Google Wants a Wireless Carrier Cage Match New Google instant auction system for voice and wireless data If the phone companies weren't annoyed enough with Google for their pro-net-neutrality positions, White Spaces push and "interference" in the 700Mhz auction process, the company gave them another reason this week. The same week that saw the launch of the first phone with their new OS, Google has filed a patent for a system where wireless data and voice carriers would be forced to bid to compete for your service every time you need a wireless network connection. According to New Scientist, Devices using the system would send networks their request for voice or data, and carriers would respond with their best rates. The user could then choose from the lowest price carrier, or have the device do it automatically. While Google admits it will likely never happen, it remains an interesting competitive premise -- a real time, no-holds-barred cage match for your wireless business.
|
 Reviews:
 ·DSL EXTREME
| I'd rather have all My teeth pulled I'd rather have all My teeth pulled, Than have to bid on a phone call everytime I'd need to make a call, Give Me a flat fee instead with usable and reasonable terms instead, dreaming? Maybe, I don't know.
--
Simple Nudity doesn't equal Sex or being Sexual in any way shape or form and is not obscene. It's the thoughts of the Religious Prude that's obscene. | |
|  | | | Re: I'd rather have all My teeth pulled Hey, because the last thing we need between companies in America is competition, right? | |
| | |  knightmbEverybody Lies
join:2003-12-01
Franklin, TN | Re: I'd rather have all My teeth pulled said by Angrychair:Hey, because the last thing we need between companies in America is competition, right? We all like competition, just not at a bad time. Kind of like Hospitals trying to compete for your business while you are dying on the ground between two Ambulance from two different Hospitals.
--
Fight NebuAD and the like:
Click Here to pollute their data | |
| | | | Reviews:
 ·Comcast
| Re: I'd rather have all My teeth pulled Competition brings faster response, more responsible care, and cheaper prices. How are those things bad for the guy that needs care?
Or are you imagining something absurd like two ambulance drivers both trying to pull a gurney into the back of their van? | |
| | | | |  en102Canadian, eh?
join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA | Re: I'd rather have all My teeth pulled Right...The U.S. system is based on competition... but on a different level.
The insurance companies hold the cards, and decide how and where your treatment will occur.
I think there's somewhere in Asia where you pay into insurance, but rather than it going directly into a specific carrier (say Blue Shield or Kaiser), its held until you use it, and can be used at ANY hospital.
Hospitals there tend to try and win your business.
U.S. system is built on co-pay and prescription drugs and whacked out insurance policies, putting fear into people.
Out of all of them...I prefer the Canadian/European system of socialized health care.
--
Canada = Hollywood North | |
|
| | | | | said by knightmb:[We all like competition, just not at a bad time. Kind of like Hospitals trying to compete for your business while you are dying on the ground between two Ambulance from two different Hospitals. Since 911 calls aren't suppose to be billed to you, I'm pretty sure this system would not affect the ability to make emergency calls.
--
---
Eleven years of carrying The Clue Bat... | |
| | | | | MordhemLove it, Hate it.
join:2003-07-10
Baltimore, MD | Re: I'd rather have all My teeth pulled yep! That is correct I like the idea but I doupt they will want to play.... The Cell company's that is. | |
|
| | | | | said by knightmb:said by Angrychair:Hey, because the last thing we need between companies in America is competition, right? We all like competition, just not at a bad time. Kind of like Hospitals trying to compete for your business while you are dying on the ground between two Ambulance from two different Hospitals. Good point. I would rather there be a feature on the phone that tells the phone to connect to the lowest price carrier all the time, automatically without delaying the call would be nice.
Otherwise 911 emergency calls should go through on any carrier without delay, if it does delay scrap the phone. | |
|
|  SLDPremium
join:2002-04-17
San Francisco, CA
1 edit | "The user could then choose from the lowest price carrier, or have the device do it automatically". | |
| | |  kamm
join:2001-02-14
Brooklyn, NY | Re: I'd rather have all My teeth pulled said by SLD:"The user could then choose from the lowest price carrier, or have the device do it automatically". Pssst,
you're trying to use sane, logical reasons against the retarded pro-corporate, pro-monopoly, anti-competition "free market capitalism" crowd... 
--
[BQUOTE=[user=bicker]]Waaaa waaaa waaaa. You just want what you want and don't care to factor in what is right or true. Your perspectives are un-American, and deserve far more ridicule than I'm prepared to pile on them.
[/BQUOTE] | |
|
|  wifi4milezBig Russ, 1918 to 2008. Rest in Peace
join:2004-08-07
New York, NY | said by zoom314:I'd rather have all My teeth pulled, Than have to bid on a phone call everytime I'd need to make a call, Give Me a flat fee instead with usable and reasonable terms instead, dreaming? Maybe, I don't know. I agree, and I think this is a terrible idea. Who uses wireless on a "pay per call" basis anyway?? I like the fact that my bill is roughly the same every month, and I dont need to think about it. The other major issue with this is that (as we all know) each carrier would likely add on a "convenience fee", which would likely end up doubling your bill at the end of the day. I am going to pass on this and stick with my flat rate plan.
--
If history teaches us anything, it teaches that simple-minded appeasement or wishful thinking about our adversaries is folly.
-Ronald Reagan-
| |
| | |  Romney2012Defeat Obama 2012-Chg we can believe inPremium
join:2002-03-03
USA
kudos:4 | Re: I'd rather have all My teeth pulled said by wifi4milez:The other major issue with this is that (as we all know) each carrier would likely add on a "convenience fee", which would likely end up doubling your bill at the end of the day. And don't forget that local, state, federal taxes, USF fees, etc would all need to be included in the billing.
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page
Ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk? | |
| | | | wifi4milezBig Russ, 1918 to 2008. Rest in Peace
join:2004-08-07
New York, NY | Re: I'd rather have all My teeth pulled said by Romney2012:said by wifi4milez:The other major issue with this is that (as we all know) each carrier would likely add on a "convenience fee", which would likely end up doubling your bill at the end of the day. And don't forget that local, state, federal taxes, USF fees, etc would all need to be included in the billing. Correct, I should have also mentioned that. Sure, you might get a lower price on the call but you would be totally screwed when the actual bill arrives due to the extra charges/taxes.
--
If history teaches us anything, it teaches that simple-minded appeasement or wishful thinking about our adversaries is folly.
-Ronald Reagan-
| |
|
| | | What if the price goes lower in the middle of your call? They should have it so carriers compete for each voice packet. And maybe we can also have Internet transport carriers bid on your IP traffic traveling across the Internet after it leaves your ISP. Each transport provider can bid on each bit individually and you'll get the best price that millisecond. Of course, Google will be the company to manage it all. I'm not sure what they'll call the service but it will be in perpetual beta. | |
|
Reviews:
 ·AT&T U-Verse
| Billing? An interesting concept, but on the practical side, what about billing?
Could one be getting a bill for a couple of phone calls from Verizon, some cell data from AT&T, and computer internet access from Sprint. That should be really interesting.
It seems hard enough, at times, to keep track of one carrier's billing, let alone, the possibility of several different carriers billing one. | |
| |  MattAll noise, no signal.Premium
join:2003-07-20
Jamestown, NC
kudos:12 | Re: Billing? said by Austinloop:An interesting concept, but on the practical side, what about billing? Could one be getting a bill for a couple of phone calls from Verizon, some cell data from AT&T, and computer internet access from Sprint. That should be really interesting. It seems hard enough, at times, to keep track of one carrier's billing, let alone, the possibility of several different carriers billing one. There used to be companies who did this on the wireline side. They would take care of billing you and would add in either a flat monthly fee, or a small percentage of the per minute fee for the service.
I doubt Google wants to get into that business though.
--
Linux Haters Unite! | |
| | Romney2012Defeat Obama 2012-Chg we can believe inPremium
join:2002-03-03
USA
kudos:4 | said by Austinloop:An interesting concept, but on the practical side, what about billing? Could one be getting a bill for a couple of phone calls from Verizon, some cell data from AT&T, and computer internet access from Sprint. That should be really interesting. It seems hard enough, at times, to keep track of one carrier's billing, let alone, the possibility of several different carriers billing one. I am sure Google would be willing to provide a service that would concentrate all the billing on their servers and provide you with 1 bill for all your wireless calls.
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page
Ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk? | |
|
 jjoshuaPremium
join:2001-06-01
Scotch Plains, NJ
kudos:1 | That's how my VOIP works At home, my VOIP is configured to use different providers for different types of calls. And if one provider is not available, then the next best provider is used.
Sounds good to me. | |
| | kamm
join:2001-02-14
Brooklyn, NY
1 edit | Re: That's how my VOIP works Sounds cool. How do you select the right offer? | |
|
| | This model will make towers into gas stations where there is one unspoken 'base price' and you get regional variations between towers. | |
|  MrMoodyFree range slavePremium
join:2002-09-03
Smithfield, NC | Patent squatting Competition is a Good Thing, but ...
quote:
Google admits it will likely never happen,
So they are just squatting on the patent.
We need patent reform, where patents quickly expire if they aren't used. The current system encourages the shotgun approach and stifles innovation.
--
Electile Dysfunction: the inability to become aroused over the choice for President put forth by either party. | |
| | |  AVDRespice, Adspice, ProspicePremium
join:2003-02-06
Onion, NJ | Re: Off topic but I have to ask.... said by fatmanskinny:Karl, where in the heck did you get that picture of Hulk Hogan fighting King Kong Bundy in a steel cage match? That brought back some memories for this Hulkamaniac.  google is yr friend:
»images.google.com/images?hl=en&q···es&gbv=2 | |
|
 WiseOldNerdDe gustibus non est disputandumPremium
join:2001-11-25
Phoenix, AZ
·Charter
·Cox HSI
| WOW! We Need This Now! I just love watching all the right wing wackos here rail against the use of technology to give us a true free market approach. The idea is a great one and could be a model for how technology can actually save us dollars and reduce the level of political whore mandated rapacious capitalism. True, free market capitalism can work. We just haven't seen any such thing for 100 or more years.
--
My perception is REALITY | |
| | | ? Good story, but your first two sentences made my head spin. | |
| | | Really stupid idea. So easy to exploit. Create artificial scarcity and ramp up the price. This is what Enron did to California during it's "Energy Crisis". The parallels are there - both electricity and cell calls can't be stored in any large amount so a spot pricing market is open to abuse. | |
|
| |
|
|
·
Off topic but I have to ask....
