Eshoo Bill Takes Aim at 4G Confusion And Requires Carriers Be Clearer About Speeds, Coverage According to the San Francisco Chronicle, Representative Anna Eshoo, D-Palo Alto, is introducing the Next Generation Wireless Disclosure Act. The Act would require carriers to disclose a long-list of details about the network, including minimum data speeds, network reliability and coverage, and specifically what technology is being used to provide "4G" service. The 4G term has been used and abused by carriers ever since the ITU essentially declared that it can be described to use pretty much anything faster than carrier pigeon. "Consumers deserve to know exactly what they're getting for their money when they sign up for a 4G data plan," Eshoo said in a statement. Such bills typically have a very difficult time making it through the carrier lobbyist gauntlet.
|
 Romney2012Defeat Obama 2012-Chg we can believe inPremium join:2002-03-03 USA kudos:4 1 edit | Eshoo just wants her name in the news
This bill is nothing more than a way for Rep. Eshoo to get her name in the news. It has no chance of getting out of committee and by hanging its hook on the 4G non-issue shows it is nothing more than that. -- Record your speedtest.net results in DSLReports SpeedWave »www.speedtest.net/wave/afe201cb84d45c88 | |
|  |  vpokoPremium join:2003-07-03 Boston, MA | Re: Eshoo just wants her name in the news Might put the wireless industry on notice that if they engage in deceptive advertising practices, congress might have an appetite to do something. | |
|  |  |  openbox9 join:2004-01-26 Alexandria, VA kudos:2 | Re: Eshoo just wants her name in the news Has "threat" of congressional action bothered other deceptive advertising practices? | |
|  |  |  |  vpokoPremium join:2003-07-03 Boston, MA | Re: Eshoo just wants her name in the news We'd never know, maybe AT&T would have created an ad with Abraham Lincoln endorsing their network by now if not for some occasional congressional sabre-rattling about truth in advertising. I'll concede your point, too. | |
|
 |  |
 HIPAR join:2005-11-10 Tannersville, PA | Useless Information I doubt you could find two engineers who would agree how to answer those demands. Then after you get the technical jargon through the legal reviews you'd have a batch of babble understandable by nobody. It will serve no useful purpose for the legions of twits who walk into light posts while gazing into their iGadgets. | |
|  |  | | Re: Useless Information that's ok... as long as there are people on dslreports who do understand the technical jargon, it can be dumbed down for the rest of us.
Greater transparency only helps consumers. Less transparency only helps wireless providers continue to use all sorts of false information to deceive customers and hide bad business practices. | |
|
 | | 4G "Plus" We need to start using more terms that are ill defined. How about 4G "Plus". as long as we have "marketing" people involved all this techie language is going to be totally abused. thats the name of the game. Its like car salesmen and all their BS re car features. Send out the lobbyists to kill this | |
|  SnowymIRC unix.ro UnderNetPremium join:2003-04-05 Kailua, HI kudos:5 | Just my luck Now that I finally understand what 4g is they want to go ahead & confuse the issue with something meaningful? | |
|  BHNtechXpertBHN StaffPremium,VIP join:2006-02-16 Saint Petersburg, FL kudos:32 | Eshooo Eshooo! Hmmm I think I'm coming down with a cold. | |
|
 | |
|
|