 | | t-mobile A bunch of greedy bastards who need to stop the advancement of technologies because they wont get their cut. | |
|
 |  EPS join:2008-02-13 Hingham, MA | Re: t-mobile Because it's totally impossible that there could actually be interference issues. | |
|
 WiseOldNerdDe gustibus non est disputandumPremium join:2001-11-25 Phoenix, AZ Reviews:
·Charter
·Cox HSI
| T-Mobile Could Be Right-Hence The Test T-Mobile is perhaps the least rapacious of the major wireless companies, and as a TMO customer I don't want the Bush Nazis in the FCC to f++kup my service as they sell off our airwaves to their cronies. -- My perception is REALITY | |
|
 n2jtx join:2001-01-13 Glen Head, NY Reviews:
·Optimum Online
| The Results Are In! The test results are in and no interference was found (at least any reports of interference were expunged from final report). The AWS sale will continue as planned and T-Mobile will be out the test fees. Money talks...
This look at the future provided by ME. -- I support the right to keep and arm bears. | |
|
 | | and we have to foot the bill so the fcc makes the money off selling a 25MHz piece of the Advanced Wireless Service spectrum but us tmobile customers have to foot the bill for them to do the test first. Does anyone els see something wrong with this? If the fcc wants to sell something shouldn't they have to pay for the test? | |
|
 |  | | Re: and we have to foot the bill nope cause tmo said it was going to cause interf. what i dont understand how someone would say it was going to do this, when most cell carriers use the 900MHz to 1900Mhz spec, the signals should travel through the air right next toeach other with no issues | |
|
 | | Maybe it wasn't interference they were worried about My theory is they were mostly worried that people would be able to leverage T-Mobile compatible hardware for use with the free spectrum. That would lower the cost for entry, thus in a way T-Mo would be subsidizing the free spectrum. If there was a new unique frequency used it would require development of new radios and that would slow down uptake of the free frequencies.
But then again perhaps that is a lame theory because they wouldn't want to pay for an interference test otherwise. | |
|
 |
|