dslreports logo

story category
FCC Boss Says Comcast Guilty, Should Be Punished
FCC will vote August 1 on how exactly to slap their wrist...
by Karl Bode 08:37AM Friday Jul 11 2008 Tipped by MrSpock29 See Profile
Comcast worked so hard to get the FCC off their back for the company's throttling of P2P traffic, a practice first discovered in our forums in May of 2007. Comcast first denied they were doing anything out of the ordinary. They then argued that the throttling was perfectly reasonable -- as per the definition of reasonable in the FCC's network neutrality policy statement. They then issued a new new terms of service that used the word "reasonable" a lot, and issued an 80 page statement to the FCC that used the word reasonable forty times.

Click for full size
That didn't work. Comcast then began publicly stating that the FCC lacked authority to punish them, suggesting they'd sue the FCC tried. It looks like their lawyers are going to get a workout, as late yesterday FCC boss Kevin Martin stated that Comcast did violate FCC's network neutrality principles and should be punished.

We found that Comcast’s actions in this instance violated our principles.
-The FCC, shocking some by revealing they have principles
"The commission has adopted a set of principles that protects consumers access to the Internet," Martin told The Associated Press late Thursday. "We found that Comcast’s actions in this instance violated our principles." Martin will now circulate an order recommending Comcast be punished that will be voted on by fellow commissioners August 1.

Martin says their investigation found that Comcast arbitrarily blocked Internet access, regardless of the level of congestion, then failed to disclose to consumers that they were doing so. No word yet on the severity of punishment planned. For their part, Comcast responded to the AP report by continuing to play semantic patty cake, stating that Comcast engages in "carefully limited" and "reasonable" measures to manage traffic. The company sent me this statement:
Comcast does not block any Internet content, application, or service. The Commission has never before provided any guidance on what it means by ‘reasonable network management. The carefully limited measures that Comcast takes to manage traffic on its broadband network are a reasonable part of Comcast’s strategy to ensure a high-quality, reliable Internet experience for all Comcast High-Speed Internet customers and are used by many other ISPs around the world. Comcast’s customer service agreements and policies have always informed Comcast customers that broadband capacity is not unlimited, and that the network is managed for the benefit of all customers. Our website offers detailed information on our network management practices."
Earlier this year, pressure from the FCC investigation forced Comcast to announce they'd be replacing their current network management system (24/7 throttling of upstream P2P traffic using forged TCP packets) with one that's more transparent. As I first reported in May, that new plan may include clear 250GB caps and overage fees, increased DMCA letter enforcement, and the throttling of heavy users down to "above DSL" speeds.

93 comments .. click to read

Recommended comments

Yarmouth Port, MA

4 edits

6 recommendations

Thank you to BroadbandReports.com

I am the author of the piece at »Comcast is using Sandvine to manage P2P Connections.

When Comcast bought up large systems to become the largest Cable MSO, it did not buy the Internet. It has no right to change how it works -- not one byte of it.

How the world-wide Internet works is defined by all of us, through our participation and trust in the Internet Society and the Internet Engineering Task Force. To ensure interoperability and access for all, changes must be carefully deliberated and standardized there. The responsibility of operating the Internet in accordance with those standards is entrusted to companies providing access to it. It's not Comcast's job to change how the Internet works nor can it decide who or what gets preference upon it.

In the year 1999, this website created a forum where people could come together and "demystify" DSL-based and cable-based Internet and learn about how to gain access to it. Quickly, those of us knowledgeable or interested in learning about the technology became members here. I was one of the latter, and members here have taught me a lot.

BroadbandReports.com has always been a system of people helping people, and when necessary, shedding light to those issues that would change the Internet or the industries it has created. I'm grateful that its users taught me so much through the years. It enabled me, and this outcome is a direct result of the coaching I have received here and the platform that this website provides to all of us.

I haven't seen anything other than the press reports about something to be circulated around the FCC. I am hopeful that when the details are released that it serves to preserve and protect the Internet from those who would abuse their power and change it.
Robb Topolski -= funchords.com =- Hillsboro, Oregon
HTTP is the new Bandwidth Hog...