site Search:


 
   
story category
MS, Google Eye New Broadband Delivery
What shall we use to fill the empty (white) spaces...
by Karl Bode Tuesday 13-Mar-2007 tags: competition · business · wireless
Tipped by Titus Pullo See Profile
The Washington Post explores how a six-partner coalition (including Microsoft, Google and Dell) wants to use the so-called "white space" spectrum -- partially freed by the migration to digital television -- to offer consumers Internet access via the airwaves. Microsoft submitted such a device today to the FCC for testing. There's an immense potential for interference with existing systems here, and some say available spectrum could be too limited (particularly in urban markets) to really compete with incumbent offerings -- but this is definitely something to watch.

The heavy hitters involved certainly give the push a validity it ordinarily wouldn't get. "[The Coalition] recognizes that the heart of the problem is a lack of competition on the broadband platform," says Google's Rick Whitt. "We're very interested in finding ways to create platforms for other broadband connectivity." Wi-Fi Networking News points to this report on white space spectrum that explores potential uses (summary & full report pdf).

The report claims that the wireless broadband industry "could deliver Internet access to every American household for as little as $10 a month, by some estimates" by using the freed spectrum. First, though, the FCC needs to be convinced that the mystery device won't be disruptive to existing services -- something explored in a writeup at TV Technology.

view: topics flat text 
Post a:
CMoore2004
Premium
join:2003-02-06
Jonesville, MI

2009?

Wow, 2009. Why so quick? It'll thrive after Sprint's entire network is EVDO Rev A and they have WiMax deployed. Now, I must go, as I have to join reality.
--
Sprint Mobile Broadband PX-500 | Windows XP MCE SP2 | Mobile AMD Athlon 64 4000+ | 1.5GB RAM | ATI Mobile Radeon X600 128MB | 120GB HDD
NYC Girl
Premium
join:2007-02-04
Bronx, NY
Reviews:
·Optimum Voice
·VOIPo
·Optimum Online
·RoadRunner Cable
·Time Warner VOIP

Re: 2009?

Yes, $10.00 plus, $20.00 in surcharges, taxes, and fees.... Too good to be true....
spurious

join:2001-06-09
Florence, OR

How will the FCC react?

If the FCC looks at this in the same vein as it does BPL, it will turn a blind eye on any possible interference issues and let this technology proceed.

balance101

@pacbell.net

hrmm who will the fcc side with

who will pay them more?
That's the question

Google

@rcn.com

Re: hrmm who will the fcc side with

Would use the Google service for sure. But the problem is the structure of the FCC. If the FCC is republican controlled there is NO WAY they are going to allow it because Google wireless cant be tapped by the NSA like we saw with Verizon, AT&T and others. Qwest with Vinod Khosla was one of the few which didn't.


AnonDOG

@verizon.net

Re: hrmm who will the fcc side with

quote:
... because Google wireless cant be tapped by the NSA like we saw with Verizon, AT&T and others ...

Don't delude yourself. While I don't think they would bother to monitor this system, they certainly could. I hasten to point out that Canada, Mexico, Cuba, and virtually every embassy in the US not only could, but would. It is after all what intelligence services do, isn't it?
russotto

join:2000-10-05
West Orange, NJ

There is no white space....

Not in major markets, anyway. With the government taking away channels 52+, there's very little space available in the spectrum allocated to TV channels. 6MHz gaps? No such thing; some channels are on adjacent allocations already.

BF69
Premium
join:2004-07-28
Camden, TN

Re: There is no white space....

said by russotto:

Not in major markets, anyway. With the government taking away channels 52+, there's very little space available in the spectrum allocated to TV channels. 6MHz gaps? No such thing; some channels are on adjacent allocations already.
What about rural areas like where I live. Now I live in a small city so I can get broadband, but friends that live a few miles out only have dial-up. If I was wanting to start an ISP it seems that I would tap into a underserved market like rual areas than try to compete in a market where most of the people who want broadband already have it and aren't likely to switch.

dlhusk
Premium
join:2002-06-29
Carrabelle, FL

More Pie In The Sky!!!

I love the way these "dreamers and schemers" come up with this futuristic stuff. How about just getting what is here working right!
kellenw

join:2003-11-20
Kansas City, MO

Interesting...

Seems like this spectrum could be best used for inexpensive backhaul connections to link remote areas. From there, last mile could be served via wifi, wimax, etc.

Using this spectrum in such a way could truly connect the entire country without the expense of trenching countless miles of additional fiber or copper.

This could also result in an explosion of public NAPs across the country, dramatically improving upon our current routing bottlenecks. Substantially reduced latency and improved throughput throughout the entire Internet could be the result.

Unfortunately, I think the telcos/cablecos will do EVERYTHING in the power to prevent anything resembling such a common sense plan.
flushls

join:2004-11-02
Joyce, WA

the problem is low freq modulation

The best you could hope for with this stuff is a meg or so with lots of packet loss @ latency.
I have worked with 900 mhz stuff it is like this on a good day.
once you get up it 2.4 - 11 ghz the whole digital modulation thing is better it just requires some sort of line of sight. plus with the higher freqs you have less interference and can reuse the same freqs over and over.

my .02 after hanging broadband radios for 2 years.

FCC = Full Corporate Control.

Sunday, 03-Jun 17:43:35 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.