DSL Service


1 edit
said by Matt See Profile :

I try to respect the network though and I limit my torrent client to 100 GLOBAL maximum connections. I throttle it to only about 1/8th of my upload and download during peak hours as well.

It's the script kiddies who leave uTorrent at 400 connections, or worse, 800+ and leave the upload and download to unlimited that cause the issue.

I don't think BT would be such a concern if people were a little more respectful of the network they connect to.
I feel terrible then for leaving mine at a maximum 22,000 connections global then, but only because my router can handle that kind of load doing a 10Mbps download, plus the tcpip.sys hack for windows to disable the 10 half-open connection restriction. But, even with all of that, some torrents hit the 10Mb limit and others barely get over 50 kbps sometimes, so it's hard to say if it's residential customers only or if it excluded business customers like myself as it appears to me anyway.

factchecker

@cox.net

said by Matt See Profile :

It's the script kiddies who leave uTorrent at 400 connections, or worse, 800+ and leave the upload and download to unlimited that cause the issue.
You have nailed it.

It would be nice if the client authors would simply write them so that you can't have such a ridiculously high connected peer count. There is, in reality, no reason that anyone needs more than 100 concurrent peer connections.

In fact, people need to learn that having too many peers can actually degrade performance.
B
Premium,MVM
join:2000-10-28

BitTorrent Grown Up and Left Dad?

Does anyone at all still use or want the original BitTorrent client or its current closed incarnation now that Bram has turned semi-evil (or rather, wants to make some money for his work)?

Hasn't BitTorrent, per se, moved on without him in just about every conceivable way?

I'm not pontificating -- I'm really asking. (It's not something I've closely followed.)

As to throttling, I suppose Bram considers the other means companies use to corrupt file sharing (fake trackers and corrupt or incomplete connections or "bait" or whatever it's called) equally clever and admirable?

I guess the guy's a genius, but he may also be a tool.

-- B
--
In a realm outside causality and function

Karl Bode
News Guy
join:2000-03-02

Host:
Road Runner
PC gaming GAMES
PC gaming Tech

Re: BitTorrent Grown Up and Left Dad?

I think you're probably right that things having moved on.

His big solution to avoid throttling (right around the time he was trying to monetize the client into the form of a store) was to make the client closed source and really push ISP level caching, which as far as I know, no ISP has invested in.
axus

join:2001-06-18
Washington, DC
He bought uTorrent, I don't think the python client is the one they push anymore.

telcolackey
The Truth? You can't handle the truth

join:2007-04-06
Death Valley, CA


1 edit

Comcast TOS

User agrees not to

# run programs, equipment, or servers from the Premises that provide network content or any other services to anyone outside of your Premises LAN (Local Area Network), also commonly referred to as public services or servers. Examples of prohibited services and servers include, but are not limited to, e-mail, Web hosting, file sharing, and proxy services and servers;

[Just a point, not making a statement on the issue]

--
"Believe only half of what you see and nothing that you hear." - Dinah Craik
MJRudzik

join:2002-01-13
Independence, MO

Re: Comcast TOS

Thank you. I've been saying that for a long time. Everyone acts like Comcast is attacking bt entirely when all they are doing is preventing upload via BT. Im sure that if there was a huge flood of traditional ftp servers on Comcast Residential then there would be a blockade on port 21. Sheesh I get tired of people whining about not getteing what they agreed they weren't entitled to. Buy Commercial service already.

See 26 replies to this post
eugenegill

join:2004-05-05
Greenville, SC
·Charter Pipeline
·VoicePulse

Comcast -> AOL

If an ISP is filtering, throttling, blocking ports, redirecting DNS or otherwise messing with packets, it violates internet protocol. The ISP is no longer offering an internet service and should be prevented from advertising it as such under truth-in-advertising laws.

Instead, I propose they call their crippled network something else, AOL comes to mind.
jester121
Premium
join:2003-08-09
Lake Zurich, IL

Re: Comcast -> AOL

What does "violates internet protocol" mean, and who says so? Should there be a protocol court? A packet sheriff? How about OSI layer marshalls?


Cabal
Premium
join:2007-01-21
Boston, MA


1 edit
said by eugenegill See Profile :

If an ISP is filtering, throttling, blocking ports, redirecting DNS or otherwise messing with packets, it violates internet protocol. The ISP is no longer offering an internet service and should be prevented from advertising it as such under truth-in-advertising laws.

Instead, I propose they call their crippled network something else, AOL comes to mind.
False. You're thinking of AT&T with their pondered content filtering. Comcast's BitTorrent actions operate well below that OSI level and have no effect on their common carrier status.
--
Interested in open source engine management for your Subaru?
patcat88

join:2002-04-05
Jamaica, NY

They don't sell "Internet", they can sell "Broadband" (only a speed issue, where it goes, I dont think is specified in law), or they can sell "DSL", or they can sell "High Speed Access" or "High Speed Online", or use custom brandnames. People won't know the difference, and legally they would be 2 different products, a "real internet" and a "AOL walled garden with limited access, except there is no original content".
bogey780

join:2004-03-19
Here

tiering...

'And I said, 'Why should I care?'"'

And that is why ISPs want tiering. Content creators or distributors do not care how much kludge they create. The ISPs have two choices, increase network ability at a cost to the people who pay for access, or to cut access.

See 31 replies to this post
b10010011
Whats a Posting tag?

join:2004-09-07
Bellingham, WA
·Comcast Formerly ..

monoply power rules

If Comcast had any REAL competition in most area they would stop.

Sorry, DSL, Cleawire, and satellite is not REAL competition.

Does anyone know of Comcast is doing this in areas where FIOS is also deployed? Anyone know if Verizion has plans for the same type of crap?

See 7 replies to this post
offspring07

join:2008-01-06
Taxis River, NB

Cancel Comcast

Everyone who has Comcast should cancel if they have an alternative ISP to switch too.

See 7 replies to this post
jester121
Premium
join:2003-08-09
Lake Zurich, IL

Comcast Unfazed By Traffic Shaping Media Heat

... because no one other than BBR gives a good damn?
bluedyedvd

join:2007-04-15
Overland Park, KS

Re: Comcast Unfazed By Traffic Shaping Media Heat

Just set your BT client encryption to forced to get around comcast throttling
thebulldan

join:2005-06-13
Bridgeport, PA
·Verizon FIOS
·Comcast

Re: Comcast Unfazed By Traffic Shaping Media Heat

Thank you bluedyedvd!!! I am ULing just fine on my Comcast connect... take a look. Encryption forcing it is!

viperpa33s
Why Me?
Premium
join:2002-12-20
Bradenton, FL
·Bright House

Comcast has no worries, every1 will be the same

Comcast has no worries because they have accomplished what they planned to do all along. The customers that Comcast want to get rid of switch to another provider. Then that provider will have to deal with it and then end up doing the same thing that Comcast has done. In the end the everyone is the same. The customers who can't switch, they are just out of luck.
kd6cae
P2p Shouldn't Be A Crime

join:2001-08-27
Lancaster, CA
·RoadRunner Cable
·DSL EXTREME

Comcast's goal is what exactly?

what exactly is Comcast trying to acomplish by doing a blanket blocking of torrent seeding in the sneaky way they do, and not openly admitting to doing it?
They don't exactly provide the highest speeds I know of, heck 384kbps upstream is quite common for a comcast user. I have mixed thoughts on the BT protocol itself, after having used it for severl years. I personally prefer to download via a server if possible, just because I'll get constant speeds from the beginning of the download, whereas BT always starts slow and may or may not increase speed over time. However with popular files, web servers will be overwhelmed with traffic whereas torrents you'll be able to do the download.
Back to my point though, if Comcast is so in to this whole messing with the connection so we can manage our network thing, then why are users with FTP servers still able to go at full speed without issue? Just what does it matter whether it's bt uploading at full speed or an FTP server or someone uploading their gigs of backups to an off site online backup site, like I do? Comcast should just let the traffic pass already, who cares what the hell it is!

N O Y B
St. John 3.16

join:2005-12-15
Forest Grove, OR

Speaking of Neutrality, Where is Yours Karl?

It is obvious by the unsubstantiated charges you make, like “intentionally wimpy” and your incessant harping on and trying to make an issue of something that is covered in the Comcast HSI residential terms of service and acceptable use policy.

All your incessant harping does is show your true bias. Which makes for poor reporting.
How about covering the terms of service and AUP the users have agreed to abide by but then seem to ignore.

--
Be a Good Netizen - Read, Know & Honor Your ISP Terms of Service
Comcast: »www.comcast.net/terms/index.jsp
Verizon: »onlinehelp.verizon.net/consumer/···0707.pdf

factchecker

@cox.net

Re: Speaking of Neutrality, Where is Yours Karl?

The ToS doesn't ban the use of Bittorrent...

N O Y B
St. John 3.16

join:2005-12-15
Forest Grove, OR

1 edit

Re: Speaking of Neutrality, Where is Yours Karl?


Though Bittorrent is not explicitly cited, Comcast ToS/AUP bans the type of use that is required for Bittorrent.


factchecker

@bellsouth.net

Re: Speaking of Neutrality, Where is Yours Karl?

said by N O Y B See Profile :

Though Bittorrent is not explicitly cited, Comcast ToS/AUP bans the type of use that is required for Bittorrent.
Then, for the sake of clarity and transparency to their customers, Comcast might want to clarify that.

In reality, Bittorrent differs a great deal from other servers in that it is not completely unattended. Comcast should clarify that it considers the Bittorrent application a server and then enforce that.

If they want to prohibit Bittorrent or limit bandwidth usage, make an explicit statement to that affect - ie. no BT usage or post a clear usage limit.
jsouth
Jsouth

join:2000-12-12
Wichita, KS

All Karl does is put up interesting stories from the news that have been submitted to him. Apparently you have missed the stories on AT&T and the other Telcos, Otherwise you wouldn't be complaining about neutrality.
--
Bush bashing is old. How about more solutions instead?
MiloMindbend

join:2001-01-18
Jeannette, PA

Not really that novel

"Whoever came up with [forging RST TCP packets], I have to hand it to him," Cohen says. "It's well thought out."
I wouldn't give them too much credit, there, Bram. After all, tcpkill (part of »monkey.org/~dugsong/dsniff/) is _how_ old now? And that's just the earliest example of that approach that I'm aware of...

factchecker

@cox.net

Comcast should face the same penalties as other abusers...

Just try and forge IP packets and watch what happens when you get caught...

The idea that Comcast can get away with something that is objectively harmful to the network is disgusting.

There is no viable or ethical defense for forging IP packets, just as there is no viable or ethical defense for forging documents and signatures.

N O Y B
St. John 3.16

join:2005-12-15
Forest Grove, OR

Re: Comcast should face the same penalties as other abusers...


When a customer violates the ToS/AUP the ISP is no longer under obligation to provide any particular level of service.


factchecker

@cox.net

Re: Comcast should face the same penalties as other abusers...

said by N O Y B See Profile :

When a customer violates the ToS/AUP the ISP is no longer under obligation to provide any particular level of service.
While I agree with that point, I have two problems with it.

1. If the ToS/AUP is not clear to the user about what exactly constitutes abuse, how does the user know what they can and can not do. If an ISP classifies BT as a server, spell it out explicitly, especially since BT does fit under the server column based on the classic definition of a server (or service).

2. While you are correct that the level of service is contingent upon following the rules, the method of enforcing those rules (a) should not violate the rules that govern the users (mounting MITM attacks, forging IP packets, etc) because (b) such methods should not interfere with other permitted traffic (VPNs, etc.). The problem with the Sandvine solution is that it can and does mis-classify traffic. There are much better and far more ethical solutions to forging IP packets.

ftthfreak

@charter.com

I support throttle-ing

I own a small cable system with Hi-Speed Cable Modem Service....I have no problem shutting customers OFF that use p2p sharing sites. It is easy to spot them as their bandwidth usage chart head north and stays on constent upload for hour if not days at a time......When I see these charts in consant upload I throttle thier modem to 128/128 making them call in. Then I tell them to knock it off.
Its my network, my money built it and I'll manage how I want. Comcast/Time Warner/Verizon have the same right.

fuziwuzi
Not born yesterday
Premium
join:2005-07-01
Atlanta, GA

get what you pay for?

So Comcast sells a service they advertise as having certain capabilities (6Mbps/384Kbps, always on, etc.). But, if you actually USE that service they will penalize you or cap you or even disconnect you.

So, you complain that you're not getting the service you thought you were paying for, only to be told that buried somewhere in the legalese agreement to have the service is the clauses that let them do whatever they choose and you have no rights to actually get the service they advertise or pay for, and their shills in any online forums will quickly denounce you as a whiner or worse because they have no life and can't understand why anyone would want to actually use the service and all those Mbps for anything other than to send grandma an email.

So, how wonderful that they provide all this speed, and make grandiose announcements about future speed enhancements. But how much speed do you actually need when you're limited to sending/receiving text emails from grandma lest you run the risk of having your account capped or cancelled for "abuse"?

zachary1
you talkin' to me?

join:2004-03-07
right here

this is crap

I'm not impressed. Bram Cohen is a sellout to big media and DRM.

frnortner



UTorrent, Traffic Shaping, Comcast and FiOS

I am on a FiOS (Verizon) connection 15/2 MB.
I use uTorrent all the time, with no problems
It is throttled during the day so the rest of the house can use the connection, wide open at night. HOWEVER - I found that leaving the number of connections at the default level caused my ActionTek router (supplied by Verizon) to choke.
Since reducing the Global number of connections to 100, I still upload at the maximum speed available, and during the day when the upload speed is throttled by the scheduler, the rest of the house has fast Internet access.

Time Warner (nee Comcast) is the other provider in the area, and I have not heard any reports the T/W is interfering with Torrent transfers. They have enough problems dealing with the hordes of subscribers abandoning them for FiOS.
Forums » Comcast Unfazed By Traffic Shaping Media Heat


Monday, 30-Nov 14:29:14 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole