site Search:


 
   
story category
EU Effort Underway to Ban 'Harmful' Wi-Fi
...For the Children...
by Karl Bode Tuesday 24-May-2011
There's been no solid scientific evidence that Wi-Fi is a health hazard, but that hasn't stopped a parade of people from trying to stop Wi-Fi deployment, usually based on absolutely no evidence of any kind. In the U.S., teachers have sued schools to derail installs, while angel guidance consultants have launched campaigns against Wi-Fi in their free time. In Canada, some colleges have even banned Wi-Fi after equating it to "second hand smoke." Now Techdirt directs our attention to the fact that some European politicians are pushing for an EU proposal that would ban all Wi-Fi in schools. There's no hard evidence given to support the move, outside of claims of "electrosensitive" individuals that have yet to be proven and are likely psychosomatic in nature.

view: topics flat text 
Post a:

cableties
Premium
join:2005-01-27

And the bees???

Don't they have a say?


--
Splat
Wingless60

join:2009-07-30
Athens, TN

Re: And the bees???

Only the honeybees...

N3OGH
Yo Soy Col. "Bat" Guano
Premium
join:2003-11-11
Philly burbs
kudos:1
Hey man, it's for the children. What's your problem?

Duramax08
A Challenger Appears
Premium
join:2008-08-03
San Antonio, TX
Reviews:
·Millenicom
·Cricket Broadband
·Juno Express
·Clearwire Wireless

Re: And the bees???

Donut

join:2005-06-27
Romulus, MI

really??????

Ok so wifi is harmful, what about the radar that the airport by my work uses, that's radio waves, what about the cellular systems we have set up? Are people really this stupid!
--
Mr. Donut

firephoto
KDE
Premium
join:2003-03-18
Brewster, WA
Reviews:
·Frontier Communi..

Re: really??????

said by Donut:

Ok so wifi is harmful, what about the radar that the airport by my work uses, that's radio waves, what about the cellular systems we have set up? Are people really this stupid!

There's RF exposure guidelines that have to be complied with on most installations of RF equipment. This was put in effect in 1996 but the study up to it mostly dealt with heating and not long term exposure.

As far as wifi goes it is such low power you'd have to be exposed to non-compliant (high power, high gain) installations to most likely be affected by anything but there is the chance that phones or other devices with their antennas within wavelength of your body could have an effect too.

For the lack of study in this country there are a few things causing this. The FCC guidelines set the rules so there's not much point to study these things more till someone gets sick or killed (that's just how it works with rules). There's also the multi-billion dollar gang of gorillas who have candy machines full of lawyers ready to be unleashed on anything that impedes month long tropical vacations for executives.

Seriously, money rules so any study would be propaganda'd to death no matter the results. It's like the gulf war or 9/11 in NYC and all the sick people from those things, even with physical evidence of people being actually sick and dying you'll have a lawyer somewhere being paid to say they might of just ate some bad food...
--
Say no to JAMS!
en103

join:2011-05-02

Re: really??????

The EU probably still has more issues to deal with from Chernobyl than it does with WiFi.

joako
Premium
join:2000-09-07
/dev/null
kudos:5
I'm with you. If they ban WiFi in schools they need to ban police RADAR.
--
PRescott7-2097

DaveDude
No Fear

join:1999-09-01
New Jersey
kudos:1

typical of things today

First someone makes an accusation, then they have to prove that its not true. Sure we are a modern society- sarc.
DufiefData

join:2006-06-13
Gaithersburg, MD

Hyper-quantum plasmic fluxing

The issue lies in the harmonic boundary interface between effectuated photonic induction zones and para-ionized enantiomers of bioactive trans-chiral ligands held in potentiated sub-voltaic intracellular metaspaces.

Wi-fi generates these negative effects.

Something must be done.

N3OGH
Yo Soy Col. "Bat" Guano
Premium
join:2003-11-11
Philly burbs
kudos:1

Re: Hyper-quantum plasmic fluxing

Well, according to MY research, it's nothing the Flux Capacitor can't fix....
--
Petty people are disproportionally corrupted by petty power

GNH
Tesla Recoiled
Premium
join:1999-12-20
Arlington, TX
Least government is the best government. Handle the potential problem on an individual basis.

»zapatopi.net/afdb/
me1212

join:2008-11-20
Pleasant Hill, MO
Call The Doctor, a quick sonicing from the screwdriver should fix that right up, if not the TARDIS can.

ptrowski
Got Helix?
Premium
join:2005-03-14
Putnam, CT
kudos:4
Reviews:
·VOIPo

Re: Hyper-quantum plasmic fluxing

said by me1212:

Call The Doctor, a quick sonicing from the screwdriver should fix that right up, if not the TARDIS can.

Can't, the are trying to ban sonicing as well.

gattaca
Premium
join:2003-05-28
USA
said by DufiefData:

Wi-fi generates these negative effects.

Something must be done.

There may not be sufficient evidence to support the claim that Wi-fi is harmful to the average individual, but WHY are people ignoring the research that indicates recently-vacinated children are at increased risk of cellular damage when exposed to low-level Wi-fi radiation?

This combined effect of a reduced-strength immune system post-vaccination and the bombardment of cells with Wi-fi radio is obviously harmful.

Something must be done.
patcat88

join:2002-04-05
Jamaica, NY
kudos:1
Necronomicon suggests a resurrection of the dead as the fix.

Romney2012
Defeat Obama 2012-Chg we can believe in
Premium
join:2002-03-03
USA
kudos:4

EC says "Council of Europe" proposal nonsense

The group that made this proposal is called the "Council of Europe". It is not a part of the EU political structure. Think of them as a group of human rights activists that are rarely listened to. The EC has rejected this groups WiFi nonsense:
»www.rcrwireless.com/article/2011···e-cancer

The recent press reports, said EC spokeswoman Aikaterini Apostola, “result from an unfortunate confusion.”

First off, explained Apostola, “The Council of Europe is not an institution of the European Union and has no authority on the European Union,” so whatever the organization decides on Wi-Fi may well prove to be irrelevant.

Indeed, the Council of Europe (CoE), which boasts 47 member countries, is an intergovernmental body whose core objective is purportedly “to preserve and promote human rights, democracy and the rule of law.” Lacking the basic authority to implement its decisions, the CoE relies on the European Court of Human Rights for formulating, promoting and implementing “human rights standards.”

When it comes to actual EU regulations, Apostola said all mobile phones and wifi equipment present on the EU market must comply with Directive 1999/5/EC on radio equipment and telecommunications terminal equipment.

“All such equipment is presumed to be safe,” said Apostola, who explained that presumption of conformity was provided by European technical standards “developed to respect the exposure limits proposed by Council Recommendation 1999/519/EC on the limitation of the exposure of the general public to EMF. The purpose of these exposure limits is to provide a high level of protection of the health of the general public.”

This scientific validity is assessed regularly, Apostola added, noting that the latest assessment – by the independent Scientific Committee for Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks (SCENIHR) - had even been made since the adoption of the Council Recommendation.

According to that assessment, and after a “complete review” of all the scientific evidence, “no scientific rationale could be found that would justify a change in the exposure limits.”


--
Record your speedtest.net results in DSLReports SpeedWave
»www.speedtest.net/wave/afe201cb84d45c88

woody7
Premium
join:2000-10-13
Torrance, CA

Re: EC says "Council of Europe" proposal nonsense

"EU Effort Underway to Ban 'Harmful' Wi-Fi"

um that is not what the title says....
--
BlooMe

Romney2012
Defeat Obama 2012-Chg we can believe in
Premium
join:2002-03-03
USA
kudos:4

Re: EC says "Council of Europe" proposal nonsense

said by woody7:

"EU Effort Underway to Ban 'Harmful' Wi-Fi"

um that is not what the title says....

You have to follow the trail thru the links:

»www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/a···en.shtml

Apparently there's a proposal in the EU to ban all WiFi and cellular technology in schools to "protect" the children

»unplugged.rcrwireless.com/index.···ignId=16

The odd proposal dubbed “The potential dangers of electromagnetic fields and their effect on the environment,” says the potential health effects of telecommunications and mobile telephony appear to be “more or less potentially harmful” to plants, animals and humans.

»assembly.coe.int/Documents/Worki···2608.pdf

In light of the above considerations, the Assembly recommends that the member states of the Council of Europe:

And finally the rebuttal by the EC:
»www.rcrwireless.com/article/2011···e-cancer
--
Record your speedtest.net results in DSLReports SpeedWave
»www.speedtest.net/wave/afe201cb84d45c88
PrivacyExprt

join:2010-09-29
Longwood, FL

1 edit

Re: EC says "Council of Europe" proposal nonsense

How's this for hard evidence?

In 2005 my son started suffering immense medical problems ranging from heart rhythm issues, persistent headaches, insomnia, and a few other things. The strange thing is our newborn also started having extreme 'agitation' issues, and the doctor labeled her a 'severe colic' baby. But none of this seemed normal to us, there had to be a 'cause' right? For my son; Specialist after specialist couldn't turn up any known 'physical' cause. Finally, one blood test revealed an issue with his IG panel subsets. After investigating and ruling out all potential causes of this, I ran into an article from 1995, funded by the cell phone industry that found that Microwave Radiation can disrupt the IG panel subset of the human body.

Suddenly it all made sense, all of this started around the same time I installed a powerful WiFi router in the home with several TIVO WiFi access points throughout. Is it possible? So over a few weeks I did a series of "Off and On" tests with the WiFi. To my astonishment, I discovered each time I turned it off, my kids symptoms improved. Each time I turned it back on, they returned with a vengeance! I took this data to my kids pediatrician, and through more testing, confirmed this.. Her diagnosis? "Our technology has reached a point where it is becoming incompatible with human biology.".. I'd of never believed it if I didn't witness and go through the same thing myself! These wireless technologies can be extremely harmful to humans, and especially to the weakest and smallest among us (children) - generally due to their thinner skulls, and increased sensitivity.

I made friends with experts around the world, and learned a whole lot.. Such as - the govt. knows about this, and in fact, has extensive military studies done over 50 years ago showing this tech can have long term, harmful effects. These things are 'weaponized', and are being used against humanity while masking themselves as a beneficial technology. I recommend people that are quick to discount this do some research with an open mind, and prepared to be shocked.

I recommend Dr. Magda Havas's videos to start off..

»www.youtube.com/watch?v=L7E36zGH···=related

Live Blood & Electrosmog

»www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mxrjhu1R···=related

Dr. Magda Havas,WI-FI DANGERS

Romney2012
Defeat Obama 2012-Chg we can believe in
Premium
join:2002-03-03
USA
kudos:4

Re: EC says "Council of Europe" proposal nonsense

And what happens when your kids have to leave the house and visit friends, go to school, go to McDonald's or Starbucks?

Do they get outfitted in portable faraday cages?:





and sleep at home on:


--
Record your speedtest.net results in DSLReports SpeedWave
»www.speedtest.net/wave/afe201cb84d45c88

DavePR

join:2008-06-04
Canyon Country, CA

Re: EC says "Council of Europe" proposal nonsense

Life without Starbucks or McDonalds can be brutal, I know, but it is possible.
PrivacyExprt

join:2010-09-29
Longwood, FL
said by Romney2012:

And what happens when your kids have to leave the house and visit friends, go to school, go to McDonald's or Starbucks?

Not really a problem because the exposure is quite limited in duration. Based on my testing over a decade, it seems more cumulative. Dr. Havas's findings seem to affirm this in that it causes a sort of clumping of the blood. Some cell phone/wifi studies seem to indicate they accelerate aging in this manner, which may help explain why they seem to increase tumors and cancer. (they speed up aging) Having exposure during sleep seems to be most problematic.

We've mitigated most of it in the home, no wireless technologies at all. We've also faraday-caged our home well enough to the point most people can't get a cell signal inside. I must say, we've been all much healthier since doing this - coincidence? I've got all of the evidence I need that these technologies are unhealthy, no convincing needed anymore - I've done my own studies, purchased expensive instruments, and spent the last decade trying to disprove/prove it.

Everyone will figure it out eventually. It took 50 years and untold thousands of deaths before anyone believed smoking was harmful. PS The lady in the picture is Sarah Dacre, a friend of mine. Brilliant lady. She I might add - has been subjected to countless blind studies and proved her sensitivity. Anyone with ANY health conditions would be wise to 'try' removing wireless exposure and seeing if the conditions prove..

We have a darkfield microscope coming, and will be running exposure/exposure free tests on blood pathology to either disprove, or prove actual pathology changes. I want to see for myself exactly what these techs are doing to our bodies. Also, it will make a nice science experiment for mitigation techs. It will be most interesting to see my sons blood before and after school.
PDXPLT

join:2003-12-04
Banks, OR
said by PrivacyExprt:

How's this for hard evidence?

So over a few weeks I did a series of "Off and On" tests with the WiFi. To my astonishment, I discovered each time I turned it off, my kids symptoms improved. Each time I turned it back on, they returned with a vengeance!

Meaningless anecdote; that's not evidence. Look up the term "double blind study".

Radio transmitters, far more powerdul than dinky little Wi-Fi routers, have been permeating the airwaves for about 100 years now. Yet all this hysteria has started recently over low-power Wi-Fi signals.

NOCTech75
Premium
join:2009-06-29
Marietta, GA
Reviews:
·Comcast
·AT&T Southeast

Re: EC says "Council of Europe" proposal nonsense

said by PDXPLT:

said by PrivacyExprt:

How's this for hard evidence?

So over a few weeks I did a series of "Off and On" tests with the WiFi. To my astonishment, I discovered each time I turned it off, my kids symptoms improved. Each time I turned it back on, they returned with a vengeance!

Meaningless anecdote; that's not evidence. Look up the term "double blind study".

So folks have to be blinded TWICE in order to get into the study?
Kamus

join:2011-01-27
El Paso, TX
The crackpots... they are everywhere it seems, even here ^_^

Simba7
I Void Warranties

join:2003-03-24
Billings, MT

1 edit
So.. Smoking is just as bad as WiFi?

Give me a freakin' break. Also, they didn't say which frequency they were using. Were they using 2.4GHz or 5GHz? Which channel?

Time to whip out the Faraday cages everyone.

iknow

@optonline.net

Re: EC says "Council of Europe" proposal nonsense

said by Simba7:

So.. Smoking is just as bad as WiFi?

Give me a freakin' break. Also, they didn't say which frequency they were using. Were they using 2.4GHz or 5GHz? Which channel?

Time to whip out the Faraday cages everyone.

probably, and that's a good thing, too. look at this. »www.nycclash.com/smoke_chart.html and this. »www.nycclash.com/CaseAgainstBans···tml#OSHA it's NOT about safety after all, but rather politics that decide what is safe, not science, which i just presented. it could be a few whacked out rich people making large political donations behind this WIFI thing, who knows..

runzero

join:2005-09-16
DC
Reviews:
·Verizon FiOS
·DSL EXTREME
Well, time to wear our tinfoil hats and live our lives in thick lead-walled faraday cages!

Oh, and here's a video on how to repair CDs with a microwave, Recommended and Approved by Me™:

»www.youtube.com/watch?v=kS0paP2ekfg

Simba7
I Void Warranties

join:2003-03-24
Billings, MT

Re: EC says "Council of Europe" proposal nonsense

That's awesome! I might try that in a few seconds..

"Wow.. Look at all the sparkles!!"

So, does that only work if I put in one disc at a time or does it work with several at once?
chdyoung4

join:2007-12-06
Reviews:
·Cobridge Communi..
said by PrivacyExprt:

How's this for hard evidence?

In 2005 my son started suffering immense medical problems ranging from heart rhythm issues, persistent headaches, insomnia, and a few other things. The strange thing is our newborn also started having extreme 'agitation' issues, and the doctor labeled her a 'severe colic' baby. But none of this seemed normal to us, there had to be a 'cause' right? For my son; Specialist after specialist couldn't turn up any known 'physical' cause. Finally, one blood test revealed an issue with his IG panel subsets. After investigating and ruling out all potential causes of this, I ran into an article from 1995, funded by the cell phone industry that found that Microwave Radiation can disrupt the IG panel subset of the human body.

Suddenly it all made sense, all of this started around the same time I installed a powerful WiFi router in the home with several TIVO WiFi access points throughout. Is it possible? So over a few weeks I did a series of "Off and On" tests with the WiFi. To my astonishment, I discovered each time I turned it off, my kids symptoms improved. Each time I turned it back on, they returned with a vengeance! I took this data to my kids pediatrician, and through more testing, confirmed this.. Her diagnosis? "Our technology has reached a point where it is becoming incompatible with human biology.".. I'd of never believed it if I didn't witness and go through the same thing myself! These wireless technologies can be extremely harmful to humans, and especially to the weakest and smallest among us (children) - generally due to their thinner skulls, and increased sensitivity.

"a powerful WiFi router" which is powered by a small wall wart that barely gets warm to the touch and the resulting radio signal can barely be detected at the far end of the house by a sensitive receiver that is designed to amplify a small slice of the radio spectrum and reject the rest? You receive more background radiation from the earth and sun than you receive from a WiFi router. Certainly powerful radio emissions can be harmful, but a WiFi router is certainly not a source of such emissions.

N3OGH
Yo Soy Col. "Bat" Guano
Premium
join:2003-11-11
Philly burbs
kudos:1
If I'm backing a European activist group, it's this one.

»en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FEMEN

I'm not %100 up to speed on their stand on issues either way, but I really really really like their methods!
--
Petty people are disproportionally corrupted by petty power

herb77

join:2005-02-23
Fort Myers, FL
Thank you for the Real story. Tech blogs are so lazy now.
--
Obama 2012

Simba7
I Void Warranties

join:2003-03-24
Billings, MT
Better tell all the Telecom and Media companies to shutdown their satellites, too.
PrivacyExprt

join:2010-09-29
Longwood, FL
Natural radiations and emissions are not the same as synthetic, man made modulations. We've evolved thousands of years exposed to natural frequencies - and adapted.

Fact is, there is a wealth of evidence, much of it suppressed, that these chaotic microwave signals pose a risk to human health and well being. Many reports I dug up, even from the military, proved that! The industry is well aware of this, which is why they now put disclaimers in their fine print. Such as "Keep this phone away from your head" and other crap. It's all a liability protection.

Only people not paying attention wouldn't know all of this. There is a quiet, yet continuous drone of 'alarming' reports and studies being trickled out. So much for discernment!

Radio Active
My pappy's a pistol
Premium
join:2003-01-31
Fullerton, CA

Oh, no.

Not this shit again.
BiggA

join:2005-11-23
EARTH

Damage the children

What will actually damage the children is not having up to date technology to learn with. This tinfoil hat BS is ridiculous.

Pashune
Caps stifle innovation
Premium
join:2006-04-14
Gautier, MS
Reviews:
·Vonage
·CableOne

Hey guys

Sun here. Am I gonna get banned next?
--
CableOne 10m/1m
WhyMe420
Premium
join:2009-04-06
kudos:1

Re: Hey guys

Aww... I was gonna say ban the sun first!

Oh well, I 100% support your efforts!
sharksfan3
Premium
join:2004-02-16
Hyde Park, NY

FM radio

What about the 100,000 watts your local FM radio station is pumping out 24/7/365?
PDXPLT

join:2003-12-04
Banks, OR

Re: FM radio

Or the 3,000,000 watts that UHF TV station is radiating, and has been doing so for decades?
broccoli

join:2007-11-29
Portland, OR

Re: FM radio

Or the 4e26 W nuclear reactor that's hovering above all of us. We should definitely ban that one first.

pjcamp

@spelman.edu

yes, there is solid scientific evidence

Albert Einstein won the Nobel Prize for it -- in 1905.

To cause damage to biological molecules is physically impossible until photon energies reach the near ultraviolet. That is essentially independent of the number of photons. This was essentially Einstein's prediction, verified by Millikan -- that photon absorption depends on the frequency of the light and not on the intensity.

Wifi is microwaves. That is not even within spitting distance of the near-UV. At worst, if you actually wear your router on your head, you might experience some local heating that is measureable but not perceptible by you, and the circulatory system will take care of that in short order.

So not only is there no evidence whatsoever, but there is a vast body of evidence that excludes these claims entirely. Einstein's work is foundational to quantum theory, so all of quantum mechanics and everything that depends on quantum mechanics for its function (from iPods to thermonuclear weapons) can be regarded as refutation.
InvalidError

join:2008-02-03
kudos:5

Re: yes, there is solid scientific evidence

said by pjcamp :

To cause damage to biological molecules is physically impossible until photon energies reach the near ultraviolet.

While UV may have the ability to directly break molecules, enough of any wavelength can still burn them outright.

said by pjcamp :

Wifi is microwaves. That is not even within spitting distance of the near-UV.

Microwave ovens are not anywhere near UV either but they are tuned to the resonant frequency of water molecules which yields high energy absorption rates in most organic tissues.

Eloquorius
Premium
join:2004-05-24
San Jose, CA

Would be GREAT... for other countries

If the EU bans Wi-Fi, all it will do is further harm their ability to compete on the open market by adding yet another absurd burden to their layers of leftist-driven bureaucracy and red tape. This kind of thing will give the U.S. a further edge... which, as an American worker in the IT industry is fine with me.
patcat88

join:2002-04-05
Jamaica, NY
kudos:1

Re: Would be GREAT... for other countries

But how many permits and $10000s do you need to get a wifi router approved in the USA?

ytrewq

@sbcglobal.net

Technology

It's all very well to argue about this esoteric electronic stuff which is what major industries want you to do while the real dangers are ignored. For many years the baked bean conglomerates have poo-pooed the dangers of their deadly methane gas. We are all familiar with the effects of second-hand methane but most people are unaware that the consumption of as few as four cans of beans can produce lethal concentrations with results like spontaneous combustion if near an ignition source, involuntary defenestration and colonic explosions. Cases have been recorded where people were suddenly propelled off the sidewalk and into the path of an oncoming bus. Damage can occur to painted surfaces, delicate plants can suddenly wilt and small children and animals may be asphyxiated.
Congress will not investigate of course due to the control of the bean lobbyists. The whole thing smells to high Heaven.
mbrianc2

join:2008-08-16

I am not an RF engineer

Doesn't wifi use the same unlicensed spectrum as cordless phones? If that's the case, I will give up my router if they go back to a grandma phone. You know, one of those big beige bastards with rotary dialing?

vaxvms
ferroequine fan
Premium
join:2005-03-01
Wustah, MA

hazards of life

Which is more dangerous - Wi-Fi or dodgeball?
»www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib···dge.html

Simba7
I Void Warranties

join:2003-03-24
Billings, MT

Re: hazards of life

Wow.. So the kid got hurt because she was entangled with another kid? How does that put dodgeball at fault?

I swear, I'm getting freakin' sick of this bullsh*t. "My kid accidentally ran into your kid and hurt him/herself. I'm suing you because your kid was in the way!"

Rogue Wolf
Ate Your Homework, And Framed The Dog

join:2003-08-12
Troy, NY
Obviously, the culprit in this case was NOT dodgeball. Read the article carefully.

"Heather became tangled with another child, fell and broke her elbow."

I'll bold the important part.

"...fell and broke....

Why do people fall?

GRAVITY.

The solution is right before our eyes. Ban gravity in all K-12 school physical education programs.

THINK OF THE CHILDREN!
--
Justin Timberlake brought sexy back. I'm putting it away again.

This content may not be retransmitted by your cable company without significant rate increases!

Simba7
I Void Warranties

join:2003-03-24
Billings, MT

Spectrum?

I can "possibly" understand WiFi in the 2.4GHz Range slightly heating something up if it was actually touching it.. but what about the 5GHz range? Same results, eh? Doubtful.

Especially since a household microwave operates at 7000 to 15000x that of a WiFi Router and a standard microwave operates at 2.4GHz, not 5GHz.

I wonder if these people operate a household microwave then bitch about their radiation-spewing WiFi router.
--
Bresnan 18M/1M
MyWS[i7-870@4.1G,16G RAM,2x1T HDDs,Win7]
WifeWS[A64@2G,2G RAM,120G HDD,Win7]
Router[2xP3@1G,512M RAM,18G HDD,Allied Telesyn AT2560FX,2xDigital QP DE504,Compaq DP NC3131,2xSun QP GigaSwift, SMC 8432BTA, Gentoo Linux]
en103

join:2011-05-02
Reviews:
·RoadRunner Cable

Is there a reason that public schools need WiFi ?

Most schools would have been outfitted with some form of ethernet over the past 20 years.
Even if they didn't.... they could set up either ethernet/fiber or what I use... ethernet over powerline.

»support.netgear.com/app/products···_id/2477

Put in a switch with a bunch of ethernet jacks and you're good to go.

Since this is a school - how many devices do you need to have on WiFi anyways ?

Simba7
I Void Warranties

join:2003-03-24
Billings, MT

Re: Is there a reason that public schools need WiFi ?

said by en103:

Even if they didn't.... they could set up either ethernet/fiber or what I use... ethernet over powerline.

Put in a switch with a bunch of ethernet jacks and you're good to go.

Since this is a school - how many devices do you need to have on WiFi anyways ?

Ok. So we're going to put around 50-100 computers on a "ring" network. I can imagine that network slowing down to a crawl. It's not 200mbps for EACH connection, it's 200mbps for the ENTIRE network.. and that's if conditions are ideal.

As for how many devices.. with everything becoming wireless now.. How many do you think?
--
Bresnan 18M/1M
MyWS[i7-870@4.1G,16G RAM,2x1T HDDs,Win7]
WifeWS[A64@2G,2G RAM,120G HDD,Win7]
Router[2xP3@1G,512M RAM,18G HDD,Allied Telesyn AT2560FX,2xDigital QP DE504,Compaq DP NC3131,2xSun QP GigaSwift, SMC 8432BTA, Gentoo Linux]
TheMG
Premium
join:2007-09-04
Canada
kudos:1
Reviews:
·TekSavvy DSL
said by en103:

Since this is a school - how many devices do you need to have on WiFi anyways ?

Unfortunately an ever-increasing number of devices do not have ethernet connectivity. Some netbooks and sub-notebooks as well as most handheld devices such as smartphones lack the ability to connect to a wired network without an external NIC (if the device even supports such a thing).

Wifi is also the most cost-effective solution in existing buildings that are not wired with ethernet to every room.

As much as I don't like wifi (due to it's lack of reliability, predictability, and mediocre bandwidth), it does have its uses.

Simba7
I Void Warranties

join:2003-03-24
Billings, MT

Stay away from my place!

Click for full size
Beware! I have 3 WiFi Routers running here!

This should be enough to scare 'em away.

BTW: Netgear WNR2000v1, WPN824v3, and a WGR614v6.

disconnected

@snet.net

Re: Stay away from my place!

I've got two routers on my desk here, one 802.11b, the other b/g.
But worse, there's a 50,000-watt FM station tower 900' down the road and on that are cellular antennas for all the major cellular providers. When I was outdoors, using my Pentax SpotMatic camera, which has a metal viewfinder, it stings my face when it comes in contact as I'm looking through the viewfinder. Digital cameras don't work at all in my yard. They just freeze until I take out the battery and reset it indoors.
My father before me died of leukemia, and lived under this tower. I have been diagnosed in January with colon cancer myself. Of course, I worked in the broadcast engineering field and had my arms inside many operating transmitters over the years, so I'm not surprised. But the field strength in my yard is a bit alarming.
Now that second video with the man lying down with a heart monitor, if that's not faked, that's interesting. I'd like to see if these tests can be reliably repeated, or if they're faked.

Selenia
I love Debian
Premium
join:2006-09-22
Lanesboro, MA
kudos:2
Mine too. I have 4 fixed APs running an assorted mix of 2.4 and 5.8 GHz. I also use my cell as a main phone(over wifi in the house). I have a mobile AP, too.

r81984
Fair and Balanced
Premium
join:2001-11-14
Katy, TX
Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse
·AT&T DSL Service
·row44

Where did this come from?

What makes these people think that WIFI is killing them?
I really don't get it.

Do they just wake up one day and say, "Hey what can I blame my crappy life on today?"
--
Your behavior is inconsistent with your desire to be treated like everyone else.

Monday, 04-Jun 16:46:25 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.