site Search:


 
   
story category
FCC Hopes To Use Some Spectrum For 'Free or Cheap' Wireless
But you might want to see if they can fix the USF first...
by Karl Bode Tuesday 09-Mar-2010 tags: legal · fcc · coverage · business · alternatives · bandwidth · Op/Ed · wireless
The FCC has begun their sales pitch for the nation's first national broadband plan ahead of its formal unveiling next week. As we've been discussing, we haven't been too impressed by the plan's failure to tackle competition, or its tendency to make proclamations that sound good but are rather empty upon closer inspection. The FCC is back today making headlines about how the agency hopes to help the estimated 100 million Americans without broadband by offering "free or low cost wireless plans" according to Reuters:

U.S. regulators may dedicate spectrum to free wireless Internet service for some Americans to increase affordable broadband service nationwide, the Federal Communications Commission said on Tuesday. . . One way of making broadband more affordable is to "consider use of spectrum for a free or a very low cost wireless broadband service," the FCC said in a statement.

Looking at the actual FCC statement (pdf) however, there's no real explanation of how exactly the agency hopes to do this. The statement also suggests that the FCC will "consider" such a plan, not neccessarily that they'll implement it. With spectrum obviously a limited resource, clearly the FCC's thinking about some kind of subsidy package to the nation's telcos if they provide cheaper service. Of course the FCC already plans to subsidize carriers as they examine "reforming" the long broken USF system.

That reform, according to several people familiar with the plan, could involve a new monthly fee on broadband connections used to expand the plan to cover residential broadband (right now it covers only rural phone service, and broadband provided to schools). We're told the fee is slated to be somewhere around $1 a month per person, but could be higher when the final plan is unveiled. However, "free or low cast wireless service" seems like a long shot.

Reforming the USF is a very complex and difficult task in and of itself, given the fund (and the e-Rate program) has a bit of a history as a poorly supervised mess, according to GAO studies. $25 billion has been dumped into e-Rate alone since 1998, though the FCC for many years didn't track where it went. That means that maybe that money helped, or maybe it didn't. Maybe it just found its way into the pocket of a phone company, or maybe it helped buy a high school PC in Pensacola, Florida.

One thing we know is that AT&T and Verizon have been lobbying Uncle Sam very hard for several years to ensure they get a bigger chunk of the USF pie. From the looks of things they're going to get it to the tune of several billion per major incumbent annually, according to one plan source. Getting more money for incumbents will be the primary goal. Maybe consumers will see that money put to use in tangible ways like "free or cheap" wireless service -- but maybe they won't.

view: topics flat text 
Post a:
Sammer

join:2005-12-22
Canonsburg, PA

Consumers will never see USF money that goes to T or V

Any USF money that goes to AT&T or Verizon will go directly to shareholders, consumers will never see a dime!
sonicmerlin

join:2009-05-24
Cleveland, OH
kudos:1

Re: Consumers will never see USF money that goes to T or V

Dividends are a tiny % of their total profit. They just stockpile the money and buy out content companies with it.

ThrowDemsOut
If you can't convince 'em, confuse 'em
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Mullica Hill, NJ
kudos:4
said by Sammer:

Any USF money that goes to AT&T or Verizon will go directly to shareholders, consumers will never see a dime!
No. It will most likely go to politically connected contractors who promise to install broadband upgrades; plan municipal broadband for local water & electric companies; PC wholesalers for school systems & local libraries, etc, etc. The key words being "POLITICALLY CONNECTED". The USF has always been used to reward the supporters of and contributors to politicians favored by those handing out the money(now Dems; before Repubs).
Sammer

join:2005-12-22
Canonsburg, PA

Re: Consumers will never see USF money that goes to T or V

Like I said consumers will never see a dime. Any national broadband plan based on cell phone companies expanding broadband is a failure to begin with. Except in third world countries fiber optics as deep as practical has to be the basis of such a plan and finding a way to reduce the cost of deploying fiber and encouraging competition is what will make it a success.
openbox9

join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA
kudos:1

Re: Consumers will never see USF money that goes to T or V

Ironically, the same wireless companies that you don't want receiving money to deploy Internet access are also responsible for a significant portion of the wireline infrastructure in this country. Wireless is significantly easier and less costly to fill access gaps with than wireline. Perhaps a good plan is to use wireless as a bridge and as wireline infrastructure is deployed.
hottboiinnc
ME

join:2003-10-15
Cleveland, OH

Re: Consumers will never see USF money that goes to T or V

and VZ is selling off more and more of that wireline network.
openbox9

join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA
kudos:1

Re: Consumers will never see USF money that goes to T or V

With the potential to return to those markets with wireless service. What's your point? VZ is leaning forward into the ongoing evolution of communications infrastructure.
Sammer

join:2005-12-22
Canonsburg, PA
said by openbox9:

Wireless is significantly easier and less costly to fill access gaps with than wireline. Perhaps a good plan is to use wireless as a bridge and as wireline infrastructure is deployed.
While some much smaller companies may use wireless to fill in some of those gaps what makes you think that AT&T and Verizon will be any more interested in such less profitable areas than they are now?
openbox9

join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA
kudos:1

Re: Consumers will never see USF money that goes to T or V

Have you missed the few articles here at DSLR over the last couple of weeks discussing VZ's shedding of expensive, regulated, low ROI wireline markets with the possibility of returning to those markets with relatively low cost wireless service? "Less profitable" areas are much easier to service with lower cost solutions.
act eth guy

join:2009-01-21
Downs, KS

Re: Consumers will never see USF money that goes to T or V

Yes, if you are a money hungry giant and not concerned about establishing a local business with local people employed and with kickbacks to the local economy for supporting your low- rate of return projects.
openbox9

join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA
kudos:1

Re: Consumers will never see USF money that goes to T or V

Huh? I see many Verizon Wireless stores spread throughout both urban and rural areas...including areas not served by VZ's wireline service. What exactly do you think will change?
act eth guy

join:2009-01-21
Downs, KS
So, they have been getting money and not spending it on Rural Customers. So lets give them more. What a joke. They should be forced to sell all exchanges under 100,000 subscribers to Independent, CO-OP or CLEC carriers that would actually put the money back into a rural infrastructure and the consumer.

NOCMan
MacChatter
Premium
join:2004-09-30
Colorado Springs, CO

Wireless only way to serve Rural economically

Lets face it, it will be a long time before it ever becomes cheap to run fiber to a farm in the middle of Kansas. However wireless can easily serve even sparse populations.

Satellite is not an option for these people though.
Sammer

join:2005-12-22
Canonsburg, PA

1 edit

Re: Wireless only way to serve Rural economically

said by NOCMan:

Lets face it, it will be a long time before it ever becomes cheap to run fiber to a farm in the middle of Kansas. However wireless can easily serve even sparse populations.
Actually some smaller cable companies have actually found it cheaper to run RF over Glass (RFoG) to some of those farms than it is to upgrade or expand their copper. Sorry but douchebag stock analysts prevent at least the publicly traded major cable companies from doing the same. Also areas with no fiber optic lines will not have enough cell phone towers.
openbox9

join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA
kudos:1

Re: Wireless only way to serve Rural economically

NOCMan See ProfileProbably should have stated that it will be difficult for many rural areas to generate the ROI necessary to justify any wireline infrastructure upgrade, not just fiber. Coax, twisted pair, fiber, tin cans and string....it doesn't matter. More often than not, I believe wireless technology is easier, faster, and lower cost to deploy.

Mark678

@wideopenwest.com

approval from:
ThrowDemsOut See Profile
nexex See Profile
ptuck874 See Profile

Its intended to be free wireless broad-band for low income.

This is not intended as a solution for those who don't have broadband available in their area, but rather at people with low income.

They haven't the specifics yet, but personally, If you are low income because you do not want to work, my tax dollars should not be providing you with non-essentials, such as broadband internet.

hdman
Flt Rider
Premium
join:2003-11-25
Appleton, WI
Reviews:
·Cellcom Wireless

Re: Its intended to be free wireless broad-band for low income.

said by Mark678 :

This is not intended as a solution for those who don't have broadband available in their area, but rather at people with low income.

They haven't the specifics yet, but personally, If you are low income because you do not want to work, my tax dollars should not be providing you with non-essentials, such as broadband internet.
AMEN!!!!!
--
The proper way to break in a Harley: Grab a fist full of throttle, and ride it like you stole it!!!
SuperWISP

join:2007-04-17
Laramie, WY

...and what would actually happen?

The "free" system would be overloaded by kids downloading pirated video and music, and would collapse under its own weight before it helped a single disadvantaged person.

Tuesday, 07-Feb 22:24:53 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online! © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.