republican-creole
site Search:


 
   
story category
FCC: All's Well in Broadband Land
DSL beat cable in '05, penetration looks good
by Karl Bode Wednesday 26-Jul-2006 tags: fcc · stats
The FCC today released their latest statistics on both broadband (pdf press release, report pdf) and local phone (pdf press release, report pdf) services. According to the report, there are now 50.2 million broadband lines in service, a 33% increase over last year. FCC stats show DSL "won" the year in net additions for the first time ever, adding 5.7 million new subscribers to cable's 4.2 million.

The FCC classifies broadband service lines as anything faster than 200kbps in at least one direction. A connection offering at least 200kbps in both directions is deemed an "advanced service line." "Of the 42.8 million advanced services lines reported as of December 31, 2005, 62.3% were at least 2.5 mbps in the faster direction and 37.7% were slower than 2.5 mbps in the faster direction," the agency reports. The low 200kbps water-mark has annoyed critics who suggest it should be raised to at least 1Mbps.

The FCC's measure of geographical (particularly rural) coverage has also been a sore point. The General Accounting Office recently issued a report (pdf) on broadband deployment in the United States, that criticized the FCC's determination of just how wired America is. The report recommended improvements that still have yet to be implemented.

"For its zip-code level data, the FCC collects data based on where subscribers are served, not where providers have deployed broadband infrastructure," the report noted. "Although it is clear that the deployment of broadband networks is extensive, the data may not provide a highly accurate depiction of local broadband infrastructures for residential service, especially in rural areas."

In other words, calling a zip-code "broadband wired" because one user in that zip code has service - then concluding from that data that 99% of the country is wired - might just not be an effective measurement of broadband penetration. Go figure.

While the report is slightly more nuanced this year, the FCC continues to use this criticized method:
"Providers list the Zip Codes in which they have at least one high-speed connection in service to an end user, and 99% of Zip Codes were listed by at least one provider. Our analysis indicates that more than 99% of the nation’s population lives in those Zip Codes. The most widely reported technologies by this measure were satellite (with at least some presence reported in 88% of Zip Codes), ADSL (in 82% of Zip Codes), and cable modem (in 57% of Zip Codes). ADSL and/or cable modem connections were reported to be present in 87% of Zip Codes."
As for incumbent coverage, the FCC states that DSL Is available to 78% of telco customers, and 93% of cable customers. As we recently reported, Nebraska, West Virginia, Arkansas and Kentucky are in the worst shape when it comes to deployment, Nebraska having a paltry 52% DSL penetration rate.

These FCC reports were required as part of the 1996 Telecom act. If they show penetration issues (to say oh, rural America) the FCC is expected to "take immediate action to accelerate deployment of such capability." Critics (like Harvard's Scott Bradner) yearly argue that FCC statistics are skewed "up and to the right" in order to mask the results of deregulatory policy that is primarily aimed at benefiting incumbent provider pocketbooks.

view: topics flat text 
Post a:
grandpinaple

join:2006-01-03
New York, NY

Honestly

Who cares. Does it matter what technology will carry your 100Mbps connection in the end.

rachelsfx

join:2004-09-27
Pensacola, FL

Re: Honestly

Yep.

If you junked all those slow DSL lines running 256k connections and went with only 1.5 or higher, cable would probably be smoking DSL.

If you want to truly measure how "good" the USA is see how many 6 meg or higher subs there are.

Karl Bode
News Guy
join:2000-03-02
kudos:30

Re: Honestly

But that would indicate fairly paltry coverage and the FCC would be forced to slap the knuckles of the people who comp them Vegas airline tickets. That would be unacceptable.

N3OGH
Yo Soy Col. "Bat" Guano
Premium
join:2003-11-11
Philly burbs
kudos:1
said by rachelsfx:

Yep.

If you junked all those slow DSL lines running 256k connections and went with only 1.5 or higher, cable would probably be smoking DSL.

If you want to truly measure how "good" the USA is see how many 6 meg or higher subs there are.
Like the 6 meg line I was supposed to be getting from Comcast that was, in all actuality, a 2.7 meg line.

And yes, I checked the signal strength, tweaked my system, replaced my router, blah blah blah. All I got out of Comcast was 2.7 meg and a bill for $46 at the end of the month.

My DSL connection is $26/mo, and I get 3 megs down from them (for real!) and better upstream speed.

Same speed for close to half the price, sounds like a deal to me....
--
Never ask what sort of a computer a guy drives. If he's a Mac user, he'll tell you. If not, why embarrass him? -Tom Clancy
pabster

join:2001-12-09
Waterloo, IA
Exactly. I also have a sneaky feeling the telco's are including ISDN connections (Yes, they still exist) as 'broadband'.

The FCC's 200Kbps definition and classification as an 'advanced service line' is laughable.
bogey780

join:2004-03-19
Here
kudos:1

Re: Honestly

ISDN200k ergo it's not counted.

A lot of people only want the cheapest connection which is where 768k and 256k come in. If they sold 56k DSL at 10$ a month we'd see people getting it. Most Americans just want basic internet and speed is not important to them outside of surfing.
hurfy
Premium
join:2002-08-06
Spokane, WA
hehe FCC wants to define my old wimpy dsl as advanced and you all want to define it as nothing.

I am thinking we need a definition that gets my old 640k in the middle
Bytezboy

join:2001-05-17
New York, NY
why do I see cable compared with dsl so often on the front page here? Does anyone really care? pffff

asdfghjklzx5
Premium
join:2004-05-03
kudos:1

Re: Honestly

said by Bytezboy:

why do I see cable compared with dsl so often on the front page here? Does anyone really care? pffff
For some reason, yes. It's like Chevy/Ford or Intel/AMD. People get behind one or the other and cheer it on like it's their son at a litle league game. Some of them are quite fanatical.
--
Break yourself from the Windows admin nipple...


»nonadmin.editme.com

Jovi

join:2000-02-24
Mount Joy, PA

The numbers

By looking at the numbers(depending on accurate data), the cable companies probably could benefit from having a lower priced/lower speed tier. I'd take a million customers at $30 or less than not have them at all.
--
OutKast Clan

tiger72
SexaT duorP
Premium
join:2001-03-28
Saint Louis, MO
kudos:1
Reviews:
·T-Mobile US

Re: The numbers

said by Jovi:

By looking at the numbers(depending on accurate data), the cable companies probably could benefit from having a lower priced/lower speed tier. I'd take a million customers at $30 or less than not have them at all.
Many cable companies do have a lower tier, but they don't advertise it and only offer it if people are cancelling due to price, it seems.

I believe that cable fears if they advertise their cheaper lines, then they'll lose more customers off of their $40/mo plan than they would gain by advertising their $30/mo plan, regardless of the massive speed cut between the services.
--
|- »www.lp.org/issues/issues.shtml -| |- Cato Daily Podcast »www.cato.org/rss/daily_podcast.xml -|
pabster

join:2001-12-09
Waterloo, IA

Re: The numbers

Yeah, mine has a "low tier", 128k / 128k. Problem is, it is only $10 cheaper than the "regular" tier. Now wonder they don't advertise it!
travelguy

join:1999-09-03
Santa Fe, NM

Re: The numbers

said by pabster:

Yeah, mine has a "low tier", 128k / 128k. Problem is, it is only $10 cheaper than the "regular" tier. Now wonder they don't advertise it!
OTOH, if all you want is 24/7 email and access to the occasional web page to check weather or book an airline ticket, its just the ticket.

Cable and telcos don't advertise such packages for two reasons - they are afraid they will cannibalize their higher cost packages and they dilute their Average Revenue per Unit (ARPU) numbers that Wall Street is so fond of.
pabster

join:2001-12-09
Waterloo, IA
Reviews:
·CenturyLink
·Verizon Wireless..
·Mediacom

Re: The numbers

Yeah, 128kbps service might be fine for occasional web surfing and e-mail. But why would I pay only $10 less than their "regular" tier for it? I'd be far better off (price wise) with either a cheap dial-up account (which can oft be had for less than $10 a month) or an entry-level DSL offering, both considerably cheaper.

Perhaps the other carriers don't operate the same way, I have no idea. I was surprised they weren't offering 128kbps for like $20 or $25 a month. I certainly wouldn't pay any more than that.
bchris02

join:2006-05-25

Re: The numbers

Cox is 256/256 in my area for their $30 tier. In ares with Verizon its 768 down instead of 256.
jtorre69

join:2005-12-26
Hollywood, FL
my cableco has a low tier, they call it 6meg, you get 3meg at best!!!!!!!

docchat

join:2002-10-02
New York, NY

Re: The numbers

My company's lowest tier is 10/2...Verizon Fios....and this is dedicated bandwidth (all mine), not shared like yours is...so stay on the point of this topic, point being that this is a total BS report by the FCC. And who cares if DSL has more penetration than cable or vice versa. Broadband should be more readily available and more widespread than it is now. If they are going to take the USF from us, they should make some better use of it.

dvd536
as Mr. Pink as they come
Premium
join:2001-04-27
Phoenix, AZ
kudos:4

Re: The numbers

said by docchat:

My company's lowest tier is 10/2...Verizon Fios....and this is dedicated bandwidth (all mine), not shared like yours is...so stay on the point of this topic, point being that this is a total BS report by the FCC. And who cares if DSL has more penetration than cable or vice versa. Broadband should be more readily available and more widespread than it is now. If they are going to take the USF from us, they should make some better use of it.
BS!
any type of connection is shared at some point along the way
--
You can never be too rich, too thin or have too much Bandwidth
bogey780

join:2004-03-19
Here
kudos:1

Re: The numbers

It's shared back to the node. Makes a difference if there's heavy node saturation.

I'm not familiar enough with PON architecture to make a statement about it.

insomniac84

join:2002-01-03
Schererville, IN
The shared factor only matters if your area is oversold. If your area is not oversold, cable by far destroys dsl. I currently have 6mbit comcast cable internet and 1.5mbit AT&T dsl. The dsl is always sluggish when doing anything and I am not referring to the slower download speed. If you max out your upload bandwidth on dsl your downloads suffer a lot and ping times shoot through the roof. With comcast I can max out the upload and download and still surf pretty decently. Not to mention normal web surfing is really fast now that they have speed boost.
Although because of price I only have comcast for the summer because they offer it for 20 bucks a month for the first 4 months.
PDXPLT

join:2003-12-04
Banks, OR

Zip code criterion bogus, and they know it ...

'like in my zip code. Only a tiny portion has broadband, yet the whole area is counted as "served".

The problem is, the FCC has great incentive to use the most optimistic, highly misleading metric possible, and that gives them the most chance of avoiding the "immediate action" directive in the Telecomm Act. Since they get to choose which metric they use, they are naturally going to pick the one that gives them the greatest chance ofr having to do nothing.
ITALIAN926

join:2003-08-16
kudos:1

Now u see it... now u dont

What happened to the " DSL TRUMPS CABLE " headline? Aww, did the pro-cable admin of this site realize the headline wasnt so PRO-CABLE ??

LOL

dslwanter
It's coming
Premium
join:2002-12-16
Niles, OH
Reviews:
·AT&T Midwest

1 edit

How about...

...the FCC take charge on companies like AT&T for totally sending project pronto down the pooper? If they're really concerned about broadband they'll take this analysis and shove it up some asses to get broadband available to every US household. By Broadband, I don't mean Hughesnet, that in my book isn't broadband it's just dial-up on steroids.

EDIT: And commenting on the zip code thing that is B.S. Most of my zip code,44436, is covered by Adelphia cable and a very small slither by Armstrong cable. Then about a quarter of us stuck with Rapid Cable who has yet to upgrade the system. And most of the people stuck with Rapid Cable are out of range for DSL because AT&T is too damn cheap to upgrade the RT on New Castle Rd. which would solve that problem. I say most because probably about 10 houses right when Adelphia ends still qualify for DSL, though service is unreliable due to distance.
--
"Whatsoever you do to the least of my people, that you do onto me!" Check out my internet radio station: »www.thebomb102.com
Sammer

join:2005-12-22
Canonsburg, PA

1 edit

Re: How about...

Should we even mention that the FCC is meeting the letter but not the spirit of the law by releasing these bogus reports. "Lies, d@m^ lies, and statistics"

DrTCP
Yours truly
Premium,ExMod 1999-04
join:1999-11-09
Round Rock, TX

FCC is doing its bidding to hide broken promises by Telcos

They give false illusions so as to give competitive environment and give the impression telcos have done all they promised years ago to get those monopoly deals (like exclusion of CLECs from facilities, etc).

As long as FCC is owned by Telcos this ridiculous situation is unlikely to change.

kamm

join:2001-02-14
Brooklyn, NY

FCC should be invastigated and indicted...

... for corruption, dealing with influence etc.

This - Martin-led - and the last one - Powell-led - are the two most corrupt FCC eras ever.

The system is totally broken. Disband this circus and set up a completely new system.

Monday, 04-Jun 06:11:34 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.