site Search:


 
   
story category
Friday Evening Links
by Revcb Friday 04-Dec-2009 tags: broadbandbits

view: topics flat text 
Post a:

ThrowDemsOut
If you can't convince 'em, confuse 'em
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Mullica Hill, NJ
kudos:4

H.R. 4167 submitted to excuse FCC from Sunshine mtg law

»www.broadcastingcable.com/articl···uced.php
Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.) has introduced a bill to allow more than two FCC commissioners to meet privately, so long as there is at least one commissioner from each party in the room and the meeting's content is disclosed to the public.

Currently, sunshine rules prevent more than two commissioners meeting in person outside of public meetings. That is because all meetings of federal agencies must be open if there is a quorum present, and since the FCC has five members, three represents a quorum.
Copps seems thrilled. »hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/a···81A1.pdf
----------------
Me, I like the current sunshine law and see no reason to make an exception for the FCC. This law just lets the FCC cut deals in secret and then ram thru the result in a public mtg. Not that they don't already do that. This will just make it even easier to hoodwink the public.

H.R.4167 »thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c···.R.4167:
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page


digitalfreak
Premium
join:2005-12-09
Blacklick, OH

1 edit

Re: H.R. 4167 submitted to excuse FCC from Sunshine mtg law

said by
Me, I like the current sunshine law and see no reason to make an exception for the FCC. This law just lets the FCC cut deals in secret and then ram thru the result in a public mtg. Not that they don't already do that. This will just make it even easier to hoodwink the public.
Hmm... Sounds a lot like your beloved ACTA.

digitalfreak
Premium
join:2005-12-09
Blacklick, OH
Me, I like the current sunshine law and see no reason to make an exception for the FCC. This law just lets the FCC cut deals in secret and then ram thru the result in a public mtg. Not that they don't already do that. This will just make it even easier to hoodwink the public.
Hmm... Sounds a lot like your beloved ACTA.

tschmidt
Premium,MVM
join:2000-11-12
Milford, NH
kudos:4
Reviews:
·Fairpoint Commun..
·Hollis Hosting
said by ThrowDemsOut:

I like the current sunshine law and see no reason to make an exception for the FCC.
I agree. I'm on several local committees in our small town. We are be careful about unofficial hallway or email meetings since they are not open to the public. While it is a little cumbersome if we overlook something I think it serves the voters well. Open meeting are not open if members are able to meet in private.

/tom
russotto

join:2000-10-05
West Orange, NJ

Adsense and copyright infringement

Google profiting from Adsense infringing content could lead it to being found liable for vicarious copyright infringement, so it isn't surprising they'd block it. I don't think Adsense falls under the DMCA 512 exemptions.

BF69
Premium
join:2004-07-28
Camden, TN

Re: Adsense and copyright infringement

Well they don't allow adsense ads on porn sites even though they have adwords ads for porn and the fact that porn is perfectly legal. I the end it's their system they can allow or not allow whatever they want.

FastiBook

join:2003-01-08
Newtown, PA

No thanks!

I think i'll keep my iTunes stuff on my computer, thanks!

- A
--
LETS GO METS!

Simba7

join:2003-03-24
Billings, MT

Bing dies (briefly) after Microsoft hits wrong button

Hey, at least they didn't go through another "Sidekick" issue.

Seems like M$ is goofing up alot lately. I guess "uptime" isn't a requirement anymore.

cableties
Premium
join:2005-01-27
Reviews:
·Verizon FiOS

FCC Chair wants USF??? WTF!

Isn't this what Verizon and others wanted all along, for the US Taxpayer-broadband user to foot the bill of "Broadband to everyone" ?

There ya go, hi-speed bandwidth so you can watch those Hee-Haw reruns on Hulu...y'all..
--
Splat

KrK
Heavy Artillery For The Little Guy
Premium
join:2000-01-17
Tulsa, OK
Reviews:
·AT&T DSL Service

Re: FCC Chair wants USF??? WTF!

Yeah, the USF is already a giant slush fund where the Telcos get to "Provide" phone service to rural areas and broadband to schools, libraries, etc and then charge an arm and a leg to the USF which is funded by customers of not only the Telco but wireless customers, etc etc

The Telcos love the USF. Expanding it would make it even more of a cash cow. There's little or no oversight or regulation, so they basically can charge anything they like to these projects.

Imagine if you worked a job where you could write your own bill and whatever you put down was what you got paid. Well, there you go.

Expanding this is a bad idea, as it was never implemented properly in the first place.
--
"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power." -- Benito Mussolini

ThrowDemsOut
If you can't convince 'em, confuse 'em
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Mullica Hill, NJ
kudos:4

Google makes search history default & opt-out from opt-in

Google is quickly leaving the "Google the Good" reputation behind. Their latest change involves making Web Search history the default for non-logged in users and opt-out instead of opt-in as in the past. The better, I am sure, to collect more info on your searches and to tailor the ads to your preferences.

»www.eweek.com/c/a/Search-Engines···-623612/
Google risked drawing the ire of privacy advocates Dec. 4 by making its personalized search results available to all of its users, whether they are signed in or not. Personalized results were previously served only to users who were signed into their Google account and had opted in to let Google track their Web History, or log of search queries and results. Going forward, personalized results will be offered to users whether they are signed in or not. By hedging the privacy quotient in Web search, Google is setting itself up for some loud barking by privacy watchdogs who already feel Google takes too many liberties with users' info.

Google will continue to use Web History to personalize result for users who are signed in. Even when users are not signed in, Google will customize their search results based on past search information linked to users' computer Web browser using an anonymous cookie. Google stores up to 180 days of signed-out search activity linked to the browser's cookie, including queries and results that are clicked.

Users who elect not to receive personalized results while they are signed in must turn off Web History and remove it from their Google account. To do that, users must be signed into their account. They then must click the My Account link from the Google homepage, click Edit next to 'My products" and then click Delete Web History.

Marc Rotenberg, executive director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center in Washington, told the New York Times:

"The key point is that Google is now tracking users of search who have specifically chosen not to log in to a Google account. They are obliterating one of the few remaining privacy safeguards for Google services."

With each baby step, Google is tempting fate with agencies such as the Department of Justice, which is increasingly scrutinizing the company's behavior regarding its search and other Web services, such as the Google Book Search deal.
More info on this here:
»searchengineland.com/google-now-···ts-31195
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page


Saturday, 11-Feb 10:11:43 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online! © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.