dslreports logo
site
spacer

spacer
 
   
spc
story category
Los Angeles Citywide Wi-Fi
Largest network in terms of people served
by Karl Bode 01:10PM Wednesday Feb 14 2007
The city of Los Angeles this week announced (also see MuniWireless) their plans to offer citywide Wi-Fi. Few details are available at this point, as the city has only hired an expert to determine the best course of action, with early rough estimates of $40 million to cover the city's 470 square miles. The city wants a public-private partnership and would be seeking bids as early as this fall. The LA network would be the largest in terms of people served (4m), while Houston's Wi-Fi network (announced yesterday) would be the largest geographically, at 600 square miles.

view:
topics flat nest 

Brianv5
Low Level Functionary
Premium
join:2001-01-20
Keyser, WV

600 square feet?

WOW.. Houston has a huge setup there!
--
Its not a bug.. Its a "feature"
dcjaxon
Premium
join:2004-07-16
Sikeston, MO

Re: 600 square feet?

Beat me to it!
LOL
Eric Martin

join:2005-06-19
66308

$40 000 000 ??????????????????????? Shiiiiiiiiii

Thats way way excessive.

Muniwireless was suppose to bring costs down because it doesn't use fiber. At those distances wouldn't a total wireless system like wimax make more sense ?

I sense somebody is price inflating.
ShadezeRO

join:2006-04-24
Fort Lauderdale, FL

Re: $40 000 000 ??????????????????????? Shiiiiiiiiii

gotta make a living...

en102
Canadian, eh?

join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA

Re: $40 000 000 ??????????????????????? Shiiiiiiiiii

Everything in Los Angeles is overpriced...
First you have to have the $$$ lawyers
Then you have your 'preferred' contractor which charges 5x more than it should be.

Lone Wolf
Retired
Premium
join:2001-12-30
USA
kudos:1

1 recommendation

Re: $40 000 000 ??????????????????????? Shiiiiiiiiii

Philadelphia is the same way. We've been promised citywide wifi for 2 years and we got nothing.

Meanwhile, Philly wastes money on wifi consultants and the murder rate soars because we don't have enough cops on the street.
raye
Premium
join:2000-08-14
Orange, CA

Los Angeles is a VERY spread out city

Before people start quoting $40M as overpriced, you should realize that Los Angeles terrain is not flat. LA has mountains (3000-5000 ft) and valleys (i.e. San Fernando Valley) all withing its space. It was a challenge to get cell coverage going and there are still spots where it is tough and/or unavailable.

IMHO they are going to need a lot of towers; whether $40M is the right number or not remains to be seen.

Joey B
Wee
Premium
join:2001-02-16
Los Angeles, CA

Re: Los Angeles is a VERY spread out city

As a Los Angelino, I must give an empathetic "Woo Woo!!"

And then I let the fact that we're talking about something that.... 10-1 will not happen for many years to come. So many in fact, that I believe EVDO and the like will have all but eliminated the necessity/convenience of city wide Wifi. Now indeed, it would certainly be a leap in the right direction in eliminating what remains of the digital divide but with low-end DSL being offered @ 14.95 as it stands now, I can only assume that we'll see it go down further by the time this would ever have a chance to go live.

With all that said though, I'd love to have a decent speed alternative wireless internet solution in the city. You can never have too much internets surrounding you. Just imagine an entire city understanding the "O RLY" owl :P

hambone42
Peace, through superior firepower
Premium
join:2002-02-02
Manassas, VA
Reviews:
·Comcast

Great Pic!

Love the Jack Webb -- "Dragnet" reference. They're gonna need him to separate the facts from the malarkey in the proposals
--
Son, there's only one thing you need to know: HEMI

FFH5
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Tavistock NJ
kudos:5

Re: Great Pic!

said by hambone42:

Love the Jack Webb -- "Dragnet" reference. They're gonna need him to separate the facts from the malarkey in the proposals
Me too!!
--
--
My BLOG
My Web Page

Anonymous_
Anonymous
Premium
join:2004-06-21
127.0.0.1
kudos:2

1 edit

old news

i saw this on the news last night
they sad it would be done by 2009 i think

bigunk
Gort, Klattu Birada Nikto

join:2001-02-10
USA

1 recommendation

Re: old news

said by Anonymous_:

uhh: they sad it would be done by 2009 i think
Hardy har har. They won't even have started by 2009!! This is LA, where the wheels grind slowly. Hee hee hee, ha ha ha!!

LA Citywide WIFI. That's almost as big a joke as the LA City Council, not to mention Mayor Antonia VivaLaRaza.

Snicker snicker....
--
There is not a man in the country that can't make a living for himself and family. But he can't make a living for them AND his government, the way his government is living. What the government has got to do is live as cheap as the people.
- Will Rogers

grtgonzo
Premium
join:2003-02-26
Waterford, MI

Not the largest network - Wireless Oakland (Oakland Co., MI)

You could say Houston is the largest planned citywide network in terms of coverage area and be correct. However, Wireless Oakland in Oakland County, Michigan (north of Detroit) plans to cover all 910 square miles of the county (1.2 Million residents).

»www.oakgov.com/wireless
hoyleysox
Premium
join:2003-11-07
Long Beach, CA

What about the children

How nice of the city government to facilitate childrens' access to pr0n & warez.