 glinc join:2009-04-07 New York, NY | meh never understood why people take the risk to go to public sites and having a much higher chance of getting caught. Private sites is the way to go. | |
|
 |  | | Re: meh said by glinc:never understood why people take the risk to go to public sites and having a much higher chance of getting caught. Private sites is the way to go. I agree. Probably because it's so easy, and the people that do aren't thinking all that much. It's kind of comical to see this Keystone Cop type of approach of prevention. A decade of this sh*t and the entertainment industry still hasn't found a way to grasp the web rather than fighting it. -- BF69~~~Please stop suffocating gerbils! | |
|
 |  |  SLDPremium join:2002-04-17 San Francisco, CA 2 edits | Re: meh No kidding! If the entertainment industry would stop trying to keep me from buying content online, they'd make some money! There are so many great, current series I'd pay to watch, like Dexter or Weeds, but those networks refuse to allow them to be purcahsed and viewed online. And they won't let me subscribe *only* to their channels - I have to pay like $90/mo for a bunch of other junk.
I'll just wait until I get them for "free" on Netflix next year. | |
|
 |  |  |  openbox9 join:2004-01-26 Alexandria, VA kudos:2 | Re: meh Dexter in the iTS |  Weeds in the iTS |
said by SLD:If the entertainment industry would stop trying to keep me from buying content online, they'd make some money! There are so many great, current series I'd pay to watch, like Dexter or Weeds, but those networks refuse to allow them to be purcahsed and viewed online. Really? My five second searches in the iTS show both Weeds and Dexter easily available. What other shows is the entertainment industry stopping you from purchasing? | |
|
 |  |  |  |  patcat88 join:2002-04-05 Jamaica, NY kudos:1 | Re: meh said by openbox9:said by SLD:If the entertainment industry would stop trying to keep me from buying content online, they'd make some money! There are so many great, current series I'd pay to watch, like Dexter or Weeds, but those networks refuse to allow them to be purcahsed and viewed online. Really? My five second searches in the iTS show both Weeds and Dexter easily available. What other shows is the entertainment industry stopping you from purchasing? checkmate
But it doesn't apply to all shows. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  openbox9 join:2004-01-26 Alexandria, VA kudos:2 | Re: meh said by patcat88:But it doesn't apply to all shows. Granted, but I grow extremely tired of people attempting to excuse their actions with no validity to their arguments. I would have more respect for people if they just admitted that they don't want to pay money for something and have no issue infringing copyrights to facilitate their next viewing of _____________ (fill in the blank). | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  SLDPremium join:2002-04-17 San Francisco, CA 1 edit | Re: meh Being that I don't even know where you claimed to get that content, and it isn't available through HBO, or Comcast's Fancast junk, I'd like to verify if they even have current episodes. Dexter is only up to Season 3 - yay, I got that on Netflix months ago. What about the current episodes???
Maybe you are some god that can summons the content you want at the twitch of a finger, but I've been looking all over for this stuff and never found it. Link please. Oh, and fuck you. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  openbox9 join:2004-01-26 Alexandria, VA kudos:2 | Re: meh I didn't "get" the content. I have no desire to watch either of those shows. I merely executed a quick search in iTunes and both of the shows popped up as available, either individual episodes, or whole seasons. Since both Dexter and Weeds appear to be Showtime's content, I don't imagine that they would show up through HBO.
Oh, and thanks for arguing your point in a mature manner  | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  SLDPremium join:2002-04-17 San Francisco, CA | Re: meh Well, the assumptions you made in your post were wrong and offensive. I've been looking to purchase the content, and it is being denied to me.
BTW, all the content you found on iTunes is outdated - current shows are not provided, thus my point still stands. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  openbox9 join:2004-01-26 Alexandria, VA kudos:2 | Re: meh said by SLD:Well, the assumptions you made in your post were wrong and offensive. I made no assumptions in my response to your post, so your tone is unwarranted and is inflammatory at best.said by SLD:BTW, all the content you found on iTunes is outdated - current shows are not provided, thus my point still stands. Yet you have no problem waiting for Netflix to catch up? Has season 6 of Weeds begun yet? Yes, it appears Dexter is behind. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  Augustus IIIIf Only Rome Could See Us Now.... join:2001-01-25 Gainesville, GA | Re: meh yeah but netflix doesnt charge you by the episode!
if i had to pay 3$ for every episode of every show i watched on netflix (and yes, you can cap them so dont even try to bring that up) i would be running 400$ monthly bills, which means, i wouldnt be using the service, just like im not touching ifail and the rest. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  openbox9 join:2004-01-26 Alexandria, VA kudos:2 | Re: meh No, but Netflix charges you a per month subscription, just like cable and sat tv providers. the iTS pay-per-episode/movie obviously isn't a subscription model and doesn't enable the cost efficiency of a traditional subscription model. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  SLDPremium join:2002-04-17 San Francisco, CA 2 edits | You wrote in response to my post:
"I grow extremely tired of people attempting to excuse their actions with no validity to their arguments. I would have more respect for people if they just admitted that they don't want to pay money for something and have no issue infringing copyrights to facilitate their next viewing of ..."
You assumed that I was looking to steal. I find that offensive and your assumption was wrong. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  openbox9 join:2004-01-26 Alexandria, VA kudos:2 | Re: meh said by SLD:You wrote in response to my post: No, that was in response to patcat88 's post and it was a generalization, not directed at you. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  SLDPremium join:2002-04-17 San Francisco, CA | What is the iTS? | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  openbox9 join:2004-01-26 Alexandria, VA kudos:2 | Re: meh iTunes Store | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  dvd536as Mr. Pink as they comePremium join:2001-04-27 Phoenix, AZ kudos:4 | Re: meh that would involve infecting your system with itunes and QUICKTIME! -- When I gez aju zavateh na nalechoo more new yonooz tonigh molinigh - Ken Lee | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  openbox9 join:2004-01-26 Alexandria, VA kudos:2 | Re: meh No infection here. Would you prefer the disease that is Flash? | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  sivranBack to Opera againPremium join:2003-09-15 Arlington, TX kudos:1 | Re: meh I'd prefer to download x264 in an mkv container.  | |
|
 |  VanPremium join:2009-07-08 New Orleans, LA | said by glinc:never understood why people take the risk to go to public sites and having a much higher chance of getting caught. Private sites is the way to go. Even with the public sites, the chances of actually getting caught are slim to none for the average downloader....and not someone downloading 10,000 songs and uploading | |
|
 |  |  | | Re: meh I think the RIAA has essentially given up on music. The only ISP warnings I've been seeing people get are for TV and film transfers...and while those can be reduced by private trackers I think people can still get them... | |
|
 |  dvd536as Mr. Pink as they comePremium join:2001-04-27 Phoenix, AZ kudos:4 | said by glinc:never understood why people take the risk to go to public sites and having a much higher chance of getting caught. Private sites is the way to go. because pub sites you can hit n run. they're just now blocking TPB? TPB has been dead a while now. -- When I gez aju zavateh na nalechoo more new yonooz tonigh molinigh - Ken Lee | |
|
 ReformCRTCSupport Your Independent ISP join:2004-03-07 Canada | Just waiting for... Big Fool to waltz in here and say if they don't want to get caught, don't steal... | |
|
 |  | | Re: Just waiting for... ...or for someone to say if the companies made their content available... that might be part of the solution... | |
|
 |  |  ReformCRTCSupport Your Independent ISP join:2004-03-07 Canada | Re: Just waiting for... You want unavailability of content, look at the iron grip the IOC tries to have with the Olympics...and the NBC nonsense. Even with Justin.tv it's been takedown city if they even sniff Olympics on there.
However, the circumventions merrily continue  | |
|
 |  |  |  | | Re: Just waiting for... said by ReformCRTC:However, the circumventions merrily continue  Absolutely. Which is unfortunate, with so much technology, and so much ability to access stuff, you'd think there's plenty of options to get your content. Not so (legally).
Now where's my eyepatch... | |
|
 |  |  |  |  ReformCRTCSupport Your Independent ISP join:2004-03-07 Canada | Re: Just waiting for... Arrrgh matey! Shiver me timbers! | |
|
 |  |  |  Doctor FourMy other vehicle is a TARDISPremium join:2000-09-05 Dallas, TX | NBC is shooting themselves in the foot by restricting or delaying Olympic content. While they may stop the streaming of it on websites, they haven't been able to stop it from being traded over BitTorrent. And some are resorting to that in order to see some of it that NBC is blocking or delaying on the official sources. -- "The trouble with computers, of course, is that they are very sophisticated idiots." - Doctor Who (from Robot)
| |
|
 |  |  ReformCRTCSupport Your Independent ISP join:2004-03-07 Canada | Let's put it this way: The more the corporates try to lock down content, the larger the peoples' republic of the middle finger is thrust back into their collective faces. | |
|
 |  |  |  | | Re: Just waiting for... When they outsource your living to (insert blank country), I wonder if you will be as cavalier as you are with other folks living. For every spoiled rich artist that may not engender much pity, there are thousands of little folks like you who get hurt. Stealing is stealing, and there are consequences. | |
|
 ame101 join:2002-05-02 Southington, CT 1 edit | odd are You have a better chance getting killed in a car crash in US, then getting busted for file sharing, anyone stop driving yet? | |
|
 |  | | Re: odd are I have an odd question on this whole torrent thing. Can you be "seeding" when you only have 50% of a file or do you need a complete file to be able to seed? Never understood the torent thing...sounds interesting. -- People who don't get good service on average tell 10 others while people who do get good service on average tell 1. | |
|
 |  |  openbox9 join:2004-01-26 Alexandria, VA kudos:2 | Re: odd are said by fishacura:Can you be "seeding" when you only have 50% of a file Yes. | |
|
 |  |  |  ReformCRTCSupport Your Independent ISP join:2004-03-07 Canada | Re: odd are Or even one piece of a file. That's what makes it faster as more swarm on a torrent. Better yet, it helps your ratio on ratio-dependant sites. | |
|
 |  |  sivranBack to Opera againPremium join:2003-09-15 Arlington, TX kudos:1 Reviews:
·RoadRunner Cable
| No. You are not a seed until you have the entire file. You may be sharing part of it, but until you finish the file, you are still a leech. -- I used to think I was a democrat. Then I thought I was a republican. Lately though, I'm just cynical. | |
|
 Augustus IIIIf Only Rome Could See Us Now.... join:2001-01-25 Gainesville, GA | hmm thevirusbay has been mostly unusable lately with the exception of a handfull of torrents only available there for some stupid reason
major loss im sure. go go italy. you guys have a great track record with fascism though so this comes as no surprise.
your "courts" still can't do anything to your mob. funney. joke of a judiciary and country really | |
|
 |
|