site Search:


 
   
story category
FCC's Baker Heads for Job at Comcast
Four Months After Approving $13.75 Billion Comcast/NBC Deal
by Karl Bode Wednesday 11-May-2011 tags: fcc · business · consumers
As the revolving door continues to spin and the line between regulators and companies they're supposed to oversee evaporates, the Wall Street Journal today reports that Republican FCC Commissioner Meredith Attwell Baker is poised to leave the FCC for a job at Comcast Corporation. "Ms. Baker is expected to announce her departure as soon as this week for an unknown position at the Philadelphia-based cable giant," notes the Journal. Baker, who joined the FCC just two years ago, leaves the FCC just four months after she voted yes on Comcast's $13.75 billion acquisition of NBC. Bakers term is up in June, though she was expected to be re-nominated for the seat.

Update: Comcast has confirmed the hire, and Baker will report directly to Kyle Mcslarrow at Comcast/NBC Universal. McSlarrow just made a lateral move from the cable industry's chief lobbying organization (the NCTA) to Comcast, and his position at the NCTA was filled by former FCC boss Michael Powell. Baker has issued a press statement saying she's leaving the FCC June 3, though she fails to mention the fact she's going to Comcast -- apparently in the hopes you won't notice this looks bad after her support of NBC/Comcast.

Update 2: For those wondering, one of our commenters notes that it's perfectly legal for Comcast to hire Baker so quickly from an agency that oversees them -- she just can't have lobbying contact with the highest level FCC officials for one year two years. Of course that still doesn't mean the move is ethical, or that there aren't questions to be asked about the level of contact between Comcast and Baker during the NBC review while Baker supposedly was employed in the public trust.

view: topics flat text 
Post a:
page: 1 · 2

rit56

join:2000-12-01
New York, NY

AT&T & T Mobil

Based on this consumers can anticipate a good screwing on the upcoming AT&T, T - Mobil merger. We should have a friendly contest here to see which current FCC official gets the AT&T job.

RiseAbove
Premium
join:2004-01-30

Re: AT&T & T Mobil

exactly what I was thinking. How many people at the FCC are going to get bought off for this merger.

MerinX
Crunching for Cures
Premium
join:2011-02-03
kudos:1
Reviews:
·Shaw
said by rit56:

Based on this consumers can anticipate a good screwing on the upcoming AT&T, T - Mobil merger. We should have a friendly contest here to see which current FCC official gets the AT&T job.

I am starting an office pool now....
--
WCG Can you BOINC it?!?

PapaMidnight

join:2009-01-13
Baltimore, MD
said by rit56:

Based on this consumers can anticipate a good screwing on the upcoming AT&T, T - Mobil merger.

"Based on this..."? In all honesty, did anyone NOT see this coming; and does anyone NOT anticipate consumers being royally screwed with the upcoming (inevitable - because seriously, what agency is NOT going to rubberstamp the deal) AT&T/T-MOBILE merger?

SLD
Premium
join:2002-04-17
San Francisco, CA

Invalidate

[see subject]

RiseAbove
Premium
join:2004-01-30

Every Politician can be bought.

this once again proves that every politician can easily be bought. Why we haven't risen up from this madness and burned DC to the ground so we can start over is beyond me.
sonicmerlin

join:2009-05-24
Cleveland, OH
kudos:1

Re: Every Politician can be bought.

Because there's so much misinformation from news media. You have Fox News and AM radio riling up the right over non existent issues like abortion and evil scientists, and for the "left" you have corporate controlled "liberal" outlets which ignore the corruption in the government.

Where the US population needs unity, the media serves to divide and conquer.

The shills on here like elray, openbox, and TK have no real effect on people's opinions. It's not like their "logic" ever makes sense. It's more an atmosphere of derision and emotional manipulation that confuses the less educated and easily scared.

S_engineer
Premium
join:2007-05-16
Chicago, IL

Re: Every Politician can be bought.

said by sonicmerlin:

The shills on here like elray, openbox, and TK have no real effect on people's opinions. It's not like their "logic" ever makes sense. It's more an atmosphere of derision and emotional manipulation that confuses the less educated and easily scared.

But their views are a reflection of the broader population that is in fact polarized by the media outlets that you suggest.The bad thing is, then these same outlets go out and poll this manipulated populace on various legislation, and our duly elected representatives vote based on these skewed poll numbers.
As far as Baker goes, if this isn't criminal, then it should be. Lets see the Teaparty go after her public pension!
--
"Thanks for the dance... and cut yourself a slice'a throat! "
- Curly (HOI POLLOI, 1935)

jmn1207
Premium
join:2000-07-19
Ashburn, VA
kudos:1
said by RiseAbove:

this once again proves that every politician can easily be bought. Why we haven't risen up from this madness and burned DC to the ground so we can start over is beyond me.

Is it that every politician can be bought, or perhaps only the politicians that accept bribes become successful? Does it matter?
dadarkside
Premium
join:2006-05-20
The Moon

Re: Every Politician can be bought.

She's not a politician, but a political appointee. A bit of a difference. And ironically, appointed by the current Democratic president. Apparantly, he thought a mix of dems and repubs on the FCC to be considered balance.

It's a shame he couldn't consider integrity as a prerequisite for appointment. This lady appears to have none of that.

Linklist
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Williamstown, NJ
kudos:5

Re: Every Politician can be bought.

said by dadarkside:

She's not a politician, but a political appointee. A bit of a difference. And ironically, appointed by the current Democratic president. Apparantly, he thought a mix of dems and repubs on the FCC to be considered balance.

That wasn't a choice but a legal requirement that on the 5 member FCC, 2 have to be from the party opposite of the majority.
--
Record your speedtest.net results in DSLReports SpeedWave
»www.speedtest.net/wave/afe201cb84d45c88
dadarkside
Premium
join:2006-05-20
The Moon

Re: Every Politician can be bought.

said by Linklist:

said by dadarkside:

She's not a politician, but a political appointee. A bit of a difference. And ironically, appointed by the current Democratic president. Apparantly, he thought a mix of dems and repubs on the FCC to be considered balance.

That wasn't a choice but a legal requirement that on the 5 member FCC, 2 have to be from the party opposite of the majority.

Thanks for the clarification.

She's still a self serving corporate stooge who seems completely lacking in integrity.

anonme

@comcast.net
And they can be contacted too. Send her your luv.

»transition.fcc.gov/commissioners···ail.html

yoshamano

join:2002-05-12
Marshall, MI

One of my favorite Fight Club quotes fits right in here.

"I am Jack's complete lack of surprise."

tiger72
SexaT duorP
Premium
join:2001-03-28
Saint Louis, MO
kudos:1

Re: One of my favorite Fight Club quotes fits right in here.

said by yoshamano:

"I am Jack's complete lack of surprise."

It's sad because it's true. =(
resa1983
Premium
join:2008-03-10
North York, ON
kudos:7

Conflict of Interest much?

Lovely... Talk about a conflict of interest.

Sounds like Canada's CRTC too.

Linklist
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Williamstown, NJ
kudos:5

4 edits

Move to Comcast should have been prohibited

I am pretty sure Federal rules prohibit Baker leaving the FCC and taking a job at Comcast for a period of time around 1 yr. That is the general rule for government workers in the executive pay range. Not 100% sure these rules apply to the FCC, which is an independent agency.

»www.cleanupwashington.org/lobbyi···ageid=40

If the rules don't apply that is wrong.

»www.opensecrets.org/revolving/se···id=EIFCC

--
Record your speedtest.net results in DSLReports SpeedWave
»www.speedtest.net/wave/afe201cb84d45c88

cdru
Go Colts
Premium,MVM
join:2003-05-14
Fort Wayne, IN
kudos:7

Re: Move to Comcast should have been prohibited

Your first link clearly explains how she can be hired by Comcast even if the cooling off period applies.

From clear at the bottom:
quote:
The "cooling off" period applies only to making lobbying contacts with the restricted government agencies or personnel. As a result, a former public official or former senior government employee may research relevant issues, develop lobbying strategies and supervise those lobbying their former agencies or personnel immediately upon leaving office, so long as the former official does not make the actual lobbying contact during the cooling off period. The former official simply directs other lobbyists to make the contact.
Comcast/NBC just merged. While I'm sure there will be issues before the FCC pertaining to Comcast's interests, major lobbying probably will be down in the next year year or so. Between her brain being picked for strategy and directing others, I'm sure she can still easily satisfy the restrictions.

Linklist
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Williamstown, NJ
kudos:5

Re: Move to Comcast should have been prohibited

said by cdru:

Your first link clearly explains how she can be hired by Comcast even if the cooling off period applies.

From clear at the bottom:

quote:
The "cooling off" period applies only to making lobbying contacts with the restricted government agencies or personnel. As a result, a former public official or former senior government employee may research relevant issues, develop lobbying strategies and supervise those lobbying their former agencies or personnel immediately upon leaving office, so long as the former official does not make the actual lobbying contact during the cooling off period. The former official simply directs other lobbyists to make the contact.
Comcast/NBC just merged. While I'm sure there will be issues before the FCC pertaining to Comcast's interests, major lobbying probably will be down in the next year year or so. Between her brain being picked for strategy and directing others, I'm sure she can still easily satisfy the restrictions.

Thanks for that further enlightening research on the law. All these laws come with loopholes I guess.
--
Record your speedtest.net results in DSLReports SpeedWave
»www.speedtest.net/wave/afe201cb84d45c88

KrK
Heavy Artillery For The Little Guy
Premium
join:2000-01-17
Tulsa, OK
Reviews:
·AT&T DSL Service

Re: Move to Comcast should have been prohibited

said by Linklist:

Thanks for that further enlightening research on the law. All these laws come with loopholes I guess.

Yeah, pretty big loophole. More like: These laws are a complete joke.
--
"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power." -- Benito Mussolini
TheRogueX

join:2003-03-26
Springfield, MO
Reviews:
·Mediacom
GIANT loopholes.

"Yeah, you can't talk to them yourself, but you can tell them who to talk to and what all the right selling points are, as well as whatever tricks are necessary to get us our way."

Total BS. Any regulator should have extremely strict rules limiting them from becoming lobbyists after they leave the regulatory body in which they work. In fact, they shouldn't even be allowed to work for companies in the fields of which they were regulators for a specific time frame (more than just 1 year). They should also not be allowed to take any gifts, money, or anything of monetary value from the industries they regulate while they are still regulators(no private retreats paid for by lobbyists so that they can explain their views, no special dinners, etc).

Linklist
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Williamstown, NJ
kudos:5
Baker defends her actions in jumping to Comcast, but it still sounds pretty lame:
»www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/pos···log.html

Under the ethics pledge enacted by President Obama, Baker cannot lobby the FCC for two years, but she can lobby Congress.

Baker won’t be able to directly lobby the FCC, but she holds much influence and knowledge that can help Comcast in its regulatory agenda.

She says:
“Not once in my entire tenure as a Commissioner had anyone at Comcast or NBC Universal approached me about potential employment,” Baker said in a statement. She said the “opportunity became available in mid-April,” at which point she sought advice from the FCC’s general counsel and recused herself from any issues involving Comcast and NBC Universal.


--
Record your speedtest.net results in DSLReports SpeedWave
»www.speedtest.net/wave/afe201cb84d45c88

aciddrink

join:2000-08-26
Lexington, KY

.

Good old fashioned US Government corruption. Ahh feels good don't it?

EUS
Kill cancer
Premium
join:2002-09-10
canada

It's like

It's like they're (FCC) not even trying anymore.
It's also getting harder every day to deny that fascism is alive.
--
~ Project Hope ~
Bobby100

join:2000-09-29
Centreville, VA

unbelieveable!

just 4 months?!@#? How can anyone think this is acceptable for a government employee...sheesh...

Linklist
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Williamstown, NJ
kudos:5

2 edits

Baker will be Washington lobbyist for NBCU

»thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valle···shington

UPDATE: Comcast and Baker's office each put out releases about the development. Baker's title will be senior vice president of government affairs for NBC Universal. She will report to McSlarrow.

"I’ve been privileged to serve in government for the past seven years under President Obama at the FCC and President Bush at NTIA, I’m excited to embark on a new phase of my career with Comcast and NBCUniversal,” Baker said in a statement. 

»www.adweek.com/news/technology/f···u-131536

Baker will report to Kyle McSlarrow, president of Comcast/NBCUniversal for Washington, D.C., who recently joined the company after heading up the National Cable & Telecommunications Association. She will also work with Rick Cotton, NBCU's executive vice president and general counsel, who sets strategic policy direction for the TV network.

While most everyone in Washington shot off the usual "best wishes" statements about Baker, liberal public interest group Free Press took the opportunity to blast her for leaving the FCC just four months after approving Comcast's purchase of NBCU.

"This is just the latest, though perhaps most blatant, example of a so-called public servant cashing in at a company she is supposed to be regulating," said Craig Aaron, CEO of Free Press. "As recently as March, Commissioner Baker gave a speech lamenting that review of the Comcast-NBCU deal 'took too long.' What we didn't know then was that she was in such a rush to start picking out the drapes in her new corner office."

--
Record your speedtest.net results in DSLReports SpeedWave
»www.speedtest.net/wave/afe201cb84d45c88

FarmerBob

join:2000-12-21
Littleton, CO

But she's a Republican't and . . .

. . . they can do anything they want. Including rewriting the rules and history.

ptrowski
Got Helix?
Premium
join:2005-03-14
Putnam, CT
kudos:4

Re: But she's a Republican't and . . .

Any politician can be bought, don't kid yourself. It has nothing to do with being a republican.
Poguemahone0

join:2010-05-27
united state

Re: But she's a Republican't and . . .

Don'r kid yourself, either. Corporations have been snatching up pet Republicans faster than their profits rise. Both sides can be easily bought, but it's Republicans who have recently demonstrated unwavering support for anything any corporation wants.
Bob61571

join:2008-08-08
Washington, IL
Reviews:
·Frontier Communi..

1 edit

Re: But she's a Republican't and . . .

Bill Daley(yes, the brother of Chicago's nearly-ex Mayor Daley), Obama's current Chief of Staff, was Clinton's Commerce Secretary in Clinton's 2nd term.

Bill Daley was Clinton's chief NAFTA lobbyist in Clinton's 1st term.
(Yes, NAFTA passed Congress and was heavily endorsed by Bill Clinton. ) Daley also opposed Obamacare.

He also was a President at SBC (now AT&T). Daley was also Midwest chairman of JP Morgan Chase. He has also been on the board of both Boeing and Merck. Mr. Daley is also a member of the Council on Foreign Relations.

The more the US government regulates, the more of this Revolving Door situation happens. It ensures a good living for more government employees, govt regulators, lawyers, and lobbyists. It also favors big companies, to the detriment of small companies.
Poguemahone0

join:2010-05-27
united state

Re: But she's a Republican't and . . .

What's your point? It has almost no bearing on any current situation. Regulation isn't bad because corporations aren't inherently benevolent as people seem to think. Don't tell me cable companies running community broadband into the ground and gas companies pushing through frakking rights is a good thing - regulation is in place to prevent these nightmare scenarios. Namely: you should be able to get broadband even if the big telco/cable companies won't offer in your area and your water shouldn't be flammable.

warriors
It's A Great Time Out

join:2001-06-05
San Jose, CA

4 months is too soon.

There ought to be a low to say it needs a minimum of 2 years!

Linklist
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Williamstown, NJ
kudos:5

Re: 4 months is too soon.

said by warriors:

There ought to be a low to say it needs a minimum of 2 years!

There are laws. But they have big loopholes. See this sub-thread:
»Move to Comcast should have been prohibited
--
Record your speedtest.net results in DSLReports SpeedWave
»www.speedtest.net/wave/afe201cb84d45c88
rdmiller

join:2005-09-23
Richmond, VA

Counting paper clips?

If Baker will be reporting to Mcslarrow, Comcast's lobbyist extraordinaire, what else will she be doing, counting paper clips?
expert007

join:2006-01-10
Buffalo, NY

This happened at the FAA

until the shit hit the fan. Then they cracked down.

Just joking on the 'cracked down' part. Nothing changed.

NOCMan
MacChatter
Premium
join:2004-09-30
Colorado Springs, CO

Should just be illegal.

Not only is this unethical, it's probably illegal. In exchange for providing favorable actions, he is given a job by the company the performed the actions for.

Almost like insider trading, except, he betrayed the American consumers by protecting his benefactor, instead of the people.
jjeffeory

join:2002-12-04
USA

Re: Should just be illegal.

LOL.

I'm right there with you but what are WE going to do about it? NOTHING! So they will do what they want.

This is just so comical; we have no chance!
MyDogHsFleas
Premium
join:2007-08-15
Austin, TX
kudos:5
Reviews:
·Mediacom
·RoadRunner Cable
said by NOCMan:

Not only is this unethical, it's probably illegal. In exchange for providing favorable actions, he is given a job by the company the performed the actions for.

It IS illegal do to this. If he sought or was offered a job from a company that he was overseeing, and did not report it, and later took the job, that is a crime and he could go to jail, and those decisions could be revisited. Something that Karl did not mention - "revolving door" laws are already on the books.

Here I found a reference. (see part 4)
WernerSchutz

join:2009-08-04
Sugar Land, TX

Re: Should just be illegal.

Politicians are corporations are above the law in the US.

anonme

@comcast.net
Well just let her know...

»transition.fcc.gov/commissioners···ail.html

AlphaOne
I see
Premium
join:2004-02-21

Unethical indeed

even though legal.

From where I work, we can't just hire Federal and other government employees (current or former). It will go through several legal processes before they're even considered for a position.

Limit

@alter.net

Need some limits

Govt needs to set a limit of say 10 years before anyone can go to work for a company that they approved deals for .. this includes all govt officials.. i know i am really dreaming since our govt is a bunch of back stabbing, contradictory buffoons who only server themselves and not the people of this country.. we should have protests like they are doing in the Middle East to get rid of our govt and put o capable govt in that will actually server the people...

SLD
Premium
join:2002-04-17
San Francisco, CA

Re: Need some limits

Higer levels of Gov't have become a defacto-royalty. Just look at how they treat themselves and the incredible deference they give to the President (a public servent). Senators act as if it is a privilige to see them if they allow it at all - Dukes of the Hill.

SLD
Premium
join:2002-04-17
San Francisco, CA

How to clean up the USA

1. Remove the rights of personhood from corporations.
2. Nationalize banks. But first, limit amounts of money to be created by private banks. Print money and build some inflation: 25% to lower [real] personal debt, and help pay off debt with printed money.
3. Remove revolving door between Congress/Agencies and companies. 5 year minimum.
4. National health insurance - as a right. Start by nationalizing private largest insurance companies.
5. Adjust taxes for wealthy to pre-1980 rates.
6. Outlaw speculation on "necessary products" (fuel, food, water).
7. De-couple media distribution from content providers.
8. Breakup large corporations, particularly in communications/media.
9. Guarantee Net-neutrality.
10. Flat-progressive tax. 0% first $15K, 15% up to $100K 22%$ $100-250K, 40% $250K-1mil, 90% - $1mil+.
11. Reduce military spending by 30%.
12. Increase educational spending 2x.
13. Limit public salaries to 4x the lowest paid worker or $85K adjusted for inflation.
14. Decentralize energy creation. Solar on rooftops selling power back to grid. Windmills.
15. Require 80% of produce be sold within 200 miles of where it is grown.
16. Governmental desalination projects.
17. Tax breaks for children = $2k 1st, $500 2nd, $2K penalty for each additional. Encourage population reduction. Limit immigration and prepare for the new economy that does NOT run on growth and debt.
18. Choose a national language and limit tax-funded programs to it. Require working knowledge of the language for incoming legal residents and citizens.
19. Outlaw genetically-modified crops. Require organic farming / ranching. Outlaw factory farming.
20. Penalize offshoring of businesses.

See 24 replies to this post
Matsayz
Premium
join:2005-02-08
Henderson, NV

Whaaaaat?!

Are you serious? In this day and age this is still happening? Did we not learn a darn thing from Wall Street? Jeez just get rid of the FCC already if this can still happen. I can't believe it, I mean I can but really? Really? Really really?
BiggA

join:2005-11-23
EARTH

Nothing wrong

There's nothing wrong with that, and there's nothing the government can do about it.

The other way around should be restricted, I know Obama tried to, I'm not sure how successful or wide-reaching his initiatives were.

Monday, 08-Apr 03:04:40 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 13.5 years online © 1999-2013 dslreports.com.