dslreports logo
site
spacer

spacer
 
   
spc
story category
FCC Boss Heartily Embraces Caps, Overages
While Ignoring All of the Potential Pitfalls
by Karl Bode 11:58AM Wednesday May 23 2012 Tipped by FFH5 See Profile
While he was of course speaking to his audience at this week's Cable Show in Boston, FCC boss Julius Genachowski gave his full-throated support to the cap and overage pricing model. "Business model innovation is very important," told the Cable Show attendees, adding that "usage-based pricing could be healthy and beneficial." "There was a point of view a couple years ago that there was only one permissible pricing model for broadband," said Genachowski, adding that "I didn't agree."

Click for full size
The problem is that while many people (including us) have argued many things about metered billing, that there should be only one pricing model has never been among them. Most of the conversations have centered around things like the fact the caps and overages imposed aren't fair, aren't tied to economic realities, and have major anti-competitive implications if abused by a broadband duopoly.

One of the larger issues, utterly ignored by Genachowski, is that while ISPs want to bill like utilities -- they refuse to be regulated like utilities -- so nobody, including the FCC, is checking to confirm meter accuracy. As such, it's not that people don't want ISPs to explore new pricing models, they just don't want them to be punitive -- and when you've got a marginally-competitive market, it's more than likely that they ultimately will be.

While the FCC professes to be concerned with "bill shock" and high subscriber prices, they generally brush aside aggressive and anti-consumer pricing as "creative." One prime example: ISPs have been burying below-the-line fees to subscriber bills to jack up the advertised price post sale -- a practice the FCC has never been even-slightly concerned about. New broadband pricing is fine, but not if the FCC's going to ignore anti-competitive abuses, meter accuracy, or aggressive over-billing.


54 comments .. click to read

Recommended comments




HaloFans

join:2006-12-18

1 edit

2 recommendations

reply to pandora

Re: Hope and fail?

lol wut.

Mitt is an obvious corporate apologist as he is famously quoted, "Corporations are people my friend."

He would approve caps/overages or whatever "benefits" the corporations obtain so that they will "trickle down" to the consumers.

If anything, Karl and user Facetious are simply reminding everyone that our telecom industry needs more regulation, not deregulation.

Day by day, year by year, the USA continues to fall further behind in Internet speeds at affordable prices. Instead, money used to improve infrastructure is thrown at propaganda and lobbying to tell people that our Internet structure, even though it's the furthest away from the truth.

Money = free speech. A sad reality of the times.


Camaro
Question everything
Premium
join:2008-04-05
Westfield, MA
kudos:1

2 recommendations

Blah

"One of the larger issues, utterly ignored by Genachowski, is that while ISPs want to bill like utilities -- they refuse to be regulated like utilities"

To me that is the only thing that matters.