site Search:


 
   
story category
FTC Drops Google Street View Wi-Fi Investigation
Satisfied with Google claims that they've reformed procedures
by Karl Bode Thursday 28-Oct-2010 tags: legal · business · wireless · security · privacy · Google
Tipped by Gbcue See Profile
Back in April of this year, Google was busted using their Google Street View cars to collect Wi-Fi data from areas they passed through. Google initially stated they only collected publicly available SSID and MAC Address data -- then later acknowledged that they were collecting snippets of actual transmitted data -- though Google insisted they did so accidentally, and only from unsecured hotspots. Several studies subsequently found that not a whole lot of useful data was collected, given collection vehicles automatically changed channels roughly five times a second -- and also faced physical obstacles and interference.

Click for full size
Given Google CEO Eric Schmidt's love of creepy statements and sometimes-justified paranoia concerning Google power, the company found itself facing inquiries in dozens of countries over the admitted screw up. Here in the States however, the FTC has sent a letter (pdf) to Google attorneys this week saying they're closing their investigation into the matter. The FTC had concerns about Google's obliviousness, but those concerns have apparently faded:

...we note that Google has recently announced improvements to its internal processes to address some of the concerns raised above, including appointing a director of privacy for engineering and product management; adding core privacy training for key employees; and incorporating a formal privacy review process into the design phases of new initiatives. The company also publicly stated its intention to delete the inadvertently collected payload data as soon as possible.5 Further, Google has made assurances to the FTC that the company has not used and will not use any of the payload data collected in any Google product or service, now or in the future.

Letting things sit isn't too surprising for an FTC that came on watch promising significant new online privacy rules but hasn't moved much in that direction. That said, Google has at least clearly admitted error, deleted the data (which wasn't of much use anyway), and claims to have reformed internal procedures to help prevent further screw ups of this nature.

view: topics flat text 
Post a:

Anon6

@comcast.net

Hmm

I don't believe google deleted the data, but that's just me.

james

join:2001-02-26
CWCville USA

Re: Hmm

said by Anon6 :

I don't believe google deleted the data, but that's just me.
I don't believe you don't believe google deleted the data, but that's just me.
--
said by Metatron2008:

But people who download thousands of movies and games.... Yes, they are as bad as any murderer

PierJes

join:2001-04-17
Quebec, QC
Reviews:
·Videotron
said by Anon6 :

I don't believe google deleted the data, but that's just me.
Perhaps they didn't.... but they can't use it.
Otherwise it would be known sooner or later and they'd get in deep trouble.

My way of seeing it.

joako
Premium
join:2000-09-07
/dev/null
kudos:5
Reviews:
·Comcast
said by Anon6 :

I don't believe google deleted the data, but that's just me.
Who cares? It was information that was transmitted in the open and without encryption. It's not like Google broke into people's houses and installed tracking devices. They had no expectation of privacy.

Instead of blaming Google it should be a wakeup call for people with vulnerable networks.
--
PRescott7-2097
Crookshanks

join:2008-02-04
Endicott, NY
Reviews:
·Frontier Communi..
·Verizon Online DSL

Re: Hmm

You could say the same thing about analog cordless phones but it's a Federal crime to record snippets of that conversation. Google should have known better. A simple filter would have kept them from recording anything besides the SSID and MAC. Surely somewhere there is smart enough to have considered what they'd be capturing without such a filter?

insomniac84

join:2002-01-03
Schererville, IN

Finally some common sense.

Dumping raw unecrypted wifi traffic to a log file is not a crime.

Krisnatharok
Caveat Emptor
Premium
join:2009-02-11
Earth Orbit
kudos:3
Reviews:
·Comcast

1 edit

Re: Finally some common sense.

said by insomniac84:

Dumping raw unecrypted wifi traffic to a log file is not a crime.
If it's a corporation doing it, it is.

/sarcasm

notyet321

@verizon.net
I don't know that I'd call it common sense when a govt. agency decides to do nothing much... pretty much par for the course.

Romney2012
Defeat Obama 2012-Chg we can believe in
Premium
join:2002-03-03
USA
kudos:4
The only ones that will pay are probably the programmers & managers involved that let this code get on to the Street View cars. They are probably looking for work elsewhere.
--
Take poll on how you will vote on Nov 2nd

Sofa King
Premium
join:2009-03-01
21435
said by insomniac84:

Dumping raw unecrypted wifi traffic to a log file is not a crime.
That is a good question. How is the law interpreted here?

»www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/···00-.html

TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 119 > § 2511
quote:
§ 2511. Interception and disclosure of wire, oral, or electronic communications prohibited

(1) Except as otherwise specifically provided in this chapter any person who—
(a) intentionally intercepts, endeavors to intercept, or procures any other person to intercept or endeavor to intercept, any wire, oral, or electronic communication;

joako
Premium
join:2000-09-07
/dev/null
kudos:5
Reviews:
·Comcast

Re: Finally some common sense.

If you keep on reading:

quote:
(g) It shall not be unlawful under this chapter or chapter 121 of this title for any person—
(i) to intercept or access an electronic communication made through an electronic communication system that is configured so that such electronic communication is readily accessible to the general public;
It is not even saying intent. Just the fact that the device is configured, even from the factory, without encryption it is not illegal to intercept.
--
PRescott7-2097

insomniac84

join:2002-01-03
Schererville, IN
said by Sofa King:

said by insomniac84:

Dumping raw unecrypted wifi traffic to a log file is not a crime.
That is a good question. How is the law interpreted here?

»www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/···00-.html

TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 119 > § 2511
quote:
§ 2511. Interception and disclosure of wire, oral, or electronic communications prohibited

(1) Except as otherwise specifically provided in this chapter any person who—
(a) intentionally intercepts, endeavors to intercept, or procures any other person to intercept or endeavor to intercept, any wire, oral, or electronic communication;
There is no intention. Every wifi device has no choice but to intercept all wifi traffic in it's range. The radio picks it up no matter what.

Dumping the traffic from ram to a hard drive doesn't change anything.
Kearnstd
Elf Wizard
Premium
join:2002-01-22
Mullica Hill, NJ
that law likely does not apply here since they would have to prove intent to intercept the contents of the the communications.

Also does anyone else not wonder why the governments are so worried with what has been sniffed up to wanting to see it? rather than just wanting evidence the data was completely destroyed.
--
[65 Arcanist]Filan(High Elf) Zone: Broadband Reports

Jim Gurd
Premium
join:2000-07-08
Plymouth, MI

No big deal

Anyone who encrypted their wireless connection has nothing to worry about. That's part of the basic setup and anyone who isn't doing so has much bigger things to worry about than Google.
--
4 out of 5 urologists smell their apple juice before drinking it.

BBBanditRuR
Dingbits

join:2009-06-02
Parachute, CO

Re: No big deal

True, however, human nature is to blame somebody else first for one's own incompetence.
--
Listen...do you smell something?

Nightfall
My Goal Is To Deny Yours
Premium,MVM
join:2001-08-03
Grand Rapids, MI
Reviews:
·Site5.com
·Comcast
·Callcentric

Re: No big deal

said by BBBanditRuR:

True, however, human nature is to blame somebody else first for one's own incompetence.
I have to agree. People are upset when Google drives by and finds wireless connections? Isn't that like google's street view driving by and finding a 3 year old running around the yard naked?

»www.geekologie.com/2010/06/woman···stre.php

Or half naked girls sunning themselves?

»googlesightseeing.com/2007/05/ha···et-view/

The point is if your wireless is secure, they aren't going to catch anything. Heck, if you don't roam around outside naked or half naked, you won't get caught with your pants down (no pun intended). Same goes with your wireless point. If you secure it, then there is nothing to see here.
--
My domain - Nightfall.net
jjeffeory

join:2002-12-04
USA

Re: No big deal

Heh, that's two different issues, not related.

Nightfall
My Goal Is To Deny Yours
Premium,MVM
join:2001-08-03
Grand Rapids, MI
Reviews:
·Site5.com
·Comcast
·Callcentric

Re: No big deal

said by jjeffeory:

Heh, that's two different issues, not related.
It is related if you think about it. What is stopping someone who is wardriving from getting access to an open wireless point? What is stopping someone from driving through your neighborhood and seeing your kid running around naked in the yard? Nothing! If you don't want people to see it or get access to it, then secure it. Its a very simple procedure.
--
My domain - Nightfall.net

insomniac84

join:2002-01-03
Schererville, IN
said by Nightfall:

The point is if your wireless is secure, they aren't going to catch anything.
They do catch it all. They were just dumping raw wifi packets to a log.

Since google does research they datamined things that were not encrypted to see if anything useful could be learned.

But if it is encrypted, the act of breaking the encryption is a crime. Make no mistake, it is easily decrypted. But legally, they can't do it.

Nightfall
My Goal Is To Deny Yours
Premium,MVM
join:2001-08-03
Grand Rapids, MI
Reviews:
·Site5.com
·Comcast
·Callcentric

Re: No big deal

said by insomniac84:

said by Nightfall:

The point is if your wireless is secure, they aren't going to catch anything.
They do catch it all. They were just dumping raw wifi packets to a log.

Since google does research they datamined things that were not encrypted to see if anything useful could be learned.

But if it is encrypted, the act of breaking the encryption is a crime. Make no mistake, it is easily decrypted. But legally, they can't do it.
Capturing the packets of an encrypted network accomplishes nothing. Especially if you are running WPA2.
--
My domain - Nightfall.net

insomniac84

join:2002-01-03
Schererville, IN

Re: No big deal

said by Nightfall:

Capturing the packets of an encrypted network accomplishes nothing. Especially if you are running WPA2.
You can still crack it passively. But it is unlikely that you got enough of a sample to do it while driving around.

Romney2012
Defeat Obama 2012-Chg we can believe in
Premium
join:2002-03-03
USA
kudos:4
All Google was looking for was the SSIDs of open WiFi APs to put in to their database of open WiFi for hotspots. The data capture, other than SSIDs was unintentional.
--
Take poll on how you will vote on Nov 2nd
chgo_man99

join:2010-01-01
Schaumburg, IL
lol! good point!
Kearnstd
Elf Wizard
Premium
join:2002-01-22
Mullica Hill, NJ
WPA2-AES cannot be cracked*

*With in any reasonable time frame unless data is so important you can devote a petaflop class supercomputer to the cause.
--
[65 Arcanist]Filan(High Elf) Zone: Broadband Reports
hottboiinnc
ME

join:2003-10-15
Cleveland, OH
Reviews:
·WOW Internet and..

Another Pay Off

Another pay off by a large company. I'd like to know how they claim Google won't do anything with the data in the future. you can't say they deleted all the information they had. Hell everyone knows that the data will NEVER go away unless the hard-drives it was stored on were burned and then shot into the space and back again. Just pushing the "delete" button won't do a damn thing. maybe other countries will put Google in their place and slap them around a bit.
--
www.twopugsbrand.com Kosher, Vegan, and Organic Certified Dog and Cat treats/foods and other products! www.etsy.com/shop/snakx4u/ Organic, Kosher, Gluten Free, Vegan Human Baked Goods
zolcos

join:2010-05-19
Houghton, MI

1 edit

Re: Another Pay Off

said by hottboiinnc:

Another pay off by a large company. I'd like to know how they claim Google won't do anything with the data in the future.
And what exactly could be done with all these instances of one-fifth of a second of captured wifi data that people were publicly transmitting, where anything important was likely encrypted anyway (if not by wep/wpa then with https?)

FBGuy
yippee ki yay
Premium
join:2005-03-19

Re: Another Pay Off

thanks for the shred of common sense.

koam
Pink Pecker
Premium
join:2000-08-16
East Puddle

Trust

When you donate over $800,000 to Obama's campaign, they trust your word that you can handle these things internally.

FBGuy
yippee ki yay
Premium
join:2005-03-19

Re: Trust

obama had nothing to do with it.

Harddrive
Proud American and Infidel since 1968.
Premium
join:2000-09-20
Phone Room
kudos:2
Reviews:
·Comcast

FTC got a small tap on the shoulder.

"hello, this is the NSA. we are in cahoots with Google over this whole thing. we're putting the data to good use in the fight against terrorism. move along to something else... or else."
--
Liberty is allowing other people to do the things you disapprove of.

toddbs98

join:2000-07-08
North Little Rock, AR

Missing the point.

I think most people are missing the the point here. Its not so terrible that they "accidentally" captured wifi data. But that they lied about it. First they said they didnt capture any data, then only SSID's then finally admitted what they really did. So how is anyone supposed to take their word that the have changed their ways?
--
Patriots always speak of dying for their country never killing for it. Bertrand Russell

Monday, 04-Jun 06:23:51 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.