republican-creole
site Search:


 
   
story category
Government Sues AT&T for Millions in IP Relay Fraud
Did Nothing to Curb Abuses To Protect Subsidy Flow
by Karl Bode Thursday 22-Mar-2012 tags: legal · prices · business · trouble · stats · scam · consumers · AT&T · cellular
Since around 2004 we've talked about the significant amount of fraud involved in the government's IP Relay service, which is intended to help the hearing impaired communicate with phone users via the Internet with the help of paid transcription workers. Unfortunately, for the better part of a decade the service has been abused by scammers and other assorted technoscumbags, with carriers doing nothing about it because they're paid by the FCC (aka you) about $1.50 per minute to carry this traffic.

Click for full size
Estimates are that anywhere between 80-90% of the traffic on IP-Relay networks is scammers using stolen credit cards to anonymously mail-order electronics in bulk. Carriers could have erected any number of simple authentication systems to recognize scammers and cut down on the fraud, but when you're being subsidized by the government at $1.50 a minute, why would you?

So in 2008 the FCC finally passed rules requiring that carriers register users and at least try to verify their names and addresses. Finally saying enough was enough, the Department of Justice today announced they were filing a lawsuit against AT&T for bilking taxpayers out of millions of dollars by abusing IP Relay subsidies. According to the complaint, the DOJ says AT&T intentionally implemented an authentication system they knew wouldn't work so they could keep raking in the cash:

The complaint alleges that, out of fears that fraudulent call volume would drop after the registration deadline, AT&T knowingly adopted a non-compliant registration system that did not verify whether the user was located within the United States. The complaint further contends that AT&T continued to employ this system even with the knowledge that it facilitated use of IP Relay by fraudulent foreign callers, which accounted for up to 95 percent of AT&T’s call volume. The government’s complaint alleges that AT&T improperly billed the TRS Fund for reimbursement of these calls and received millions of dollars in federal payments as a result.

AT&T has issued a statement to the press claiming they adhered to the rules, and that it's not their fault that the rules aren't very good or that Nigerian scammers are pretending to be disabled. When you consider that 95% of AT&T's IP Relay call volume was fraudulent, and AT&T was receiving $1.50 for every minute of every call made over the last decade, the numbers start to get absolutely staggering. The DOJ's claimed impact of "millions" of dollars may be a severe under-estimate.

While AT&T operates the lion's share of these services, Sprint and others have also played a role -- their exclusion from the suit suggests they did a better job adhering to the rule changes imposed by the FCC in 2008. Obviously there's plenty of government culpability here as well for running yet another program where it takes years to realize that just maybe somebody should stop throwing slush fund money at giant carriers.

view: topics flat text 
Post a:
25139889

join:2011-10-25
Toledo, OH

FCC

And we keep asking the FCC for help why? This proves the FCC can't even do a job they're given the task to complete and handle. Why should we permit them to do anything else??

vpoko
Premium
join:2003-07-03
Boston, MA

Re: FCC

Or maybe we could give them the tools to actually do their job, like legislation with some teeth in it.

ArrayList
Premium
join:2005-03-19
Evanston, IL

Re: FCC

BINGO.
25139889

join:2011-10-25
Toledo, OH
they have that for telephone services. And that's all they need. They can go back and check- they just don't. they're busying trying to regulate the Internet instead. Why give them more power?
sonicmerlin

join:2009-05-24
Cleveland, OH
kudos:1

Re: FCC

said by 25139889:

they have that for telephone services. And that's all they need. They can go back and check- they just don't. they're busying trying to regulate the Internet instead. Why give them more power?

So AT&T can't get away with more fraud?

Stop being such a transparent corporate boot-licking fanboy.
Montezuma

join:2009-11-15
AT&T made close to $20 billion USD, in profit, last year. As such, AT&T does not need any government funding, of any kind. We also do not need any more damned legislation to correct the problem, as we already have too much legislation.

Quit rallying behind a broken system, while turning around and trying to champion more, useless legislation.

Snowy
mIRC unix.ro UnderNet
Premium
join:2003-04-05
Kailua, HI
kudos:6
Reviews:
·RoadRunner Cable
·Clearwire Wireless

Re: FCC

said by Montezuma:

AT&T made close to $20 billion USD, in profit, last year. As such, AT&T does not need any government funding, of any kind.


Is your theory that since AT&T earns realizes a large profit they would not be involved with regulatory shenanigans or that since AT&T realizes such a large profit from their regulatory shenanigans the lawsuit is just a cost of doing business, win, lose or draw?

Noah Vail
Son made my Avatar
Premium
join:2004-12-10
Lorton, VA
kudos:2
Reviews:
·Bright House
said by vpoko:

Or maybe we could give them the tools to actually do their job

Like the tools we gave them to create the national broadband map?

Example 1
Example 2
Example 3
Example 4
Example 5
--
The Dark Tower's Skynet evolves from 4chan.
Telco

join:2008-12-19

Re: FCC

Point proven actually.

We gave them squat so they produced nothing more than some maps.

Allowing the old men in the GOP to make decisions about technology was never going to end well.

Gbcue
P.E.
Premium
join:2001-09-30
Santa Rosa, CA
kudos:8
Bingo! Some enforcement ability would be nice.

Noah Vail
Son made my Avatar
Premium
join:2004-12-10
Lorton, VA
kudos:2
Reviews:
·Bright House

Re: FCC

said by Gbcue:

anything at all

Dang! When did you get back?
--
The Dark Tower's Skynet evolves from 4chan.
Telco

join:2008-12-19
Reviews:
·Callcentric
Yep. It's funny what the equivalent FCC has been able to accomplish and achieve in Europe and Asia-Pac give the right tools.

For starters, following universal cellular frequency bands saved them billions. Whereas, we had to get out equipment customized for our markets.

jester121
Premium
join:2003-08-09
Lake Zurich, IL
As is obvious from the quoted portion of the suit, the FCC clearly has no comprehension that maybe scammers are smart enough to bounce their calls to make it appear to be domestic. They don't even understand the industry/technology they're supposed to be regulating, so they do a piss poor job.
Skippy25

join:2000-09-13
Hazelwood, MO

Re: FCC

The FCC doesnt need to know this. It is AT&T's job to know this and figure it out. It is their system they are "hacking" to do this, AT&T just doesnt care because they get paid handsomely for it so why try to stop it? Thus the lawsuit and hopefully criminal charges against that those allowed it.
cavillis

join:2011-08-03
it looks like the FCC went as far as they could by saying operators must register users and attempt to verify them.

The FCC are not a police force. That's why you see the DOJ coming and and suing them for breaking the law. This is EXACTLY how it's supposed to happen.
Telco

join:2008-12-19
Bud this is DSL reports, not TEAnutters united.

KrK
Heavy Artillery For The Little Guy
Premium
join:2000-01-17
Tulsa, OK
Go FCC.
rebus9

join:2002-03-26
Tampa Bay
Reviews:
·Verizon FiOS
·Bright House
said by 25139889:

And we keep asking the FCC for help why? This proves the FCC can't even do a job they're given the task to complete and handle.

And it further proves what I've believed for years about AT&T being pure evil, acting in ways that don't just betray the public trust, but fly in the face of it.

morbo
Complete Your Transaction

join:2002-01-22
00000

Was AT&T the only one committing fraud?

Do we know if AT&T was the only telecom provider letting the obvious fraud go unchecked? If Verizon also had IP Relay service business, did they erect a system of checks and balances?

pnh102
Reptiles Are Cuddly And Pretty
Premium
join:2002-05-02
Mount Airy, MD

Easier Solution

Perhaps the Congress should end this subsidy instead.
mgamer20o0

join:2003-12-01
Norwalk, CA

Re: Easier Solution

said by pnh102:

Perhaps the Congress should end this subsidy instead.

and sue them for past money sent plus damages. i know nothing on this but it sounds like they are being accessories of the crime.
TheRogueX

join:2003-03-26
Springfield, MO
This will never happen. AT&T pays way too much money to Congress.

cablegeek01

join:2003-05-13
USA
kudos:1

IP....Relay picture

That picture is of a generic Ethernet controlled electrical relay (AKA an IP Relay). It has nothing to do with AT&T's Relay service. what gives?.....Did you guys get busted using the first Google image search result? LOL

Noah Vail
Son made my Avatar
Premium
join:2004-12-10
Lorton, VA
kudos:2
Reviews:
·Bright House

Re: IP....Relay picture

said by cablegeek01:

That picture is of a generic Ethernet controlled electrical relay (AKA an IP Relay). It has nothing to do with AT&T's Relay service.

Well Dang. That pretty well invalidates the whole story, doesn't it.
--
The Dark Tower's Skynet evolves from 4chan.
brianiscool

join:2000-08-16
Tampa, FL
kudos:1

hah

I bet most of the cell phone customer's paid this bill.
mgschwendtne
Premium
join:2009-01-10
Allentown, PA

Phony Phone Calls

How would Sal and Richard make their phony phone calls?

CannotHaveIt

@myvzw.com

Cannot have it both ways, people!

all those crying fowl that at&t didn't do anything to stop this are probably the same people downloading movies and complaining that their ISPs are turning over their names to RIAA or shaping traffic to slow down torrents.

Think about it. at&t runs the network; they shouldn't be the police force for what is on the network.

the way to fix this is have the (real) users of the system pay upfront for the service and be reimbursed upon proof of disability. I'm sure the Social Security Admnistration knows who is legally disabled and who is not.
CXM_Splicer
Looking at the bigger picture
Premium
join:2011-08-11
NYC
kudos:1
Reviews:
·Verizon FiOS

Re: Cannot have it both ways, people!

said by CannotHaveIt :

Think about it. at&t runs the network; they shouldn't be the police force for what is on the network.

You are comparing apples to oranges, the two situations are not similar at all.
brad

join:2007-09-06
Etobicoke, ON
Your post makes no sense at all.

HaloFans

join:2006-12-18

But who's going to pay for my political campaign?

said by Karl Bode :
Obviously there's plenty of government culpability here as well for running yet another program where it takes years to realize that just maybe somebody should stop throwing slush fund money at giant carriers.
I want the money.

TheMole

join:2001-12-06
USA

Police Force

The US Government shouldn't make a for-profit-company a police force. Enforcement of rules/laws ought only be done by a governmental agency. That's the role of Government, enforce the rules in a uniform fashion.
--
(1) It's either 99¢ or $0.99; not .99¢ (2) It's "so MUCH fun" not "so fun"

tshirt
Premium,MVM
join:2004-07-11
Snohomish, WA
kudos:3
Reviews:
·Comcast

Re: Police Force

AT&T can't make or enforce rules on their own.
They are merely pointing out that they or any other Gov't contractor will do only what is specificaly required by the contract.

This shows that all contracts MUST be let with SPECIFIC instruction and truely punitive penalties for non-compliance.
also the cost of the contract/program needs to include INDEPENDENT watchdog and outside auditing, with public results.
whoaru99

join:2003-12-17

Re: Police Force


You're right inasmuch as they can't unilaterally change the terms or rules, but there is some fiduciary duty IMO, to point out fraud/waste/abuse. Yet, they chose to do essentially nothing except keep sucking in the $.

KrK
Heavy Artillery For The Little Guy
Premium
join:2000-01-17
Tulsa, OK
Nope, but neither should they pay people who are defrauding them.

The Federal Government will prosecute or sue health providers they prove are scamming them on Medicare. I see this as little different.
--
"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power." -- Benito Mussolini
brad

join:2007-09-06
Etobicoke, ON

Re: Police Force

said by KrK:

Nope, but neither should they pay people who are defrauding them.

The Federal Government will prosecute or sue health providers they prove are scamming them on Medicare. I see this as little different.

It isn't any different. AT&T is knowingly defrauding the government.

skeechan
Ai Otsukaholic
Premium
join:2012-01-26
AA169|170
kudos:2

Take them for 100X the profit they made

Only when it is more expensive to break the law will they start obeying it.

dvd536
as Mr. Pink as they come
Premium
join:2001-04-27
Phoenix, AZ
kudos:4

Get ready

IP relay compliance fee . . . . . . . . . . $0.34

abbyjo

@comcast.net

Re: Get ready

Great! It is about time, see first post. Use succinctly and judiciously.
patcat88

join:2002-04-05
Jamaica, NY
kudos:1

A non disabled use for IP Relay

My PC doesn't have a phone in it, and I often dont have my phone on me when I'm at the PC. So rather than scream so the whole house hears me. I call my house on IP Relay so the misses picks up and tell her to get me a beer. Thanks IP Relay.

oh Yeah

@truvista.net

Don't Soon Forget the NSA

So how does one take the heat off some other Crazy ATT/Government bed wetting? Ace in the hole Fraud Suit..
That keeps the masses happy that a spanking is coming, or
does it? humm!

abbyjo

@comcast.net

Quite Pleased with DOJ

I am quite pleased with this DOJ action, it is about time!

Passinthru

@sbcglobal.net

You betcha.

IP Relay has been going on since 2002. Those calls have been 95 percent fraud calls by Nigerians. The government paid 16 million since December 2009. I would say that the government has paid AT&T at least 70 million since 2002. The government has paid AT&T at least 70 million tax payers dollars to have Nigerians steal from American businesses and citizens with stolen credit cards.

Saturday, 25-May 16:23:37 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 13.5 years online © 1999-2013 dslreports.com.