 LightSPremium join:2005-12-17 Greenville, TX | At least they're honest and admit it, haha | |
|
 |  | | Re: At least they're honest Google should just buy Ooma, which already has the regulatory/tax thing figured out and billing in place. Ooma already has options to tie into Google Voice. I use it and is a pretty good service - Google could beef it up even more even for non-Gfiber customers, and use Ooma to boost Google Voice service. | |
|
 |  |  | | Re: At least they're honest Google has the ability to move into the voice market very easily. They choose NOT to. Why? customer service. | |
|
 |  |  |  | | Re: At least they're honest Thank god. I would rather they focus on Internet and TV. | |
|
 | | lol Give me a 1gig/1gig connection and I'll happily use my cellphone for conversations. | |
|
 pkorx8 join:2003-06-19 San Francisco, CA | doesn't stop anyone This doesn't stop anyone from using Google Voice from the normal web interface or using one of those Google Voice-compatible VOIP boxes on their 1G/1G connection. | |
|
 |  |
 |  |  Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse
·MegaPath
| Re: doesn't stop anyone Although more than 98% of 911 call centers - including major metro areas- do NOT have GPS tracking on cell phones. They can see your number but not your location. To obtain that location would take time and some man work with the phone companies. And then you don't even get an address, you get an "area" off the cell tower. | |
|
 |  |  |  |
 |  |  |  |  | | Re: doesn't stop anyone There are dozens, if not scores, of places to get very reasonable IP telephone service. Only an IP telephone (about $25 and up) connected directly to the router or computer is needed. This avoids conversion from old analog phones, and their crappy audio.
Google surely knows this; they should publish a list of companies that offer this service. Eventually somebody else will if they don't. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |
 |  |  |  |  |  |
 |  |  |  Reviews:
·Windstream
·VOIPo
| said by TBusiness:Although more than 98% of 911 call centers - including major metro areas- do NOT have GPS tracking on cell phones. They can see your number but not your location. To obtain that location would take time and some man work with the phone companies. And then you don't even get an address, you get an "area" off the cell tower. Definitely gonna need a citation on that.
For Instance last report I saw for GA stated all but 3 counties has E911 Phase 2 , And now 1 of of those has been upgraded since then.
1 requirement of E911 Phase 2 "Wireless network operators must provide the latitude and longitude of callers within 300 meters, within six minutes of a request by a PSAP. Accuracy rates must meet FCC standards on average within any given participating PSAP service area by September 11, 2012" -- ASUS M4A79T Deluxe | AMD Phenom II x3 720 BE AM3 w/4 Cores @ 3.41Ghz(OC) | 4Gb DDR3 Memory @ 1600mhz | Sapphire ATI HD4870 1GB 800mhz/1000mhz(OC) | 2x500GB HDD's Raid 0 | Windows 7 Ultimate x64 Build 7600 (RTM) | Windstream DSL 12m (14.9m Sync)/766k | |
|
 |  |  |  tc1uscg join:2005-03-09 Saint Clair Shores, MI | said by TBusiness:Although more than 98% of 911 call centers - including major metro areas- do NOT have GPS tracking on cell phones. They can see your number but not your location. To obtain that location would take time and some man work with the phone companies. And then you don't even get an address, you get an "area" off the cell tower. E911. It works and has nothing to do with GPS. Not as close but darn close and enough to get help on the way. Once your call routes to your PSAP, it's the phone companies system that provides your location and unless the 911 op knows what they are doing, most use to not go to the proper screen to obtain this info. It's not the same field as the persons address. I've done hundreds of 911 test calls during my years with Sprint and 9 times out of 10, I had to 'remind' them to go to the next page/screen to see my location. Which in the beginning, was the address to the tower that i was connected to. Those kinks have for the most part, been worked out.  | |
|
 |  |  |  |  Reviews:
·Windstream
·VOIPo
| Re: doesn't stop anyone said by tc1uscg:said by TBusiness:Although more than 98% of 911 call centers - including major metro areas- do NOT have GPS tracking on cell phones. They can see your number but not your location. To obtain that location would take time and some man work with the phone companies. And then you don't even get an address, you get an "area" off the cell tower. E911. It works and has nothing to do with GPS. Not as close but darn close and enough to get help on the way. Once your call routes to your PSAP, it's the phone companies system that provides your location and unless the 911 op knows what they are doing, most use to not go to the proper screen to obtain this info. It's not the same field as the persons address. I've done hundreds of 911 test calls during my years with Sprint and 9 times out of 10, I had to 'remind' them to go to the next page/screen to see my location. Which in the beginning, was the address to the tower that i was connected to. Those kinks have for the most part, been worked out. It can use GPS, in fact early on Verizon Opted for GPS while ATT opted for Cell triangulation, both had pros and cons but I'm sure its changed and can use a combination of methods to get the information. -- ASUS M4A79T Deluxe | AMD Phenom II x3 720 BE AM3 w/4 Cores @ 3.41Ghz(OC) | 4Gb DDR3 Memory @ 1600mhz | Sapphire ATI HD4870 1GB 800mhz/1000mhz(OC) | 2x500GB HDD's Raid 0 | Windows 7 Ultimate x64 Build 7600 (RTM) | Windstream DSL 12m (14.9m Sync)/766k | |
|
 |  |  | | I use an ObiHai device with Google Voice for free outbound calls, a Google Voice local number forwarded to a free Callcentric DID for inbound calls, and a $1.50/month Callcentric 911 service.
Aside from a short period of Sandy induced disruption, it works very well. | |
|
 |  AVDRespice, Adspice, ProspicePremium join:2003-02-06 Onion, NJ kudos:1 | said by pkorx8:This doesn't stop anyone from using Google Voice from the normal web interface or using one of those Google Voice-compatible VOIP boxes on their 1G/1G connection. THIS, and its unregulated from a wireline provider point of view. Plus, its probably not a money maker -- * seek help if having trouble coping --Standard disclaimers apply.-- | |
|
 | | "there are all of these special rules that apply." Aka- we we couldn't get anything bent for us like we did for the build.
But the taxes and service deployment should be easy. Especially since they have a CLEC on board for GoogleVoice and for Google411. | |
|
 |  LinklistPremium join:2002-03-03 Longport, NJ kudos:5 | Re: "there are all of these special rules that apply." said by TBusiness:Aka- we we couldn't get anything bent for us like we did for the build.
But the taxes and service deployment should be easy. Especially since they have a CLEC on board for GoogleVoice and for Google411. And this little whine by Google is bogus: quote: The complications of calculating two different tax rates for Missouri and Kansas
Google already has to deal with varying tax rates around the country for cellphone devices they sell and for Google Apps. Google should just have said what they meant - they didn't want to staff the customer service positions needed to deal with complaining telephone users. -- A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves money from the public treasury. | |
|
 |  |  Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse
·MegaPath
| Re: "there are all of these special rules that apply." That as well.
Although a true but if Google was smart from the start, they'd hire an outside call center that would know what they're doing. Instead of trying it themselves. That is what is going to hurt them long term, not having a customer service center that can actually trouble-shoot and provide answers to something that does NOT work instead of saying "please visit us online at: help.google.com/fiber.
The interesting thing though; they already have to deal with the two different taxes for their cable network. So why not add 2 more. Would be easy enough to program the billing system to do that. But wait, I forgot that involves someone that knows what they are doing. | |
|
 |  |  |  | | Re: "there are all of these special rules that apply." said by TBusiness:That as well.
Although a true but if Google was smart from the start, they'd hire an outside call center that would know what they're doing. Instead of trying it themselves. That is what is going to hurt them long term, not having a customer service center that can actually trouble-shoot and provide answers to something that does NOT work instead of saying "please visit us online at: help.google.com/fiber.
The interesting thing though; they already have to deal with the two different taxes for their cable network. So why not add 2 more. Would be easy enough to program the billing system to do that. But wait, I forgot that involves someone that knows what they are doing. Can't hire a call center and still be able to provide free internet/dirt-cheap service and be able to turn a profit. Google wants to stick it to the telcos, not offer customer service. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse
·MegaPath
| Re: "there are all of these special rules that apply." and without customer service they won't be anywhere. and they're not trying to kick it to the telcos. If they did, they'd deploy Google voice over their fiber services instead of crying about the taxes and "rules" that they'd have to follow. The big rule they'd be required to have is customer service. Google's CSRs are nothing but an auto-reply system that NEVER provides answers like their own help site. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  | | Re: "there are all of these special rules that apply." said by TBusiness:and without customer service they won't be anywhere. TW and ATT have no customer service in this area and do pretty well.
So there goes that argument. | |
|
 |  |  |
 |  |  |  Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse
·MegaPath
| Re: "there are all of these special rules that apply." they already pay taxes on their Voice services. Those are purchased from bandwidth.com - the company behind Republic Wireless and was the company behind Goog411. Remember the little advertising saying "your call is being connected by Bandwidth.com? They're the backend provider for the entire network of Google Voice. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  | | Re: "there are all of these special rules that apply." Please read the post fully TB, I never said they don't pay taxes, I said pay MORE taxes... big difference. | |
|
 |  |  | | said by Linklist:And this little whine by Google is bogus: quote: The complications of calculating two different tax rates for Missouri and Kansas
I think google was referring to the line item municipal tax on phone service, which vary widely, and are a can of worms (granted google fiber is in what, two municipalities). | |
|
 |  |  |  | | Re: "there are all of these special rules that apply." they service 2 cities. It's not like they service the entire country.  | |
|
 |  |  Oh_NoTrogglus normalus join:2011-05-21 Chicago, IL | Yeah it is not worth the hassle to be a landline. I guess the issue is when you position yourself as a landline instead of voip (even though its all the same thing) you become on the radar of politicians who fight for seniors. Its not worth fighting politicians over some grandma somewhere not being able to make a phone call.
I would also say they know the home phone is dead and its a break even effort not a profitable one. Even ATT has already started to offer only cell to landline hook up in many areas. Also, they have google voice which you can use for phone calls if you want for free. | |
|
 CheesePremium join:2003-10-26 Naples, FL kudos:1 | Goverment and thier Rules.... Even a company like Google doesn't want to have to deal with the rules and regulations to bring out competition for Voice. And we wonder why we don't have much competition in this country. | |
|
 |  Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse
·MegaPath
| Re: Goverment and thier Rules.... The reason is Google couldn't get the rules bent and had to deal with taxes. And then add customer service on top of it. You can bet if someone was treated the way Nexus customers were/are treated that Google would have some issues with Voice customers. Something Google does NOT want to deal with. | |
|
 |  |  CheesePremium join:2003-10-26 Naples, FL kudos:1 | Re: Goverment and thier Rules.... Proof of this claim? Regardless, the rules and regulations in place, they hinder smaller companies from competing, that was my point. | |
|
 |  |  |  Toguro join:2003-10-23 Ottawa, IL | Re: Goverment and thier Rules.... Google small  | |
|
 |  |  rradina join:2000-08-08 Chesterfield, MO | Aren't you kind of making the point? I agree that Google could easily pay someone to figure it out for them but why are the taxes on a telephone so damn complicated? Who decided years ago that this bold, new-technology device needed a list of fees, taxes and special surcharges as long as your arm?
When taxing something based on use so that the burden of something is shifted to those who derive the most benefit, fine but everyone has a phone so why are all of these static fees added to everyone's bill? Why does someone pay double if they have two phones? Why don't we simplify things and remove all the bullshit taxes and fees from telephones and just add the revenue back as a line-item to state income taxes? It doesn't have to be a percentage, it could just be a line item charge.
If we did this, then telecommunications providers would all be equal in terms of price and when they advertise $19.99/month for unlimited local and long distance, it would actually be $19.99/month. | |
|
 |  KearnstdElf WizardPremium join:2002-01-22 Mullica Hill, NJ | I think taxation of some things is complex just to make it harder to question the tax.
One reason internet vendors resist sales taxes is they do not want to get mired up in city, county and state sales taxes. if the states win the right to sales tax in Congress regardless of company and warehouse locations the counties and cities will want in too. -- [65 Arcanist]Filan(High Elf) Zone: Broadband Reports | |
|
 Donut join:2005-06-27 Romulus, MI | Who gives a shit There are tons of VoIP providers. Aint like you have a cap to worry about on Google fiber. -- Mr. Donut
| |
|
 |  See 7 replies to this post |
|
 Reviews:
·ooma
·Optimum Online
·Verizon FiOS
| done and done Google already offers basic voip service through google talk and 3rd party hardware.. and if you want the full paid versions there are plenty of vendors from ooma, to magic jack, to nettalk which offer hardware solutions for pennies on the dollar w/ e911 services.
backup is ANY cellphone, with service or not.. | |
|
 Kamus join:2011-01-27 El Paso, TX | Don't care. I don't care for their phone services and i don't care for their TV services one bit. Their connection with no restrictions is exactly about that. It's so fast that you don't need any of the "old ways" of communicating or using media. | |
|
 | | Still work to be done? I'd jump at the chance for Google fiber. Any time, any place, any way, almost any price.
Several years ago my young daughter and I were involved in a car accident. I was hit on the drivers' side by an older gentleman who was from another state and didn't know the roads, and fortunately none of us were hurt. I had a cell phone and called 911...
...and got the county Prosecutor himself.
He asked me why didn't I dial 911 and sounded pretty shocked when I told him I did! He was quick to help and I don't know if the switching problem was with their office or the network. | |
|
 | | Google Talk? Why can they not provide Google Talk ? | |
|
 |  Oh_NoTrogglus normalus join:2011-05-21 Chicago, IL | Re: Google Talk? They have google voice right now you can use for phone service for free. | |
|
 |  |  openbox9Premium join:2004-01-26 japan kudos:2 | Re: Google Talk? Google Voice doesn't actually provide the voice service though. You need a dialtone from somewhere. Google Talk OTOH, can provide that dialtone. Google needs to "flip the switch" and meld the services together to make it simple for all of the laypeople. | |
|
 |  | | said by brianiscool:Why can they not provide Google Talk ? They can. Use your computer. | |
|
 |  |  | | Re: Google Talk? Is it hard for Google to make a VOIP phone for Google Talk and just call that phone service? | |
|
 BiggA join:2005-11-23 EARTH | Good There's no point to fiber or cable phone. If you want something reliable, get copper, if not, cell phones and/or voip is fine. | |
|
 |  | | Re: Good said by BiggA:There's no point to fiber or cable phone. If you want something reliable, get copper, if not, cell phones and/or voip is fine. I don't know about that. My phone company is going to discontinue their copper as soon as they can. I am going to get their phone service over fiber as soon as I can. It may not be as cheap as your typical voip service, but it is going to be a whole lot more reliable with unparalleled service. If it stops working, they will come out and fix it the same day for no charge. The no hassle is worth it. | |
|
 |  |  BiggA join:2005-11-23 EARTH | Re: Good Maybe telco fiber, i.e. FIOS is reliable if you have backup power locally for it. However, Verizon is NOT getting rid of their copper plant, so you can keep copper, unless of course you're in lower Manhattan, where the copper plant was destroyed. | |
|
 IowaCowboyWant to go back to IowaPremium join:2010-10-16 Springfield, MA Reviews:
·Comcast
·Verizon Broadban..
| I'll take FiOS There may be a possibility that FiOS may be making its way to Springfield, MA. I have seen a lot of Verizon crews and subcontractors around town. I asked if that line he was pulling was fiber optic, he said yes. I asked if FiOS is coming, he replied it was for a data center that is going up and I am not aware of any data center projects and I've seen them outside of the central business district, I suspect they are upgrading the back haul infrastructure for a possible FiOS deployment. Considering the possibility of a casino in town (with the passed casino legislation, I'll save discussion on that for the Red Room), they want to upgrade the infrastructure to support the possibility of a resort casino (which includes upgrading the residential infrastructure as well).
At least with FiOS, I can get a home phone so my burglar alarm can dial in to the central station. | |
|
 |  | | Re: I'll take FiOS If it's for a "data center" most likely this has nothing to do with FIOS; they could just be adding another fiber to an existing data center or business. Also, Verizon is no longer rolling out FIOS in new areas - except in areas where they are contractually obligated, which I highly doubt Springfield is. If a resort casino is built, they will get enterprise grade fiber and have their own infrastructure within the hotel/casino. There's no reason for Verizon, Comcast, etc. to upgrade their residential infrastructure if this is the case. | |
|
 |  |  IowaCowboyWant to go back to IowaPremium join:2010-10-16 Springfield, MA Reviews:
·Comcast
·Verizon Broadban..
| Re: I'll take FiOS I think the reason he said it was a data center might be that Verizon won't let him divulge that information. Considering where they were working, they were definitely upgrading infrastructure. If it was for a data center, they would not be working in an area away from the downtown area (the areas I've seen them working was residential and retail, data centers tend to be in the central business district). And once you are away from the CBD, you are going away from the backhaul due to the geography of the area.
Verizon will probably jump start FiOS deployment in the future as their copper networks are reaching the end of their useful life and are becoming costly to maintain and losing subscribers. And there are no buyers interested in their remaining landlines. AT&T is trying to unload landlines and they are not having much luck so they restarted U-Verse deployment so they can make those profitable again. It would be nice if Verizon sold their Western Mass assets to AT&T so AT&T could expand their U-verse into the area (which they have U-Verse in Enfield, CT which is a 15 minute drive from my house). | |
|
 |  |  |  KearnstdElf WizardPremium join:2002-01-22 Mullica Hill, NJ | Re: I'll take FiOS most people in CT would rather be sold to Verizon. AT&T does not even know Connecticut exists.
when I lived in Danbury(a city of 80,000 mind you) it took AT&T/SBC until 2004 to even deploy DSL. ATT/SBC areas elsewhere in the country had already had DSL for much longer. ATT only has CT because well someone at SBC wanted to give an FU to Verizon. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  | | Re: I'll take FiOS said by Kearnstd:AT&T does not even know Connecticut exists. They call it Connect-I-cut. | |
|
 |
|