Google To Wiggle Around, Over iPhone Ban With Google Voice iPhone-tailored page... While AT&T and Apple may have thrown a boulder in Google's path by blocking Google's new voice application from the iPhone application store, Google appears ready to navigate around the obstruction. David Pogue at the New York Times notes Google's already hard at work on a web site specifically tailored to the iPhone to mimic the application's functionality. While users could access Google Voice through the iPhone's browser already, this should simply make it easier. Lamenting the dynamic duo's "Soviet information-control style" approach to application approval, Pogue goes on to note that the only thing Apple and AT&T's ban accomplished is an FCC inquiry and a lot of bad press.
|
 ptrowskiGot Helix?Premium join:2005-03-14 Putnam, CT kudos:4 | Good stuff... I am glad they are doing it. While the Google Voice page works, the actual application is much easier. | |
|  |  | | Re: Good stuff... said by ptrowski:I am glad they are doing it. While the Google Voice page works, the actual application is much easier. How much you want to bet AT&T blocks access to the page? It's not like there isn't precedent for them doing such. | |
|  |  |  ptrowskiGot Helix?Premium join:2005-03-14 Putnam, CT kudos:4 | Re: Good stuff... Their balls are not that big... | |
|  |  |  |  |  |  openbox9 join:2004-01-26 Alexandria, VA kudos:1 | Re: Good stuff... That would bring the wrath of net neutrality down on them and I don't believe any ISP really wants to test those waters in this environment. | |
|
 | | Google will get what it wants Google will get what it wants. | |
|  |  |  |  |  | | Re: Google will get what it wants I really doubt it. Yeah, it would be nice, but that's the way it goes. I know of no one personally that really cared in the first place.  | |
|  |  |  |  MattAll noise, no signal.Premium join:2003-07-20 Jamestown, NC kudos:12 | Re: Google will get what it wants said by ndcart :I really doubt it. Yeah, it would be nice, but that's the way it goes. I know of no one personally that really cared in the first place. Hello, nice to meet you. 
I really like the novelty of my iPhone, but all this application restricting is starting to make me look seriously at a BlackBerry again. Hopefully by the time my contract is up they'll have one with a nice screen. | |
|  |  |  |  |  | | Re: Google will get what it wants said by Matt:said by ndcart :I really doubt it. Yeah, it would be nice, but that's the way it goes. I know of no one personally that really cared in the first place. Hello, nice to meet you.  I really like the novelty of my iPhone, but all this application restricting is starting to make me look seriously at a BlackBerry again. Hopefully by the time my contract is up they'll have one with a nice screen. *cough* Windows Mobile or Android *cough* Was I subtle enough? | |
|  |  |  |  |  |  en102Canadian, eh? join:2001-01-26 Valencia, CA | Re: Google will get what it wants That's one of the reasons that I went Windowz mobile in the first place:
- No restrictions/DRM on what you can put on/off the device - Tethering is simple - Any app can be loaded - Don't need (or want) iTunes - Don't need (or want to pay for) MobileMe - I can go PayPer Use on data, and go strictly WiFi if I want and not pay for data (use MoDaCo NODATA to block 3g/Medianet as a safeguard) - Opera Mobile is a great browser. | |
|  |  |  |  |  |  ptrowskiGot Helix?Premium join:2005-03-14 Putnam, CT kudos:4 Reviews:
·VOIPo
·Choice One Commu..
1 edit | said by k1ll3rdr4g0n:said by Matt:said by ndcart :I really doubt it. Yeah, it would be nice, but that's the way it goes. I know of no one personally that really cared in the first place. Hello, nice to meet you.  I really like the novelty of my iPhone, but all this application restricting is starting to make me look seriously at a BlackBerry again. Hopefully by the time my contract is up they'll have one with a nice screen. *cough* Windows Mobile or Android *cough* Was I subtle enough? Cough cough, using in on the iPhone so there is no need. thanks though, it is appreciated.
How come Windows Mobile doesn't show up in the list?
»www.google.com/mobile/products/v···=default -- "So, Lone Starr, now you see that evil will always triumph because good is dumb."
Have you been touched by his noodly appendage? »www.venganza.org | |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  MattAll noise, no signal.Premium join:2003-07-20 Jamestown, NC kudos:12 | Re: Google will get what it wants I would never go back to a Windows Mobile phone and I still think Android looks like a computer with horribly out of place "docklets." | |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | | Re: Google will get what it wants Agreed. Windows Mobile is the biggest pile of crap I've ever used. I had two Windows Mobile phones before I switched to the iPhone and I would have to reboot them AT LEAST 3-4 times a day due to a crash or a lockup. I can go weeks or even a month or longer without ever having to restart my iPhone. Not to mention the fact that AT&T coverage for me here across Connecticut is WAYYYY better than Verizon's coverage. I'll be sticking with the iPhone for now -- Apple will eventually grow a pair and tell AT&T to shut up about this stuff, IMO. | |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  kwPremium join:2004-06-12 kudos:5 1 edit | Re: Google will get what it wants jkfkgkfg | |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | | said by matrix3D:Agreed. Windows Mobile is the biggest pile of crap I've ever used. I had two Windows Mobile phones before I switched to the iPhone and I would have to reboot them AT LEAST 3-4 times a day due to a crash or a lockup. I can go weeks or even a month or longer without ever having to restart my iPhone. Not to mention the fact that AT&T coverage for me here across Connecticut is WAYYYY better than Verizon's coverage. I'll be sticking with the iPhone for now -- Apple will eventually grow a pair and tell AT&T to shut up about this stuff, IMO. Are you sure that wasn't due to a faulty program that you installed?
Rarely will any of mine lockup or crash, but I put up with it because I expect a device made by a human to crash. Mac's crash, Windows boxes crash, Linux crashes, it happens. If you really think that a device from Apple won't crash, then you are either a sheep and/or a fool. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  1 edit | How come iPhone isn't on the list? All I see is: "Download App for: Android BlackBerry"
Hey, go ahead and void your warranty. Don't complain when a piece of hardware breaks and Apple wont replace it because you jailbroke it .
And whats up with the whole "duplicates functionality" excuse for Google Voice? Isn't that what one of the core principles that America was founded on, freedom to choose between competition? On Windows Mobile there are probably a few applications that do the same thing, but they each differ in UI and functionality. You choose what you like and install. Unless, of course, you like someone else to choose for you and tell you how you should use the device?
Btw, I have a third party application for Google Voice on my Windows Mobile device. And I didn't have to jailbreak it.
Btw, install the latest fart app and let me know how that works out for yeah. | |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  ptrowskiGot Helix?Premium join:2005-03-14 Putnam, CT kudos:4 | Re: Google will get what it wants No complaints here. I already had Apple replace one phone under warranty. But again, Windows wasn't on that list. So you point wasn't made. Thanks though. | |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | | Re: Google will get what it wants said by ptrowski:No complaints here. I already had Apple replace one phone under warranty. But again, Windows wasn't on that list. So you point wasn't made. Thanks though. Here is a site I think you should bookmark: »www.fallacyfiles.org/
Your response: "Windows Mobile isn't in the list, but I can still use it on the iPhone" My Response: "The iPhone isn't listed, but I can use it in Windows Mobile" Your response: "Windows Mobile wasn't on the list"
Do you see how incoherent of an argument you are trying to make? I believe that is begging the question.
The point in my statement: Even though Google doesn't list Windows Mobile as a "compatible device", I can still use Google Voice on my Windows Mobile based device. However, in order for iPhone users to utilize a Google Voice application that will have to jailbreak, and potentially void their warranty. Windows Mobile users on the other hand, can install a third party program without fear of voiding the device's warranty. These applications for example, but not limited too, a custom made interface to more easily use Google Voice. However, Google does indeed provide an interface for iPhone users, from what I hear, the experience is not the same. Should one really recommend an action that can void their warranty? Even though jailbreaking has worked for you, doesn't mean it will work perfectly for the next person. A person could have really bad luck and have a power outage at the exact moment that they are applying the jailbreak, which would essentially make their iPhone a paperweight. All thoughts aside - this whole argument would be mute if Apple wasn't so concerned about people who jailbreak iPhones. If Apple had a didn't care attitude towards people who jailbreak their iPhones, then I say have a jailbreak-iPhone-party. But, since Apple is taking a firm stand against individuals using the device the way the individuals want - I would caution against jailbreaking because even though 9 times out of 10 the Apple CSRs are nice and useful and willing to help you out...there will always be that one person who bricks their iPhone, brings it to the counter where they go "Oh, looks like you attempted to jailbreak it, we can't warranty it; sorry.". I ask you, do you really want that sitting on your shoulder? Or would you just tell him "meh, my jailbreak worked fine, buy another one." And don't act like that would never happen at Apple, just look at these articles and say that you couldn't find ONE article of someone who got the shaft from Apple. | |
|
 |  |  | | The author comes short of calling Apple a monopoly by using the word "monopolistic". Still, this is a flawed premise because there are literally thousands of competing products for its music player and phone business. Locking in customers because *they* enjoy using your product is not monopolistic. Certainly, Apple *does* exclude rivals from its product line and supporting businesses; why the hell shouldn't it? Microsoft doesn't include iTunes support as part of its Zune package.
The Zune is, in many ways, more compelling than the iPod but fails in key areas. Namely, Microsoft falls down in being able to successfully market it as a lifestyle device. Despite the products merits, it wounded compelling features and failed to duplicate the iTunes experience.
"Apple will face a user revolt in the coming years based upon Microsoft, Google and other yet-to-be-formed companies, undercutting their core markets with cheap, stable and open devices."
Doubtful. There are forces beyond Apple and AT&T that do not want open devices. Namely, the entertainment industry. Apple has the option of telling Hollywood to go **ck themselves, or they can appease the entertainment people and get them aboard to assure that the customer has a nice experience as well as a Disneyland like method of spending more money.
As it pertains to the telecommunications industry, sure, go ahead and put Apple up against the wall. Then, line up Motorola, Nokia and LG for playing the same game along with the cell providers themselves. Apple is the first handset to be release in the past 10 years that hasn't had the manufacturer's software replaced or modified to the liking of the carrier.
Certainly, Apple is no saint. Their application approval process is as political as they come, and not very friendly to the people who make the iPhone such an attractive handset. And I do not agree with how the iPhone has limitations upon the use of 3G with respect to certain applications. But the fall-out isn't going to have people throwing their iPhones on Ebay and defecting. It may or may not affect future purchases, but I really doubt it.
The iPhone is three years old and probably is no longer the least restricted smartphone on the market. But it was the first to push a carrier into chilling the hell out and letting the customer do what they want. I agree, still a ways to go, but all of this is probably going to amount to bumpkis defections away from the iPhone nor other Apple products.
Well, with the exception of Apple TV. That thing sucks. | |
|  |  |  |  MattAll noise, no signal.Premium join:2003-07-20 Jamestown, NC kudos:12 | Re: Google will get what it wants said by clickie:Apple is the first handset to be release in the past 10 years that hasn't had the manufacturer's software replaced or modified to the liking of the carrier. As an iPhone owner, I find this laughable. Modification comes in many more forms than outright OS modification. Not allowing applications to work over 3G seems like a pretty serious modification to me. Aside from that, I've owned 2 Windows Mobile phones and aside from crippling GPS, there was no OS modification whatsoever.
And as far as anti-trust, the only reason Apple is able to get away with things Microsoft gets slapped for, is because they have high margin, low-volume products. Of course, the iPod and the iPhone have changed that and the repercussions are starting to be seen. Anyone remember the France iPod lawsuit? I would imagine that is just the start if the iPhone stays exclusively on the AT&T network. | |
|  |  |  |  |  Reviews:
·WOW Internet and..
·Time Warner Cable
| Re: Google will get what it wants MSFT doesn't get slapped here in the US. It's the EU that doesn't like MSFT and thats only because Google runs their mouth over there and then two weeks later (if that long) you see Google in the news getting their hands slapped for the same damn thing. | |
|  |  |  |  |  | | Aside...aside...aside. That is exactly my point, although I did a poor job of enumerating it. Apple is no saint, and the 3.0 software is crippled. But what I had intended on saying is that it isn't an outright replacement of the phone OS with something that displays a big red V and moves menu buttons around to increase the probability of hitting the data service to incur a $2 data charge for 31kb of data.
Likewise for disabling Bluetooth, disabling file transfer of photos. However, despite its faults, the iPhone is a very big first step in the right direction of getting the carrier's sticky fingers out of the phones.
I don't find a compelling comparison between Microsoft and Apple as it pertains to monopoly in computers. However, I will agree that they might have a difficult time of it in their own App Store. Their control seems to be intended more to protect their and partner profits and less about user experience. Troubling times. | |
|  |  |  |  |  |  MattAll noise, no signal.Premium join:2003-07-20 Jamestown, NC kudos:12 | Re: Google will get what it wants said by clickie:Aside...aside...aside. That is exactly my point, although I did a poor job of enumerating it. Apple is no saint, and the 3.0 software is crippled. But what I had intended on saying is that it isn't an outright replacement of the phone OS with something that displays a big red V and moves menu buttons around to increase the probability of hitting the data service to incur a $2 data charge for 31kb of data. Likewise for disabling Bluetooth, disabling file transfer of photos. However, despite its faults, the iPhone is a very big first step in the right direction of getting the carrier's sticky fingers out of the phones. They don't do this on any smartphones. I've never seen an OS replaced on a BlackBerry nor a Windows Mobile phone. They did do this on the handheld phones (the Verizon BREW software was a terrible offender) but not on their smartphone-type devices ... the ones that would compete with the iPhone that is. | |
|
 |  |  |  rradina join:2000-08-08 Chesterfield, MO | Re: Monopoly...how is what Apple is doing different from what Microsoft did when the FTC slapped it with regulation? | |
|  |  |  |  |  | | Re: Google will get what it wants Different circumstances. | |
|  |  |  |  |  | | said by rradina:Re: Monopoly...how is what Apple is doing different from what Microsoft did when the FTC slapped it with regulation? Holding a 93% market share? -- Jay: What the @#$% is the internet??? | |
|
 |  |  |  | | said by clickie:The author comes short of calling Apple a monopoly by using the word "monopolistic". Still, this is a flawed premise because there are literally thousands of competing products for its music player and phone business. Locking in customers because *they* enjoy using your product is not monopolistic. Certainly, Apple *does* exclude rivals from its product line and supporting businesses; why the hell shouldn't it? Microsoft doesn't include iTunes support as part of its Zune package. The Zune is, in many ways, more compelling than the iPod but fails in key areas. Namely, Microsoft falls down in being able to successfully market it as a lifestyle device. Despite the products merits, it wounded compelling features and failed to duplicate the iTunes experience. "Apple will face a user revolt in the coming years based upon Microsoft, Google and other yet-to-be-formed companies, undercutting their core markets with cheap, stable and open devices." Doubtful. There are forces beyond Apple and AT&T that do not want open devices. Namely, the entertainment industry. Apple has the option of telling Hollywood to go **ck themselves, or they can appease the entertainment people and get them aboard to assure that the customer has a nice experience as well as a Disneyland like method of spending more money. As it pertains to the telecommunications industry, sure, go ahead and put Apple up against the wall. Then, line up Motorola, Nokia and LG for playing the same game along with the cell providers themselves. Apple is the first handset to be release in the past 10 years that hasn't had the manufacturer's software replaced or modified to the liking of the carrier. Certainly, Apple is no saint. Their application approval process is as political as they come, and not very friendly to the people who make the iPhone such an attractive handset. And I do not agree with how the iPhone has limitations upon the use of 3G with respect to certain applications. But the fall-out isn't going to have people throwing their iPhones on Ebay and defecting. It may or may not affect future purchases, but I really doubt it. The iPhone is three years old and probably is no longer the least restricted smartphone on the market. But it was the first to push a carrier into chilling the hell out and letting the customer do what they want. I agree, still a ways to go, but all of this is probably going to amount to bumpkis defections away from the iPhone nor other Apple products. Well, with the exception of Apple TV. That thing sucks. Um...it's called anti-TRUST litigation for a reason. You don't need to have a monopoly to engage in anti-competitive behavior. As long as you're engaging your market share at one level to leverage your products and degrade your competitors at another level, you are breaking a law. *That* is what Apple has been doing with its iPhone hardware and App store. | |
|  |  |  |  |  | | Re: Google will get what it wants anti-trust? LMAO! The Feds have other things to do than worry about that right now. | |
|
 |  |  | | That is one person's opinion, not the masses. Your post should read "This is why the flocks are leaving Microsoft & the PC market." | |
|  |  |  |  | | Re: Google will get what it wants leaving Microsoft and the PC market? LMAO!
Good joke! | |
|  |  |  |  | | said by huhh8:That is one person's opinion, not the masses. Your post should read "This is why the flocks are leaving Microsoft & the PC market." You say it's only one persons....but reality is that "a lot" of people have been saying this recently.
Apple is going to get slapped when it's all said and done. Wait and see. I said it a few weeks ago and everybody thought I was crazy.
Three days later the FCC starts an inquiry. It's coming.
I usually don't agree with the author. But I do agree with this.
I will not buy another Apple product. -- "There are no stupid questions, but there are a LOT of inquisitive idiots" | |
|  |  |  |  |  Reviews:
·WOW Internet and..
·Time Warner Cable
| Re: Google will get what it wants the FCC starts an inquiry. Big deal. The FCC can NOT make Apple to approve software for their phones. Just like they can NOT make Microsoft make Office for Mac.
The FCC only says their doing shit to make the public think they're worth the money they spend on their "studies". | |
|  |  |  |  |  | | Incorrect on Apple getting slapped. Apple has not infringed any anti-trust laws. Do a search about Viso-Calc, DEC, DR-DOS, etc. MS has purchased those companies that can cause them harm, and Apple is not one of them. | |
|
 |  |  | | said by ThrowDemsOut:said by Devanchya:Google will get what it wants. And that is more and more people leaving the Apple cult Dream on, Dream on, Dream on... Sing it with me, sing for the... | |
|
 Hookem99Deep In The Heart join:2007-07-18 Pflugerville, TX kudos:1 | Numbers Now if only GV would have numbers in my area code. Austin, Tx, the silicon valley of the south..... go figure. | |
|  |  See 12 replies to this post | |
 easoninRock Ridge, FL join:2008-07-08 | GV mobile in Cydia Has anyone used the GV mobile app available from cydia? i have it, but have yet to use it. | |
|  |  ptrowskiGot Helix?Premium join:2005-03-14 Putnam, CT kudos:4 Reviews:
·VOIPo
·Choice One Commu..
| Re: GV mobile in Cydia said by easonin:Has anyone used the GV mobile app available from cydia? i have it, but have yet to use it. I have and really like it. It's simple to use, and much better than the website. -- "So, Lone Starr, now you see that evil will always triumph because good is dumb."
Have you been touched by his noodly appendage? »www.venganza.org | |
|  |  |  | | Re: GV mobile in Cydia Off topic but how hard is it to jailbreak and use cydia? | |
|  |  |  |  | | Re: GV mobile in Cydia OT: Just did it last night. Very simple.Just google cydia tutorial and follow the instructions.
BTW: did it just because of google voice. it really irks me. | |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  DrModemPremium join:2006-10-19 USA kudos:1 | said by SyNiSt3r:Off topic but how hard is it to jailbreak and use cydia? It's really easy. | |
|
 kaila join:2000-10-11 Lincolnshire, IL Reviews:
·voip.ms
| Just wait......... This little tiff between Apple/ATT & Google is nothing. When porting numbers into GV becomes reality, the carriers will really have lost control. And have nothing but the ETF hammer to bludgeon consumers with to try to keep them in line.
Any further attempt to block network access or the 406 area code GV uses will either be illegal, or run the real risk of a FCC/Congressional response. -- Jeff Howe Jeff's Blog - »www.jeffhowe.net | |
|  |  | | Re: Just wait......... I can't wait for number portability. | |
|  |  Reviews:
·WOW Internet and..
·Time Warner Cable
| Congressional response? What gives Congress the right to say what Apple does with its hardware and product.
the ILECs BLOCK the FreeConference.com phone numbers. Congress didn't step up to protect them.
GV will NEVER be able to port numbers, the company that is providing the numbers TO Google is: Bandwidth.com who resells Qwest and L3 services. | |
|  |  |  | | Re: Just wait......... You, sir are out of your mind. Regardless of the fact that a particular firm happens to resell competing services (etc.), it's all a matter of time before such porting becomes reality. | |
|
 FLengineerCCNA, CEH, MCSAPremium join:2007-06-26 Leesburg, FL Reviews:
·T-Mobile US
·Bright House
1 edit | G1 said by Matt:Hello, nice to meet you.  I really like the novelty of my iPhone, but all this application restricting is starting to make me look seriously at a BlackBerry again. Hopefully by the time my contract is up they'll have one with a nice screen. I have the G1, rooted and running Cyan 3.9.7 but that isn't required to install and run GV on the G1. In fact it integrates so perfectly that if you choose to do so you use you phone like normal and the only difference is an extra 5 secs to make a call. Dial from the native contact list and never open the GV app.
Love the G1 | |
|  |  GbcueAlmost P.E.Premium join:2001-09-30 Santa Rosa, CA kudos:8 Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse
| Re: G1 said by FLengineer:said by Matt:Hello, nice to meet you.  I really like the novelty of my iPhone, but all this application restricting is starting to make me look seriously at a BlackBerry again. Hopefully by the time my contract is up they'll have one with a nice screen. I have the G1, rooted and running Cyan 3.9.7 but that isn't required to install and run GV on the G1. In fact it integrates so perfectly that if you choose to do so you use you phone like normal and the only difference is an extra 5 secs to make a call. Dial from the native contact list and never open the GV app. Love the G1 Same with the myTouch. The GV app is really slick. -- My BLOG! Black Friday Ads | |
|
 | | am i missing something If you really want to use Google Voice then you can use a Blackberry. It's not as if you can't use the Google voice application. No one is forcing someone to use an iPhone. | |
|  |  See 10 replies to this post |
 | |
|
|