Monday Evening Links
|
 Sammer
join:2005-12-22
Canonsburg, PA | Major Labels Accused Of Of Copyright Infringement Why am I not surprised that the major labels are infringing? Too bad the recording artists can't sue the labels for the same outrageous statutory damages that the major labels sue filesharers for. BTW the major labels say the filesharers are thieves so guess what this makes the major labels. | |
|
4 edits | and its actually 6 billion some 300,000 songs and if one person for file sharing personal use gets a 1.9 million fine for 30 songs what should a HUGE big corporate entity get for directly infringing for commercial purposes
if this were a USA land of suits that could be a massive class action suit with up to 570 billion if you take the above number and maybe more as it was commercial uses.
"A reader helpfully noted the math gremlin - the correct number is $6 billion ($20,000 per infringement X 300,000 songs). "- geists site
I am sure the usa has made sure the obama biden cartel has protected itself form this kinda of oooops.
i think we should get free blank media levy until this 6 billion is used up
and remember if a judgment is given to remember it cause next year the CRIA will cry big about piracy and how it cost them so much money and ya know they were right LOL.
OH and i bet this takes a good bite out of the bribe an mp fund and the see these kids are pirating .....i dont think any kid sells then packs them and distributes them in retail stores ....and i do not think the cria paid there own CDR levy another violation.
NOW who wants to be part of ACTA that the CRIA and friends are part of?
--------------
perhaps someone ought to be showing this lawsuit to the British govt and asking them why they'd support people and industry that out right infringes for commercial purposes and even the lawsuits are $$$ makers, someone ought to ask some veterans of WW2 what they think of these sick people using there names and there history of courage to do such well EVIL NON democratic things | |
| | | Phishing success rate So apparently 0.47% of phishing e-mails result in a visit and 45% of those result in a sucker giving up his/her bank details. No wonder phishing is so successful. If you sent 1,000,000 e-mails, you'd wind up with just over 2,100 people giving you their bank account information. Even if you skimmed an average of $2,000 from each of those people, you'd net over $4 million. One phishing attempt and a malicious individual could retire comfortably. I've said it before and I'll say it again, I could be a very wealthy man if it weren't for these pesky morals. (Of course, I could also be a very incarcerated man, so I think I'll keep the morals.)
--
-Jason Levine
Support a children's charity. Buy a calendar and/or a photo book. Shooting For A Cause | |
|  | | | Re: Phishing success rate Those pesky morals!  | |
| | Sammer
join:2005-12-22
Canonsburg, PA | said by Jason Levine:One phishing attempt and a malicious individual could retire comfortably Usually such malicious individuals spend or lose the money as easily as they came by it so one phishing attempt will never be enough. | |
|
| |
|
|
