 | | Coool Log everything see if I care 
VPN and tor are my best buddies. | |
|
 |  Romney2012Defeat Obama 2012-Chg we can believe inPremium
join:2002-03-03
USA
kudos:4 | Re: Coool said by brianiscool:Log everything see if I care VPN and tor are my best buddies. And you go thru the hassle and the delays for what reason? What have you got to hide?
--
--
Internet News
My BLOG
My Web Page | |
|
| |  MxxCon
join:1999-11-19
Brooklyn, NY
1 edit | Re: Coool ah the ever ignorant "if you are not a criminal, you got nothing to hide..." argument  | |
|
| | | | | Re: Coool said by MxxCon:ah the ever ignorant "if you are not a criminal, you got nothing to hide..." argument The last refuge of the brain dead( and blind) | |
|
| |  tiger72SexaT duorPPremium
join:2001-03-28
Saint Louis, MO
kudos:1
 ·T-Mobile US
| said by Romney2012:said by brianiscool:Log everything see if I care VPN and tor are my best buddies. And you go thru the hassle and the delays for what reason? What have you got to hide? If the government mandated that houses could no longer have walls would you be so cavalier? What have you got to hide? | |
|
| |
1 edit | Have you ever thought for one second that maybe he has nothing to hide?
Maybe he values and respects his right to privacy and will do anything at any lengths to protect the right he so cherishes, like any patriotic, red-blooded American should.
I know I do and I'm a law abiding citizen with nothing to hide. But that is irrelevant because I cherish my right to privacy and will protect it feverishly, especially from the government.
I do not care to live in a police state. | |
|
| |  HangmnDon't Fight It...It's InevitablePremium
join:2000-04-08
Philadelphia, PA | said by Romney2012:said by brianiscool:Log everything see if I care VPN and tor are my best buddies. And you go thru the hassle and the delays for what reason? What have you got to hide? Ahh the resident neo-con raises his head
--
»davescustompc.com | |
|
| |  tc1uscg
join:2005-03-09
Saint Clair Shores, MI | said by Romney2012:said by brianiscool:Log everything see if I care VPN and tor are my best buddies. And you go thru the hassle and the delays for what reason? What have you got to hide? But no one said you had to make it so easy to allow this to happen. Rather you have nothing to hide or do, there will be tools out there that will allow unscrupulous types to seek you out and exploit the open door policy we are so quick to allow. Just a quick thought. | |
|
| | | | said by Romney2012:said by brianiscool:Log everything see if I care VPN and tor are my best buddies. And you go thru the hassle and the delays for what reason? What have you got to hide? We all have secrets...maybe they're not illegal but you would still like them to be private. like maybe a cool screenplay or idea you don't want people stealing/leaking....or that secret blog about how you hate your job @ Comcast. or embarrasing porn?? No. people should not be able to just peek in when they feel like it. How would you like my eyeballs on your junk right now? | |
|
| axus
join:2001-06-18
Washington, DC Reviews:
 ·Verizon Online DSL
| If there was evidence of you doing something illegal, I think you'd get key-logged by the government and cracked that way. But now you don't have to worry about bored or corrupt agents of the government snooping through your personal and financial info without cause. | |
|
| | Reviews:
 ·Bright House
|  I don't know about the NSA, but e-mail deletion can be stopp
Learn how to use your service... |
As far as disclosing information to the government, I can sorta understand why they would charge, because Comcast has an archiving company, and they have to get the info from them if it's old info... Long story short, they reserve the right to charge for the info. It's THEIR network, and I doubt for SERIOUS crimes (like bank fraud, child porn, etc) they won't charge, but for petty stuff (Joe hacked into my computer, and he read my diary, and I wanna sue him) they will make it worth their time, and discourage petty suits from being made.
-Rob G
--
SIPPhone/Gizmo # 17476200648 / PIMPNET Chatline / Ran by Asterisk & Slackware 10.1. | |
|
| | Let the comcast bashing begin... my issue is with their service...I already know there is no privacy!
--
Burn a tire, but make sure you buy that carbon offset! | |
|
 NightfallMy Goal Is To Deny YoursPremium,MVM
join:2001-08-03
Grand Rapids, MI | No suprise They follow the law which is what they are supposed to do. | |
|
| tiger72SexaT duorPPremium
join:2001-03-28
Saint Louis, MO
kudos:1 | Re: No suprise a number of others don't. In fact, they're downright EAGER to give your personal records to the government without as much as asking WHY. | |
|
| | | | Re: No suprise said by tiger72:a number of others don't. In fact, they're downright EAGER to give your personal records to the government without as much as asking WHY. What does it matter whether Comcrap follows any laws or not? All the telcos that participated in the NSA snoopfest are looking for, and will most likely get, retroactive immunity. ISP immunity is also likely to follow. Consequently, the alleged following of any laws now is a joke. | |
|
MxxCon
join:1999-11-19
Brooklyn, NY |  cable records can only be retrieved upon a court order
cable records can only be retrieved upon a court order does that mean other(voip/internet) records can be obtained w/o court order?
--
[Sig removed by Administrator: Signature can not exceed 20GB] | |
|
| tiger72SexaT duorPPremium
join:2001-03-28
Saint Louis, MO
kudos:1 | Re: cable records can only be retrieved upon a court order yep. Merely a subpoena, NSA request, Summons, Warrant, etc... can get those. In other words, for everything BUT cable TV, authorities can access those records at-will, without needing a bench-sanctioned warrant for searching your private records. | |
|
| | KearnstdElf WizardPremium
join:2002-01-22
Mullica Hill, NJ | Re: cable records can only be retrieved upon a court order so they can know who you called, and what sites you visited but they need a special court order to know you watched Backdoor Bandits 3 on the Spice Channel....
--
[65 Arcanist]Filan(High Elf) Zone: Broadband Reports | |
|
| | It sounds like Comcast has their stuff together... | |
|
 MIRV
join:2000-12-01
Louisville, KY | Gouging to run the spy equipment $1000 for the first month?
$750 each month thereafter?
Nice racket.
--
Capitalism and Democracy are mutually exclusive | |
|
| KearnstdElf WizardPremium
join:2002-01-22
Mullica Hill, NJ | Re: Gouging to run the spy equipment however by costing money they also make the agency wanting the snooping done think about it rather then just do blanket snooping. as remember those government guys cant use 50 cents in a candy machine without paperwork and red tape.
--
[65 Arcanist]Filan(High Elf) Zone: Broadband Reports | |
|
| | | said by MIRV:$1000 for the first month? $750 each month thereafter? Nice racket. Wondered who would be the first to say it was just about the money. Ever think it is also to discourage the frivilous requests? Do you know how easy it is to get a warrent these days? The costs may just stop some overzealous LEO from persuing something for a friend or at least have to have enough evidence w/o the Comcast info to get approval from the boss whose budget the check will be drawn on. | |
|
|  Titus PulloI came, I saw, I slept
join:2004-06-26
kudos:1
·Embarq Now Centu..
| said by MIRV:$1000 for the first month? $750 each month thereafter? Nice racket. There's also the Triple Play® - $500 a month wiretaps for an entire year if you bundle enhanced NetSpy® (email and deep browsing history) along with PowerSnoop® (10x faster than DSL can tap you).
--
.sig probably deleted by the NGZ Zbqrengbe | |
|
| | | | Re: Gouging to run the spy equipment I am only surprised that they do not charge a fee on child exploitation cases.
I wonder what other fees were rejected by comcast last year
My top guesses
1. No Competition Fee (you can't get DSL you pay a $10.00 monthly charge)
2. Repair Call Fee, if you cable or high speed internet goes out you have to pay a dispatch fee
3. Disconnect Fee, if you decide you no longer want comcast service you have to pay 100% of your old cable bill for the next two years, but you don't have to pay any rate increases during that period. | |
|
robertflPremium
join:2005-10-10
Mary Esther, FL | Constitution anyone remember the constitution? we are innocent until proven guilty - now it's guilty until proven.
this is about greed and CONTROL.
Please wake up, people.
-Rob | |
|
| | | Re: Constitution Don't be a drama queen. No where in that document does Comcast say anything about assuming guilt before innocence. If anything, they appear to be following the letter of the law. | |
|
| | | | Re: Constitution As much as i generally hate comcast, i must admit they did not sell out customers to the Riaa and NSA.
ATT and Verizon are both looking for a presidential pardon in the form of the veto pen. | |
|
| | | | | Re: Constitution said by Freezone:As much as i generally hate comcast, i must admit they did not sell out customers to the Riaa and NSA. ATT and Verizon are both looking for a presidential pardon in the form of the veto pen. Agreed. In this case, Comcast is just complying with the law. They clearly spell out what information is provided, to whom, and reasons when that information is exposed.
Unlike those Verizon folk who think CPNI is theirs to sell to anybody and their mother. | |
|
| | | | | | Re: Constitution I am glad that Comcast was open enough to share their privacy polices with the public. It shows me that my ISP provider cares enough about how I feel about privacy rights. It also shows me that they will not give out or volunteer any information unless they are required to by law.
Good job Comcast, and thanks for the information.
--
True Happiness Must Come From Within | |
|
 81399672Premium
join:2006-05-17
Los Angeles, CA
kudos:2 | All emails between friends are encrypted All email between my friends are encrypted, government is welcome to read my encrypted emails.
--
i am not a lawyer but I do play one on the internet | |
|
Reviews:
 ·AT&T U-Verse
| Govt surveillence laws are unconstitutional. Its not whether Comcast AT&T or any other Telco followed the laws because the laws are unconstitutional (in my opinion). The Feds are saying they can get anything they want from anyone without a court order warrant or subpoena.
Whatever happened to the Constitution and its so-called inalienable rights? Pissed on and defecated on by those zealots who are two steps below a cretin. I don't think I have anything to hide but piss on them if they think that because they want information on me they take it. Its high time the Supreme Court grew some cojones and protected the Americans rather than selling them out for political gain and personal prestige. Its a pipe dream I know because the "Supreme Court" is nothing but a puppet and someone besides me is pulling their strings. | |
|
| | | Re: Govt surveillence laws are unconstitutional. Amen Jimbo-48 | |
|
|
|
