site Search:


 
   
story category
Fairpoint to Lay Off 400 Workers
Four Years After Promising Verizon Deal Job Creation
by Karl Bode Thursday 08-Sep-2011 tags: business · consumers · Fairpoint Communications
To get their $2.7 billion acquisition of Verizon's New England networks approved by regulators, in 2007 Fairpoint promised they'd create 675 jobs, but immediately following the deal Fairpoint collapsed into bankruptcy amidst a wave of significant service disruption. While the company has righted the ship somewhat and has been meeting broadband build out conditions, Fairpoint remains financially strained by the heavy debt-burden of the deal -- and the constant erosion of traditional landline customers. Roughly four years after making job creation promises, Fairpoint has announced that the company will be slashing their job force by around 400 workers to save $34 million. "We are making this decision after careful evaluation to ensure that FairPoint is staffed appropriately to serve our customers well, while prudently managing expenses," says company CEO Paul Sunu.

view: topics flat text 
Post a:
en103

join:2011-05-02

math isn't too far off

$34 mill / 400 employees = $85,000/employee

I'm sure that includes benefits

charlieweiss

@fairpoint.com

Re: math isn't too far off

thats before benefits, average technician is making around $75k to $80K before overtime...
viperlmw
Premium
join:2005-01-25

Re: math isn't too far off

said by charlieweiss :

thats before benefits, average technician is making around $75k to $80K before overtime...

?Really? Average technician pay is 80,000 a year before overtime? Really? That comes out to over $38 an hour. Fairpoint techs make $38 an hour, base wage? I'm working for the wrong telco!

nightmare

@uhc.com

Executive

I bet no executives loss there jobs and even if they do they get a HUGE golden parachute for there part in helping verizon offload a failing business(Landlines). If the numbers are right then the people losing there jobs are ones that make around $85,000. a very nice wage but not near the pay a executive gets in salary and those "bonuses". Why cant exec's of a failing company ever just take a pay cut? i mean they get stock options not available to most workers, and they usually get very nice bonuses. Middle class being beat again for the failings of people who never have to worry about being poor.
CXMNYC

join:2011-08-30
New York, NY

Re: Executive

Amen

N3OGH
Yo Soy Col. "Bat" Guano
Premium
join:2003-11-11
Philly burbs
kudos:1
Just sit tight, it won't be long before its some union member's fault.

At least to someone posting here. Companies never go belly up because of bad management.

You know, places like Bear Sterns, Lehman Brothers & AIG were destroyed by their middle class laborers.....
--
Petty people are disproportionally corrupted by petty power
en103

join:2011-05-02

Re: Executive

Yeah - typically if it is managements fault, they take the whole company down with them (Enron, WorldCom)

N3OGH
Yo Soy Col. "Bat" Guano
Premium
join:2003-11-11
Philly burbs
kudos:1

Re: Executive

Those guys at Citibank and Bank of America are doing an upstanding job, too!

All hail the job creators.

Oh, right. Never mind......

Gotta go, I've got a call coming in from Arthur Anderson via my Worldcom secure CEO link. I'm important, and you're not.

Now, go. Go back Proletariat fly to your un important little job, I have millions to make and deals to broker while you try and figure out how to heat your house this winter, or make your next car payment....

....Click Yes, Mr. Gore? Absolutely, I have no problem helping keeping your mansions cool in the summer and warm in the winter. Carbon footprint? That's for the schlubs who listen to so called "leaders". Do as I say, and not as I do.

Um, Mr. Gore, have you seen the Bush Ranch in Texas? Absolutely, Mr. Vice President, I agree, that solar thing is a bunch of bullshit, and that rain water collection WILL leave spots on our suv. YES, I understand that the Geothermal thing and passive solar will leave Tipper cold in the winter, but... but.. but...

Whole system's full of shit. Government by the people & for the people?

We're all puppets. Whole thing is a crock.
--
Petty people are disproportionally corrupted by petty power

David
Now accepting new patients
Premium,VIP
join:2002-05-30
Granite City, IL
kudos:78
you made my sarcasm detector twitch... nice..
rradina

join:2000-08-08
Chesterfield, MO
$34M is the cost saved by eliminating those employees. What the average employee earns isn't as simple as $34M/400. We have to remove these expenses from the $34M before dividing by 400:

1. Average health plan costs for family coverage is $14K, for individual coverage $6K. On average companies pay 70% of family and 80% of individual.
2. Employer-paid wage taxes
- social security (6.2%)
- medicare/medicaid (1.45%)
- federal unemployment taxes (FUTA)
- state unemployment taxes (SUTA)
3. Employee materials & equipment (paper, pens, staples, copiers, printers computers, network, phones etc.)
4. Employee office space (cubes, chairs, desks)

400 people need a lot of space. Eliminating that many people may allow them to sell a building or terminate a lease.

Considering these costs, the average employee might be paid $50K to $60K, which is still a wage with some discretionary spending power but I wouldn't classify that as a "nice wage". $60K/1920 (workable hours in a year after 2 weeks vacation and 10 paid holidays) is a bit more than $30/hour. That's certainly better than burger joints and Wal-Mart but it's tough to support a family on this wage unless both adults work. As a result, a lot of families are going to be stressed and with 9% unemployment, it'll be hard to replace that $60K job. Since some of these folks are probably former Verizon "lifers", it's quite a bummer for them.

HaloFans

join:2006-12-18

This is why the AT&T merger should be approved.

To lose jobs!

Tomek
Premium
join:2002-01-30
Valley Stream, NY

Re: This is why the AT&T merger should be approved.

said by HaloFans:

To lose jobs!

And annoy existing customers
--
Semper Fi

IowaCowboy
Want to go back to Iowa
Premium
join:2010-10-16
Springfield, MA
Reviews:
·Comcast
·Verizon Broadban..

Because they're losing customers to Time Warner

When Verizon unloaded it's ME/NH/VT customers to FairPoint, many customers switched to offerings from their cable providers (my Grandmother, who lives in Maine switched her internet and phone to Time Warner) and their customer service and quality is much higher. The only downside is TWC does not use battery backup in their EMTAs. Even in Portsmouth, NH (which has a FiOS system now owned by FairPoint) customers are finding Comcast to be a better option. My grandma keeps getting bills from FairPoint for $2.14 with the words "Do Not Pay", even though she has been with Time Warner for several years now. Many people in northern New England did not want FairPoint to come to town and many fled to competitors (such as cable companies) when FairPoint took over.

I just wish TWC would deploy DOCSIS 3.0 in Maine. Comcast has D3 throughout most of their footprint. TWC only has a few D3 markets and mostly in areas they're competing with Fiber providers (such as FiOS).

zpm

join:2009-03-23
Columbus, GA

Re: Because they're losing customers to Time Warner

how bout the CEO and Board take 30% pay cuts... Asses!!!
rradina

join:2000-08-08
Chesterfield, MO

Re: Because they're losing customers to Time Warner

I don't think the board members get paid large sums of money. While I agree with the premise of whacking executive pay if a company isn't performing, cutting a CEO's pay by 30% has more emotional impact than financial impact. Even if a CEO makes $10M a year base pay, 30% is only $3M. Granted, it's icing on top of $34M but not enough to really improve anything.

It is true that some CEOs have generous incentive pay packages but a company laying off employees isn't meeting it's financial targets and it's likely that most of those incentives won't be paid at all or will be substantially less. If they are tied to stock performance (options/stock grants), the CEO might be able to claim losses to offset their tax burden! (When you think about it, doesn't that suck!)

Harddrive
Proud American and Infidel since 1968.
Premium
join:2000-09-20
Phone Room
kudos:2

Wow.

What a shit company. Good job Vermont, New Hampshire, and Maine. You've done a great service to your citizens.
--
When I press '1 for English' that means I want to talk to someone that speaks English!
nocannothave

join:2006-10-14
Kennewick, WA

Pro tip for all future buyouts like this:

"Oh, but esteemed Mr. Congressman, what happened to Fairpoint would NEVER happen to us!"


Lone Wolf
Independent Voter, Buy Gold and Guns
Premium
join:2001-12-30
USA
kudos:1
Reviews:
·Verizon Online DSL
·Comcast

Maine PUC Staff Urges Fairpoint Deal Rejection

Check out the discussion "back in the day" when Maine PUC wanted to reject the offer.

»Maine PUC Staff Urges Fairpoint Deal Rejection
--
Charlie Rangel/Bawney Fwank 2012 Dem Ticket

again

@rr.com

Broke

I can see why, just mailed my last check to Fairpoint, wire is dead.
old_wiz_60

join:2005-06-03
Bedford, MA

Agencies..

and congress should never ever ever believe that mergers/takeovers, and acquisitions will result in job creations. They always result in job losses.

Fairpoint was just a way for Verizon to dump an albatross and get huge tax credits.
hottboiinnc
ME

join:2003-10-15
Cleveland, OH

Re: Agencies..

congress had no control over this. It was basically let it happen or VZ will and would let those areas rot and get the sames to take away MTS and those citizens wouldn't have shit after that. Telcos also can NOT be forced to service any area. They can pull out with due notice 3-6 months (depending on the state) and then what happens? Grandma doesn't have telco service.

Friday, 24-May 10:04:32 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 13.5 years online © 1999-2013 dslreports.com.