Search:  

 
 
   News
newer
story category Martin Wants 'Open Access' 700Mhz
Who are you and what did you do with the FCC chief?
(old news - 10:57AM Tuesday Jul 10 2007)
tags: competition · fcc · business · wireless
Kevin Martin appears poised to attach conditions to whomever nabs the highly prized 700Mhz spectrum at auction. Microsoft, Google and a group of hardware vendors and consumer advocates have been pushing the FCC to use the spectrum to create a new, inexpensive broadband option for us to play with.

A recent report (pdf) boldly suggested that every American household could see access "for as little as $10 a month" using the new spectrum.

Whoever wins this spectrum has to provide (a) truly open broadband network.
-FCC chief Kevin Martin
Martin's circulating a proposal at the FCC this week that would ensure that whoever nabs the spectrum at auction would have to provide a "truly open broadband network — one that will open the door to a lot of innovative services for consumers," according to the FCC chief.

"You can use any wireless device and download any mobile broadband application, with no restrictions," Martin explains. Obviously that's in sharp contrast to existing wireless services that frequently nickle and dime customers, while locking down phones and often prohibiting the use of third party applications and services.

As Dow Jones reports, attaching such conditions to the spectrum would challenge incumbent phone operators, something highly out of character for the FCC boss. The piece does note that he's denying most of the requests by Frontline, who wanted to build a national broadband network to challenge incumbent operators AT&T and Verizon Wireless.

Martin's plan should be released within weeks, and the auction itself should occur in January of next year.

Related:
  1. 700 MHz Auction Inches towards $20 Billion
  2. Verizon Nabs Most Valuable 700Mhz Spectrum
  3. So Much For The Talk of Open Wireless Networks
  4. 700Mhz Auction Winners Finally Talking
  5. Anti-Competition Concerns Ignite Spectrum Cap Debate
  6. Cyren Call Asks Rural Providers to Bid on D-Block
  7. FCC Proceeds Cautiously With White Space Testing
  8. Google Launches White Space Broadband Website
Forums » Martin Wants 'Open Access' 700Mhz
view: topics flat text 
Post a:

RadioDoc
Sortofadog
Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11
Chicago, IL

Common carrier

The whole thing should operate as a common carrier. It wouldn't be a bad idea to apply that to existing wireless operations, too.
nalaregeork

join:2004-08-25
Yorktown Heights, NY

I hope it happens... soon

Aw da po wittle wireless carriers will have to open up their service to innovation to compete, how terwable.

It's about time hopefully this will become what it should have been a lonf time ago. Hopefully I will be looking for an Internet Tablet with a soft SIP installed to do what we should have been doing around 2000
raptor1418
Premium
join:2002-12-03
Denver, CO

I want to see the written requirements

All sounds good as a verbal statement but I can't wait to see what pay offs are made to officials to add loop holes into the requirements.

TK Junk Mail
Go ahead, make my day
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Margate City, NJ
clubs:
·Comcast

Will existing wireless providers buy spectrum to NOT use it

If the new open access rules only apply to the newly auctioned spectrum and NOT to existing frequencies, will the current wireless providers buy up all the spectrum with the intent of never using it, keeping it out of the hands of competitors?
--
--
Internet News
My BLOG
My Web Page
nasadude

join:2001-10-05
Rockville, MD
·Comcast

Re: Will existing wireless providers buy spectrum to NOT use it

said by TK Junk Mail See Profile :

If the new open access rules only apply to the newly auctioned spectrum and NOT to existing frequencies, will the current wireless providers buy up all the spectrum with the intent of never using it, keeping it out of the hands of competitors?
does a bear sh*t in the woods?

is the pope catholic?

Dagda1175

join:2001-06-17
Goleta, CA

Sell it with no restrictions

There is no reason the government should have ANY say in what a company does with what it buys. This auction needs to happen as soon as possible. A government agency should not own this in the first place.
footballdude

join:2002-08-13
Imperial, MO

Re: Sell it with no restrictions

said by Dagda1175 See Profile :

A government agency should not own this in the first place.
I'm about as anti big government as you'll find, but I got to disagree here. A certain level of government is necessary in certain areas. You wouldn't want private companies (or individuals) to own large rivers (like the Mississippi) which everyone around them uses. You wouldn't want a private company to own a certain section of the atmosphere. Some things are just shared by their nature. Spectrum falls into that category.
--
What's certain about Darwinism is that it would take less time for (1) a single-celled organism to evolve into a human being through mutation and natural selection than for (2) Darwinists to admit they have no proof of (1) - Ann Coulter

kyler13
Is your fiber grounded?

join:2006-12-12
Arnold, MD
·ViaTalk
·Verizon FIOS

Re: Sell it with no restrictions

said by footballdude See Profile :

You wouldn't want a private company to own a certain section of the atmosphere. Some things are just shared by their nature. Spectrum falls into that category.
Excellent point. But I'll claim rights to the space over my property up to a height of 250 ft. Any "owned" part of the spectrum that permeates and/or travels through my space is subject to certain access fees. I'll draft some letters tonight and send them out to the wireless carriers.

digitalfreak
Frodo failed. Bush has the ring

join:2005-12-09
49533
Considering that companies like AT&T and Verizon buy spectrum and sit on it just so they won't have any competition, your idea is insane.

sporkme
drop the crantini and move it, sister
Premium,MVM
join:2000-07-01
Budd Lake, NJ

said by Dagda1175 See Profile :

There is no reason the government should have ANY say in what a company does with what it buys. This auction needs to happen as soon as possible. A government agency should not own this in the first place.
You know that they are auctioning off something that belongs to you, right?

RadioDoc
Sortofadog
Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11
Chicago, IL
Oddly enough, they aren't "buying" it. They are being licensed to use it. Licenses can expire, be revoked, or even be modified against the holder's wishes.

Big difference.

KrK
Heavy Artillery For The Little Guy
Premium
join:2000-01-17
Tulsa, OK
·Cox HSI
·AT&T Southwest


edit:
July 10th, @05:35PM

said by Dagda1175 See Profile :

There is no reason the government should have ANY say in what a company does with what it buys.
Not true.

The seller of an item can choose to put conditions or restrictions on the sale all the time. If a prospective buyer refuses to comply, well, they get told to take a hike.

A classic example is a business that sells off some facilities--- BUT makes the buyer agree that they can't run a competing business in those facilities.

Example: A restaurant chain sells off some locations. As a condition of sale, they prohibit the buyer from opening a competing restaurant, or selling it to someone who would, for xx number of years.

It's perfectly acceptable for the FCC to set rules as to what spectrum is used for/how it is used. This is part of the license they draft. In fact, that's their main job, actually.

nipseyrussel
Nipsey Russell, yo

join:2002-02-22
Philadelphia, PA

exceptions

sounds good....
but: "...The only exceptions would be software that is illegal or could harm a network"
what software is illegal?
"could harm a network"?? cant wait to see the list as defined by the carriers anything that uses the network could harm it

Karl Bode
News Guy
join:2000-03-02

Host:
Road Runner
PC gaming GAMES
PC gaming Tech

Re: exceptions

Joost, Skype and others of course cause "excessive network degradation" and must obviously be banned.

Yeah, I'll believe the launching of a unhindered, robust third wireless competitive pipe that challenges the incumbent chokehold when I'm sitting in a park, sucking down coffee and 4Mbps via laptop watching streaming video.

KrK
Heavy Artillery For The Little Guy
Premium
join:2000-01-17
Tulsa, OK
·Cox HSI
·AT&T Southwest

Re: exceptions

said by Karl Bode See Profile :

Yeah, I'll believe the launching of a unhindered, robust third wireless competitive pipe that challenges the incumbent chokehold when I'm sitting in a park, sucking down coffee and 4Mbps via laptop watching streaming video.
Heh....

"We'll be sitting on a beach.... Earning 20 percent."


--
"Regulatory capitalism is when companies invest in lawyers, lobbyists, and politicians, instead of plant, people, and customer service." - former FCC Chairman William Kennard (A real FCC Chairman, unlike the current Corporate Spokesperson in the job!)

DC23

@cox.net


from:
tschmidt See Profile

This isn't Open Access, but "Carterfone" principles

This story is not 100 percent correct. What Martin is proposing is "Carterfone" like principles of freedom to connect devices.

"Open Access" would mean the spectrum license holder would have to provide wholesale access on a reasonably and non-discriminatory basis. If implemented, this would mean that multiple providers would offer service on the spectrum. What Martin has proposed means that only the spectrum holder will provide service, but they can't lock you into their devices.
Eric Martin

join:2005-06-19
66308

Re: This isn't Open Access, but "Carterfone" principles

»en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carterfone

Hope Skype wins.
»www.3gnewsroom.com/3g_news/mar_0···16.shtml
disc

join:2005-12-31
Raleigh, NC

said by DC23 :

... What Martin has proposed means that only the spectrum holder will provide service, but they can't lock you into their devices.
Reading the articles, I got the impression of net neutrality as the goal. That is, not only unhindered access to devices, but unhindered access to internet-based services as well.
jevernew

join:2007-07-12
Sedro Woolley, WA
·Comcast

Payoffs and loopholes

To state the obvious here; big business and big money have unlimited access to armies of attorneys whose sole purpose is to give advantage to their employees. USA tax payers have government lawyers who do a very poor job of protecting our resources.
ddpardue
Premium
join:2007-01-07
Hattiesburg, MS

DC43 is right

Martin is proposing CarterPhone rules. No locking or blocking devices to your own network. Phone portability across networks, instead of having to buy a new phone everytime you change carriers, or at least use a new phone which they may "give" you. Open access, such as proposed by Google's CEO and many consumer groups, would mandate that whoever won the auction would have to make spectrum available to competitors at reasonable market prices. Being a local WISP provider, I (and 3000+ local WISPs across America) would love to see this pass. It would enable us to offer broadband in much larger rural areas than is possible now using unlicensed bandwidth. Or at least make it more economical, enabling us to compete with the "BIG 4" in the cities also, and enable us to afford to expand our networks in rural areas.

batterup
I Can Not Tell A Lie.
Premium
join:2003-02-06
Netcong, NJ
clubs:

GSM CDMA

Verizon and at&t use very different systems and the phones will NEVER roam on the others system.

Verizon should let Google and MS buy it then leech off them and suck them dry. It should be cheep to buy with such restrictions.
Forums » Martin Wants 'Open Access' 700Mhz


Tuesday, 07-Oct 17:59:41 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 9 years online! © 1999-2008 dslreports.com.