dslreports logo
 story category
FCC Boss Keeps Repeating the Same Lie About Net Neutrality

We've pretty well established by this point that contrary to the broadband industry's claims, net neutrality didn't harm sector investment in new networks. It's not something that's debatable. Publicly-available earnings reports, SEC filings, and countless CEO statements have made that clear. So have numerous deep dives by reporters and analysts who've dug through ISP financial reports. As have numerous, lengthy reports (pdf) from consumer advocates.

Click for full size
And yet, FCC Boss Ajit Pai keeps falsely claiming that net neutrality demolished broadband industry investment, and that everybody should be singing his praises for stopping this investment apocalypse.

"I'm proud to say that last year, we reversed the Title II Order," Pai said in a speech hosted by the cable industry this week. "We restored the light-touch approach to network regulation that served us well for almost 20 years, paving the way for over $1.5 trillion in private investment to build out wired and wireless networks."

Of course the claim that Pai returned the broadband industry to a "light touch" approach that always existed is also false, since broadband was more heavily regulated early on than it was even under the FCC's 2015 net neutrality rules. In fact, most ISPs were regulated under Title II of the Communications Act until around 2002, when former FCC boss (turned top cable lobbyist Michael Powell) began gutting oversight of the uncompetitive sector.

"Overregulation is a major threat to investment," Pai told attendees. "And there was no better example of overregulation than the FCC’s 2015 Title II Order. This regulatory misadventure resulted in 1930s utility-style regulation being imposed on your businesses."

And by "1930s utility-style regulation" Pai means the same Title II-based ISP regulation that was in place until 2002, responsible for most of the early growth in the broadband sector. He also ignores the fact that the FCC's 2015 net neutrality rules were crafted to pre-empt most of the heavier, utility-style regulations he's complaining about.

Pai's following a pretty standard tactic for disinformation: the idea that if you repeat a falsehood often enough, it becomes entrenched as a fact in the minds of people either eager to be misled, or who don't know any better. Unfortunately for Pai, under the law the FCC can't just reverse a major regulatory action without proving significant market harm, and the courts may not find his magic math convincing in the numerous lawsuits to come.

Most recommended from 34 comments



Ut98Ex
join:2012-07-11
Georgetown, TX

20 recommendations

Ut98Ex

Member

He is just following the party line...

Which is: lie, repeat, repeat, repeat, repeat and then go on foxnews and repeat some more again. Eventually the followers will just take his constant lie as as gospel (i.e.: Mexico will pay for the wall, Bowling Green massacre, etc.,etc. etc.). This is how "alternate facts" are created, promoted and eventually disseminated and accepted by some to be the truth.

davidc502
join:2002-03-06
Mount Juliet, TN

13 recommendations

davidc502

Member

when one says a lie enough

when one says a lie enough, it becomes the truth.

For those who listen, it will be the truth.

TIGERON
join:2008-03-11
Boston, MA

5 recommendations

TIGERON

Member

with an ugly mug only a mother could love

I'd like to punch him in the face
HiDesert
join:2008-08-17

5 recommendations

HiDesert

Member

The big lie

Joseph Goebbels coined it in Germany saying “If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it". Hitler touched upon it first in his book Mein Kampf in 1925. This is a big part of the GOP playbook. Scary times. People really need to start thinking for themselves and not get sucked into the propaganda. If not for themselves, but for our future generations. It may already be too late with the advent of citizen's united.