dslreports logo
 story category
Interconnection Feuds Mysteriously End As Neutrality Rules Loom

Wary of running afoul of the FCC's new net neutrality rules (which technically take effect on Saturday) transit providers and last mile ISPs have suddenly and magically been settling their differences and signing new arrangements that end years of squabbling on the interconnection front. For example, a year ago Level 3 was accusing Verizon of sabotaging peering points for a buck, and now they're the very best of friends.

Click for full size
A year ago, companies like Cogent and Level3 claimed AT&T, Verizon and Comcast were letting peering points saturate to kill settlement free peering and extract new direct interconnection tolls from the likes of Comcast.

But after Cogent and Level 3 hinted they'd use the new FCC rules to file complaints about this behavior, everybody is just getting along famously. Cogent now says companies like Comcast are added capacity wherever needed, and Cogent and AT&T this week were the latest companies to strike new interconnection deals both sides appear happy with.

"Both Cogent and AT&T's customers will benefit from this agreement for years to come," said Cogent CEO Dave Schaeffer on the new AT&T deal. "We are putting customer needs at the forefront by enabling an expanded, secure and resilient interconnection environment."

Why it's almost as if the mere specter of real net neutrality rules have carriers getting along to the benefit of customers! That's quite a far cry from the industry claims that net neutrality rules would destroy the Internet as we know it, though surely the timing of these new deals (many of which don't include payment) is coincidental.

Most recommended from 24 comments



IowaCowboy
Iowa native
Premium Member
join:2010-10-16
Springfield, MA
ARRIS SB6183
Netgear R8000

IowaCowboy

Premium Member

This is why ISPs need to be broken up

Companies like Comcast, AT&T, Verizon should be limited to owning the actual infrastructure and data transmission. Management of the data transmission and the content should be left to third party ISPs like it was in the '90s.

In other words Comcast's responsibility should begin at the ground block and end at the CMTS where it hands off to third party ISPs. The modem should be provided by the customer and provisioned by the customer's choice of ISP.

This would be an ideal Comcast divestiture if they broke it up like the Bell System.

How about ..