 andybPremium join:2003-05-29 SW Ontario kudos:1 | F*ck the marketers Who needs em any how. | |
|
 |  MikePremium,Mod join:2000-09-17 Pittsburgh, PA kudos:1 | Re: F*ck the marketers ^ | |
|
 |  |  Noah VailSon made my AvatarPremium join:2004-12-10 Lorton, VA kudos:2 Reviews:
·Bright House
| Rock the marketers So, what would marketing Armageddon look like?
Who would play the part of the 12th Imam? Who'd be Auntie Christ? What would Hot Tamales taste like?
So many un-marketed questions.
NV -- Abortion: A Republican Plot to Thin the Liberal Herd. | |
|
 |  |  |  John GaltForward, MarchPremium join:2004-09-30 Happy Camp kudos:5 | Re: Rock the marketers Like chicken...or Tasty Wheat. -- A is A | |
|
 |  |  |  TamaraBQuestion The Current ParadigmPremium join:2000-11-08 Da Bronx Reviews:
·Optimum Online
·Clearwire Wireless
| said by Noah Vail:So, what would marketing Armageddon look like? ... What would Hot Tamales taste like? They would taste "good". Quality would rule instead of propaganda! Choices would be based on taste as opposed to lies. This would be a good thing. Let the market rule, instead of lying advertisements.
Bob -- Motor Vessel - Tamara B. 43' Long-Range Trawler Cape Elizebeth ME. See her Here. | |
|
 |  swhx7Premium join:2006-07-23 Elbonia | This admission that they would lose 80% of advertising targets (people like you and me) if they couldn't advertise at them without their permission - this exposes the falshood of their usual claim that targeted ads "benefit" audiences by showing ads for things they're supposedly interested in. If the marketers can't get a person to agree to it voluntarily, it's not a benefit for that person, and the standard excuse is a lie. | |
|
 |  |  |
 |  |  wtansillNcc1701 join:2000-10-10 Falls Church, VA | said by swhx7:This admission that they would lose 80% of advertising targets (people like you and me) if they couldn't advertise at them without their permission - this exposes the falshood of their usual claim that targeted ads "benefit" audiences by showing ads for things they're supposedly interested in. If the marketers can't get a person to agree to it voluntarily, it's not a benefit for that person, and the standard excuse is a lie. Interestingly enough, this guy agrees: »sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog···ion.html
I don't even like marketing, but I've made this guy a daily read. -- "In every generation, there are those who want to rule well - but they mean to rule. They promise to be good masters - but they mean to be master." --Daniel Webster
| |
|
 |  bicker join:2007-05-10 Burlington, MA | Well that's really it: People should ADMIT that the marketers are correct, in that it would be Armageddon for their industry, and then ADMIT that they want to put all the people in that industry out of work. I am willing to admit that doing away with targeted marketing is worth taking that kind of drastic, anti-business action. The problem is that that gets people thinking about what THEY do, and how readily people would start sending the government out to do away with their industry, if they're doing something that people would rather not be done. | |
|
 |  C0deZer0Oc'D To Rhythm And PolicePremium join:2001-10-03 Tempe, AZ | Considering that these are the same people that make internet ads which outright are toxic to a computer's system stability (by demanding I install some really badly written plug-in which hoses other things if not are outright spyware/malware), and that these are the same people who whine and piss and moan about how injecting truth in advertising ends up being damaging to their bottom line (because now they have to tell you about all those hidden fees to get the service you were initially interested in), I have no sympathy with their whines and moans.
And if I were evil dictator of America, everyone in a marketing job would be executed.  | |
|
 KrKHeavy Artillery For The Little GuyPremium join:2000-01-17 Tulsa, OK | If Opt-In is Armageddon, then I say... Nuke the bastids Bring it ON. Opt-In, yes please. | |
|
 |  | | Re: If Opt-In is Armageddon, then I say... Nuke the bastids Even if it means killing kittens or children didnt have food to eat cause daddy lost his marketing job, so be it. nobody cares, opt in should be mandatory. | |
|
 |  |  Cthen join:2004-08-01 Detroit, MI Reviews:
·Verizon Wireless..
·Comcast
| Re: If Opt-In is Armageddon, then I say... Nuke the bastids said by elister:Even if it means killing kittens or children didnt have food to eat cause daddy lost his marketing job, so be it. nobody cares, opt in should be mandatory. No I sure as hell don't care that daddy chose the wrong job to support anything. I sure as hell didn't see daddy crying for me when I lost my job due to ad revenue cuts. | |
|
 axus join:2001-06-18 Washington, DC | It would probably become an option on your bill Check this box, get $1 off your monthly bill. | |
|
 |  BabyBearKeep wise ...with Nite-Owl join:2007-01-11 | Re: It would probably become an option on your bill said by axus:Check this box, get $1 off your monthly bill. This month we announce the $2 a month "checked box" fee.  | |
|
 garmst join:2000-09-17 New York, NY | No marketing? You'll pay more for probably everything. All those web sites would go away.
Wow! THIS web site would likely go away. Is that bad? After all, who'll pay the bills? | |
|
 |  andybPremium join:2003-05-29 SW Ontario kudos:1 | Re: No marketing? You'll pay more for probably everything. Not to be rude but what the hell are you trying to say?It's hard to make it out without some clear language. | |
|
 |  |  LinklistPremium join:2002-03-03 Longport, NJ kudos:5 | Re: No marketing? You'll pay more for probably everything. said by andyb:Not to be rude but what the hell are you trying to say?It's hard to make it out without some clear language. He is trying to say that without ads most of the FREE web sites would dry up and blow away. And when ads are opt-in, very very few will accept them. End result - opt-in if made a regulated mandate for the whole internet could result in a web where you pay a la carte for all the web sites you want. -- My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page | |
|
 |  |  |  DogfatherPremium join:2007-12-26 Laguna Hills, CA 1 edit | Re: No marketing? You'll pay more for probably everything. Perhaps I'm misreading the article.
The only thing they're talking about being Opt-In are the browse history snooping behavioral advertising being opt in.
Meaning you have to opt in to having your browsing history turned over to the likes of Nebu-Ad and used to serve particular ads based on that history. Regular banner and/or pop-up ads aren't affected. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  LinklistPremium join:2002-03-03 Longport, NJ kudos:5 | Re: No marketing? You'll pay more for probably everything. said by Dogfather:Perhaps I'm misreading the article. The only thing they're talking about being Opt-In are the browse history snooping behavioral advertising being opt in. Meaning you have to opt in to having your browsing history turned over to the likes of Nebu-Ad and used to serve particular ads based on that history. Regular banner and/or pop-up ads aren't affected. You are reading it correctly. But I think the earlier poster was making a point that making ads, in general, opt-in would be a disaster for the free web we all now know. -- My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  DogfatherPremium join:2007-12-26 Laguna Hills, CA | Re: No marketing? You'll pay more for probably everything. I'd say yeah (opt in only) for email, fax, telephone and other marketing that costs the END USER time and money to receive, but banner ads are little more than commercials and totally justified.
The 1st amendment should end when it starts to cost ME money. | |
|
 |  DogfatherPremium join:2007-12-26 Laguna Hills, CA | No they won't. They'll just continue to use traditional banner ads just as they do now. The only think that will change is that they won't be able to use your private browsing behavior to market to you. | |
|
 |  dvd536as Mr. Pink as they comePremium join:2001-04-27 Phoenix, AZ kudos:4 | said by garmst:All those web sites would go away. Wow! THIS web site would likely go away. Is that bad? After all, who'll pay the bills? toolpoints -- When I gez aju zavateh na nalechoo more new yonooz tonigh molinigh - Ken Lee | |
|
 quatrixPremium join:2005-02-11 South FL kudos:2 | Track my browsing history all you want Unlike a lot of people, I'm not paranoid about my "privacy". | |
|
 |  ykronicPremium join:2006-01-31 Canada | Re: Track my browsing history all you want Nor am I, hell if they want my browsing history I'll read it off to them myself. But I think it's more a matter of principle. They managed to stick ads in magazines, tv, movies, websites, my phone, bus stops, billboards, sides of buildings, phone books, my mail, my email, messenger, misdirects, on the side of the product I'm already purchasing 
I think there comes a point where someone has to draw a line and leave some privacy and some space for a more important message than "50% off shoes" or cures for erectile dysfunction. | |
|
 |  |  MikePremium,Mod join:2000-09-17 Pittsburgh, PA kudos:1 | Re: Track my browsing history all you want you forgot on radio, mobile billboards, art, made up words, on your bills, on letters, and on planes. | |
|
 |  |  |  DownTheShoreHelp Moore OklahomaPremium join:2003-12-02 Beautiful NJ kudos:12 Reviews:
·Verizon Online DSL
| Re: Track my browsing history all you want Not to mention plane that drag signs up and down the coast to get the attention of beach-goers in the summer.  -- Life is simply one damned thing after another. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  GlobalMindDomino Dude, POWER Systems GuyPremium join:2001-10-29 Hollywood, FL | Re: Track my browsing history all you want said by DownTheShore:Not to mention plane that drag signs up and down the coast to get the attention of beach-goers in the summer. See now when I'd go down to OC MD, I wouldn't mind that really because it usually had something on it that was going on that night or whatever.
That was one of the lesser intrusions I've seen in marketing really.
One of things that both ISPs and marketers assert that irritates me is that my browsing history is their data. I don't really care if you pay for it or not because the ISP sold it to you, the data still comes from me, and I am not getting one red cent from it.
The ISP can go sell random data but when it has my information attatched to it, I think it's crap but unfortunately there isn't much you can do if you want service and they've put it in the TOS other than go find another ISP and more & more want to sell that data. -- TheGlobalMind.com | Speed costs money. How fast do you want to go? | Trust the instinct to the end, though you can render no reason. Ralph Waldo Emerson
| |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  DownTheShoreHelp Moore OklahomaPremium join:2003-12-02 Beautiful NJ kudos:12 Reviews:
·Verizon Online DSL
| Re: Track my browsing history all you want said by GlobalMind:said by DownTheShore:Not to mention plane that drag signs up and down the coast to get the attention of beach-goers in the summer. See now when I'd go down to OC MD, I wouldn't mind that really because it usually had something on it that was going on that night or whatever. That was one of the lesser intrusions I've seen in marketing really. To me, that is one of the most annoying. Those damn prop planes are very noisy, and on sunny weekends in the summer they're going by every 15 minutes. I really hate having my day at the beach turn into a TV show with commercials.  -- Life is simply one damned thing after another. | |
|
 |  |  | | I don't care either unless it costs me money. I hate ads and rarely buy anything because of them. I just could care less about them. -- Saving the world keeps me busy. However, I find Earth very primitive from my home planet of Krypton. -Supergirl | |
|
 dvd536as Mr. Pink as they comePremium join:2001-04-27 Phoenix, AZ kudos:4 | If advertisers hate it. . . . . . . Then i'm for it! | |
|
 |  bgraham join:2001-03-15 Smithtown, NY Reviews:
·VOIPo
·Verizon VoiceWing
1 edit | Re: If advertisers hate it. . . . . . . I have no problem with advertisements. Hell, they are everywhere and lower the cost of TV, newspapers and magazines to a level that we can afford. I bet half the techies who visit this web site look through the Sunday paper ads for Circuit City, Best Buy, Staples etc to see if there are any bargains. Ads lower the cost not add to the cost and I can choose not read them if I want to.
My problem would be with companies that put their software on my computer and using my bandwidth to collect my browsing habits and selling it for profit. Then I have to spend my time and effort to opt out.
I also think that inserting ads into other peoples web pages will eventually be tried, but I think it will fail miserably. Even the big advertising kings like Yahoo or Google are going to run into problems doctoring web pages belonging to major corporations. Any little start up "upstarts" are going to get killed if they try putting say Honda ads into a GM or Ford web page. | |
|
 |  |  C0deZer0Oc'D To Rhythm And PolicePremium join:2001-10-03 Tempe, AZ | Re: If advertisers hate it. . . . . . . There was already a marketing company that managed to put a Nintendo Wii ad in Sony's PS3 page. What are you talking about?  | |
|
 Its a SecretPlease speak into the microphonePremium join:2008-02-23 Da wet coast kudos:3 | marketers fate Marketers? Hang 'em all. | |
|
 |  iansltx join:2007-02-19 Golden, CO kudos:2 Reviews:
·Verizon Online DSL
·RoadRunner Cable
·Comcast
| Re: marketers fate Gotta agree, if being tracked like a dog means the difference between steak and ramen, I'll freakin' pay for the ramen! To put it strongly, marketers are saying you have to opt out of being . Hmm, I'd like that to be opt-in, thank you very much. And I won't opt in, thank you very much.
As said above, if you have to violate others (' privacy) and make that an opt-out situation (lest 4\5 of the population not opt in) then you need a new line of work, sir. I for one run ads on my websites, but guess what they're AdSense and a static sponsor banner! Nobody gets tracked, everybody's happy. Though on my forum I notice that I'm being location-targeted (not my ads...the forum's). Where's the opt-out button? I don't need a new car, and I'm antisocial enough NOT to want to meet hot teens in my area. As Jason Calacanis would say as an impression of Dvorak, "nyah!" The ads aren't even targeted correctly!
In conclusion, keep generic ads (where the PUBLISHER does the work of targeting, not the user...my ads on my site are related to my content, by golly!) by all means, and make targeted advertising opt-in, with possible monetary savings in doing so. After all, you get paid for completing surveys, right? (not sure on this one actually...all the sites I've come across seem scammy, heh). If someone doesn't mind being tracked for the purpose of serving ads, site to site, let 'em be tracked. For the rest of us, no freaking way. When ads are forced (tracking comes to mind, as well as telemarketing) they should be opt-in, because anything else will turn the user against the advertiser anyway. Whoda thunkit? | |
|
 CuchulainnThe Roar of the Masses Could be Farts join:2000-11-09 Chevy Chase, MD | Boo F**king Hoo The basic principle of the EU DP Directive is opt-in anyway so what's she crying about?
As for the US, I wish Congress would get off its lazy ass, stop holding softball hearings about gas prices, food prices, etc. and tackle the privacy issue once and for all. | |
|
 |  | | Re: Boo F**king Hoo We're going off on a tangent here, people.
This is about behavioral marketing - the idea that what you do, is stored and subsequently used to offer products and services they "think" you would enjoy. Not about marketing in general, not about web ads, not about text ads, not about posters or flyers.
To use an analogy, if you were walking in a mall with your spouse and 1 year old, would you want a certain store to immediately throw ads in your face for diapers, talcum, wipes, bottles, etc? No. You'd want to be able to choose when, why, and from whom you buy your children products. Not have someone assume you need the stuf just because you walked in the vicinity.
Same goes for behavioral marketing and why it absolutely needs to be opt-in: just because I visit a website that discusses various bars does not mean you should automatically be able to throw beer ads at me...unless I specifically allow you to do so.
Under opt in, there would absolutely be less value for the marketer, unless they can make the behavioral marketing look so appealing to the end user that they come clamoring for it. Then it's moot - the same thing applies for financial companies. I opted in to everything my bank was offering by way of affiliate products and services, because I actually WANT that stuff. | |
|
 FreedomBuildWell done is better than well saidPremium join:2004-10-08 Rockford, IL | Let em all fry
That is my humble stance on that matter. | |
|
 |
|