home
Mathematical trick counters wireless fraud (old news - 11:02AM Sunday Feb 20 2005)
by Will Knight Wireless computer networks could be secured against fraud and identity theft using a novel cryptographic protocol designed to keep passwords safe from prying eyes. Markus Jakobsson and Steve Myers of Indiana University, US, demonstrated the new security scheme, dubbed "delayed password disclosure", at the American Association for the Advancement of Science meeting in Washington DC on Saturday. more at Newscientist.com
|
  funchords Robb Premium,MVM join:2001-03-11 Hillsboro, OR
·Verizon Online DSL
·Skype
·Comcast
| How is this different from PSK? Existing security protocols focus on securing the link between two machines to counteract eavesdropping. But making sure that a computer is connected to a legitimate access point in the first place is also important. If a hacker uses his computer as a fake access point and then relays the messages on to a real one, the information can be stolen covertly.
The delayed password disclosure protocol counteracts this threat by allowing both parties use a pre-arranged password or pin for authentication, but preventing this from being revealed during communications.
A mathematical function is applied to the agreed code by the user who initiates the wireless link, turning it into an incoherent string of bits. At the other end of the link, another mathematical function is applied to the string and it is sent back to the user.
The resulting code can then be mathematically checked to confirm that the person at the other end of the link shares the same secret password or pin.
I couldn't have explained WPA-PSK any better! -- Robb Topolski http://www.funchords.com/ Hillsboro, Oregon USA | |
|  |  DSLrgm Premium,MVM join:2002-08-22 Oak Park, MI
| Re: How is this different from PSK? No. This is NOT PSK. Or rather, how we designed the 4-way handshake that produces the session key from the master key.
It is also not how MOST challenge responses work, but I can find dozens of authentication methods that work in this manner. This is NOT a new invention. There is plenty of prior art. | |
|  |  |   funchords Robb Premium,MVM join:2001-03-11 Hillsboro, OR | Re: How is this different from PSK? What is different about it? | |
|  | |  |
|
|