dslreports logo
 story category
If We Had Competition, We Might Not Need Neutrality Rules
Though at this rate it looks like we may not be getting either...

Opinions of the Google/Verizon proposal for network neutrality continue to flood in, with the vast majority of thoughts on the proposal being negative. While there are small bits that some like (the EFF for instance likes the idea of limiting FCC authority), most criticisms of the plan (see Wired's, for instance) correctly note the plan is riddled with loopholes and is designed to protect Google's Android ad empire. Of course there's also been a fair share of those who just think network neutrality itself is a bunch of silly hysteria, like Yale Professor David Gelernter, who writes in the NY Times that this is all a case of "net irrationality":

quote:
Maybe a company should be allowed to do what it likes on its own, but an Internet service provider (say Verizon) that deals with many Internet companies should treat them all equally. Why? If Verizon users don’t like Verizon’s service, they’ll switch to a different I.S.P. This is called “competition.” It isn’t a panacea and almost never works perfectly. In fact it is (like democracy) the worst possible system, except for all the others.
Except as the very first commenter to Gelernter's piece points out, the vast majority of customers have the choice of one or two carriers, something you'd think a Yale Professor would notice. If Verizon engages in bad behavior, millions of their customers have absolutely no way to vote with their wallets. That's of course something the FCC could have chosen to address with our national broadband plan -- but didn't.

Neutrality protections very well might not be necessary in a picture-book U.S. broadband market where consumers had the choice of multiple, varied providers -- but that simply isn't the case. The market is dominated by duopoly and monopoly carriers who by their nature in uncompetitive markets -- will try to get away with as much as napping regulators allow. They'll get away with substantially more if they're the ones dictating the "consumer protections" governing their sectors.

Most recommended from 16 comments


nasadude
join:2001-10-05
Rockville, MD

2 recommendations

nasadude

Member

competition....

the difference between 12th (or 15th or 21st or wherever the US is ranked now) and the top spots.

all of the MORE advanced broadband countries have this thing called C O M P E T I T I O N. A lot of these countries started off by regulating for competition and now they have structural competition.

I don't recall reading anything anywhere about net neutrality battles in any of the countries that have robust competition.