Search:  

 
 
   News
newer
story category GAO Rips FCC Data Collection
Again...
(old news - 04:37PM Friday Dec 01 2006)
tags: competition · fcc · business
One major critic of the FCC's broadband collection methodology has been the General Accounting Office, who recently penned a report claiming the FCC's methods made it nearly impossible to assess how broadband-wired rural America is. The FCC looks at a zip code, and if that zip code has just one customer with broadband service, that zip code is considered "served." Critics charge that this method is used to mask dysfunctional or incumbent-friendly policy, while others insist it's simple incompetence.

The GAO is back again this week with another look at broadband competition, but this time for business customers. The report (pdf) found very little competition among business providers even in "high demand" metro areas and lambasts the FCC for again failing to have effective methods of determining if competition exists. Without effective market analysis and solid data, how can the FCC be making sound decisions?

Related:
  1. What Network Neutrality Is REALLY About
  2. FCC: We're Halfway Done With National Broadband Plan
  3. Cable Industry: Shucks, Guess Nobody Wants CableCARDs
  4. Don't Judge Wireless Competition By The Number Of Carriers
  5. FCC Study: Open Access Lowers Prices, Improves Competition
  6. FCC Begins Crafting New Neutrality Rules
  7. 'Data Driven' FCC Still Using Ancient Data?
  8. FCC Broadband Problem List Omits 'No Competition,' FCC Itself
Forums » GAO Rips FCC Data Collection
view: topics flat text 
Post a:

morbo
Complete Your Transaction

join:2002-01-22
00000
clubs:

they are making decisions


based upon lobbying money.

rawgerz
In Debt we trust
Premium
join:2004-10-03
Grove City, PA

So why

doesn't just some independent group step up and assess the availability instead?

batterup
I Can Not Tell A Lie.
Premium
join:2003-02-06
Netcong, NJ
clubs:

So?

So the great unwashed doesn't have competition, what to do? I know get the CLECs together and force them to run a competing network.
hottboiinnc
ME

join:2003-10-15
Cleveland, OH
·Time Warner Cable
·buckeye cable

Re: So?

Actually thats not a bad idea. The CLECs should merge all together; Earthink/New Edge Networks, COVAD, and the large regional ISPs that resell services from the ILECs and build out their own network- just like cable.

But instead of staying private they could come up with a public IPO offering and become a publicly traded company since being privately held they'd run into money issues. They could even partner with many cities to build and run their FTTH/Wi-Fi Networks.

I think it would really work out. Let the ILECs have their copper and let the CLECs build out using their own FTTH or HFC networks (hy-bird fiber coax (cable company system).

TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast

Cost of collection is the key & Congressional budgeting

»www.gao.gov/new.items/d06426.pdf
FCC stated that gathering and analyzing additional data would be costly and burdensome. Yet without more complete and reliable data, FCC is unable to determine whether its deregulatory policies are achieving their goals.
The GAO is great for identifying problems, but they almost always ignore the biggest problem - Congress itself. If Congress doesn't appropriate sufficient funds in the FCC budget to do these studies - THEY DON'T get done. So the biggest problem here isn't the FCC - it is Congress.
--
--
My BLOG
My Web Page
nasadude

join:2001-10-05
Rockville, MD
·Comcast


1 edit

FCC doesn't want good data

the FCC doesn't want good data; good data would show that their deregulatory policies are NOT resulting in competition, but rather the opposite (in most cases).

as long as they stay blissfully ignorant, they can pretend with a clear conscience that they are steering the right course. Unfortunately, the FCC is actually steering broadband towards the deadly rocks and is about to sink competition for a long, long time.

As for the cost associated with collecting good data, the FCC didn't say they didn't have the money, they said it would be costly - they don't want to spend more money.

Karl Bode
News Guy
join:2000-03-02

Host:
Road Runner
PC gaming GAMES
PC gaming Tech

Re: FCC doesn't want good data

Look at the billions spent on the E-Rate program. Yet they have NO effective system in place to confirm that the money gets spent correctly. Thus, ample fraud and waste.

Same problem in Iraq, frankly.

I'm not so sure the problem is a lack of funds as much as it is cronyism, incompetence, and a desire to give donors political back-rubs at the cost of a comeptitive, rubust, and consumer friendly market...

Ignite
Premium,VIP
join:2004-03-18
UK
clubs:

Re: FCC doesn't want good data

So this'll be another example of the fine democracy the US wants to export

JamesPC

join:2005-10-12
Orange, CA
ya,,,,,,,,,,a big conspiracy.....sarcasm
PDXPLT

join:2003-12-04
Banks, OR

said by nasadude See Profile :

the FCC doesn't want good data; good data would show that their deregulatory policies are NOT resulting in competition, but rather the opposite (in most cases).
In particular, if they were to report that widespread broadband deployment is not progressing, then the 1996 Telecommunications Act would require them to "take immediate action". And that's the last thing the free-market-is-always-right ideologues on the Commission want to do.

So instead they make sure to use data that says everything is hunky-dory.

Karl Bode
News Guy
join:2000-03-02

Host:
Road Runner
PC gaming GAMES
PC gaming Tech

Re: FCC doesn't want good data

Exactly.

The provision that requires "immediate action" is why you'll never see this data collection methodology improved.

deregulatory visioned think tank folks who want absolutely no oversight of corporations officially run the world. The idiocy of that is people with that viewpoint probably make up .2% of the population.

karlmarx

join:2006-09-18
iraq

Re: FCC doesn't want good data

The problem is, that 2% of the population controls 80% of the wealth. Thus, 2% = majority.
PsychoSy

join:2001-01-15
Monroe, MI

Re: FCC doesn't want good data

No, the problem is 98% of the US population that are wage-slaves refuse to throw off their shackles. Without labor, that 2% majority is nothing more than a lame duck from the same gene pool as the one currently inhabiting the White House. Wanna break their monotony? Bust the Corportocracy by leaving the workforce in droves.

cableties
Premium
join:2005-01-27

Hey GAO!

Will ya look at the prices of T1, T3, Fractional and such compared to the same bandwidth consumers can get!

UnBULLeave-uh-bull! Oh the disparity...

JTRockville
Data Ho
Premium,MVM
join:2002-01-28
Rockville, MD
clubs:

Impossible to assess rural USA? Ditto for urban USA!

Why did GAO halt criticism of FCC's data as useless in assessing just rural deployment? As far as I can tell, FCC's data are just as useless in assessing urban deployment.
Forums » GAO Rips FCC Data Collection


Friday, 27-Nov 02:05:12 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole