'Hacking the cable modem' Book Review by justin Thursday 21-Sep-2006 "Hacking the Cable Modem" by Ryan Harris, No Starch Press ( Amazon, 283 pages, with decent index) is a new book with the promising subtitle What cable companies don't want you to know. The book's dedication reads, in part, to all the righteous hackers that have been silenced by greedy corporations. This book describes in some detail hacking victories the author and his crew had over various Motorola Surfboards, a LANCity, a D-link and an RCA model. (Other cable modems listed in a short list in chapter two are labelled as exploit free, at least, so far). The techniques used to convince cable modems to drop all resistance and bend to the will of the user vary from nonviolent trickery of cable modem software, to forcibly reprogramming the EEPROMs and/or re-instating/re-enabling diagnostic ports dropped from newer versions (dropped probably because of previous hacks). Once the cable modem is under full control of the Mr Cable Hacker, MAC addresses can be changed (cloning the modem to appear identical to a neighbor), and the holy-grail, uncapping, can proceed. Once uncapped, the modem will go as fast as the head-end can deliver or accept data over the available frequencies. The author states that a typical uncapped modem will currently run about 6 to 10mbit, and sometimes up to 20mbit, downstream. So for the price of $29.95 can we easily get free internet service, or uncap? Well, no. Casual buyers will be disappointed if they expected a simple guide for their current model. Advanced users will already know much of this information from online resources, including the authors own site. Breaking into a newly released or newly upgraded modem is tricky and clearly not always successful. It requires a number of tools, more than a passing familiarity with MIPs assembler, and a willingness to sacrifice a modem or two in the process. Uncapping a known-exploitable model, and not getting caught, appears to require immersion in a cable modem hacking community - lest your ISP advance their detection methods while you are asleep. I found the book a little schizophrenic in attitude. A number of remarks throughout by the young author, (from the dedication onward), imply that uncapping, MAC cloning and evading detection, is a noble pursuit, yet the back cover warns, in red, that uncapping violates service agreements and risks a "life" ban by the ISP (in fact, it risks arrest). Within the book the author warns that cable companies can always identify uncapped modems if they devote enough time and energy. In fact, Chapter 23 includes recommendations to ISP engineers on how to improve their systems to more easily defeat and detect cable modem hackers. There is another curious section in this book I'd like to take issue with. The author concludes in Chapter 3, in a DSL vs Cable presentation, that cable is superior to DSL. The last line reads: For you see, the truth is that if you want broadband, you want cable Internet broadband. Yet the balance of the book describes something that no DSL customers experience: other users able to clone your MAC address (I've personally been the victim of this, and it created six months of service misery for me), use ten times their fair share of bandwidth (guess whose performance then suffers), sniff downstream data belonging to other neighbors, and generally break out of the box and explore the config of their local node. At least some of the cable modem models can probably be hacked remotely. The book depicts harried cable engineers trying to balance demand and supply of bandwidth spending a lot of time trying to identify hackers who, after they uncap their cable modem and attempt invisibility, presumably use their new-found super status to soak the bandwidth of an area with P2P traffic for free. If you want broadband you want cable? Maybe if you want to hack outside your service agreement at the expense of the service quality of your neighbors, you want cable! Despite these criticisms, Hacking the Cable Modem is a good introduction to the inner workings of these blinky boxes, and the techniques currently in use by the hacking community to defeat security measures. I do recommend this book to anyone who itched to play with their own cable modem SNMP configuration and menu system. Unfortunately, from my experience on this site, a lot of kids are also attracted to this subject NOT for pure intellectual curiosity, but because they hope, to put it bluntly, that they can break their service agreement with their ISP, and accelerate their P2P downloading to warp speed. For this reason I believe cable industry professionals should also check out this book, if only to see where they are weakest. Update: The author, DerEngel, drops in to give his take on the subject: here
|
 rawgerzThe hell was that?Premium join:2004-10-03 Grove City, PA | bad idea.. I'm pretty sure I read in a few TOS from different cable CO's that if you do this, you will be permanently disconnected.
Or worse, they take you to court? | |
|  |  en102Canadian, eh? join:2001-01-26 Valencia, CA 1 edit | Re: bad idea.. or worse... FBI showing up at your door with a warrant due to tampering, end up being hauled away with your possessions seized, and possibly spending some time in prison. | |
|  |  |  Jerm join:2000-04-10 Richland, WA kudos:2 1 edit | Not what happend to me... Back when @Home folded and Charter had to switch me to their own broadband, I got super pissed because my bandwidth was cut from 4-6mbps actual down to 768k! Same price and everything! So...
I hacked my cable modem. I saw the very first widely published article how the guy described the config replacement hack. I was able to change my speed caps and allow my modem to pull multiple IPs from the network.
Worked great for months until my sister one day loaded up a P2P app and uploaded @ 3mbps for half a day. Oops I got caught, and thought I was in big trouble. Fortunately since it was the very beginning of the whole uncapping fad going mainstream I was able to meet with their network engineer and showed him how I did it. He was satisfied, so they let me keep my account (Charter 768kbps down 128kbps up, what a friggin joke though!)
Now the config files are much more secure, and uncapping is just not doable unless you completely hack your firmware and change your MAC. Even then its still not worth it. I'm happy to pay Charter for my 10mbps, but looking forward to Fios in my area 
In no way do I cone hacking the modem. It can't be done these days anyways - at least not with hacks I used. Pay for your service, or if really deperate be happy on your leeched wireless connection | |
|  |  |  |  thefoxboxgo fox box goPremium join:2004-10-14 Irving, TX | Re: Not what happend to me... said by Jerm:Now the config files are much more secure, and uncapping is just not doable unless you completely hack your firmware and change your MAC. Even then its still not worth it. I'm happy to pay Charter for my 10mbps, but looking forward to Fios in my area  In no way do I cone hacking the modem. It can't be done these days anyways - at least not with hacks I used. Pay for your service, or if really deperate be happy on your leeched wireless connection Funny. I like how you say that. "Pay for your service." But, the thing that's going to force me to buy an older modem just so I can do it is because I was downgraded by 2MB and no one seems to know why, and still can't even maintain a steady speed. I get between 1-4.5 Mbps on average on a 6mb plan. Nice logic--if only the cable company would deliver on their promise. | |
|
 |  justinAustralian join:1999-05-28 New York, NY kudos:7 | yes if you read my review I mention that more than once. Nevertheless, the book exists and it is not illegal to purchase it, or read it. | |
|  |  |  Romney2012Defeat Obama 2012-Chg we can believe inPremium join:2002-03-03 USA kudos:4 | Re: bad idea.. said by justin:yes if you read my review I mention that more than once. Nevertheless, the book exists and it is not illegal to purchase it, or read it. Yes, it is legal and it very similar in ethics to those books on how to make homemade bombs. Perfectly legal and upheld in court numerous times on free speech grounds. But I would hope legitimate companies would refuse to carry and sell these books. -- -- Join Red Room Forum BLOG tkjunkmail.blogspot.com My Web Page | |
|  |  |  |  tiger72SexaT duorPPremium join:2001-03-28 Saint Louis, MO kudos:1 | Re: bad idea.. Why? let the kiddies get permbanned by their ISP. Their parents will definitely appreciate it. | |
|  |  |  |  bmn? ? ?Premium,ExMod 2003-06 join:2001-03-15 hiatus | said by Romney2012:But I would hope legitimate companies would refuse to carry and sell these books. Based on that logic, if something CAN be used for bad, then companies shouldn't carry it or sell it ?
Just about everything in your home would suddenly be gone from the shelves of every store.
Bleach, gone (because it can be used to make chlorine bombs more easily that you can hack your cable modem)... Guns, gone... Cars, all gone. Computes, poof! Phones, yep, them too. Children's Tylenol, done for...
No, that doesn't work. Instead of preventing this type of information from getting out, perhaps a consorted effort to show its value and explain its legitimate uses should be made ?
And of course, keeping the book from stores doesn't prevent someone with the slightest clue from firing up the internet and using Google. -- Ann Coulter doesn't know jack about science... "Extremes to the right and left of any political dispute are always wrong." Dwight Eisenhower | |
|  |  |  |  |  9143930615,000 Watts of Bass Power join:2002-10-16 New Milford, CT | Re: bad idea.. Not so. The government won't take away things that are required to earn a TAXABLE INCOME. So cars definately stay, even though auto accidents kill more people in a year than the Viet Nam war. | |
|  |  |  |  |  |  | | Re: bad idea.. I think you forgot to count the 1 - 2 million Vietnamese deaths during the Vietnam War.
I think they'd ban cars if that many people were dying per year. | |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  9143930615,000 Watts of Bass Power join:2002-10-16 New Milford, CT | Re: bad idea.. No, they wouldn't, because it's impossible to tax people who aren't working and earning income. Without a car, 95% of the US population wouldn't be able to earn income. | |
|
 |  |  |  John GaltForward, MarchPremium join:2004-09-30 Happy Camp kudos:3 | said by Romney2012:Yes, it is legal and it very similar in ethics to those books on how to make homemade bombs. Perfectly legal and upheld in court numerous times on free speech grounds. But I would hope legitimate companies would refuse to carry and sell these books. Hmmmm....
On one hand you say that the book is perfectly legal, then on the other hand admonish legitimate companies that might carry a legal product. -- A is A | |
|  |  |  |  |  thefoxboxgo fox box goPremium join:2004-10-14 Irving, TX | Re: bad idea.. said by John Galt:said by Romney2012:Yes, it is legal and it very similar in ethics to those books on how to make homemade bombs. Perfectly legal and upheld in court numerous times on free speech grounds. But I would hope legitimate companies would refuse to carry and sell these books. Hmmmm.... On one hand you say that the book is perfectly legal, then on the other hand admonish legitimate companies that might carry a legal product. Could you clear this up for me? You said that "on the other hand you [warn] legitimate companies that might carry a legal product." Elaborate, please. | |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  thefoxboxgo fox box goPremium join:2004-10-14 Irving, TX | Re: bad idea.. Sorry, I'm stupid. I like using smaller words that the general user community can understand. [/end common sense] | |
|
 |  |  |  Michieru2zzz zzz zzzPremium join:2005-01-28 Miami, FL | Then it's best said to ban computer books which allow programmers to code applications. I like companies who carry books like these whether it be legitimate or not. Or do you think we should start burning these books simply because of there content?
Just like we should ban all guns to be given to citizens and only allow the army to have them. Or you think you are ok with them showing a burning flag but not of these muslims with a head shaped as a bomb because "it offends" them.
If you are going to be moral police on books you better apply it to everything and anything not just books and then you will see how unethical it really sounds. | |
|  |  |  |  |  cwy1980Premium join:2004-08-10 Monmouth Junction, NJ | Re: bad idea.. Should books discussing computer security/exploits be banned? How about all those books about rootkits that populate the shelves at Barnes and Nobles or Borders? What about the books talking about defeating WEP/WAP-enabled encryption on wireless routers?
Under your logic TKjunkmail, these are just as bad.
However they serve a helluva good purpose...they provide the information necessary for system administrators to ensure that as many vulnerabilities are assessed and addressed for their networks as is possible.
Don't bash a book because it contains information that can be used as an exploit. Anything can be used in a negative manner in life... -- Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy | |
|  |  |  |  |  |  Michieru2zzz zzz zzzPremium join:2005-01-28 Miami, FL | Re: bad idea.. These books also inform the reader of the actual fact of things. If a company was lying to you saying that the service is secure yet there was a high rate of identity theft. Nobody would really know it's the encryption of the wireless routers which is failing. These books exploit facts of these wireless technologies that inform the reader and then everybody will know where the problem is occuring and avoid such products. | |
|
 |  |  rawgerzThe hell was that?Premium join:2004-10-03 Grove City, PA | I would try it just to see what it and if, it did anything. But I fear being cut off too much to ever attempt it. I couldn't read it just too tempting | |
|
 |  |  |  |  Reviews:
·Bright House
1 edit | Re: bad idea.. said by Romney2012:
Yes, you can find in the Comcast forum a number of posts of those who got caught and then come whine about how the big bad cable company permanently disconnected them from all cable services - including TV. » /nsearch?q=unc···t7951755» /nsearch?q=unc···82158759 Yes, I will say that the CMTS is capable of running scripts under certain conditions. One condition, exceeding bandwidth allowance, auto-generates a ticket to one of the national ticket centers, and they review the log. Once they find the culprit, they determine the node they are on, and if you are persistent enough (keep hacking with spoofed MAC's) then they simply send a maintainence guy out to the neighborhood, and will disconnect you at the tap. Don't ask me how they locate people, but I think it has something to do with which return channel and amplifier you talk to the node with. Not sure about other companies, but about 3 years ago, I offered to "explore" the ability of undetectable hacking. Lets just say I wasn't able to get permission, but discovered a co-worker's roommate did it, and he was caught within 24 hours, woke up to no internet, came to work with supervisors waiting to talk to him about "why he hacked his modem". Luckly, he DOES have a roommate, and explained the situation. They took his internet away for about 3 years, and it took lots of occasional begging to get it back. He ended up having to prove his roommate wasn't living there anymore. This was 6 years ago, and I'm sure it's gotten much better. Although it would be neat to try, I definately wouldn't do it from my house, or modem. -- SIPPhone/Gizmo # 17476200648 / PIMPNET Chatline / Ran by Asterisk & Slackware 10.1. | |
|
 |  pb5kCan't TriforcePremium join:2005-11-16 Glendale, AZ | I believe in some jurisdictions, yes, it could be considered "theft of service" and you could be taken to court for it, though most likely they will simply disconnect someone who uncaps. And as I understand it, the docsis protocol is pretty draconian and uncappers aren't hard to find.
Aside from that, it is the epitome of greed and selfishness. If there were uncappers on every block, service could degrade to less-than-dialup speeds. -- "When they call the roll in the Senate, the Senators do not know whether to answer 'Present' or 'Not guilty.'" -- Theodore Roosevelt | |
|  |  KearnstdElf WizardPremium join:2002-01-22 Mullica Hill, NJ | doing what the book says can be illegal under theft of service(atleast the uncapping), the Author writing it and us owning and reading the book is thankfully still protected as a freedom of the press. -- [65 Arcanist]Filan(High Elf) Zone: Broadband Reports | |
|  |  |  |  |  NerdtalkerWorking Hard, Or Hardly Working?Premium,MVM join:2003-02-18 Tucson, AZ | Re: bad idea.. I still remember that.
The good days of cable modem uncapping are over. Now, pretty much all bandwidth management is done through QoS policies instated at the headend itself, fewer and fewer cable ISPs are using the cable modems to enforce the bandwidth caps because of this specific vulnerability.
As long as the customer has access to the thing, it's vulnerable. QoS policies and headend-based management take those out of the user's hands, completely. Those two essentially render all the old serial-based SurfBoard hacks obsolete. There still are some neat things you can do, but not legally, or without getting caught. -- "Some people never see the light till it shines thru bullet holes." -Bruce Cockburn
I'm testing Gmail's spam filters: Broadbandreports1@gmail.com Spam: 12900+ messages currently using 406 MB. | |
|
 |  dvd536as Mr. Pink as they comePremium join:2001-04-27 Phoenix, AZ kudos:4 | said by rawgerz:I'm pretty sure I read in a few TOS from different cable CO's that if you do this, you will be permanently disconnected. Or worse, they take you to court? Remember the buckeye cable incident? speeds are now up there where uncapping is not worth the hassle. -- You can never be too rich, too thin or have too much Bandwidth | |
|  |  |  2kmaroThinkPremium,ExMod 1 BC join:2000-07-11 ColossalCave | Re: bad idea.. Oh, someone will be tempted. How I long for the good old days of uncapped service via @Home - as much as 8-10mbps down, a couple of meg up, on an old SB-3100. Then along came capping.
But I'd rather keep my connection, spend my days in the park instead of the "yard" than to get a little more speed above the 4mbps I have now.
Good review, and I agree that understanding how things work is always helpful, especially around this particular site. -- Travel light. Never let yesterday get in the way of tomorrow. | |
|
 |  HarryTorresHarry TorresPremium join:2001-11-21 Allentown, PA Reviews:
·RCN CABLE
·1and1
| said by rawgerz:I'm pretty sure I read in a few TOS from different cable CO's that if you do this, you will be permanently disconnected. Or worse, they take you to court? Exactly...why would anyone hack a cable network? Bandwidth is dirt cheap now a days...I'm paying for 15/2 -- Harry M. Torres Jr. | |
|  |  | | Funny, this guy is probably just asking for the FBI to visit. | |
|  |  ElcabongCuba SI, Castro NO join:2000-03-09 Philadelphia, PA | The book goes into detail on how not to get noticed by your isp. I've been to derengel's forums and website and although I wouldn't risk it, I understand why someone who's pissed off and shortchanged by the big companies would try this method. | |
|
 AlpinePremium join:2000-01-11 Atlanta, GA | Typical Again theft being justified by "sticking it to the greedy corporations." I hope this guy isn't more than 15 years old... Most of us mature and grow out of that attitude around that point...
Adam | |
|  |  | | Re: Typical tell me about it. im only for free downloads of warez/mp3/moviez to stick it to the big companies. --
| |
|  |  |  John GaltForward, MarchPremium join:2004-09-30 Happy Camp kudos:3 | Re: Typical said by LiberalKing:tell me about it. im only for free downloads of warez/mp3/moviez to stick it to the big companies.  -- A is A | |
|
 | | Unbelievable I can't belive BBR would steep to such lows. Is this Slashdot?
Theft of service should never be publically condoned. | |
|  |  frankenfeet934 is 10-8Premium join:2001-10-14 Smiths Grove, KY | Re: Unbelievable BBR isn't condoning it. They're simply stating that there's a book out that shows how it can be done. What if your neighbor was to clone your MAC address. Wouldn't it be nice to know how he did it so you can fix it where he can't do it again? After you beat his ass of course. -- ℜ λ η κ ε ℵ ∃ | |
|  |  Vamp5c077Premium join:2003-01-28 MD kudos:1 | said by Enlightener:I can't belive BBR would steep to such lows. Is this Slashdot? Theft of service should never be publically condoned. There is nothing at all wrong with hacking a cable modem, it violates nothing that I know of.
What process of hacking your property is illegal? Because I don't see any.
What is illegal/violation is hacking it and then using it on a cable network that does not belong to you (eg: an ISP). 
As far as the book, there is nothing that would make it illegal... There are books about drugs, murder, etc. That doesn't make it illegal, books are for reading and learning, not for planning out or doing what you see in it. -- This page is best viewed with Mozilla Firefox | |
|  |  |  Vchat20Landing is the REAL challengePremium join:2003-09-16 Columbus, OH | Re: Unbelievable #1: AFAIK, in most situations unless you buy a modem retail, you do not OWN the modem. You are renting them from the cableco. So in essence they still own it. So in this case, it WOULD be in violation if you hacked it.
#2: Even if you do own the modem and you hack it, it would still be in violation of something because it is running on the cableco's network. This is comparable to the FCC rules regarding OTA broadcasting. Without a license you can only go so far up the power ladder and inside a specific frequency range. Above that point you need a license for it else its illegal. You may certainly own the broadcasting equipment, but the FCC is in control of the airwaves your equipment operates on. -- I reject your reality and substitue my own! -- Adam Savage, Mythbusters | |
|  |  |  |  justinAustralian join:1999-05-28 New York, NY kudos:7 Host: IPv6 Business Connectiv.. Console/Handheld g.. Home/Office setup .. Photos of Broadban..
| Re: Unbelievable Both these points are spurious, really. When you sign up for service you agree not to reverse engineer or otherwise fiddle with the config of the cable modem, whether it be their modem, or yours.
If you do fiddle with it (and they define the word fiddle, not you), and are caught, you are breaking the terms of the contract. Depending on how the company feels, it may also throw in a theft of service charge to elevate it to a crime rather than just a contractual dispute. I'm sure they could also drag in the DMCA if they wanted extra tools to beat you over the head with.
Either way, they hold all the cards here. In most cases they don't have to play even half of them. | |
|
 porkchops...mehPremium join:2003-05-17 Saint Marys, WV | The Author's Site TCN-ISO, if anyone is interested.
The site has its own forum, a store, and general cable modem-uncapping miscellanea.
They also have a section on the book, accompanied by a brief summary of each chapter. | |
|  bmn? ? ?Premium,ExMod 2003-06 join:2001-03-15 hiatus | Some usefulness still remains... I agree that most of this book's content is probably not worth the time because using it will get you slapped down, but the sections on accessing the SNMP functions of the modem would certainly make it worthwhile.
When I had cable, I would have loved the ability to use the SNMP functions for several reason, the least of which to let me know when my connection crapped out and I wasn't around to notice. Such information would certainly let me know how reliable my provider is versus what they claim to be. And of course, getting data on the traffic hitting my modem but not my router would be cool. -- Ann Coulter doesn't know jack about science... "Extremes to the right and left of any political dispute are always wrong." Dwight Eisenhower | |
|  CPMBroadband, DSL, cable join:2001-08-24 Brooklyn, NY | 20 megs I get 20 megs now with OOL. Why would I need to hack it? | |
|  |  morboComplete Your Transaction join:2002-01-22 00000 | Re: 20 megs free beer and the potential for more free beer. -- no sig | |
|  |  JRW2R.I.P. Mom, Brian, Ziggy, Max and Zen.Premium join:2004-12-20 La La Land kudos:5 Reviews:
·Optimum Online
| said by CPM:I get 20 megs now with OOL. Why would I need to hack it? So you could change the configs to ACTUALLY get the 20 meg down, not the CAPPED 20meg config that yields LESS than 20 meg is TRUE throughput..  -- RIAA... Bite me!!!! | |
|  |  dvd536as Mr. Pink as they comePremium join:2001-04-27 Phoenix, AZ kudos:4 | said by CPM:I get 20 megs now with OOL. Why would I need to hack it? to uncap your upload when CV caps you for using your upload. -- You can never be too rich, too thin or have too much Bandwidth | |
|
 rradina join:2000-08-08 Chesterfield, MO | When will it end? Although there will always be folks who want it to be free, hacking/pirating/stealing becomes a non issue when the product perceived as a value. I've said this many times regarding the music industry. If it only cost a few bucks to buy a new CD, pirating would be reduced to background noise. However, as long as the labels keep turning out "albums" that are 75% crap, who wants to pay $15? It's why on-line music sites have exploded -- folks can eliminate the crap from each album and only buy the songs they like.
If hacking cable modems is prevalent, there's a lesson for the cable companies. Either eliminate the gatekeeper role from the CPE and control it at the head end or figure out a way to give the P2P crowd what they want without killing the rest of us. For instance, why not provide a "P2P" package that provides dynamic bandwidth. That is, the P2P package gets a lower priority but it gets whatever bandwidth is left -- with a stop loss (i.e. minimum speed -- say 1Mbps). When the other "constant" packages aren't using the system, the P2P packages runs at 30Mbps or some equally outrageous bandwidth. | |
|  |  | | Re: When will it end? That's a pretty damn good idea actually. | |
|
 KiwiPremium join:2003-05-26 USA/MidWest kudos:1 Reviews:
·Comcast
| Cable Way back in the dark ages of running BOTH DSL & Cable, I came across the oxymoron of capping. After a long spell I realized that Cable capping, to satisfy the 'Neighboured' thing got sorta out of hand. It's not cool to share with neighbours, on some things though & bandwidth is one of those 
But what a few don't realize is capping is NOT always a bad thing, consider synchronous bandwidth allocations. Some people strive for the maximum download, ain't it great...NO, after all the of six months testing both DSL & Cable @ the same time...It finally hit home around six years ago:
A more synchronous line, even @ a lower rate provides optimal service. So, given @ the time a rate of 1000/127 Cable and an equitable 750/130 DSL...Guess, which worked better? These days with 8000/348 ~ How wide can you get B4 having to sit down?
The other aspect is distance, it's better to be capped lower & get service than hit the high end & drop 50%.
The more equal the rates between up/down..The better the result, but yes it sucks to get capped when the advertisements scream "All-Ya-Can-Get-For-less". BS, then add another kind of cap; ya just ran out for this month.....Hope you enjoy your letter of 'You have exceed your allocated bandwidth!
. | |
|  KrispyPremium,VIP join:2001-12-11 the stix kudos:1 | How to turn your cable modem into a brick for ~$20 Lancity modems...who the hell is still using these?!? At the very least you will turn your cable modem into a brick and have to come up with inventive excuses to get a new one, at the most the notoriety this book is getting might inspire your ISP to make you poster person for their TOS infractions.
All I will say is that 'uncapping' your modem is only one step on the road the bandwidth utopia, there are controls and monitors on most devices that will not allow you to bypass pre-configured thresholds and/or will automagically alert the company of your attempts to do so. -- you can lead a horse to the water but you cannot make him drink...you can put a man through school but you cannot make him think --ben harper | |
|  53059959Temp banned from BBR more then anyone join:2002-10-02 PwnZone 1 edit | meanies
wow just about every post is ppl badmouthing cable modem hackers.
I hacked my cox surfboard back in the day of 192k upload. it was well worth the trouble and I didn't get caught. I signed up for cox hsi the moment it was availible and it was lag city. you practically had to uncap to get the speeds you were paying for.
nobody really uncaps anymore cuz most exploits have been fixed. its the same ol' story where the book is published after all the backdoors have been locked and its mostly just a history book. go to your local bookstore and skim through books like this and the "hackers black book" for a nice history lesson. | |
|  funchordsHelloPremium,MVM join:2001-03-11 Yarmouth Port, MA kudos:5 | Excellent Review, Justin ... Thanks! Thank you, Justin! I'll probably pick up this book!
I am -not- going to hack my hackable RCA 245. I seldom have a need for more than I already have.
But, as someone who loves to explore the possibilities, I've been tempted to do it JUST TO DO IT!
I also don't want to brick my modem, nor do I want to get the "Letter of Death" from Comcast.
So a book like this might just satisfy my curiosities, without having to go through the trouble or risk of actually doing it.
Thanks again! -- Robb Topolski -= funchords.com =- Hillsboro, Oregon USA ~ Keeper of the D-Link FAQ ~ Did you Search? ~ More features, Free! Join BBR! ~ | |
|  IgnitePremium,VIP join:2004-03-18 UK | Lazy Cable Operators... Have no-one but themselves to blame for uncapping being possible. Letting users bring their own modems to connnect to their networks and not expecting them to play games with them is a bad idea straight away. Not putting the appropriate sanity checks in place is another bad idea.
Haven't seen uncapping on this side of the pond in years to be honest, some cloning but that's about all. Cable operators provide CPEs and control downstream from the CMTS making downstream uncapping impossible. Breaking upstream limits is also impossible as there are limits CMTS wide on upstream usage from a single modem.
The joys of other 'monitoring' as provide by certain 3rd party products sitting behind CMTSes monitoring and policing bandwidths is another dimension in subscriber control.
Any cable company complaining about their evil users needs to consider spending less time complaining and more time making it more difficult to do this. You give people opportunity to get something for nothing or more than they are paying for, of course they will take it. Raise the bar out of reach of most people and make sure that the others get caught. | |
|  |  CableToolPoorly Representing MYSELF.Premium join:2004-11-12 | Re: Lazy Cable Operators... said by Ignite:Haven't seen uncapping on this side of the pond in years to be honest, some cloning but that's about all. Cable operators provide CPEs and control downstream from the CMTS making downstream uncapping impossible. Breaking upstream limits is also impossible as there are limits CMTS wide on upstream usage from a single modem. Same thing here. Makes the book pretty useless. And I just read through it last night. It even mentions that the CMTS will not let you uncap. "TAKE CONTROL OF MY MODEM!" To do what? -- CableFAQ.org
|_CableFAQ forum
|__CableFAQ Fantasy Football League
| |
|
 intellerSociopaths always win. join:2003-12-08 Tulsa, OK | when your cable provider is sending 10mbs ...what is there to uncap? Think about older cable modems like the old Toshiba 1100s. Those things max out at like 11mbps. So if you are on 10 Mbps service you arent accomplishing much. | |
|  |  Reviews:
·ProLog
·DIRECTV
1 edit | Re: when your cable provider is sending 10mbs I actually successfully uncapped a few years ago when I was young and stupid. It worked for a bit until greed caught up to me. It was on Prolog cable modem service over Service Electric Cablevision. They had 2 tiers at the time, a 600/190kbps, and a 800/800kbps. I rented a SurfBoard 4100 and it was so easy to bump my modem from the 600/190k service to the 800/800kbps. I was able to run the 800k service for at least a month, but then one night the power went out which reset it to 600k service. Instead of just putting it back to 800k, I uncapped it to 2.5M/1.5M (way fast at the time). I at least wanted 2MB down because heck, Suscom was doing it when I was at College! Well that only lasted one night. Woke up the next morning to a blinking modem (won't get an IP). Called SECV and they had no idea. They had me check diags, reboot it. So they said "We'll get back to you". Later on they called and said "Prolog suspended your account due to abuse". I called Prolog and there was no way out of it. I used an excuse that we had a storm the night before (we did), and there must of been a surge to mess up the modem. No dice. He said there's no way a surge could put strange caps in the upstream/downstream settings. He said how they have SNMP traps that when your modem goes over a certain threshold it sets off an alarm. He said they used to have a serious problem with uncapping, so they installed this system to monitor for it. Needless to say, I could of stayed at the 800k tier, since that was the maximum speed at the time, it wouldn't cause any SNMP alerts (hence running it for about a month). Anyway the result was suspended modem service for 6 months. I had to return the modem to the office since it was rented. A few months later, I went back to College in Williamsport, PA, so it was no big deal, just a summer without highspeed. Well I learned something from the whole thing! Not only the inconvenience of loosing service, and the treat of loosing service for my lifetime if done again, but the embarrassment of telling my Dad. He was angry since the bill was in his name, and it was his house. He also found my 2600 magazines (the hacker quarterly) and I had to listen to countless lectures. He thought I was into real bad stuff. I'll never tamper with anything like that anymore, that's for sure! ISP's do the right thing by suspending accounts. Its a quick sure fire way to learn. | |
|
 | | Don't judge a book by its cover. The purpose of this book is not to teach people how to steal service, and if you read it, you would understand that. This book is an intermediate guide to hacking embedded devices (not specifically cable modems). For example, an entire chapter is dedicated to explaining how to find and exploit a device using buffer overflows. This technique is not shadowed by a simple you can download the source of concept code here, but is fully explained in text with diagrams.
Also, more than 50% of the content in the book is explaining how embedded devices work and the rest is step-by-step tutorials on how to use that information to exploit cable modems. And lots of hacks I developed were kept secret specifically for this book. For example, did you know that when Motorola patched a firmware to fix one of the uncapping exploits, they also added in a backdoor for themselves that you can use to gain complete control of the cable modem?
I bet MSOs wont be happy when they find that out. | |
|  |  CableToolPoorly Representing MYSELF.Premium join:2004-11-12 | Re: Don't judge a book by its cover. DerEngel Grabbed this entire book VIA pdf last night. Great read. Useless as the most recent modems have no "hardware or software hacks released"
( aside from the freaking surfs.. Motorola cant get crap right. DVR's, Modems.. whatever) -- CableFAQ.org
|_CableFAQ forum
|__CableFAQ Fantasy Football League
| |
|
 | |
|
|