 KrKHeavy Artillery For The Little GuyPremium join:2000-01-17 Tulsa, OK | Interesting.... Feel free.... but you have to wonder who's lobbying for this action.
Still it helps keep 'em honest. | |
|
 |  DogfatherPremium join:2007-12-26 Laguna Hills, CA | Re: Interesting.... Doesn't keep them honest. It just keeps them spending money in Washington. | |
|
 |  |  KrKHeavy Artillery For The Little GuyPremium join:2000-01-17 Tulsa, OK | Re: Interesting.... said by Dogfather:Doesn't keep them honest. It just keeps them spending money in Washington. Ah, valid point there.
However, I wonder who's spending money is Washington right now to make this happen  -- "Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power." -- Benito Mussolini
| |
|
 |  |  |  DogfatherPremium join:2007-12-26 Laguna Hills, CA 2 edits | Re: Interesting.... Microsoft. It's classic strategy. Attack on 2 fronts. Get them from the gov't side through lobbying and from the market side through IE8's porn-mode. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  tiger72SexaT duorPPremium join:2001-03-28 Saint Louis, MO kudos:1 | Re: Interesting.... precisely. This isn't an issue of Google making enemies in Washington. It's about them not making enough friends yet. They're late to the lobbying game that MS has been playing since the DoJ last investigated MS. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  RayWPremium join:2001-09-01 Layton, UT kudos:1 | Re: Interesting.... said by tiger72:precisely. This isn't an issue of Google making enemies in Washington. It's about them not making enough friends yet. They're late to the lobbying game that MS has been playing since the DoJ last investigated MS. Yup, Bill Clinton (and GB Jr) taught Microsoft the value of helping your friends in DC. Now we (a US government site) have the requirement to use MS products no matter how poorly they perform, unless there is no way that Microsoft has that tool available. I still keep FF on my PC and have less problems than the folks who are pure IE, even with our ton of security garbage. The only time I use IE is when I have to use flash or have to access a MS specific site (which is required by our network Nazis - all web sites on the work system must only be usable by IE, all others get removed).
Your Tax Payer dollars at work, protecting a valued company and thus the nation's security. -- I am not lost, I find myself every time. | |
|
 |  |  disc join:2005-12-31 Raleigh, NC | said by Dogfather:It just keeps them spending money in Washington. A nice make work program for all those lobbyists out of work for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.  | |
|
 |  KearnstdElf WizardPremium join:2002-01-22 Mullica Hill, NJ | it seems to me that Google is one of the few companies that dreadfully scares Microsoft. -- [65 Arcanist]Filan(High Elf) Zone: Broadband Reports | |
|
 |  |  KrKHeavy Artillery For The Little GuyPremium join:2000-01-17 Tulsa, OK | Re: Interesting.... said by Kearnstd:it seems to me that Google is one of the few companies that dreadfully scares Microsoft. Yeah, and releasing their own new free Browser sure didn't help allay Microsoft's fears any, did it...  -- "Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power." -- Benito Mussolini
| |
|
 |  TechieZeroTools Are Using MePremium join:2002-01-25 Gibsonton, FL | You know my stance on this already.  | |
|
 DogfatherPremium join:2007-12-26 Laguna Hills, CA | Depends on why they're domiant If they're dominant because they simply have a superior product is different that getting more dominant from abusing market position. | |
|
 balazone60 billionPremium join:2002-04-01 Wheeling, WV Reviews:
·Insight Communic..
| Confused Is the antitrust about that everyone uses Google ad's on their sites or that companies are only using Google to advertise?
If it's the former there is a simple reason, Google ad's are clean, small, text only and not annoying. I would never put a flashing, sound playing ad on my site.
Of course, with Adblock Plus, I don't see the ad's anyways... | |
|
 |  JGROCKYPremium,VIP join:2005-05-19 Chatham, ON | Re: Confused Go figure... Making assumptions here, but it looks like they're getting attacked for doing well... -- TSI Rocky - TekSavvy Solutions Inc. | |
|
 |  |  balazone60 billionPremium join:2002-04-01 Wheeling, WV Reviews:
·Insight Communic..
| Re: Confused said by JGROCKY:Go figure... Making assumptions here, but it looks like they're getting attacked for doing well... That's the American way! If someone else is doing better then you sue them. Trying to compete with them is so last century.  | |
|
 |  |  |  wifi4milezBig Russ, 1918 to 2008. Rest in Peace join:2004-08-07 New York, NY | Re: Confused said by balazone:said by JGROCKY:Go figure... Making assumptions here, but it looks like they're getting attacked for doing well... That's the American way! If someone else is doing better then you sue them. Trying to compete with them is so last century. I tend to agree. I think that if someone else is doing something better than you, its time to STEP UP not sue. Not that this article is actually about a lawsuit, but your point still holds merit. -- If history teaches us anything, it teaches that simple-minded appeasement or wishful thinking about our adversaries is folly. -Ronald Reagan-
| |
|
 |  |  wifi4milezBig Russ, 1918 to 2008. Rest in Peace join:2004-08-07 New York, NY | said by JGROCKY:Go figure... Making assumptions here, but it looks like they're getting attacked for doing well... Yes which clearly means that we should increasingly regulate them, triple the taxes they are paying, and discourage them from actively helping the economy... Oh wait, that idea actually sucks. -- If history teaches us anything, it teaches that simple-minded appeasement or wishful thinking about our adversaries is folly. -Ronald Reagan-
| |
|
 |  |  KrKHeavy Artillery For The Little GuyPremium join:2000-01-17 Tulsa, OK | said by JGROCKY:Go figure... Making assumptions here, but it looks like they're getting attacked for doing well... That's how American corporations fight competition. Instead of competing, they try and nuke the competitor in Court, or by lobbying the Government to mess them up with regulation changes or investigations.... Watch lawsuits begin shortly claiming Chrome violates this or that look and feel type patent.... -- "Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power." -- Benito Mussolini
| |
|
 pnh102Reptiles Are Cuddly And PrettyPremium join:2002-05-02 Mount Airy, MD | No Real Federal Crimes To Deal With? I am glad the DoJ has finally solved all of the real, tangible federal crimes that needed solving and that we do not need to worry about things like, oh, violent street gangs that cross state lines, or other such trivialities.
The people of the USA can now rest safe in bed at night knowing that the DoJ is going after big, bad Google. -- "At the moment of conception." | |
|
 |  Anonymous_AnonymousPremium join:2004-06-21 127.0.0.1 kudos:2 Reviews:
·RoadRunner Cable
| Re: No Real Federal Crimes To Deal With? said by pnh102:I am glad the DoJ has finally solved all of the real, tangible federal crimes that needed solving and that we do not need to worry about things like, oh, violent street gangs that cross state lines, or other such trivialities. The people of the USA can now rest safe in bed at night knowing that the DoJ is going after big, bad Google. they will cut a deal for a wire tapping program | |
|
 |  |  japPremium join:2003-08-10 038xx 1 edit | Re: No Real Federal Crimes To Deal With? said by Anonymous_:they will cut a deal for a wire tapping program I loath your cynicism when it concurs with mine. Or rather mine says that's at the core of DOJ so-called investigation but I'm harbor some hope that Google won't cave. | |
|
 |  |  cdruGo ColtsPremium,MVM join:2003-05-14 Fort Wayne, IN kudos:7 | Actually I think DOJ will cut a deal in exchange for Google crawling and indexing the audio from the (il)legal wire tapping program. | |
|
 GlaiceStill around herePremium join:2002-10-01 North Babylon, NY | AT&T Why not them? They're large enough and are pretty dominant in the states. | |
|
 |  wifi4milezBig Russ, 1918 to 2008. Rest in Peace join:2004-08-07 New York, NY | Re: AT&T said by Glaice:Why not them? They're large enough and are pretty dominant in the states. It already happened back in 1984.
»en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_break_up_of_AT&T -- If history teaches us anything, it teaches that simple-minded appeasement or wishful thinking about our adversaries is folly. -Ronald Reagan-
| |
|
 |  |  | | Re: AT&T google is based in japan. | |
|
 |  |  |  wifi4milezBig Russ, 1918 to 2008. Rest in Peace join:2004-08-07 New York, NY | Re: AT&T HUH?? | |
|
 |  |  |  |  | | Re: AT&T "HUH?" is right. Google is based out of California, always has been. Silicon Valley is called that for a reason. | |
|
 |  KrKHeavy Artillery For The Little GuyPremium join:2000-01-17 Tulsa, OK | said by Glaice:Why not them? They're large enough and are pretty dominant in the states. Because they co-operate with the Government when it wants to break the law! After all.... if you punish them for breaking the law, they might not help out next time the Government needs to break the law!
»www.youtube.com/watch?v=dxKYG6KTK-M -- "Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power." -- Benito Mussolini
| |
|
 |  |  |
 LinklistPremium join:2002-03-03 Longport, NJ kudos:5 | The EU has also set their antitrust sites on Google
»www.free-press-release.com/news/···432.html
European Union antitrust regulators launched an in-depth probe Tuesday into Google Inc.'s $3.1 billion bid for online ad broker DoubleClick, saying an initial investigation showed the deal would raise competition concerns. Governments don't like it when a corporation gets big enough to fight them on an equal footing. -- My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page Ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk? | |
|
 |  KrKHeavy Artillery For The Little GuyPremium join:2000-01-17 Tulsa, OK | Re: The EU has also set their antitrust sites on Google said by Linklist:Governments don't like it when a corporation gets big enough to fight them on an equal footing. Right. Until they join together, they get worried. 
Maybe this is part of that effort to bring Google to heel. -- "Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power." -- Benito Mussolini
| |
|
 |  KearnstdElf WizardPremium join:2002-01-22 Mullica Hill, NJ | really the only thing a government power wise has over many corporations is the military. -- [65 Arcanist]Filan(High Elf) Zone: Broadband Reports | |
|
 |  Reviews:
·Verizon FiOS
| said by Linklist:Governments don't like it when a corporation gets big enough to fight them on an equal footing. although that may be true, that isn't the reason for DOJ's interest. I call it governmental capture - my take on regulatory capture (from wikipedia):
Regulatory governmental capture is a term used to refer to situations in which a government regulatory agency created to act in the public interest instead acts in favor of the commercial or special interests that dominate in the industry or sector it is charged with regulating.
also similar to plutocracy, | |
|
 |  disc join:2005-12-31 Raleigh, NC | said by Linklist:Governments don't like it when a corporation gets big enough to fight them on an equal footing. Yes, I'm sure the congress critters from my state have that thought every morning. Not. | |
|
 TransmasterDon't Blame Me I Voted For Bill and Opus join:2001-06-20 Cheyenne, WY Reviews:
·CenturyLink
1 edit | Sleazy P. Martini sez Them Gogle puckers have to much moola, ya noe what ey Mene it is time for us shister lawerys to sue a few hundred million bok's out of them's. That'll teech'em not to puck wit us. -- Send a prayer to Allah, eat Beans. | |
|
 |
|