 pawelp join:2004-12-07 Ridgewood, NY | Thumbs up! No more mapquest! Another nice service from google | |
|
 |  DownLowNope...I Got NothingPremium join:2001-04-25 Long Island | Re: Thumbs up! odd...says that my brower (FF) isn't supported..but then directs me to a link that leads to FF's home page!  -- Cleverly Disguised As A Responsible Adult! | |
|
 |  |  PitBull0Premium join:2002-07-25 Orange, TX | Re: Thumbs up! said by DownLow:odd...says that my brower (FF) isn't supported..but then directs me to a link that leads to FF's home page! Works for me in Firefox.  -- Firefox - The only way to go | |
|
 |  |  |
 |  antdudeA Ninja AntPremium,VIP join:2001-03-25 kudos:2 Reviews:
·RoadRunner Cable
| said by pawelp:No more mapquest!  Another nice service from google Uhh, didn't MapQuest remove its aerial shots long ago? | |
|
 |  |  jsinaikoPremium join:2001-04-25 Chicago, IL Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse
·AT&T Midwest
| Re: Thumbs up! Looking at construction in my neighborhood, I'd say within the last year. Maybe more recently.
Images tend to look better when taken during Winter - less tree cover and better contrast if there is snow. These appear to have been taken in warm weather. I'd say last summer. -- Illigitimati non carborundum | |
|
 Rama767 join:2002-08-02 White Plains, NY | Search Ability is Still Disappointing Unfortunately, Google still can't find either of my home's addresses. Hopefully this will eventually be fixed. I think the Satellite view is pretty neat though, although the novelty might wear off after a while. Does anyone know how old the satellite images are? | |
|
 |  sean151Class 2008Premium join:2003-12-04 Auburn, WA | Re: Search Ability is Still Disappointing It looks like the same images I had seen on mapquest 2 years ago. | |
|
 |  |  | | Re: Search Ability is Still Disappointing This is a cool feature, but yeah the images are several years old... | |
|
 |  Razor155Premium join:2001-12-31 Egg Harbor Township, NJ | I guess, it depends on where you live. Some of the images seem older then other ones. The area around my house includes a new cul-de-sac that was built about 2 yrs ago. | |
|
 sean151Class 2008Premium join:2003-12-04 Auburn, WA | zoom I think you should be able to zoom in more so I can see my house and school better. | |
|
 |  gdmPremium,MVM join:2001-06-15 Mchenry, IL kudos:3 | Re: zoom I agree it needs to zoom in about 2x or 3x closer. Terra server is still better IMO..closer zoom and larger image. | |
|
 |  |  1 edit | Re: zoom in my area the zoom is far far far better then terra server...i can zoom in full range and the pictures are about 1 year old
terraserver's were 1991???!?!? | |
|
 |  | | I agree it would be cool to zoom in to about 500 ft or so. | |
|
 Chosen1 join:2001-08-05 Orange Park, FL | Go google! I like being able to click and drag both the maps and the sat photots around. This is certainly a keeper in my book. -- I think it's wrong that only one company makes the game Monopoly. | |
|
 DerchPremium join:2004-10-16 Cross Plains, WI | !!! Wow, looking good Google. So what's next? | |
|
 jjoshuaPremium join:2001-06-01 Scotch Plains, NJ kudos:1 | Wow! Cool! I'm waving to myself! Now my wife can watch to see when I'm coming home from work.
;););) | |
|
 stetVolitar Prime join:2002-03-08 Warren, MI | Nice, but better zoom please. My house and yard. |
I like how easy it is to pan around, but I wish it would zoom in a bit more. Also, how current are these images? -- I am of the stars. I am called "Forever". Eternity courses through my veins. | |
|
 |  Haquai join:2005-02-24 Ronkonkoma, NY | Re: Nice, but better zoom please. Not a bad service but all of you guys are right, I think.
It needs to be up to date and more detailed( my area is very densely populated and there are new building gong up every day) and the click and drag feature is also pretty cool. other than that, my address came up right away no problems. I'll take it since it's for free. | |
|
 |  stetVolitar Prime join:2002-03-08 Warren, MI |  My house and yard on TerraServer |
TerraServer loses on speed/controls, but wins on overall image quality. You can almost tell which direction I mowed the lawn that week. Also, no watermark is nice. -- I am of the stars. I am called "Forever". Eternity courses through my veins. | |
|
 kenyg join:2001-02-09 Hatboro, PA | re: Google Maps Very cool - I do like the panning around, very nice. I'd also like some more zoom.
My area had to be taken a couple years ago, on a weekend in the spring (no cars at my work, cars at the local baseball field, no cars at the pool) -- aye aye captain! | |
|
 |
 |
 |  bubi73 join:2004-02-03 Mundelein, IL | Re: All Your Base Are Belong To Us. My workplace |
Photos of my workplace must have been taking on a weekend or holiday. No cars in the lot | |
|
 | | Want better zoom? Try Keyhole by Google. If you want closer zoom, you'll have to use Google's other offering: »www.keyhole.com Use the 7 day trial, it's pretty cool. | |
|
 |  SammyBKI'D Rather Be Skiing join:2000-09-07 Los Angeles, CA | Re: Want better zoom? Try Keyhole by Google. Actually, I like the software NASA makes better than keyhole. It took me awhile to get the very close imagery, but it is just as good as Keyhole, and the interface is better in my opinion. »worldwind.arc.nasa.gov/ -- Sam Kislevitz//Look//For//The//Oven//http://www.difs.tk --The Revolution Begins-- | |
|
 rbrightPremium join:2002-12-10 Lexington, KY | Unfortunately I have to zoom out from my address before it will show any satellite images.  -- Team Helix | |
|
 FobulousPremium join:2002-08-14 Missouri City, TX | NICE!!! Very nice!!! | |
|
 RadioDoc58ef2c0Premium,ExMod 2000-03 join:2000-05-11 2 edits | Terraserver still has better data Terraserver, max zoom |  Google, same image @ max |
This is a nice toy but »terraserver.microsoft.com has better coverage, integrates USGS maps and uses the same USGS "Urban Areas" Color Ortho Image files (where available) Google does, but lets you zoom in, print, save and generally use the image. See above--both are the same image but Google won't zoom in further. Terraserver also has the Black and White USGS data to use inside and outside of the newer Urban Areas photos and tells you the date the photos were taken, and it's free. Google is trying to keep you from saving the image, and has a copyright watermark all over it.
Nice try, Google, but you've got some work to do...
edit: zoon->zoom | |
|
 |  antdudeA Ninja AntPremium,VIP join:2001-03-25 kudos:2 Reviews:
·RoadRunner Cable
| Re: Terraserver still has better data said by RadioDoc:This is a nice toy but » terraserver.microsoft.com has better coverage, integrates USGS maps and uses the same USGS "Urban Areas" Color Ortho Image files (where available) Google does, but lets you zoom in, print, save and generally use the image. See above--both are the same image but Google won't zoom in further. Terraserver also has the Black and White USGS data to use inside and outside of the newer Urban Areas photos and tells you the date the photos were taken, and it's free. Google is trying to keep you from saving the image, and has a copyright watermark all over it. Nice try, Google, but you've got some work to do... Agreed. It is so detailed that I can see cars! | |
|
 |  |  TzaleProud Libertarian ConservativePremium join:2004-01-06 NYC Metro | Re: Terraserver still has better data said by antdude:said by RadioDoc:This is a nice toy but » terraserver.microsoft.com has better coverage, integrates USGS maps and uses the same USGS "Urban Areas" Color Ortho Image files (where available) Google does, but lets you zoom in, print, save and generally use the image. See above--both are the same image but Google won't zoom in further. Terraserver also has the Black and White USGS data to use inside and outside of the newer Urban Areas photos and tells you the date the photos were taken, and it's free. Google is trying to keep you from saving the image, and has a copyright watermark all over it. Nice try, Google, but you've got some work to do... Agreed. It is so detailed that I can see cars! For me Google is better! More up to date and it's colored and not to mention it has a lot more features and the SAME zoom as terra server!
-Tzale -- Hey OOL, throttle this! I'm going to FIOS...Verizon FIOS Forum | |
|
 |  |  |  RadioDoc58ef2c0Premium,ExMod 2000-03 join:2000-05-11 | Re: Terraserver still has better data Where are you in NJ? | |
|
 |  | | In my case, the google sat view is more recent than the terra server... but both are are out of date - I do like the closer zoom on terra server | |
|
 |  1 edit | I take that back, terrasoft got even closer than Keyhole for Staples Center...
keyhole has a better interface though, you can spin or drag the map in real time, no clicking and waiting. | |
|
 |  |  RadioDoc58ef2c0Premium,ExMod 2000-03 join:2000-05-11 | Re: Terraserver still has better data I like the other interfaces especially for casual use, but you can't beat Terraserver for utility, especially since they maintain proper scale with respect to the other views (topo and older B & W). They all have a use, but Terraserver gives the most bang for a free service IMHO. I use these a lot. | |
|
 TzaleProud Libertarian ConservativePremium join:2004-01-06 NYC Metro | Thanks Google!
I used to be able to do this on almost all mapping sites, but then they started just offering graphical maps and not satellite imagery. Thanks to Google we now have an AWESOME FAR SUPERIOR graphical map + an AWESOME FAR SUPERIOR satellite imagery system! Not to mention it is free!
Good truly is taking over the world, but honestly I can't complain under this regime!
-Tzale -- Hey OOL, throttle this! I'm going to FIOS...Verizon FIOS Forum | |
|
 BootesPremium join:2005-01-28 Scarsdale, NY | Ehh They're both horrible for my house. When I used the Keyhole Trial awhile ago it was great. :/ | |
|
 sbdjaroI DunnoPremium join:2004-01-29 Grand Junction, CO | google My house is right about, ohh here! | |
|
 |  sbdjaroI DunnoPremium join:2004-01-29 Grand Junction, CO | Re: google Terraserver last updated - 1993 |
Why do i feel left out in the cold? | |
|
 |  |  TsumePremium join:2004-02-23 Johnson City, TN Reviews:
·Comcast
| Re: google Anyone notice some of them zoom in very nicely at high quality, and then there are the blurry as hell green-tinted ones?
The images near my house are the nice clear ones thank god Seems these are over 3 years old; there's that new building OHS has had for the last 3 years missing, and where we have a new gas station is still a dirt lot. | |
|
 | | wtf? wtf? |
what i want to know is what are these 8 triangles north of vegas 36*18 N 115*06 W this is supposedly where area 51 is around. What i think is that they are landmarks for secret aircraft testing pointing to the mountain where they are to land. LoL or maybe im just crazy. I was messing with keyhole's free trial...amazing | |
|
 |  ape join:2002-05-10 Chicago, IL | Re: wtf? key west fl doesn't look good | |
|
 |  |  2 edits | Re: wtf? Can Terraserver do this? (I can only get black fuzzy images on terraserver) The image above is from Keyhole. (and there's still some zoom left...) | |
|
 myhoesMichael Extreme UserPremium join:2003-10-05 Laval, QC | hummm this was taken a long time ago because there has been a residential development the next street over for the past 4 years and on the SAT view theres still only trees lol o well still very very cool -- And that my friends is what they say is..That! | |
|
 |
|