 | | I remember Grande I liked them. They had a really great tiered service back in 2001 when I was in Austin. Prices were good and the service was better than Time Warner. Support was spot on as well. Of course it's been a while since I was in their service area. They still doing pretty good as far providing service and support. | |
|
 |  MrMasterjetsetterPremium
join:2000-12-16
St Thomas, VI
 ·Sprint Mobile Br..
·Virgin Mobile Br..
1 edit | Re: I remember Grande said by SRFireside:I liked them. They had a really great tiered service back in 2001 when I was in Austin. Prices were good and the service was better than Time Warner. Support was spot on as well. Of course it's been a while since I was in their service area. They still doing pretty good as far providing service and support. I have only heard the complete opposite.
They have been having financial difficulties for some time and I think that is what caused their customer service to go down hill.
last year when I looked, there prices were just slightly higher or on par with TW. However, it is a great failsafe if TW decides to implement caps.
--
One never notices what has been done; one can only see what remains to be done. -Marie Curie | |
|
 spewakR.I.P DadkinsPremium
join:2001-08-07
Elk Grove, CA
kudos:1 | "G-Force Cheetah with Bolt" Makes my "X-wing Laser with Red Bull" tier look positively slow. 
--
The weekend is here, grab a can of beer! | |
|
 RallyBah HumbugPremium
join:2000-10-27
Astoria, NY
1 edit | Good Pricing Point. 50 bucks uncapped internet is a A++ in my book  Good luck Grande, hope you get more customers!
--
The more you talk, the less you listen. | |
|
| me1212
join:2008-11-20
Pleasant Hill, MO | Re: Good Pricing Point. I know, it is a greats deal. I wish them well and hope the bets for them. I wish they served here. | |
|
| | iansltx
join:2007-02-19
Golden, CO
kudos:2 Reviews:
 ·Comcast
 ·Verizon Online DSL
| Re: Good Pricing Point. I wish they served here, too 
Though I'm no fan of a mere 1 Mbps upload speed, their fiber does 15/4 (awesome...plenty enough download and very good uploads) and TWC's nodes are getting overloaded here so PowerBoost only does something for Standard users. | |
|
| | Licensed PowerBoot Since when did this become a licensed technology? Cisco has done this for what, almost 10 years now in the corporate world?
I think I will patenent the drive thru window and then license it. What kind of idiots do these cable companies hire to do PR? | |
|
| | | Re: Licensed PowerBoot Comcast developed this technology for their network and put a patent on it. Which gives them the right license it. Do they charge other cable companies? probably not. | |
|
| | openbox9
join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA
kudos:1 | Re: Licensed PowerBoot I don't believe so. My understanding is that DOCSIS provides the ability to dynamically uncap/burst connections. I believe "PowerBoost" is Comcast's trademark name, hence the licensing.
»www.lightreading.com/document.as···site=cdn | |
|
| | licensed? Bolt is probably based on the Docsis 1.1 capability to utilize SfMaxTrafficBurst in the upstream and downstream service flows. | |
|
|
|
