Cox Wireless Service To Launch In March Hampton Roads, Omaha and Orange County In 2008's 700 MHz Advanced Wireless Services (AWS) spectrum auction, Cox Communications won 14 Block A and 8 Block B licenses for bids totaling $304 million. Through a joint venture with Sprint and several other cable companies, Cox also spent $2.37 billion to buy 137 AWS licenses. If those acquisitions didn't make it obvious, Cox is planning to become a wireless voice/broadband carrier. Unlike Comcast and Time Warner Cable however, Cox wants to do more than just resell existing service -- they want to build a wireless network. That build is well underway, but so far Cox has been quiet about specific details for the service. In December the company did announce that the service would first go live in 2010 Hampton Roads, Virginia; Omaha, Nebraska, and Orange County, California. This week they've announced that the first of those markets will go live in March. "In our initial markets, we are leveraging Sprint's 3G CDMA network and assets to get to market quicker, while managing every aspect of the service ourselves," Cox tells Broadband Reports. "In parallel, we are building our own wireless network with 3G CDMA for additional market launches that we'll announce in the future," says the cable company. Cox also tells us that they're currently testing LTE technology, for a migration to the faster service sometime down the road. There's still no word on pricing, but Cox has launched a new website that laments the "unfairness" of current wireless industry overages and pricing. The website offers users a free On Demand movie to customers who sign up for more information, and promises users the service will come with "unbelievably fair wireless plans." We'll see how well that promise holds up in just a few months.
|
 Romney2012Defeat Obama 2012-Chg we can believe inPremium join:2002-03-03 USA kudos:4 | Some more competition coming to cellphone market
While there is already competition in the wireless market, Cox & other cable companies getting in to the business should create even more competition. And the use of new wireless spectrum should help ease the crunch being caused by more and more smartphone data users. | |
|  |  KrKHeavy Artillery For The Little GuyPremium join:2000-01-17 Tulsa, OK | Re: Some more competition coming to cellphone market I agree.... More competition in this sector is good. ANY competition in the Telecom sector is good. | |
|
 Z80APremium join:2009-11-23 1 edit | I'd rather they deploy D3 quicker in OC.
Meanwhile Cox Wireless would be "unfair" sooner rather than later. | |
|  KSUJaceGolden Flash join:2001-12-01 Chicago, IL | Seriously CDMA?? why would you deploy CDMA in 2010? waste of time & money, should go straight to LTE | |
|  |  | | Re: Seriously CDMA?? they are going lte, they are using existing cdma network via sprint while they build out their own lte network. just so they can get a service up and ready asap | |
|  |  |  | | Re: Seriously CDMA?? They are building their own towers though right now here in RI even though the service here won't get a March rollout.
Cox only has 1700 here, no 700. LTE on 1700/AWS wavelength? | |
|  |  |  |  tiger72SexaT duorPPremium join:2001-03-28 Saint Louis, MO kudos:1 | Re: Seriously CDMA?? Yes. There are a number of AWS auction spectrum winners who intend to use AWS for LTE. Cox, ATT, etc. | |
|
 |  iansltx join:2007-02-19 Golden, CO kudos:2 Reviews:
·Verizon Online DSL
·Comcast
| Easy: no AWS LTE handsets are out right now, and TONS of AWS CDMA EvDO handsets are out now. Same thing with modems. Also, I'm pretty sure CDMA equipment is dirt cheap these days compared with LTE gear.
Would I like an LTE network instead of CDMA? Sure, but I totally understand where Cox is coming from on this one. Once devices out there can handle it, they'll switch to LTE. | |
|  |  |  | | Re: Seriously CDMA?? I believe their using next generation IP RAN hardware/software where the protocol is controlled using software instead of hardware. This makes it a very easy and fast migration to LTE when ready and can deploy CDMA EvDO now. Also with next generation IP-RAN/cellular base station technology they can use 100% complete IP transport from the cell site to decrease transport costs and increase efficiency. From what I read it's Huawei's gear their using in AWS spectrum. | |
|
 | | verizon why did they not go with Verizon. They have a better network than sprint. | |
|  |  needforspeed59Cruise Ship Just Passing Through join:2001-05-02 Glendale, AZ | Re: verizon said by jchambers28:why did they not go with Verizon. They have a better network than sprint. My guess: Cox and Verizon are fierce competitors for TV, Internet and landline phones in several markets. There's nothing like that with Sprint. -- Great success! High five! | |
|  |  |  | | Re: verizon just because of that I have to deal with shitty coverage with cox if i get their service. If that's the case I will stick with straight talk for 50 a month. | |
|
 | | ..... Sprint's secondary roaming network is Verizon, no need to go with them, if u get 1 bar in sprint territory u ride out on VW's network...
...you ever wonder why you don't see them going at each other in tv commercials ?? ...sprints alot cheaper as well, and not to mention they aren't stealing home users away with fios lol | |
|  |  3 edits | Re: ..... I would like to also follow up on that dont forget that Virgin Mobile/Boost Mobile does use sprint/vzw as a back up.
just like how net-10,tracfone,t-mobile, uses ATT network for back up. | |
|  |  |  | | Re: ..... Cricket runs on CDMA. No way that they use AT&T as a backup for roaming or otherwise. | |
|  |  |  | | Virgin Mobile is the Sprint Network (MVNO). As for roaming on Verizon, i have yet to hand off to Verizon when I lose my Sprint signal. I love the Sprint service here in the Boston area, and you cant beat their price (for the unlimited plan with the extras). However, I would love to know why I have yet to roam even when losing my signal. | |
|
 tim_kButtons, Bows, Beamer, Shadow, KaseyPremium,VIP join:2002-02-02 Stewartstown, PA kudos:13 | what's in it for me? I bet this new service will overlap the same urban areas that have lots of other choices. Just once I'd like to see a new service be deployed that served the rural areas with few if any internet choices. | |
|  |  | | Re: what's in it for me? said by tim_k:I bet this new service will overlap the same urban areas that have lots of other choices. Just once I'd like to see a new service be deployed that served the rural areas with few if any internet choices. it's wireless phone not just internet. | |
|
 | | counting down...... OK, it's now March 14 2010, still waiting......no peep out of Cox here in Hampton Roads Virginia about their wireless plan, yet...... | |
|  |  | | Re: counting down...... Now March 20th and I am still awaiting information. Any information. Trying to hold off on a new phone, that I really need, to see if Cox is going to offer a much better discount. I doubt it, but I would hate to get my phone through Sprint and sign up for a two year contract when Cox will (may) have a better deal. | |
|
 | |
|
|