 |  |   Neyland85
join:2003-02-04 North Augusta, SC | Re: Hundt's isn't answering the questions raised by study How do we know this was paid for by Verizon? Just because a link on this website indicating that it was doesn't make it so... | |
|  |  |  Zoder
join:2002-04-16 Miami, FL
| Re: Hundt's isn't answering the questions raised by study First page of the study.
quote: BY JEFFREY A. EISENACH, PH.D.
Chairman, Criterion Economics and Adjunct Professor, George Mason University Law School. The author expresses thanks to Joseph Kraemer for helpful suggestions, but takes full responsibility for any errors or omissions. Support for this paper was provided by Verizon Communications. The opinions expressed are my own.
| |
|  |  Time4aNAP Premium join:2007-04-09 Des Plaines, IL
| "Lower taxes, less government, more freedom" my @$$ said by LiamJunket :No matter who paid for the study, it has made many valid points... No, it hasn't. In fact its few claims are false and/or misleading.
...that Frontline has refused to answer. Those questions are nobody's business but Frontline's. What grounds do you have to claim that "Hundt's [sic] isn't answering the questions raised by (the) study"? And why do you feel that Frontline has any obligation to Verizon's hired guns? | |
|   Michieru2 zzz zzz zzz Premium join:2005-01-28 Miami, FL | .... This idea gives a bad taste in my mouth, something smells rotten and I don't like it. -- Duct tape, saving lives since 1942. | |
|  AMDonUT2004
join:2006-06-12 Bedford, VA | this could work if they don't like each other, let them fight in jello and put it on live tv  | |
|   Ream0
@rr.com
| WOW! midget wrestling! ...Verizon's got a plan! Screw the consumer any way you can!
With 20% broadband penetration,shouldn't they work on their primary network rather than build a emergency broadband network? I think their funding this with the dubious $2.00/month forced long distance fee.
I wish someone would jamb a phone pole up Seidenberg's ass!
| |
|  Time4aNAP Premium join:2007-04-09 Des Plaines, IL
| Question
Why should Verizon, an incumbent telco with no overt plans to suddenly abandon its wire & fiber plant and throw all of its eggs into the wireless broadband basket, have any say in what any wireless broadband company proposes to do? The only possible motive that Verizon could have is anti-competitive and not in the public interest. Why is this even being reported as news? | |
|  ltjordan
join:2001-12-02 Hyattsville, MD | Re: Ivan debating. I'm sure Ivan is going to put that at the top of his "to-do" list. | |
|  | |  |
|
|