dslreports logo
 story category
DOJ Moves to Block AT&T Merger
But Says 'Door Is Still Open' to Deal Changes

In what might be the most shocking news in many years given AT&T's potent political influence, the Department of Justice has moved to block AT&T's planned acquisition of T-Mobile. The DOJ has filed papers in federal court in Washington to block AT&T’s $39 billion deal, insisting it would harm both consumers and the market. "AT&T’s elimination of T-Mobile as an independent, low- priced rival would remove a significant competitive force from the market," the DOJ said in its filing. The DOJ also announced this afternoon that blocking the deal would protect the elimination of a significant number of jobs.

Click for full size
Indicating that AT&T was well aware the government wasn't buying their justifications for the deal, the company made new promises this week to bring 5,000 jobs back from overseas call centers, despite the fact the deal could eliminate up to 20,000 jobs.

The company also recently shot itself in the foot by posting documents destroying their argument that they need T-Mobile to build LTE service out to 97% of the population. That was a major problem, given the hard proof that AT&T could complete their LTE build for far less ($3.8 billion) than the cost of this deal meant the deal didn't meet the DOJ's standard for merger-specific benefits.

Again, given AT&T's political power (they've contributed more to political campaigns than any company since 1989), the government blocking this move is a significant shock. However, AT&T's claimed deal benefits were so hallucinatory in nature, the DOJ had little choice but to acknowledge the competitive problems created by giving AT&T and Verizon 80% marketplace domination. The fact that the deal was rejected by a merger-loving government bathed in AT&T political cash indicates just how bad of a deal it really is.

As we noted back in May, AT&T owes T-Mobile owner Deutsche Telekom $3 billion in cash, plus another $4 billion in spectrum assets and network sharing obligations if the deal falls through. To be clear, it's possible and perhaps even likely that this deal does still happen, but AT&T is going to have to make some fairly major concessions -- or at least put on a high-quality dog and pony show that gives the illusion of major concessions.

Update: The FCC is sending this statement to the press:

quote:
By filing suit today, the Department of Justice has concluded that AT&T’s acquisition of T-Mobile would substantially lessen competition in violation of the antitrust laws. Competition is an essential component of the FCC’s statutory public interest analysis, and although our process is not complete, the record before this agency also raises serious concerns about the impact of the proposed transaction on competition. Vibrant competition in wireless services is vital to innovation, investment, economic growth and job creation, and to drive our global leadership in mobile. Competition fosters consumer benefits, including more choices, better service and lower prices.
Update 2: In a story at the Wall Street Journal, the paper quotes Deputy Attorney General James Cole as saying the "'door is still open' to AT&T to propose remedies in the deal."

Update 3: AT&T's sticking to their guns in a statement, and continues to insist the deal is great for consumers and the market alike. Despite the fact that was just caught lying about needing T-Mobile to reach 97% LTE coverage, AT&T's policy folk apparently thought it was a good idea to stick to the lie:

quote:
We are surprised and disappointed by today’s action, particularly since we have met repeatedly with the Department of Justice and there was no indication from the DOJ that this action was being contemplated.

We plan to ask for an expedited hearing so the enormous benefits of this merger can be fully reviewed. The DOJ has the burden of proving alleged anti-competitive affects and we intend to vigorously contest this matter in court.

At the end of the day, we believe facts will guide any final decision and the facts are clear. This merger will:

•Help solve our nation’s spectrum exhaust situation and improve wireless service for millions.

•Allow AT&T to expand 4G mobile broadband to another 55 million Americans, or 97% of the population;

•Result in billions of additional investment and tens of thousands of jobs, at a time when our nation needs them most.

We remain confident that this merger is in the best interest of consumers and our country, and the facts will prevail in court.
view:
topics flat nest 
page: 1 · 2 · 3 · next
sullim4
join:2003-05-18
Redmond, WA

sullim4

Member

And there was much rejoicing by T-Mobile's customers

FINALLY the government looks out for the consumer.
xenophon
join:2007-09-17

xenophon

Member

Re: And there was much rejoicing by T-Mobile's customers

Is surprising. Most everyone on this board assumed this was a done deal. I wonder if this would have gotten this far if Sprint didn't strongly oppose.
pandora
Premium Member
join:2001-06-01
Outland

pandora

Premium Member

Re: And there was much rejoicing by T-Mobile's customers

Maybe Sprint and the misfiled document caused enough embarrassment that the DOJ had to move to block the merger. Next question, how serious is the DOJ, and will they be able to block the merger?

If they are serious, could AT&T withdraw it's offer, and wait for another more tolerant administration (one they have better ownership of)?
xenophon
join:2007-09-17

xenophon

Member

Re: And there was much rejoicing by T-Mobile's customers

»news.yahoo.com/blogs/loo ··· 634.html
quote:
"Any objective antitrust lawyer expected this," Reed Hundt, a former chair of the Federal Communications Commission, said in a brief phone interview.
And Hundt, who chaired the FCC from 1993 until 1997, predicted a win for the government.
"The Department of Justice will prevail," he said. "The Justice Department in its entire history has never lost a telecom case of this sort."

Gbcue
Premium Member
join:2001-09-30
Santa Rosa, CA

Gbcue to sullim4

Premium Member

to sullim4
Now T-Mobile gets cash and spectrum!
xenophon
join:2007-09-17

1 recommendation

xenophon

Member

Re: And there was much rejoicing by T-Mobile's customers

said by Gbcue:

Now T-Mobile gets cash and spectrum!

It will be amusing if Tmob gets the $3B and spectrum and then DT dumps Tmob later to Sprint. Could happen as the Feds would much more likely allow Sprint/Tmob to merge.

ATT would have been better off to let the earlier Sprint/Tmob merger efforts to proceed. If all this goes as I just described, ATT will have essentially funded a Sprint/Tmob merger. Would be really bizarre if this whole thing transpires.

DataRiker
Premium Member
join:2002-05-19
00000

DataRiker

Premium Member

Re: And there was much rejoicing by T-Mobile's customers

I don't see how the DOJ could have done any different. I have not met one person yet who thought this would be a good deal, surely they felt this pressure.
Mordhem
Love it, Hate it.
join:2003-07-10
Baltimore, MD

Mordhem

Member

Re: And there was much rejoicing by T-Mobile's customers

Really this would be bs, they might as well let att and verizon merge and then eat the last two. This country is slowly turning in to a communist state as it sits.
MrHappy316
Wish I had my tank
Premium Member
join:2003-01-02
Columbia, SC

MrHappy316 to Gbcue

Premium Member

to Gbcue
I thought that only happened if AT&T decided they wanted to back out of the deal, not if it wasn't approved. I most certainly could be wrong

tiger72
SexaT duorP
Premium Member
join:2001-03-28
Saint Louis, MO

tiger72

Premium Member

Re: And there was much rejoicing by T-Mobile's customers

said by MrHappy316:

I thought that only happened if AT&T decided they wanted to back out of the deal, not if it wasn't approved. I most certainly could be wrong

It happens no matter what the circumstances. If the deal falls through, ATT has to pay the breakup fee.
sparc
join:2006-05-06

sparc to Gbcue

Member

to Gbcue
AT&T has until September 2012 to conclude the deal....

»www.businessweek.com/tec ··· 011.html

How much of T-mobile USA will be left after that date to even utilize that $3 billion and spectrum?

IMO, A year and a half of uncertainty for customers will totally devastate T-mobile USA.

deathstarh8t
@tmodns.net

deathstarh8t to sullim4

Anon

to sullim4
So are the t-mobile employees like meself

Oh_No
Trogglus normalus
join:2011-05-21
Chicago, IL

Oh_No to sullim4

Member

to sullim4
said by sullim4:

FINALLY the government looks out for the consumer.

We have to wonder if this is an attempt at politics.
Later they might approve the merger quietly.

We shall see if this is actually our government doing the right thing for once or just a delay.

cdru
Go Colts
MVM
join:2003-05-14
Fort Wayne, IN

cdru

MVM

Re: And there was much rejoicing by T-Mobile's customers

said by Oh_No:

We have to wonder if this is an attempt at politics.
Later they might approve the merger quietly.

How the hell do you sue to block a merger on antitrust grounds and then QUIETLY approve it later? It's not likely they are going to pass it in a secret FISA court, the companies merge, and then they go public.

WHT
join:2010-03-26
Rosston, TX

1 recommendation

WHT

Member

Re: And there was much rejoicing by T-Mobile's customers

said by cdru:

It's not likely they are going to pass it in a secret FISA court, the companies merge, and then they go public.

Don't give them ideas.

Oh_No
Trogglus normalus
join:2011-05-21
Chicago, IL

Oh_No to cdru

Member

to cdru
said by cdru:

said by Oh_No:

We have to wonder if this is an attempt at politics.
Later they might approve the merger quietly.

How the hell do you sue to block a merger on antitrust grounds and then QUIETLY approve it later? It's not likely they are going to pass it in a secret FISA court, the companies merge, and then they go public.

Easy, they do everything to stay out of the media.
Then they approve it later saying ATT changed enough in the deal.

Things like this have happen all the time in government.
There is a big outrage for an approval, but then it gets approved under the shadow of some other big news event and without news coverage no one knows about it.

battleop
join:2005-09-28
00000

battleop to sullim4

Member

to sullim4
Nope, just looking for votes.

tiger72
SexaT duorP
Premium Member
join:2001-03-28
Saint Louis, MO

tiger72

Premium Member

Re: And there was much rejoicing by T-Mobile's customers

Who is?
Last I checked, not a single person in the DoJ is elected.

battleop
join:2005-09-28
00000

battleop

Member

Re: And there was much rejoicing by T-Mobile's customers

No, the President appoints the The United States Attorney General, Deputy Attorney General, and the Associate Attorney General. Don't you think the President has a little pull with them?

SLD
Premium Member
join:2002-04-17
San Francisco, CA

SLD to sullim4

Premium Member

to sullim4
The gov't hasn't done anything until they finally approve it in closed-door sessions. There is always the circus before the final act.

Fronkman
An Apple a day keeps the doctor away
Premium Member
join:2003-06-23
Saint Louis, MO

Fronkman to sullim4

Premium Member

to sullim4
kind of...you know if this fails that $7 billion that they will owe to Deutsche Telecom is going to be paid by AT&T customers in the form of new "fees" or "government required taxes"

morbo
Complete Your Transaction
join:2002-01-22
00000

morbo

Member

Re: And there was much rejoicing by T-Mobile's customers

said by Fronkman:

kind of...you know if this fails that $7 billion that they will owe to Deutsche Telecom is going to be paid by AT&T customers in the form of new "fees" or "government required taxes"

Yet another reason to not be an AT&T customer?

elwoodblues
Elwood Blues
Premium Member
join:2006-08-30
Somewhere in

elwoodblues to Fronkman

Premium Member

to Fronkman
said by Fronkman:

kind of...you know if this fails that $7 billion that they will owe to Deutsche Telecom is going to be paid by AT&T customers in the form of new "fees" or "government required taxes"

It's the "Failed lawsuit, non governmental recovery fee"

Fronkman
An Apple a day keeps the doctor away
Premium Member
join:2003-06-23
Saint Louis, MO

Fronkman

Premium Member

Re: And there was much rejoicing by T-Mobile's customers

said by elwoodblues:

said by Fronkman:

kind of...you know if this fails that $7 billion that they will owe to Deutsche Telecom is going to be paid by AT&T customers in the form of new "fees" or "government required taxes"

It's the "Failed lawsuit, non governmental recovery fee"

ha, that is a good one. i'm surprised they haven't tried that one before.

Scatcatpdx
Fur It Up
join:2007-06-22
Portland, OR

Scatcatpdx to sullim4

Member

to sullim4
The only result I see as a T-moble cutomer is a stunted or bankrupt T-Moble.

I do not see how this helps me.
xenophon
join:2007-09-17

xenophon

Member

Re: And there was much rejoicing by T-Mobile's customers

said by Scatcatpdx:

The only result I see as a T-moble cutomer is a stunted or bankrupt T-Moble.

I do not see how this helps me.

Or is eventually merged into Sprint at ATT's expense.
etaadmin
join:2002-01-17
united state

etaadmin to Scatcatpdx

Member

to Scatcatpdx
said by Scatcatpdx:

The only result I see as a T-moble cutomer is a stunted or bankrupt T-Moble.

I do not see how this helps me.

In one hand you'll end up switching to AT&T (preferably other carrier) on the other hand you'll end up being absorbed and digested by AT&T.

So why don't you switch now? Now that you have a choice why not Verizon or Sprint?

tiger72
SexaT duorP
Premium Member
join:2001-03-28
Saint Louis, MO

tiger72 to Scatcatpdx

Premium Member

to Scatcatpdx
said by Scatcatpdx:

The only result I see as a T-moble cutomer is a stunted or bankrupt T-Moble.

I do not see how this helps me.

How does getting $3billion from ATT, plus much needed spectrum = stunted or bankrupt T-Mobile?
They're still making money.
And their network outperforms ATT.

Maybe you can elaborate?

cdru
Go Colts
MVM
join:2003-05-14
Fort Wayne, IN

cdru to Scatcatpdx

MVM

to Scatcatpdx
said by Scatcatpdx:

The only result I see as a T-moble cutomer is a stunted or bankrupt T-Moble.

I do not see how this helps me.

Presuming the merger is successfully blocked, it's done nothing to change T-mobile. They always have been the red-headed stepchild of the cellular companies that has stunted growth, and they would remain that way, albeit with $3b cash and an additional $4b in spectrum.

Subaru
1-3-2-4
Premium Member
join:2001-05-31
Greenwich, CT

Subaru to sullim4

Premium Member

to sullim4
said by sullim4:

FINALLY the government looks out for the consumer.

About frigeen time I was about to say the same.. it was so obvious I don't see how anyone could not see it was going to have anything positive going for it.

rebus9
join:2002-03-26
Tampa Bay

rebus9 to sullim4

Member

to sullim4
said by sullim4:

FINALLY the government looks out for the consumer.

They haven't officially said NO yet. AT&T still has time to spice up the deal and grease a few more palms.

cork1958
Cork
Premium Member
join:2000-02-26

cork1958 to sullim4

Premium Member

to sullim4
said by sullim4:

FINALLY the government looks out for the consumer.

Yeah, right!

It was the total stupidity of AT&T lawyers and their blatant arrogance that got this deal shot down. Otherwise, our stupid a** government would've let this go through in a minute.

Our government doesn't and hasn't looked out for the consumer in ages. They look out for #1 (meaning themselves)
rob316
join:2005-10-17
Carteret, NJ

rob316

Member

Just saw this.

Block the Death Star Nice!!
xenophon
join:2007-09-17

1 recommendation

xenophon

Member

Re: Just saw this.

I like how the WSJ puts it...

[DOJ moves to block merger based on law rather than politics...]

Wow, what a concept.

»online.wsj.com/article/S ··· news_wsj

dmxrob
Premium Member
join:2005-06-24
Saint Peters, MO
·Charter
·StarLink
·Suddenlink

dmxrob

Premium Member

Wow, they are listening

I am impressed - I was expecting this to be another rubber stamp approval. It seems like someone at the DOJ is actually paying attention out there. There is no way any rational person could believe this was going to help competition and lower prices.

Then the dirty trick AT&T pulled this morning of basically saying "if you approve this, we'll bring back some outsourced jobs to the US" (which they would have just turned around 3 months later and outsourced them to a foreign company again anyway).

Thank you DOJ!
AndyDufresne
Premium Member
join:2010-10-30
Chanhassen, MN

AndyDufresne

Premium Member

At&t must have gotten wind of what was coming

And that is why they all of sudden they had press release about bring back 5000 jobs to US. They know that "jobs" is a key word in DC right now and some congress scum will be quick to defend the proposed merger.

••••
tmc8080
join:2004-04-24
Brooklyn, NY

1 recommendation

tmc8080

Member

reaction:

»www.youtube.com/watch?v= ··· 6CopW9GQ

coldmoon
Premium Member
join:2002-02-04
Fulton, NY

coldmoon

Premium Member

Re: reaction:

quote:
...We remain confident that this merger is in the best interest of consumers and our country, and the facts will prevail in court.
I suspect that this will be true, but AT&T will have a reason to hate that song when they realize the "facts" will take them down like the Titanic. Spinning will just be a waste of time and resources that could be better applied to getting their rear-ends in gear and start competing.

Thanks for that YouTube post BTW, it made my whole day

R4M0N
Brazilian Soccer Ownz Joo
join:2000-10-04
Glen Allen, VA

R4M0N

Member

Wow

This DOJ has finally done something worthwhile.
sparc
join:2006-05-06

sparc

Member

Re: Wow

up until you read karl's second update that they are willing to cut a deal...

"Update 2: In a story at the Wall Street Journal, the paper quotes Deputy Attorney General James Cole as saying the "'door is still open' to AT&T to propose remedies in the deal."

R4M0N
Brazilian Soccer Ownz Joo
join:2000-10-04
Glen Allen, VA

R4M0N

Member

Re: Wow

said by sparc:

up until you read karl's second update that they are willing to cut a deal...

"Update 2: In a story at the Wall Street Journal, the paper quotes Deputy Attorney General James Cole as saying the "'door is still open' to AT&T to propose remedies in the deal."

Should have known...

whfsdude
Premium Member
join:2003-04-05
Washington, DC

whfsdude

Premium Member

Holder Skywalker?

In our little death star paradigm, does this make Eric Holder - Luke Skywalker?

Photoshop please?

Government++, good job DOJ!
MUHerd37
join:2011-02-22
Clinton, IN

1 recommendation

MUHerd37

Member

About time

About the only thing Obama has done that I agree with.

•••••
whiteyonenh
join:2004-08-09
Keene, NH

1 recommendation

whiteyonenh

Member

Ahahahahaha!

Sorry AT$T, better luck next time on taking over the world!
MaynardKrebs
We did it. We heaved Steve. Yipee.
Premium Member
join:2009-06-17

MaynardKrebs

Premium Member

Re: Ahahahahaha!

Hopefully AT&T's lobbyists don't get this turned around.

If the DOJ's view sticks, T-Mobile will have $3B cash from AT&T's 'break' fee to build out their network even further.
openbox9
Premium Member
join:2004-01-26
71144

openbox9

Premium Member

Re: Ahahahahaha!

Or to better pitch itself to a different investor for an acquisition.

kapil
The Kapil
join:2000-04-26
Chicago, IL

1 recommendation

kapil

Member

Really?

This was unexpected to say the least. A government agency actually doing its job and stopping one of the largest corporations on Earth from having its way?

Call me cynical, but given the rather hefty merger breakup fee AT&T agreed to, I don't see T giving up so easily. My money is on AT&T and DoJ coming to some agreement which allows the merger to proceed while the government claims victory by getting AT&T to agree to some small meaningless concession.

Then again, this is the DoJ, not the FCC....Justice doesn't get involved in these things usually unless it means business. So, to paraphrase something the POTUS himself recently said...let's hope for the best while bending over for the ass fucking that is virtually certain to arrive in the form of a bigger meaner AT&T.

•••••

Gbcue
Premium Member
join:2001-09-30
Santa Rosa, CA

Gbcue

Premium Member

YES

A victory!

Great!

••••
rob316
join:2005-10-17
Carteret, NJ

rob316

Member

DOJ

DOJ FTW
p51d007
Naa-P51d Mustang
join:2002-06-07
Springfield, MO

p51d007

Member

GOOD!

This merger would bring LESS competition in the USA, not better service. Year after year, at&t's "quality" is always rated dead last
in the USA. Until such time that at&t gets its act together, I wouldn't allow any more mergers with at&t.

dvd536
as Mr. Pink as they come
Premium Member
join:2001-04-27
Phoenix, AZ

dvd536

Premium Member

Re: GOOD!

said by p51d007:

This merger would bring LESS competition in the USA, not better service. Year after year, at&t's "quality" is always rated dead last

Only because after paying everyone off they don't have enough left to buy a jd power award.

MovieLover76
join:2009-09-11
Cherry Hill, NJ
(Software) pfSense
Asus RT-AC68
Asus RT-AC66

MovieLover76

Member

Re: GOOD!

While I'm not saying their isn't some degree of rigging to JD power I will say this, I've been on every major carrier and I'm a heavy user.
Verizion in my experience is by far the best.
Sprint was second, thanks to the roaming on Verizion to expand it's coverage area.
T-mo was third because of limited coverage, but where I had coverage it worked great
AT&T is by far the worst, I paid a huge ETF to get out because their service was so bad, constant dropped calls, slow texts, slow internet and before you ask no I wasn't using an iPhone.

I have AT&T as a work cell, so I get to compare the services every day.

The ratings still manage to reflect what my real world usage has always said. I'm currently on Verizon and I'm staying, the quality is worth the price to me.

n2jtx
join:2001-01-13
Glen Head, NY

n2jtx

Member

Woot!

I am truly surprised. In this age of "come as you are" government and AT&T paying off just about any politician and association around (read all the filings in support of merger and who they are from) and one just assumed it was a done deal. AT&T can still go to court but I think DOJ has a strong case and perhaps the FCC will fall inline too.
flashcore
join:2007-01-23
united state

flashcore

Member

Re: Woot!

I think the problem is, AT&T forgot to send a fat envelope to there person at the DOJ who is now pissed off causing this to happen.

n2jtx
join:2001-01-13
Glen Head, NY

n2jtx

Member

Re: Woot!

said by flashcore:

I think the problem is, AT&T forgot to send a fat envelope to there person at the DOJ who is now pissed off causing this to happen.

Or the check bounced because they have been making too many payoffs!

pnh102
Reptiles Are Cuddly And Pretty
Premium Member
join:2002-05-02
Mount Airy, MD

pnh102

Premium Member

Meaningless

AT&T simply needs to sweeten the deal and DoJ will back off.

This merger is a done deal. Make no mistake. This is just a parlor game.

••••••••••••••••

technologiq
EU2251
join:2000-08-08
Reno, NV

technologiq

Member

I hope this sticks

This is a wake up Call to AT&T. They have been 'tightening the noose' on customers recently and I really think they thought that this would go through without question.

I'm hoping the fact that their competition will remain will have them loosen their grip vs. punishing their customers with higher prices. However, something tells me that the latter will happen.

tonytoronto
join:2007-10-31
Toronto, ON

1 edit

tonytoronto

Member

Re: I hope this sticks

Great news! I'm not in US but this decision will affect me also, I'm with a smaller Wireless in Canada that uses same frequency as T-mobile, handsets are hard to come by already, without T-mobile we would be screwed big time. Just hope this not just a game, to show government doing something while working out back door deal.
Just read the press release from FCC, that made me happy, seems like they agree with DOJ, maybe "this" deal is dead, lets see what new deal ATT comes up with.

kapil
The Kapil
join:2000-04-26
Chicago, IL

kapil

Member

Re: I hope this sticks

It is too bad that your voice, being a Canadian, doesn't matter in this debate but your point is worth noting...this merger will have an anti-competitive effect on more than just T-Mobile customers...or Americans for that matter.

Daarken
Rara Avises
Premium Member
join:2005-01-12
Southwest LA

Daarken

Premium Member

Time to Jump Ship

Screw AT&T and their shit poor service and customer support.
I am glad this "appears to be a victory" for the little guy.

buddahbless
join:2005-03-21
Premium

1 recommendation

buddahbless

Member

OH Happy Day !

OH HAPPY DAY !

WHEN THE GOVERNMENT ACTUALLY WORKS,
TO PROTECT ITS PEOPLE,
OH HAPPY DAY!!!

»www.youtube.com/watch?v= ··· 0C6B5202


Its surprising that the deal was shot down this soon but after the damaging leak it was expected,I personal thought We would not hear any news until end of the 4th quarter and the DOJ would just let ATT dig them self a deeper hole.
I wonder how soon will it be before ATT stops running that commercial ad saying ..." Our combined network with Tmobile will be...." ATT thought they had this in the bag,
wait, wait ... its not april 1st is it? nope! just making sure...

Now what was that all those who were saying "its a done deal" ..RFLOL

As Ive said before and happily say again Im typing this tethered wirelessly with unlimited data from my G2X on Tmobile !

King P
Don't blame me. I voted for Ron Paul
Premium Member
join:2004-11-17
Murfreesboro, TN

King P

Premium Member

DOJ...

just COCKBLOCKED at&t.
67845017 (banned)
join:2000-12-17
Naperville, IL

67845017 (banned)

Member

Only a temporary block

I'd still put my money on this going through. Hopefully I'm wrong.
abadaba
join:2005-09-25
Mason City, IA

abadaba

Member

Re: Only a temporary block

You can gurantee the coffers are wide open and AT$T is on the horn with every politician in the US. They will loose more money if this deal fails...then had they just updated their network...so they will be smashing the politicians before end of day...this deal will go through no matter whom attempts to stop it.

jfgnet
12 Step Program
Premium Member
join:2001-02-14
Limbo

jfgnet to 67845017

Premium Member

to 67845017
The fact that "Sprint Nextel Files Antitrust Suit Against ATandT, Deutsche Telekom, T-Mobile" »www.eweek.com/c/a/Mobile ··· 2011STR4 might help a little
page: 1 · 2 · 3 · next