  bokamba Chengdu Rocks Premium join:2002-04-05 Falls Church, VA | iPhone cost in China The very high price of an iPhone in China doesn't mean that the market will be tiny. Rather, it means that there will still be a big market for iPhones that have been smuggled over from the US and jailbroken. | |
|
 |   andyb Premium join:2003-05-29 SW Ontario | Re: iPhone cost in China Why would they buy locked phones in the US when you can get unlocked in the EU without a jailbreaking? | |
|
 |  |   NOCMan Verizon Fios User Premium join:2004-09-30 Flower Mound, TX | Re: iPhone cost in China They're cheaper for one. Exchange Rate. | |
|
 |  |   bokamba Chengdu Rocks Premium join:2002-04-05 Falls Church, VA | People probably smuggle them in from Europe too. | |
|
  TKJunkMail Enjoy the sun Premium join:2002-03-03 Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast
| Verizons slams on AT&T are working big time
No wonder AT&T is squealing like a stuck pig. The ads are actually working to chg the public's perception of Verizon & AT&T. AT&T's rep is sinking like a stone and Verizons is rising.
»tech.yahoo.com/news/pcworld/2009···urtworse
According to BrandIndex, a service that measures thousands of consumer brands year-round, public perception of Verizon has shot up since its ad campaigns began in October. AT&T's public perception, at the same time, has plummeted.
BrandIndex surveys a representative sample of the U.S. population every weekday. Prior to Verizon's recent campaign, Verizon had a "buzz score" among adults 18 to 34 years old of 8.3, while AT&T measured 1.4. By the end of last week, Verizon had jumped up to 24.2 and AT&T had dropped to -2.4. The buzz score ranges from -100 to 100 and represents how much positive news people report hearing about each company.
Perhaps even more telling, BrandIndex also measured how willing people said they were to recommend AT&T versus Verizon. In late October, the two companies were tied with scores of nine (on the same -100 to 100 point scale). By early November, Verizon had climbed up to 25, while AT&T had fallen to -8.
If all of that's not enough, the number of people reporting they're satisfied with AT&T has dropped in the past few weeks, too, according to BrandIndex's data -- while the satisfaction score for Verizon has remained constant. -- My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page
| |
|
 |   ropeguru Premium join:2001-01-25 Bridgeport, WV clubs:
·VOIPo
| Re: Verizons slams on AT&T are working big time said by TKJunkMail :No wonder AT&T is squealing like a stuck pig. Truth hurts.. That is why they are squealing... | |
|
  fatmanskinny Premium join:2004-01-04 Wandering
·Comcast Digital Vo..
·Comcast
| Comcast "On Demand Online" counts against cap? Per the article:
Banse acknowledged that On Demand Online usage will count against Comcast's 250-Gigabyte monthly cap, as the operator's executives have previously said. "I know from my own experience, that's plenty," she said.
Lovely! Just freaking lovely. -- Satan is always busy. He makes bad things look good and good things look bad! Watch that Devil. | |
|
 |  Kearnstd Elf Wizard Premium join:2002-01-22 Mullica Hill, NJ | Re: Comcast "On Demand Online" counts against cap? one thing i heard was if they exempted their service from the cap the Net Neutrality fans would cry bloody murder and go crying to daddy FCC. -- [65 Arcanist]Filan(High Elf) Zone: Broadband Reports | |
|
 |  |  fiberguy My views are my own. Premium join:2005-05-20
| Re: Comcast "On Demand Online" counts against cap? Yea... people need to make up their minds.. it can't be both ways depending on one's own personal desires.
Either you want all services to be neutral and it will count against the cap, OR, it's time to shut up to the ISPs and realize their going to screw with other providers..
So with this, I agree.. The Internet OnDemand service is gonna count against caps.. Let the activists, with out clues, cry.  | |
|
 |  |  Necronomikro
join:2005-09-01
| said by Kearnstd :one thing i heard was if they exempted their service from the cap the Net Neutrality fans would cry bloody murder and go crying to daddy FCC. They could just eliminate the cap... | |
|
 |   Rob In Deo speramus, God Bless the USA Premium join:2001-08-25 Kendall, FL
·Comcast
| said by fatmanskinny :Per the article: Banse acknowledged that On Demand Online usage will count against Comcast's 250-Gigabyte monthly cap, as the operator's executives have previously said. "I know from my own experience, that's plenty," she said. Lovely! Just freaking lovely. Do you realize that it HAS to go against the cap, otherwise it would be seen as a violation of net neutrality? -- CheckSite.us | YourIP.us | Reverseip.us | |
|
  TKJunkMail Enjoy the sun Premium join:2002-03-03 Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast
| FCC wants comments on USF by Dec 7, 2009
Here is the FCC news release asking for comments on how to reform the USF(Universal Service Fund, aka the big sucking sinkhole of gov't waste):
»hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/a···19A1.pdf
With this Public Notice, the Commission seeks more focused comment on our universal service and intercarrier compensation (ICC) policies and to explore various policy options that would further the goal of making broadband universally available to all people of the United States. All comments should refer to GN Docket Nos. 09-47, 09-51, and 09-137. Please title comments responsive to this Notice as Comments NBP Public Notice #19. Further, we strongly encourage parties to develop responses to this Notice that adhere to the organization and structure of the questions in this Notice. Comments can also be filed via the Federal eRulemaking Portal: » www.regulations.gov I've submitted my suggestion - terminate the USF and end the wasting of taxpayer dollars on useless graft to telcos large and small. All the USF is is another tax helping pols send graft to their political contributors.
Feel free to submit your own suggestions. -- My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page
| |
|
 |   BF69
join:2004-07-28 Camden, TN | Re: FCC wants comments on USF by Dec 7, 2009 Yes ideally the best thing is to scrap is altogether. Knowing that is not realistic my next suggestion would be to allow the funds to be used to extend broadband. Then telcos will have ZERO excuse not to do it. | |
|
 |
 qworster
join:2001-11-25 Los Angeles, CA | FLO TV-Why would anyone want this? Why would anyone want this when they can buy a small HDTV for half this price and then get everything for free? | |
|
 |  aparis99
join:2006-10-24 Owensboro, KY | Re: FLO TV-Why would anyone want this? b/c you obviously cant take your HDTV around with you.
You buy it, and it runs off of ATT/Verizon. | |
|
 |  |  |
 |  xirian Premium join:2003-01-26 Beacon, NY
| said by qworster :Why would anyone want this when they can buy a small HDTV for half this price and then get everything for free? Because this sends the signal from cell towers, so theres more places with signal. I cant get tv ota in my area without a giant antenna. | |
|
 |  |  qworster
join:2001-11-25 Los Angeles, CA
·DSL EXTREME
·Brand X Internet
·RoadRunner Cable
·Vonage
4 edits | Re: FLO TV-Why would anyone want this? said by xirian :said by qworster :Why would anyone want this when they can buy a small HDTV for half this price and then get everything for free? Because this sends the signal from cell towers, so theres more places with signal. I cant get tv ota in my area without a giant antenna. WRONG!
This does NOT use cell towers!
It sends the signal from 2-4 transmitters per metropolitan area on TV channels 55 and 56, which were bought by Qualcomm in an FCC auction- channel 55 nationwide and channel 56 in five of the USA's largest cities.
FLO stands for Forward Link Only-there is one way BROADCAST transmission only!
»en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MediaFLO | |
|
 chronoss2009
join:2008-09-23 | comcast wil be okay with you tv cap THINK OF THE profits they will get when you are able to only watch 5 tv shows a week | |
|
 |
|
 |