 CoronaIt's cool, I'm takin it backPremium join:2000-03-14 Dallas, TX | why not let the market decide on a la cart
why not offer packages like today and a la carte and let the market decide which they want?
personally, I would stick with bundling as that's where the savings would be. | |
|
 |  BF69Premium join:2004-07-28 Camden, TN | Re: why not let the market decide on a la cart said by Corona:why not offer packages like today and a la carte and let the market decide which they want? personally, I would stick with bundling as that's where the savings would be. there is no market.
This "free market" crap only works when there's a "free market" how many cable companies compete in your town? ONE and that's all there is ever going to be. If you had 4 or 5 then fine "free market" rules the day. | |
|
 |  Ahrenl join:2004-10-26 North Andover, MA | For you maybe, and that's find.
Me and the 5 channels I watch, don't need to be paying $70's a month for 500 channels. | |
|
 |  | | You're kidding right? What market? Who does a cableco compete with in the vast majority of markets? Cablecos on the whole have no competition and that is why their service is lousy and they can bundle channels and force you to buy the bass fishing channel. They is no way they could get away with that if there was a market - so there is no market to decide anything.
Yes FiOS poses a threat. Can cable doesnt like FiOS. But FiOS has very small market share. | |
|
 Reviews:
·AT&T Southeast
| No suprise Wow. Fearmongering to push Democrat canidates. Kinda sad for a technical site. Guess what, some democrat could appoint someone better or someone worse. Same goes for a Republican president. Lets get some real news instead of this Liberal spin BS. | |
|
 |  Dominokat"Hi"Premium join:2002-08-06 Boothbay, ME kudos:2 1 edit | MultiChannel News Upon reflection, I do not wish to post. Take me back!
----------
I posted the link doen't work. But it does now. | |
|
 |  ptrowskiGot Helix?Premium join:2005-03-14 Putnam, CT kudos:4 Reviews:
·VOIPo
| Re: No suprise said by ender7074: Lets get some real news instead of this Liberal spin BS. How about finding some better news and tipping it instead of whining about it? There's some news for you. | |
|
 |  BF69Premium join:2004-07-28 Camden, TN | said by ender7074:Wow. Fearmongering to push Democrat canidates. Kinda sad for a technical site. Guess what, some democrat could appoint someone better or someone worse. Same goes for a Republican president. Lets get some real news instead of this Liberal spin BS. I don't see any bias. You clearly are a neo-con/republcian. Please quit drinking the kool-aid and start thinking for yourself. | |
|
 |  |  Reviews:
·AT&T Southeast
| Re: No suprise said by BF69:said by ender7074:Wow. Fearmongering to push Democrat canidates. Kinda sad for a technical site. Guess what, some democrat could appoint someone better or someone worse. Same goes for a Republican president. Lets get some real news instead of this Liberal spin BS. I don't see any bias. You clearly are a neo-con/republcian. Please quit drinking the kool-aid and start thinking for yourself. No such thing as a Neocon unless you sumbit to being called a Stalinist. Insulting isnt it? The article is clearly written to foster a fear in people that if a Conservative is elected, its going to be this clown all over again while the Democrat is some big net neutrality guy. If you don't see the bias in the article you're blind. Seems to me that you need to lay off the kool aid. Try reading it instead of waving your lib flag and chanting Obama's name. | |
|
 |  KrKHeavy Artillery For The Little GuyPremium join:2000-01-17 Tulsa, OK Reviews:
·AT&T DSL Service
| Whenever the news doesn't line up with your viewpoint, you safely and smugly dismiss it as "Liberal Media Crap" eh?
Of course, that was the intention of labelling the media liberal in the first place and working to undermine it--- to make sure the party faithful ignore it when the facts are "inconvenient" for the Republican party... -- "Regulatory capitalism is when companies invest in lawyers, lobbyists, and politicians, instead of plant, people, and customer service." - former FCC Chairman William Kennard (A real FCC Chairman, unlike the current Corporate Spokesperson in the job!) | |
|
 | | Next FCC Chair Reports indicate that Clinton would chose Susan Ness to be the next FCC Chair. | |
|
 |  | | Re: Next FCC Chair Funny, Obama is ahead on all cards. Have you decided? | |
|
 |  |  |
 |  |  | | Not relevant what anyone has decided. Only thing relevant is that the article says the Dems would put Copps in as chair. Not true. Commissioner jobs are handed out as political favors. That is how Martin got the job - he was involved in Bushes' campaign is florida. His wife currently works for Cheney. Clinton is not going to name Copps. And in all likelihood, neither will Obama.
I also question whether McPain would name Martin. They have really disliked each other in the past. Martain is a Bush/Cheney loyalist. McPain is the rebel republican challenging the junta on things like broadcast spectrum give away and torture policy. I would not be surprised that McPain has his own folks to give political favors to. | |
|
 Romney2012Defeat Obama 2012-Chg we can believe inPremium join:2002-03-03 USA kudos:4 | Martin can stay until 2011 even if Dem wins »Martin Side Stepped Forced FCC ExitIf the Democrats win, they'll likely appoint current Commissioner Michael Copps to head the Commission. He's consistently taken a much tougher position for network neutrality. If McCain wins, he could keep Martin in place until 2011, Even if a Dem wins the presidency, Martin can remain on the commission until 2011 if he so wishes. Though he will probably be leaving sometime in 2009 to run for office no matter who wins. The only thing a Dem president can do is replace Martin as Chairman, NOT knock him off the commission. -- My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page | |
|
 |  BF69Premium join:2004-07-28 Camden, TN | Re: Martin can stay until 2011 even if Dem wins said by Romney2012:Even if a Dem wins the presidency, Martin can remain on the commission until 2011 if he so wishes. Though he will probably be leaving sometime in 2009 to run for office no matter who wins. The only thing a Dem president can do is replace Martin as Chairman, NOT knock him off the commission. So it's the Chairman that has all the power and if the dems win they'll have a 3-2 vote in everything. Martin would be effectively neutered | |
|
 |  |  Romney2012Defeat Obama 2012-Chg we can believe inPremium join:2002-03-03 USA kudos:4 | Re: Martin can stay until 2011 even if Dem wins said by BF69:said by Romney2012:Even if a Dem wins the presidency, Martin can remain on the commission until 2011 if he so wishes. Though he will probably be leaving sometime in 2009 to run for office no matter who wins. The only thing a Dem president can do is replace Martin as Chairman, NOT knock him off the commission. So it's the Chairman that has all the power and if the dems win they'll have a 3-2 vote in everything. Martin would be effectively neutered Depending on whether any deals are cut to change this, it can be 3-2 Republican on the FCC throughout most of 2009, but with a DEM chairman. Bush could reappoint Republican Tate without a Senate OK by making the appointment during the recess between sessions of Congress at the end of the year. -- My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page | |
|
 |  | | This is fully inconsistent with experience, and inconsistent with MArtian's political agenda. If you look over the history of FCC Chairs, they ALWAYS resign after a presidential election. They dont win brownie points by getting busted in rank down to commissioner. They get brownie points by resigning, riding off into the sun set, and getting on a board of directors, or acting as consultants. This is what Powell, Kennard, and Hundt all did. If the dems take the white building, Martian is gone gone. | |
|
 |  axus join:2001-06-18 Washington, DC | I think you mean "leaving sometime in 2009 to take a cushy job with AT&T, to show how loyalty is rewarded" | |
|
 |  |  Romney2012Defeat Obama 2012-Chg we can believe inPremium join:2002-03-03 USA kudos:4 | Re: Martin can stay until 2011 even if Dem wins said by axus:I think you mean "leaving sometime in 2009 to take a cushy job with AT&T, to show how loyalty is rewarded" Maybe. But his plans to run for office when he leaves the FCC are a poorly hidden "secret". It has been mentioned many times by those who know him. -- My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page | |
|
 Reviews:
·RoadRunner Cable
| Dems better for Cable, maybe? The Democrats are mostly anti-Telco because they see them as cooperating with the Republican war effort. Democrats are currently trying to punish Telcos by stripping the immunity clause out of the security law renewal. So I would think that a Democratic administration would be welcomed by Cable because "the enemy of my enemy is my friend".
Also, network neutrality is a much smaller bullet for them to bite then full blown regulatory hell (a la carte channels, price regulation, antitrust, etc. etc.). Maybe the Dems would spare them the latter if they roll over on the former. | |
|
 |  | | Re: Dems better for Cable, maybe? Ah, no. The Telecom Act of 1996 was passed by the Democrats, Clinton and Gore and implemented by Democratic Chairs Reed Hundt and William Kennard. The dems were procompetition, supporting just about any way for competition to form. The Telecom Act provided for UNEs and CLECS, and long distance competition, and mobile phone competition. At the end of the term, there were independent 7000 ISPs, 1000s of CLECs, long distance competition, and more.
And then Republican Powell came in. And while Powell had a policy, Martian followed and the only policy he had was "how much did you give to the bush / cheney campaign." And they got rid of UNEs. And they got rid of ISPs. And they got rid of CLECs. And they permitted merger after merger. And what is now the biggest company? ATT (aka SBC from Pres Bush's hometown of Austin).
The dems were pro telecom in that they were pro competition and under their administration telecom grew like wild fire. The Bush /Cheney loyalists are pro campaign contributors and have no real telecom policy other then, "who is on our side." | |
|
 |  |  BF69Premium join:2004-07-28 Camden, TN | Re: Dems better for Cable, maybe? said by Sam Spade :
Ah, no. The Telecom Act of 1996 was passed by the Democrats, Nice story but republicans took control of both the house and senate in jan of 1995. If you can't have SIMPLE facts straight why believe ANYTHING you have to say? | |
|
 |  |  |  | | Re: Dems better for Cable, maybe? /sigh. Guess the fact that Clinton SIGNED the damn bill still frees him from any responsiblitiy. Check YOUR facts pal. | |
|
 | | Don't like Martin I don't like Martin I feel that if one thing is applied to cable it should apply to satellite and telcos as well. | |
|
 | | WHO thinks they know about cable? Let ME be the first to let you know why there is only one cable company in one area. The amount of money it takes to over build an entire city is outrageous. Most companies by out each other and just use the same old junk the last company had so that they keep the profits they earn from charging way to much for terrible service. An industry that is slowly being dominated by Verizon and AT&T with their fiber network. Tell the cable company you've had enough with the terrible product and switch. The results will shock you. | |
|
 KrKHeavy Artillery For The Little GuyPremium join:2000-01-17 Tulsa, OK | Martin knows where his future paycheck is at. ...He's been a loyal Telco defender since day one.
Maybe the Cable guy screwed his GF in college or something, I dunno.... | |
|
 |  | | Re: Martin knows where his future paycheck is at. said by KrK:...He's been a loyal Telco defender since day one. Maybe the Cable guy screwed his GF in college or something, I dunno.... You mean screwed his boyfriend???  -- Saving the world keeps me busy. However, I find Earth very primitive from my home planet of Krypton. -Supergirl | |
|
 LeeWL join:2002-11-10 Morrisville, NC | Politics in NC I will say that he sounds like he will fit right in with the politicians we currently have in North Carolina. | |
|
 |
|