  TKJunkMail Enjoy the sun Premium join:2002-03-03 Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast
| For the curious, you can observe field tests at below sites
If you would like to watch some of these field tests and live in the area where they are being run, here is the initial field test sites:

And when the FCC publishes the actual dates and times, they will be found here: »www.fcc.gov/oet/projects/tvbandd···ome.html
Here is the 1st couple dates and times. More will be available later at the above link.
The field testing of the TV White Space Devices will commence on Wednesday (July 16, 2008) at 9:30 AM at Site 1. It is expected that tests will proceed to Site 2 on Thursday. The test schedule may have to be adjusted in case of inclement weather or unexpected delays at the sites. In that case the tests will continue on Friday.
Site 1: Patapsco Valley State Park (Avalon Area), Elkridge, MD Follow direction to entrance on Route 1 and then to the marked parking area. (Please note that this is a Maryland State Park and there is a nominal entrance fee.)
GPS: 39° 14’ 29” N; 076° 45’ 04” W
Site 2: Thomas A. Dixon, Jr. Aircraft Observation Area (BWI Airport) Dorsey Road, Glen Burnie, MD
GPS: 39° 09’ 44” N; 076° 39’ 47” W
In case of questions about the test site location or schedule, please call Rashmi Doshi at 301 362 3011.
-- My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page | |
|   DavePR
join:2008-06-04
·DSL EXTREME
1 edit | Toothpaste back into the tube... "Listen before talking" is the easy part. The more difficult problem is the installed base of millions of inferior HDTV tuners, with very little ability to tolerate a strong signal (or, more likely, signals) on the channel adjacent to (or several channels away, for that matter) the one the receiver is tuned to. The original ATSC specifications were drawn up using laboratory grade hardware. The circuitry actually in peoples' TVs is much less sophisticated and much more prone to overload. None of the consumer tuners has very good intermod rejection and all manner of unexpected operation is to be expected. Here's some science for y'all:
»www.tvtechnology.com/pages/s.007···001.html
Couple this with the trend toward ditching cable or satellite in favor of a good old fashioned antenna and you can see why the NAB is antsy. | |
|  RayW Premium join:2001-09-01 Layton, UT clubs:
·XMission
| Is this the same group that thought BPL was a "Holy Grail"? Does not matter if it works or not, the NAB needs to pump more money into the political coffers. The house is D and the senate is mixed, guess you have to pay off both sides since the pres has to sign off on it and any attached riders that the crooks bury in the bill that have nothing to do to with it (a million dollar subsidy to a supporter back home to count whozits on alternate leap days at noon?). -- I am not lost, I find myself every time. | |
|  |   shoe1
join:2007-09-28 Colfax, CA | Re: Is this the same group that thought BPL was a "Holy Grail"? What? Are you one of those people that like to sound smart by using ridiculous political sentence structure to "only Sound" smart? enough all ready, your post makes no real world sense. | |
|  |  |  RayW Premium join:2001-09-01 Layton, UT clubs:
·XMission
| Re: Is this the same group that thought BPL was a "Holy Grail"? said by shoe1 :What? Are you one of those people that like to sound smart by using ridiculous political sentence structure to "only Sound" smart? enough all ready, your post makes no real world sense. Ok, just for you.
1. The FCC is the group that thought BPL was a such a good idea, YEAH VERILY - the very holy grail of BB to the masses, despite the many engineering facts and laws of physics that ruled against it. Now they are going to a random (and it is random in the overall geographical sense) RF interleaving that may or may not be in conflict with various regions and the established broadcast pattern (which does not always match what the regulators declare it to be). And to do this they are using a sensing/blocking technology that while it is viable, is questionable when corners are cut for the low end Joe/Jane Six Pack budget devices.
2. Big money went to making the FCC blind to facts for BPL and probably for this too.
3. NAB has not (to my knowledge paid the big dollars that the 'telecommunications' giants have paid in this arena.
4. I think the party that rules the legislative branch is obvious, although it is a slim rule. The President has some power, but not as much as a lot of folks think, so the parties are essentially balanced, hence they (the NAB) have to split the graft to get any protection. At least if they want another law passed to protect them they will pay.
5. Most bills passed by the legislative branch usually have so many riders that the main bill is a smoke screen for graft and featherbedding. Hence any bill that has the approval of many here may get killed because of the hidden items that you have to go out and actually read the bill to see, hence the President will be bad mouthed again because most people only see the initial bill, not the added on slime underneath that can turn good bills bad.
Sorry I did not get that verbal the first time instead of keeping it simple, but all this has been hashed over many times in various ways on this site. -- I am not lost, I find myself every time. | |
|   plk bo may sleep in loft Premium join:2002-04-20 Ogden, IA | Not very rural if you ask me This testing area isn't very rural if you ask me. Is this area is unserved they are using for testing?
Why not rural Kansas, Montana, Iowa etc?
I suppose if the system works there it will work in rural. | |
|  |   DavePR
join:2008-06-04 | Re: Not very rural if you ask me They'll go to the edge of the DTV stations' coverage and see if an unlicensed wireless node can operate without trashing the DTV signals. This is a very important test. | |
|  | |  |
|
|