Search:  

 
 
   News
newer
story category FCC Seeks Comments on Free Nationwide Broadband Plan
Incumbent carriers are likely to have a lot to say
10:37AM Saturday Jun 21 2008 by KathrynV
tags: fcc · business · wireless
The FCC has been considering a spectrum auction designed to create free nationwide wireless broadband service and has now released information about their plans in order to get feedback about moving forward. The plan involves combining existing unused spectrum and auctioning it off to a bidder who would then build out a network that would cover 95% of the country within the next ten years.

The plan has been controversial due in no small part to the fact that it’s opposed by power-wielding incumbent wireless carriers. T-Mobile has stated the intention to detail concerns to the FCC regarding interference issues that it believes require further joint testing with the FCC. Although the carriers are likely to push for delays on this issue, the FCC claims to seek an expedited comment period with a final decision to come in August.

Related:
  1. Motorola Offers White Space Device For Testing
  2. FCC Free Broadband Plan Going Nowhere Fast
  3. FCC Proceeds Cautiously With White Space Testing
  4. New Wireless ETF Policies Compared
  5. FCC Begins Field Testing Of Prototype 'White Space' Broadband
  6. FCC May Require Telcos to Speed Up LNP
  7. Phone Service Coalition Seeks Intercarrier Compensation Decision
  8. Google Launches White Space Broadband Website
Forums » FCC Seeks Comments on Free Nationwide Broadband Plan
view: topics flat text 
Post a:

NickD
Premium
join:2000-11-17
Princeton Junction, NJ
clubs:

Profitability

How would building a free national wireless network be profitable to any company who does it?

ur do

@rr.com

Re: Profitability

get cash or tax breaks or etc from the government, and after 10 years discover the plan is not finished...

TK Junk Mail
Go ahead, make my day
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Margate City, NJ
clubs:
·Comcast


edit:
June 21st, @10:59AM

said by NickD See Profile :

How would building a free national wireless network be profitable to any company who does it?
Only 25% of the spectrum would be for the free internet service. The remaining 75% would be available for the winner to use as they see fit in for-profit endeavors.

One part of the plan is to also make the free internet piece(25%) free of porn thru an ISP controlled filter process. The porn free filter can be opt-out for those who want their porn. But they would have to prove who they are to opt-out.
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page

Mike
Premium,Mod
join:2000-09-17
Pittsburgh, PA
clubs:

Re: Profitability

great firewall of china satellite office?

I think it's safe to say this is the only case where NIMBY is valid.
BF69

join:2004-07-28
Camden, TN

said by TK Junk Mail See Profile :

said by NickD See Profile :

How would building a free national wireless network be profitable to any company who does it?
Only 25% of the spectrum would be for the free internet service. The remaining 75% would be available for the winner to use as they see fit in for-profit endeavors.

One part of the plan is to also make the free internet piece(25%) free of porn thru an ISP controlled filter process. The porn free filter can be opt-out for those who want their porn. But they would have to prove who they are to opt-out.
Or they could just PAY for thier internet and it won't be an issue.
jerbell

join:2004-02-19
Abilene, TX
Only the slowest speed would be free, you would pay for the faster tiers and for unfiltered access.

Mike
Premium,Mod
join:2000-09-17
Pittsburgh, PA
clubs:

Re: Profitability

That would actually work then.

You could apply the same broadcast rules for "public" access.

If you decide to pay for it, you can get the unfiltered access.

nappyd

sweet, free U-Verse!
Austinloop

join:2001-08-19
Austin, TX

Free service

If the government (FCC) desires free service, let them build it.
Test99
Premium
join:2003-04-24
San Jose, CA
·DSL EXTREME
·InPhonex

Stranger than Fiction

The government proposes to make a profit by auctioning off spectrum. The successful bidder is required to pay the government for the spectrum and then provide free service...

You couldn't make this stuff up.
--
50775@fwd.pulver.com
BF69

join:2004-07-28
Camden, TN

Re: Stranger than Fiction

said by Test99 See Profile :

The government proposes to make a profit by auctioning off spectrum. The successful bidder is required to pay the government for the spectrum and then provide free service...

You couldn't make this stuff up.
you should really try READING the details.
Test99
Premium
join:2003-04-24
San Jose, CA

Re: Stranger than Fiction

If you want me to read the details, please tell me where to find them.
--
50775@fwd.pulver.com

mod_wastrel

join:2008-03-28

Watered down...

I expect the free Internet service will be about as useful as free broadcast TV is entertaining. Some things are actually worth what you pay for them.
Lazlow

join:2006-08-07
Saint Louis, MO

Re: Watered down...

I dropped cable a few years ago. There is actually quite a bit of stuff on OTA. PBS here has 4 channels. I get CBS,NBC,ABC,Fox,WB(or whatever they call it now), a weather channel, and five other stations. PBS and all the big names are all in digital. I find it a FAR better value than what I was paying for cable. My digital channels also look much better than my neighbors digital cable(channel to channel).

mod_wastrel

join:2008-03-28
·magicjack.com

Re: Watered down...

said by Lazlow See Profile :

"OTA ... [is] a FAR better value than ... cable."
I totally agree with that.

XBL2007

join:2001-01-03
Chicago, IL
Plenty of shows on free TV are worth watching.

Lost, House, CSI, etc.

mod_wastrel

join:2008-03-28
·magicjack.com

Re: Watered down...

I don't think so, but to each his own (or her own).

And it's not really "free" TV--you pay more for every product you buy so manufacturers and advertisers and pay for all of those commercials (especially the ones during professional sports programs: where do think those multi-million dollar pro athlete salaries come from? ...your pocket).
Lazlow

join:2006-08-07
Saint Louis, MO

Re: Watered down...

The majority of cable channels also have commercials. So if you do not consider OTA free(which I can see) then you are paying twice for cable.
bac522

join:2003-08-04
Manchester, NH

Goverment and free...bad combination.

I'm trouble when the anything the government wants to do is has the word "free" attached to it. Capitalism is democracy's greatest attributes but when you start to require that certain things be provided for free doesn't this lend to a socialist mentality??? This has nothing but cluster f*ck written all over it...I really hope major changes come at the FCC after the election!
Lazlow

join:2006-08-07
Saint Louis, MO

Re: Goverment and free...bad combination.

I look at this just like OTA TV. It has worked reasonably well.

If I recall correctly, the FCC appointments are for 6 years, so even after the election it will be a couple of years before anything changes.
Forums » FCC Seeks Comments on Free Nationwide Broadband Plan


Thursday, 21-Aug 00:19:48 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 9 years online! © 1999-2008 dslreports.com.