 |
 |  | | Re: Many major web sites already provide mobile versions I was thinking the legal end would be an issue too. Websites that fund by advertising suddenly are still providing, without the ad revenue (as the stuff isn't even loaded) Major lawsuits there. -- Intel Q6600 @3400Mhz/GA-EP35-DS3P/2x 2048Mb G.Skill/Seagate 750.10/EVGA 8800GT's SLI/Silverstone 850W/Custom water cooler | |
|
 |  |  Romney2012Defeat Obama 2012-Chg we can believe inPremium join:2002-03-03 USA kudos:4 | Re: Many major web sites already provide mobile versions said by Camelot One:I was thinking the legal end would be an issue too. Websites that fund by advertising suddenly are still providing, without the ad revenue (as the stuff isn't even loaded) Major lawsuits there. Although I did find this tool that skirts legality unless they signed deals with the sites they use:
»www.mdog.com/bookmarks.php
It formats info from many sites in to a mobile version. -- My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page Ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk? | |
|
 PolarBear03The bear formerly known as aaron8301Premium join:2005-01-03 | Google does it Although not perfect, if you search for a site and then click on it from m.google.com, Google does something like this for you for ANY site, not just ones you have set up. | |
|
 |  seamanPremium join:2000-12-08 Seattle, WA | Re: Google does it said by PolarBear03:Although not perfect, if you search for a site and then click on it from m.google.com, Google does something like this for you for ANY site, not just ones you have set up. Thanks!
"I-did-not-know-that!" -Johnny Carson | |
|
 | | Typical IBM Develop stuff that never makes it to market or if anything, never gets standardized. If it works well, they should sell it to Google and let them make it happen. | |
|
 | | Sounds like. From the description it sound sort of like the clip feature for it was either osx or the iphone that let you turn pages into widgets, but a step above if it can perfor actions for you too. | |
|
 | | .. Back then IBM was good
Now days they suck or slacking on technology. | |
|
 |  contsolePremium join:2003-12-30 Bloomfield, CT | Re: .. Back then, IBM sold $10 million mainframes that cost $2 million to manufacture. | |
|
 wmcbrine213 251 145 96 join:2002-12-30 Laurel, MD 1 edit | It's time once again for the old adage... "If you don't want your stuff copied, don't put it on the Internet."
Seriously, people, how hard is this to understand? You don't want your content copied onto other servers? Too bad, it will be. Get over it. -- 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 | |
|
 |
|