 KrKHeavy Artillery For The Little GuyPremium join:2000-01-17 Tulsa, OK 1 edit | The Internet is GUILTY! Yes! It's not the people who commit the crimes, they are victims of the Internet! It's the internet that was guilty! | |
|
 |  Duramax08Ya rly.Premium join:2008-08-03 San Antonio, TX | Re: The Internet is GUILTY! See you in hell internet!  | |
|
 | | What no blame on video games? I figured someone would blame COD6. | |
|
 |  | | Re: What no blame on video games? said by battleop:I figured someone would blame COD6. Nah, the "terrorism" angle sells better. They'll save blaming COD until the next "crazy white guy with no reason" shooting. -- Intel Q6600 @3400Mhz/GA-EP35-DS3P/4x 2048Mb G.Skill/WD Raptor 300Gb/3x WD20EADS 2TB/2x PNY GTX 260/Silverstone 850W/Custom water cooler | |
|
 |  |  | | Re: What no blame on video games? said by Camelot One:said by battleop:I figured someone would blame COD6. Nah, the "terrorism" angle sells better. They'll save blaming COD until the next "crazy white guy with no reason" shooting. What he did was a terrorist act. | |
|
 |  |  |  BF69Premium join:2004-07-28 Camden, TN | Re: What no blame on video games? said by PunkGod:said by Camelot One:said by battleop:I figured someone would blame COD6. Nah, the "terrorism" angle sells better. They'll save blaming COD until the next "crazy white guy with no reason" shooting. What he did was a terrorist act. One could say all rape and murders are terrorist acts. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  james join:2001-02-26 CWCville USA 1 edit | Re: What no blame on video games? said by BF69:One could say all rape and murders are terrorist acts. I guess one could if they only had a vague understanding of what "terrorism" actually refers to. --
said by Metatron2008:But people who download thousands of movies and games.... Yes, they are as bad as any murderer | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  BF69Premium join:2004-07-28 Camden, TN | Re: What no blame on video games? Are/were Timothy McViegh, the Unibomber, and Eric Rudolph terrorists? | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  james join:2001-02-26 CWCville USA | Re: What no blame on video games? Yes they are. I certainly hope you have a point. Actually, I'm sure you think you do, but you're wrong.
Let me point out the obvious difference between the average rapist/murderer and the people you just mentioned: Motivation.
Someone could rape/murder a single person, and if they are doing so with the intent of affecting national policy, social issues or any political issue it is terrorism. While I disagree with people who say this: I do see logic behind the argument that warfare is state sponsored Terrorism. Conversely, someone can mail bombs, blow up buildings and fly planes into buildings, but if they did it for their personal enjoyment, it's not terrorism. -- [BQUOTE=[user=Metatron2008]]But people who download thousands of movies and games.... Yes, they are as bad as any murderer[/BQUOTE] | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | | Re: What no blame on video games? So under your definition, Ft. Hood wasn't an act of terrorism. He wasn't a guy trying to make a political or social issues point. He was a guy who had no problem collecting a paycheck from the military, but then flipped out when asked to actually earn it.
This wasn't terrorism, it was an act of a guy f$cked up in the head. -- Intel Q6600 @3400Mhz/GA-EP35-DS3P/4x 2048Mb G.Skill/WD Raptor 300Gb/3x WD20EADS 2TB/2x PNY GTX 260/Silverstone 850W/Custom water cooler | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  james join:2001-02-26 CWCville USA | Re: What no blame on video games? said by Camelot One:So under your definition, Ft. Hood wasn't an act of terrorism. Under "my" definition? Please tell me you're trolling.
Also you're wrong anyways. Under the definition of terrorism that I just described, what he did was without a doubt terrorism. He didn't do it "for the lulz" he was talking to a cleric linked with other terror groups ffs. What are you smoking? Seriously. --
said by Metatron2008:But people who download thousands of movies and games.... Yes, they are as bad as any murderer | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | | Re: What no blame on video games? So because he talked to someone else, he's a terrorist? Have you read anything about the case? The guy was f*cked in the head, LOOKING to do something. The fact that the cleric pointed him in one direction over another doesn't really matter. This jackass was going to do something, because he was too chicken shit to earn his pay. He wasn't trying to make a political statement, or strike fear into the country. His actions were about him.
I'm not suggesting he's a good guy, or even any less of a bad guy. But claiming a lone gunman is a terrorist lessens the inpact of the word. -- Intel Q6600 @3400Mhz/GA-EP35-DS3P/4x 2048Mb G.Skill/WD Raptor 300Gb/3x WD20EADS 2TB/2x PNY GTX 260/Silverstone 850W/Custom water cooler | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  ThrowDemsOutIf you can't convince 'em, confuse 'emPremium join:2002-03-03 Mullica Hill, NJ kudos:4 | Re: What no blame on video games? You are wrong and you can talk until doomsday and it won't change the fact this guy was a terrorist. And the fact that all terrorists are slightly messed up in the head doesn't change that. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | | Re: What no blame on video games? You are right about one thing, there is no use debating it here. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  james join:2001-02-26 CWCville USA | said by Camelot One:But claiming a lone gunman is a terrorist lessens the inpact of the word. Hahaha wow.
Your claim that the word even needs to have an "impact" at all shows the way you think.
How about you go back to your sensationalist media like a good child and leave the debating to the big boys. --
said by Metatron2008:But people who download thousands of movies and games.... Yes, they are as bad as any murderer | |
|
 |
 |  |
 ThrowDemsOutIf you can't convince 'em, confuse 'emPremium join:2002-03-03 Mullica Hill, NJ kudos:4 1 edit | FCC's Copps wants to toughen broadcast license renewals
»www.rbr.com/media-news/18731.html
FCC Commissioner Michael Copps addressed a RainbowPUSH Coalition(aka Jesse Jackson) event, calling for greater diversity of media ownership and stronger public interest requirements for broadcasters. He wants to use the quadrennial review and separate proceedings to move toward both goals. » hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/a···79A1.pdfHe also once again cited his disapproval of the postcard license renewal process, saying, There is no reason on Gods green earth why the Commission shouldnt go back to having some guidelines to make sure stations are consulting with their audiences on what kinds of programming people would like to see and that news and information arent the first thing to go on the chopping block when ownership changes hands. Ive been begging the broadcasters representatives in Washington to join this discussion for years. They refused. RBR-TVBR observation: Sometimes it seems like Copps believes stations are in the business of driving audiences away. Of course, the opposite is true, and one of the most difficult business achievements in the entertainment world is getting people to tune in to your station. We can guarantee one thing: Stations wont find out what their audience wants by convening a panel of well-meaning civic-minded local residents. If the panel attracts the type of earnest individual who is concerned about just where the town aldermen plan to site the fire hydrants in the new townhouse development and thinks that the local broadcast stations should be on top of the story, all the panel will do is drive the audience to the nearest medium that actually provides entertainment. If you dont believe us, just check out the microscopic ratings of your local cable access channel. Copps did nothing to further his agenda by using Jesse Jackson's blackmailing organization to make his points. -- My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page
| |
|
 1 edit | do you get scared when someone shop lifts in your store ( scream terrorist even though it was a candy bar and cause they have no money and are starving just wanted food )
How about that drug dealer , who buys his drugs form someone who buys it form someone who you know gets it from a terrorist, them good awful dope dealers like i dunno that Afghanistan leader haha
every crime makes someone scared and that is what a terrorist is WERE ALL TERRORISTS as everyone has committed a crime, its the degree and the fact that human life taken ON MASS is whats usually referred ( through an organized effort NOT some force or army in some foreign country) but hey lets round up everyone on terror charges without any due process or warrants and be
"ESCAPE FROM LA" | |
|
 |  Reviews:
·magicjack.com
| Re: do you get scared when said by chronoss2009:every crime makes someone scared and that is what a terrorist is. WE'RE ALL TERRORISTS as everyone has committed a crime, Ok, I'll be the first to confess. I've driven with a burned out headlight. And I liked it. I liked making little children scream, "mommy, why does that car have only one headlight!"
I'm a terrorist.
Mark | |
|
 |  |  CPUYODA join:2003-01-25 Johnson City, TN | Re: do you get scared when I think Sam Raimi can be a poster boy for terrorist,....Evil Dead still spooks me. -- "In God We Trust,All Others Pay Cash" | |
|
 | | Internet? That's dumb. So if I use the phone to hire a hitman, the telephone network is complicit somehow. Yeah, right. | |
|

approval from: ThrowDemsOut 
| No, The Internet was not blamed... No, I don't see in the article where the Internet is blamed for the attacks at Fort Hood.
What I see is a blatant attempt by some left leaning idiot to try to convince me that it had nothing to do with Islam...
This man, was a Muslim. He was devout and he associated with the extremists in his religion. There are extremists in any religion and there are extremists even in the absence of religion, all a fool needs is a cause.
This man was a fool, with a cause. | |
|
 |
|