 stridr69 join:2003-05-19 San Luis Obispo, CA | Doesn't surprise me.. Shelling out over $500 for a phone you can't physically play with was a poor decision. But, I give Google kudos for being different. It will be interesting to see what retail stores will sell this phone. Now, if they only sold that puppy completely unlocked, I'd get one.  | |
|
 IIIBradIIIComm M-E-L Instr join:2000-09-28 Greer, SC | So does that mean T-Mobile is getting the N1 in stores? So does that mean T-Mobile is getting the N1 in stores? | |
|
 |  sapoCruising Down Memory LanePremium join:2002-09-16 Sacramento, CA kudos:1 | Re: So does that mean T-Mobile is getting the N1 in stores? "Of course the Android platform itself remains a huge success and the Nexus One isn't dead -- it will soon arrive in retail locations for consumers to poke and prod first hand. " -- Purple Drink | |
|
 |  |  tiger72SexaT duorPPremium join:2001-03-28 Saint Louis, MO kudos:1 | Re: So does that mean T-Mobile is getting the N1 in stores? I'm actually very happy to see the N1 in stores. I may be a fan of Android, but there's no way I'm going to buy a phone sight-unseen for that kinda money. | |
|
 GuspazGuspazPremium,MVM join:2001-11-05 Montreal, QC kudos:19 | Where does this leave Canadians? The Nexus One was a popular purchase for subscribers to Wind Mobile, who got the AWS throughout most of Canada. They don't carry the phones themselves, but do encourage customers to use whatever hardware they want. | |
|
 |  pfakPremium join:2002-12-29 Vancouver, BC | Re: Where does this leave Canadians? Since when is parts of Alberta and Ontario "all of Canada"? What other providers besides WIND offer AWS?
»care.windmobile.ca/Support/Cover···ing.aspx -- Xenophase - British Columbia's premier online gaming community. | |
|
 |  |  GuspazGuspazPremium,MVM join:2001-11-05 Montreal, QC kudos:19 | Re: Where does this leave Canadians? Since Wind won the AWS spectrum auction for every province except Quebec (where Quebecor paid about as much for Quebec alone as Wind did for the rest of Canada). Just because they've only launched service in Alberta, BC, and Ontario doesn't mean that other provinces aren't in the plans. | |
|
 |  |  |  patcat88 join:2002-04-05 Jamaica, NY kudos:1 | Re: Where does this leave Canadians? So what band did Bell and Telus build their HSPA network on? | |
|
 |  |  |  |  GuspazGuspazPremium,MVM join:2001-11-05 Montreal, QC kudos:19 | Re: Where does this leave Canadians? I *think* they use 850/1900, but don't quote me on that. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  tiger72SexaT duorPPremium join:2001-03-28 Saint Louis, MO kudos:1 | Re: Where does this leave Canadians? That's correct. | |
|
 WiseOldNerdDe gustibus non est disputandumPremium join:2001-11-25 Phoenix, AZ Reviews:
·Cox HSI
·Charter
| Glad I Got Mine I bought the AT&T version day it was announced and glad I did. I rather enjoy not being tied to iTunes and find the marketplace well supplied with apps I actually use. I also like the fact it is totally unlocked. -- My perception is REALITY | |
|
 |  DarkLogixTexan and ProudPremium join:2008-10-23 Baytown, TX kudos:3 | Re: Glad I Got Mine I just bought mine today and can't wait for it to arrive | |
|
 |  MRCUR join:2007-03-09 Columbia, PA | I ordered one with AT&T 3G bands about a week after it launched. Only kept it for about a week though and sent it back.
Not only was I not sold on Android (especially with the absolutely piss poor Exchange syncing), the screen sucked with a weird bright purple/pink tint, and the 3G radio was horrendous. I'm back on my 3GS for now, although I'm sure I'll have another Android phone at some point in the future. | |
|
 | | Destined to fail The model of buying a phone and then shopping for carriers will never work in the U.S. until the government gets involved and mandates that all carriers use the same type of network (GSM or CDMA) and same frequencies. -- "You do know that OS-X is built on BSD, which is a derivative of Unix. So in essence, you are still using Linux." --gregz | |
|
 |  | | Re: Destined to fail said by asdfghjklzx5:The model of buying a phone and then shopping for carriers will never work in the U.S. until the government gets involved and mandates that all carriers use the same type of network (GSM or CDMA) and same frequencies. Maybe I'm wrong but isn't that exactly what will happen since all carriers are moving to LTE ? Or does the voice part still stay on the old respective GSM/CDMA networks? | |
|
 |  |  | | Re: Destined to fail said by mikesterr:said by asdfghjklzx5:The model of buying a phone and then shopping for carriers will never work in the U.S. until the government gets involved and mandates that all carriers use the same type of network (GSM or CDMA) and same frequencies. Maybe I'm wrong but isn't that exactly what will happen since all carriers are moving to LTE ? Or does the voice part still stay on the old respective GSM/CDMA networks? I'm not an expert on what's going on regarding carriers and what technologies they are adopting. All I know is that the current system is a clusterf**** of consumer unfriendliness. -- "You do know that OS-X is built on BSD, which is a derivative of Unix. So in essence, you are still using Linux." --gregz | |
|
 |  |  |  | | Re: Destined to fail All I know is that the current system is a clusterf**** of consumer unfriendliness. AMEN | |
|
 |  |  |  |  DarkLogixTexan and ProudPremium join:2008-10-23 Baytown, TX kudos:3 | Re: Destined to fail said by mikesterr: All I know is that the current system is a clusterf**** of consumer unfriendliness. AMEN I second that AMEN | |
|
 |  |  patcat88 join:2002-04-05 Jamaica, NY kudos:1 | said by mikesterr:Maybe I'm wrong but isn't that exactly what will happen since all carriers are moving to LTE ? Or does the voice part still stay on the old respective GSM/CDMA networks? LTE STILL doesn't have a voice standard. I'm not sure whether the first LTE phones will ever be firmware upgradeable to have LTE Voice, or the LTE Voice circuit must burnt into hardware (CPU consumption/latency), or we will wind up with a format war with phones having 2-3 different LTE voice implementations DVD -/+ style. | |
|
 |  | | said by asdfghjklzx5:The model of buying a phone and then shopping for carriers will never work in the U.S. until the government gets involved and mandates that all carriers use the same type of network (GSM or CDMA) and same frequencies. You're forgetting that carriers force everyone to pay the same price for service, even if you bring your own phone. That's essentially extortion, and the government will have to force carriers to stop that as well. Unfortunately with Genachowski at the helm it's not going to happen. | |
|
 |  | | the gov't doestnt force the Carriers to use the same network. IF they did everyone would be on the same and most likely GSM and then go to LTE. That is why the phones are limited and TMO's 3G won't work on ATT phones--like the iPhone. they use a different freq. they paid for. -- www.twopugsbrand.com Kosher, Vegan, and Organic Certified Dog and Cat treats/foods and other products! | |
|
 |  |  | | Re: Destined to fail said by hottboiinnc:the gov't doestnt force the Carriers to use the same network. IF they did everyone would be on the same and most likely GSM and then go to LTE. That is why the phones are limited and TMO's 3G won't work on ATT phones--like the iPhone. they use a different freq. they paid for. In the future, please bother to read and understand my posts before replying.
Thanks. -- "You do know that OS-X is built on BSD, which is a derivative of Unix. So in essence, you are still using Linux." --gregz | |
|
 |  | | said by asdfghjklzx5:The model of buying a phone and then shopping for carriers will never work in the U.S. until the government gets involved and mandates that all carriers use the same type of network (GSM or CDMA) and same frequencies. How exactly would the US government be able to mandate the technology that a company is paying for with their own money?
If there were no competition in wireless, and there was 1 carrier with GSM and CDMA all over the place and not overlapping, and a bunch of phones that weren't compatible with both, you might have a point.
Otherwise, unless they're footing the bill, the government can't tell a company what technology to use to serve its customers. | |
|
 |  |  patcat88 join:2002-04-05 Jamaica, NY kudos:1 | Re: Destined to fail said by skuv :said by asdfghjklzx5:The model of buying a phone and then shopping for carriers will never work in the U.S. until the government gets involved and mandates that all carriers use the same type of network (GSM or CDMA) and same frequencies. How exactly would the US government be able to mandate the technology that a company is paying for with their own money? ......................... Otherwise, unless they're footing the bill, the government can't tell a company what technology to use to serve its customers. Anonymous poster, lol.
Why is the electricity coming out of your socket 120v and 60 hz? Why is your steering wheel on the left? why does your car have a seat belt? Why does your water bill come in english and not Klingon? | |
|
 |  |  |  AlakarFacts do not cease to exist when ignored join:2001-03-23 Milwaukee, WI 1 edit | Re: Destined to fail said by patcat88:said by skuv :said by asdfghjklzx5:The model of buying a phone and then shopping for carriers will never work in the U.S. until the government gets involved and mandates that all carriers use the same type of network (GSM or CDMA) and same frequencies. How exactly would the US government be able to mandate the technology that a company is paying for with their own money? ......................... Otherwise, unless they're footing the bill, the government can't tell a company what technology to use to serve its customers. Anonymous poster, lol. Why is the electricity coming out of your socket 120v and 60 hz? Why is your steering wheel on the left? why does your car have a seat belt? Why does your water bill come in english and not Klingon? You laugh at an Anon when you don't seem to know what you're talking about. LOL! 
Electricity = Public Utility, not private company. Steering wheel on the left; if you want it on the right, you can get a British built vehicle. There is nothing mandating that a steering wheel be on the left side. Seat belt, safety item, and what is mandated is a restraint system not necessarily seat belts. You can get your water bill here (which is again from a public utility) in English, Spanish, French, or Hmong.
So your point was? -- "Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom; it is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves." William Pitt the Younger | |
|
 |  |  |  |  patcat88 join:2002-04-05 Jamaica, NY kudos:1 | Re: Destined to fail All spectrum is a public resource, same as any road or river or sea water, therefore every cell carrier who has a monopoly on spectrum should be/naturally is a utility company. Utility companies do not have unlimited ownership of public property and have to follow the government's, who on paper represents the people, rules and conditions of use of public property.
I checked, steering wheel right cars are legal in the USA, if you can jump the protectionist import rules, post office uses them without any legal exceptions. My mistake.
Now why should the government be telling me if my car has a restraint system or not? Why doesn't the free market decide whether cars need seat belts or not? What about bumper collision damage resistence standards? or fuel economy standards, I bought the fuel, what right does the government have to tell me how I use it?
Why can't I get my water bill in Klingon or Latin? | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  somithoJNCIEPremium join:2004-08-17 Richmond, VA | Re: Destined to fail Last I checked, spectrum became private property when the FCC elected to auction it off. Ocean based travel is controlled by governments and in some cases private parties, which yes, can restrict your right of movement within their property. Consult the USCG on that.
Utility companies are split and regulated differently, you have public and private utilities. Such as some localities privatize the delivery of water and natural gas. They may choose to sell all rights to delivery, or they may choose to contract it out in a management agreement. Private utilities, are anything from ConEd up there in Queens to Dominion Power in most of Virginia. They own the poles, they paid the locales for the easements and at some point and time a land owner prior to you (or yourself) gave easement rights to the power company in order for you to receive electricity from said company. If you didn't want it, you were free at that time to decline and refuse it.
The government tells you that your car must have a restraint system in order to be operated on a public road, if you choose to drive on a private road without it, well that's your ignorance. But public funds go into maintaining public roads, and you elected to travel on these public roads rather than negotiate your own method of travel.
Fuel economy is due to emissions, California standards are actually higher than national standards. They protect the air quality for everyone else and find a happy medium between those which detest the motorized vehicle and carbon emissions, and those which would prefer to drive cars which generate more carbon emissions than the average 727.
If you actually want a 1MPG car, you can have one. Just plan to make it meet emissions standards.
Water bills can come in any language you would like. You can ask them for their billing template and translate it to whatever language you want, or pay them to do it for you. -- "If everyone is thinking alike, someone isn't thinking." General George Patton Jr | |
|
 LinklistPremium join:2002-03-03 Williamstown, NJ kudos:5 1 edit | Google's plan for unsubsidized phones dies
Looks like Google's plan to bypass the carriers and push the unsubsidized phone model has crashed and burned. U.S. buyers are just too hooked on buying subsidized phones, even though they ultimately pay close to full price for it over the length of a 2 yr cell plan.
Also what helped kill it was the fact that Google has one of the worst customer service organizations on the planet. The cell service providers get bad marks for customer service, but they look great compared to what Google offers. -- Are you happy with your rep in Washington, DC? | |
|
 |  MizzatWill post for thumbsPremium join:2003-05-03 Atlanta, GA kudos:1 | Re: Google's plan for unsubsidized phones dies said by Linklist:Looks like Google's plan to bypass the carriers and push the unsubsidized phone model has crashed and burned. U.S. buyers are just too hooked on buying subsidized phones, even though they ultimately pay close to full price for it over the length of a 2 yr cell plan. Also what helped kill it was the fact that Google has one of the worst customer service organizations on the planet. The cell service providers get bad marks for customer service, but they look great compared to what Google offers. Buying an unsubsidized phone is silly, the rates for the carriers are the same wether you buy it subsidized or not, so it is built into thier pricing. Now if they offered a discount for brining your own hardware, or price went down after your commitment....
So to take full advantage you should upgrade everytime you're able and sell your new or old phone. It just makes sense. -- -M | |
|
 |  |  | | Re: Google's plan for unsubsidized phones dies said by Mizzat:Now if they offered a discount for brining your own hardware, or price went down after your commitment.... T-Mobile does exactly that... | |
|
 |  |  |  FBGuyPremium join:2005-03-19 Evanston, IL Reviews:
·Comcast
·T-Mobile US
| Re: Google's plan for unsubsidized phones dies said by Philmatic:said by Mizzat:Now if they offered a discount for brining your own hardware, or price went down after your commitment.... T-Mobile does exactly that... I was going to say that exactly. -- sbcglobal.net speedtest result 11/11/09 - 5256kbps | |
|
 |  |  |  |  | | Re: Google's plan for unsubsidized phones dies said by FBGuy:said by Philmatic:said by Mizzat:Now if they offered a discount for brining your own hardware, or price went down after your commitment.... T-Mobile does exactly that... I was going to say that exactly. But it's not enough, and the discount is unrelated to the cost of the phone you bring. A cursory glance at European service plans shows that bringing your own phone saves you a huge amount of money. With T-Mobile you only save $10/month, ultimately making it cheaper to just buy a phone with a contract. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  | | Re: Google's plan for unsubsidized phones dies Try $20/month, Unlimited Talk/Text/Web is $79.99 when you bring a phone, or $99.99 if you are in a contract.
$20/month (Savings over subsidized) * 24 months (Standard contract) = $480 savings over the course of your contract.
That is an EXTRA $130 in savings over buying a cheaper subsidized phone (Nexus One in my example) and sticking with the more expensive plan. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | | Re: Google's plan for unsubsidized phones dies those are standard pricings now with TMO.. where have you been? | |
|
 |  |  FBGuyPremium join:2005-03-19 Evanston, IL Reviews:
·Comcast
·T-Mobile US
| said by Mizzat:So to take full advantage you should upgrade everytime you're able and sell your new or old phone. It just makes sense. who is going to buy the phone your selling if everyone is constantly getting new subsidized phones?
personally I don't think cellullar companies should be selling phones. I think they should focus on service exclusively. -- sbcglobal.net speedtest result 11/11/09 - 5256kbps | |
|
 |  |  |  iansltx join:2007-02-19 Golden, CO kudos:2 | Re: Google's plan for unsubsidized phones dies Cellular carriers in the US get a leg up on each other mainly by offering cooler phones than the other provider. Or exclusive phones anyway. Otherwise T-Mobile would have to compete more fiercely on price than they do already. | |
|
 |  |  RockyBBPremium join:2005-01-31 Steamboat Springs, CO | said by Mizzat:Buying an unsubsidized phone is silly ... sell your new or old phone. It just makes sense. Sell to who? someone who is silly by buying an unsubsidized phone? | |
|
 |  |  |  MizzatWill post for thumbsPremium join:2003-05-03 Atlanta, GA kudos:1 | Re: Google's plan for unsubsidized phones dies Check eBay, plenty of people buying over the subsidized rates, could even send overseas. -- -M | |
|
 |  |  | | said by Mizzat:Buying an unsubsidized phone is silly, the rates for the carriers are the same wether you buy it subsidized or not, so it is built into thier pricing. Now if they offered a discount for brining your own hardware, or price went down after your commitment.... It's not silly, because it is the 2 year commitment that is getting you the subsidy, not anything else.
If you plan to change your carrier without an ETF, it's not silly at all to not sign up for 2 years just to get a cheaper phone.
If you don't mind being tied to the same carrier for 2 years, then yes, it would be silly to outright buy a phone instead of having it subsidized.
But it's silly to call it "silly" when unsubsidized has a situation that is useful for some people. | |
|
 |  pnh102Reptiles Are Cuddly And PrettyPremium join:2002-05-02 Mount Airy, MD | I wouldn't say the unsubisidized part was the problem. I would say the problem of it only working effectively with T-Mobile was the real issue.
The Nexus One should have included full 3G support for all the major carriers right out of the box. THEN it would have stood a chance for taking off. -- "Net Neutrality" zealots - the people you can thank for your capped Internet service. | |
|
 |  |  DaveDudeNo Fear join:1999-09-01 New Jersey kudos:1 Reviews:
·ViaTalk
·Vonage
1 edit | Re: Google's plan for unsubsidized phones dies said by pnh102:I wouldn't say the unsubisidized part was the problem. I would say the problem of it only working effectively with T-Mobile was the real issue. The Nexus One should have included full 3G support for all the major carriers right out of the box. THEN it would have stood a chance for taking off. I agree, only releasing on Tmobile, then months later releasing the ATT version. No commericals or Ads. Plus a weak camera. If there isnt 3G support, whats the point ? -- They Live... We Sleep...
Spreading the wealth around never results in a better outcome for people. It always results in destruction.
| |
|
 |  |  |  iansltx join:2007-02-19 Golden, CO kudos:2 | Re: Google's plan for unsubsidized phones dies 5 megapixel is weak? | |
|
 |  |  |  | | its too bad that google is throwing in the towel soo early, they should sell the phone at t-mobile stores i would buy one...
actually google about the n1 camera vs droid
here is one of them »androidandme.com/2010/05/phones/···xus-one/
the n1 has a better camera, don't get fooled by megapixels alone...
also, speed tests indicate the n1 is faster... htc gui changes slowed it down... and dont look as good anyways...
and google releases updates on it first... google android 2.2, rooting / jit, alternative roms... ect makes its better for android software developers | |
|
 |  Z80APremium join:2009-11-23 | 'mericans love making payments. We are a debt culture. | |
|
 |  |  | | Re: Google's plan for unsubsidized phones dies said by Z80A:'mericans love making payments. We are a debt culture. ??? Unless I terminate the contract I don't pay anything more whether I buy a phone and bring it to a carrier or buy a subsidized phone from the carrier. No "payments" involved. -- CCNA, Comtrain Certified Tower Climber | |
|
 |  |  |  FBGuyPremium join:2005-03-19 Evanston, IL Reviews:
·Comcast
·T-Mobile US
| Re: Google's plan for unsubsidized phones dies said by cmaenginsb1:said by Z80A:'mericans love making payments. We are a debt culture. ??? Unless I terminate the contract I don't pay anything more whether I buy a phone and bring it to a carrier or buy a subsidized phone from the carrier. No "payments" involved. t-mobile doesn't do this. if you byod you get a lower monthly rate. -- sbcglobal.net speedtest result 11/11/09 - 5256kbps | |
|
 |  |  |  |  iansltx join:2007-02-19 Golden, CO kudos:2 | Re: Google's plan for unsubsidized phones dies T-Mobile is the exception rather than the rule...they also subsidize their phones less than average and charle less for their phones off of contract. | |
|
 |  Ulmo join:2005-09-22 San Jose, CA | said by Linklist:Looks like Google's plan to bypass the carriers and push the unsubsidized phone model has crashed and burned. U.S. buyers are just too hooked on buying subsidized phones, even though they ultimately pay close to full price for it over the length of a 2 yr cell plan. I thought I saw some stats that USA users were buying more and more full-price unlocked phones, despite them being carrier specific in hardware designs. Also, if the phones would work on all/most carriers, then this would be far more widespread. Saying no one does it because they don't want it is premature if in fact they can't really make use of it because it really isn't available. | |
|
 | | bow down before the ones you serve Android winning is very important. I never expected Verizon to actually launch it without gutting it, but they did. AT&T was too spineless to let the Backflip stand on its own, though.
Unless Google's going to build its own network it has to bow down to the carriers in the US on some level.
Google could take the high road by promoting the phones that offer a fuller google experience than not on its own, maybe with some really good YouTube comparisons. Profile all of the good points about all of the Android phones, as best they can by region.
Sort of like direct-to-consumer marketing in pharma. "Ask your doctor about the HTC Incredible." | |
|
 |  iansltx join:2007-02-19 Golden, CO kudos:2 Reviews:
·Verizon Online DSL
·RoadRunner Cable
·Comcast
| Re: bow down before the ones you serve Like the Evo 4G? Or the Droid Incredible?
Props to Google for acknowledging two very good Android phones (though I personally don't agree with the "Evo surcharge" Sprint will undoubtedly remove after a few months.
Props to them for also totally neglecting to mention the Backflip. Which is crap. | |
|
 MPScanPremium join:2001-08-24 Boston, MA | You have to give.... Props to Google. Admit defeat. Shut it down. Move on. | |
|
 |  JeffreyConnoisseur of leisurely thingsPremium join:2002-12-24 Long Island kudos:3 Reviews:
·Verizon FiOS
·Vonage
| Re: You have to give.... said by MPScan:Props to Google. Admit defeat. Shut it down. Move on. Agreed. They're not offering up any bullshit excuses, which is nice to see. | |
|
 |  | | said by MPScan:Props to Google. Admit defeat. Shut it down. Move on.
Did they really fail? I think that they have accomplished what they set out to do. | |
|
 |  |  MRCUR join:2007-03-09 Columbia, PA | Re: You have to give.... We all have to remember that Google is a company which loves to beta test new ideas on a huge scale. Their "Google Phone" webstore was a beta test which happened to fail. But fail isn't the right word, since the test "succeeded" in that it showed Google (and other US companies) that US consumers aren't (yet) interested in unlocked, unsubsidized device purchases.
Look at their fiber network buildout as another example. They're just beta testing it to see if it takes off (which it will, IMO). | |
|
 neftv join:2000-10-01 Broomall, PA | Prices Yea that phone is/was pricey. One can get a glorified Net book for that price of $549. | |
|
 |  See 12 replies to this post |
|
 | | The phone was too expensive I went to google site nexus page to buy the phone but the price was a killer. If it was $200 maybe 300 i would have bought want without the service. | |
|
 thenderScreen tycoonPremium join:2009-01-01 Brooklyn, NY kudos:1 | It's not just about an online only sales model. a)You couldn't find this phone on carrier websites, and from many other retailers.
This may surprise google, but many may not want to buy from them. When Google Checkout came out, it did not have a customer service phone # for years. Google's products may be nice, but people like to know they can call and scream at someone if they want to. Google has improved since, but it doesn't compare to dealing with a store or a 5 star online retailer with a long, credible sales history.
Also, the exclusivitiy of it only being available through google doesn't help. It possibly hurt. It hurts a product's credibility - when that product is a mass produced consumer electronic item, when it is only available from one place.
I used to think, it could have been different with the Nexus One. Perhaps there were more options available for support & people did have confidence in buying directly from Google. The sales figures for the phone prove I'm not wrong.
b)Unlocked smartphones aren't all they're cracked up to be due to high speed mobile internet carrier inconsistencies.
An unlocked dumbphone can be fully utilized on any network for its major purposes of SMS & phone calls.
An unlocked smartphone has severe limitations used on any network other than the one it was intended for because every network has different frequencies & technologies for providing people with data & voice.
Yes, you can use wi-fi and edge, but this is severely limiting compared to the idea of unlocking a phone and having 3G available from every network. I don't want to wait forever for maps to load while I wait in the street looking for directions, I don't want to web browse at 100 kbps waiting in a doctor's office on EDGE, or listen to music via Pandora on the lo-fi option.
In addition to the limitations when used on neighboring GSM networks, you don't even get the option to use it on Verizon or Sprint because they're CDMA!
Of the "big four" nationwide wireless networks, most of the major unlocked smartphones can at best work on two networks! One of which it will be decidedly crippled on!
And one wonders why there was no revolution?
It's not google's fault that sprint, verizon, t-mobile, and AT&T all have different methods of getting people high speed mobile data & voice service, but it's the reality.
People who buy unlocked smartphones are paying very high dollar amounts for them. At that point, I don't think tacking on more to the price to include a radio for every major provider would be a bad idea, if it were possible to pack it all in there. Imagine a phone you can use on any provider in your area at the drop of a dime without losing 3G service! -- Macbook, & BlackBerry repair in NYC | |
|
 | | Was hoping they'd make one for MetroPCS. If you're going to make a phone without subsidies try selling it with carriers who have that pricing model. | |
|
 |  AlcoholPremium join:2003-05-26 Climax, MI kudos:3 Reviews:
·Comcast
| Re: Was hoping they'd make one for MetroPCS. MetroPCS doesn't have 3g i believe, so it shouldn't interest Google.
Sprint and Verizon didn't get it because of EVO and Incredible respectively.
ATT is just an Apple fan boy so they are scared of android since people will prefer it over the iPhone and android isn't exclusively to their network. Thus no subsidy from ATT for N1. -- I found the key to success but somebody changed the lock. | |
|
 |
|